Ivković, M., Petrović Trifunović, T.,& Prodanović, S..The Burden of Systemic Legitimization in Socialist Yugoslavia: Discursive Reduction of Kosovo Protests. in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations: Figuring out the Enemy
Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge., 61-79.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2591

Ivković M, Petrović Trifunović T, Prodanović S. The Burden of Systemic Legitimization in Socialist Yugoslavia: Discursive Reduction of Kosovo Protests. in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations: Figuring out the Enemy.:61-79.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2591 .

Ivković, Marjan, Petrović Trifunović, Tamara, Prodanović, Srđan, "The Burden of Systemic Legitimization in Socialist Yugoslavia: Discursive Reduction of Kosovo Protests" in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations: Figuring out the Enemy:61-79,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2591 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Resanović, Milica
AU  - Petrović Trifunović, Tamara
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2869
AB  - U radu ćemo nastojati da istražimo mogućnosti primene analize diskursa kao tehnike za proučavanje različitih značenjskih aspekata društvenog života tokom pandemije kovida 19. Primena analize diskursa (konkretno, kritičke analize diskursa) ispituje se na primeru dva istraživanja o diskurzivnim konstrukcijama same krize i reakcijama različitih aktera u društvu Srbije na nju, sprovedena tokom trajanja same pandemije (2021). Jedno od navedenih istraživanja je posvećeno analizi diskursa državnog vrha o odgovoru Srbije na krizu izazvanu pandemijom, a drugo analizi simboličkih borbi koje su se odvijale na relaciji između predstavnika crkvene i građanske sfere. Uprkos razlikama u temama, sprovođenje oba istraživanja pratio je sličan set izazova, a centralni problemi se tiču: 1) selekcije i dostupnosti građe; 2) odsustva preciznih smernica za kodiranje i analizu građe; 3) raskoraka između diskursa i prakse posmatranih aktera; 4) razlika između diskursa aktera i njihove medijske reprezentacije; i 5) mogućnosti identifikacije dominantnog diskursa u medijskom sadržaju. Cilj rada je da se problematizuju izazovi koji su pratili sprovođenje ovih istraživanja, bilo da je reč o izazovima koji prate primenu analize diskursa kao istraživačke tehnike uopšte, bilo da su u pitanju izazovi prilikom istraživanja pandemije ili kada se istraživanje sprovodi u pandemiji. Potom, ispituju se mogućnosti za prevazilaženje navedenih problema, te se na kraju osvetljavaju prednosti primene analize diskursa kako u praktično-istraživačkom smislu (posebno u uslovima pandemije) tako i na saznajnom nivou.
AB  - : This paper aims to explore the possibilities of applying discourse analysis as a research technique for analyzing meaningful aspects of social life during the COVID-19 pandemic. The application of discourse analysis (specifically, critical discourse analysis) is examined on the example of two research projects on the discursive constructions of the crisis itself and the reactions of various actors in Serbian society on it, carried out during the pandemic (2021). One of the projects mentioned above was dedicated to the analysis of the symbolic struggles between the representatives of the Serbian Orthodox Church and the civil sphere, and the other one to the analysis of the discourse of the state leadership on Serbia’s response to the crisis caused by the pandemic. Despite the differences in research topics, a similar set of challenges appeared in both research projects, and the central problems concern 1) the selection and availability of material, 2) the absence of precise guidelines for the coding and analysis of the material, 3) the gap between the discourse and practice of the observed actors, 4) the difference between the actors’ discourse and their media representation, and 5) the possibility of identifying the dominant discourse in the media content. The aim of this paper is to problematize the challenges that followed the conduct of both research projects, whether it is the challenges that accompany the application of discourse analysis as a research technique in general, or challenges that arose because we researched pandemics or when the research is conducted in a pandemic. Additionally, the possibilities for overcoming these problems are examined, and finally the advantages of the application of discourse analysis are emphasized, both in a practical sense (especially in the context of the pandemic), and in the epistemic sense.
PB  - Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Filozofski fakultet, Institut za sociološka istraživanja
T2  - Istraživati društvo tokom pandemije  – neke metodološke prepreke i rešenja
T1  - Analiza diskursa kao istraživačka tehnika u pandemiji i za razumevanje pandemije
SP  - 95
EP  - 120
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2869
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Resanović, Milica and Petrović Trifunović, Tamara",
year = "2023",
abstract = "U radu ćemo nastojati da istražimo mogućnosti primene analize diskursa kao tehnike za proučavanje različitih značenjskih aspekata društvenog života tokom pandemije kovida 19. Primena analize diskursa (konkretno, kritičke analize diskursa) ispituje se na primeru dva istraživanja o diskurzivnim konstrukcijama same krize i reakcijama različitih aktera u društvu Srbije na nju, sprovedena tokom trajanja same pandemije (2021). Jedno od navedenih istraživanja je posvećeno analizi diskursa državnog vrha o odgovoru Srbije na krizu izazvanu pandemijom, a drugo analizi simboličkih borbi koje su se odvijale na relaciji između predstavnika crkvene i građanske sfere. Uprkos razlikama u temama, sprovođenje oba istraživanja pratio je sličan set izazova, a centralni problemi se tiču: 1) selekcije i dostupnosti građe; 2) odsustva preciznih smernica za kodiranje i analizu građe; 3) raskoraka između diskursa i prakse posmatranih aktera; 4) razlika između diskursa aktera i njihove medijske reprezentacije; i 5) mogućnosti identifikacije dominantnog diskursa u medijskom sadržaju. Cilj rada je da se problematizuju izazovi koji su pratili sprovođenje ovih istraživanja, bilo da je reč o izazovima koji prate primenu analize diskursa kao istraživačke tehnike uopšte, bilo da su u pitanju izazovi prilikom istraživanja pandemije ili kada se istraživanje sprovodi u pandemiji. Potom, ispituju se mogućnosti za prevazilaženje navedenih problema, te se na kraju osvetljavaju prednosti primene analize diskursa kako u praktično-istraživačkom smislu (posebno u uslovima pandemije) tako i na saznajnom nivou., : This paper aims to explore the possibilities of applying discourse analysis as a research technique for analyzing meaningful aspects of social life during the COVID-19 pandemic. The application of discourse analysis (specifically, critical discourse analysis) is examined on the example of two research projects on the discursive constructions of the crisis itself and the reactions of various actors in Serbian society on it, carried out during the pandemic (2021). One of the projects mentioned above was dedicated to the analysis of the symbolic struggles between the representatives of the Serbian Orthodox Church and the civil sphere, and the other one to the analysis of the discourse of the state leadership on Serbia’s response to the crisis caused by the pandemic. Despite the differences in research topics, a similar set of challenges appeared in both research projects, and the central problems concern 1) the selection and availability of material, 2) the absence of precise guidelines for the coding and analysis of the material, 3) the gap between the discourse and practice of the observed actors, 4) the difference between the actors’ discourse and their media representation, and 5) the possibility of identifying the dominant discourse in the media content. The aim of this paper is to problematize the challenges that followed the conduct of both research projects, whether it is the challenges that accompany the application of discourse analysis as a research technique in general, or challenges that arose because we researched pandemics or when the research is conducted in a pandemic. Additionally, the possibilities for overcoming these problems are examined, and finally the advantages of the application of discourse analysis are emphasized, both in a practical sense (especially in the context of the pandemic), and in the epistemic sense.",
publisher = "Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Filozofski fakultet, Institut za sociološka istraživanja",
journal = "Istraživati društvo tokom pandemije  – neke metodološke prepreke i rešenja",
booktitle = "Analiza diskursa kao istraživačka tehnika u pandemiji i za razumevanje pandemije",
pages = "95-120",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2869"
}

Resanović, M.,& Petrović Trifunović, T.. (2023). Analiza diskursa kao istraživačka tehnika u pandemiji i za razumevanje pandemije. in Istraživati društvo tokom pandemije  – neke metodološke prepreke i rešenja
Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu – Filozofski fakultet, Institut za sociološka istraživanja., 95-120.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2869

Resanović M, Petrović Trifunović T. Analiza diskursa kao istraživačka tehnika u pandemiji i za razumevanje pandemije. in Istraživati društvo tokom pandemije  – neke metodološke prepreke i rešenja. 2023;:95-120.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2869 .

Resanović, Milica, Petrović Trifunović, Tamara, "Analiza diskursa kao istraživačka tehnika u pandemiji i za razumevanje pandemije" in Istraživati društvo tokom pandemije  – neke metodološke prepreke i rešenja (2023):95-120,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2869 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1686
AB  - U ovom radu ćemo nastojati da ispitamo u kojoj meri je egalitaristički rečnik jugoslovenskog
socijalizma bio u stanju da ponudi alternativni okvir za interpretaciju savremenih
srpsko-albanskih odnosa. Inicijalna hipoteza polazi od toga da je jugoslovenska
elita – usled eksperimentalnog karaktera samoupravnog socijalizma koji je podrazumevao
određene kompromise sa liberalnim kapitalizmom – bila strukturalno prinuđena
da sistematično negira socijalni aspekt demonstracija koje su na Kosovu odvijale
tokom 1968, 1981. i 1988 godine. Primenom kritičke analize diskursa na štampane
medije (Politika, Večernje novosti i Borba), pokušaćemo da pokažemo kako je vladajuća
nomenklatura složene političko-ekonomske aspekte bunta isključivo tretirala kao izraz
nacionalizma. Ova diskurzivna strategija je samim akterima sugerisala da je nacionalizam
zajednički imenitelj za ekonomsku, političku i etničku jednakost. Krajnje posledice
ovakvih diskurzivnih redukcija će biti prikazane kroz analizu medijskog
izveštavanja sa demonstracija na Kosovu i mitinga „Bratstva i jedinstva“ u Beogradu
1988. godine, gde je primetno zatvaranje prostora za ne-nacionalističko tumačenje
bilo koje vrste socijalnog bunta, ali i postepeno odustajanje aktera od artikulisanja
sopstvenog iskustva nepravde u socijalnom ključu.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Beton
T2  - Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa
T1  - Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1686
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Prodanović, Srđan and Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara",
year = "2016",
abstract = "U ovom radu ćemo nastojati da ispitamo u kojoj meri je egalitaristički rečnik jugoslovenskog
socijalizma bio u stanju da ponudi alternativni okvir za interpretaciju savremenih
srpsko-albanskih odnosa. Inicijalna hipoteza polazi od toga da je jugoslovenska
elita – usled eksperimentalnog karaktera samoupravnog socijalizma koji je podrazumevao
određene kompromise sa liberalnim kapitalizmom – bila strukturalno prinuđena
da sistematično negira socijalni aspekt demonstracija koje su na Kosovu odvijale
tokom 1968, 1981. i 1988 godine. Primenom kritičke analize diskursa na štampane
medije (Politika, Večernje novosti i Borba), pokušaćemo da pokažemo kako je vladajuća
nomenklatura složene političko-ekonomske aspekte bunta isključivo tretirala kao izraz
nacionalizma. Ova diskurzivna strategija je samim akterima sugerisala da je nacionalizam
zajednički imenitelj za ekonomsku, političku i etničku jednakost. Krajnje posledice
ovakvih diskurzivnih redukcija će biti prikazane kroz analizu medijskog
izveštavanja sa demonstracija na Kosovu i mitinga „Bratstva i jedinstva“ u Beogradu
1988. godine, gde je primetno zatvaranje prostora za ne-nacionalističko tumačenje
bilo koje vrste socijalnog bunta, ali i postepeno odustajanje aktera od artikulisanja
sopstvenog iskustva nepravde u socijalnom ključu.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Beton",
journal = "Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa",
booktitle = "Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1686"
}

Ivković, M., Prodanović, S.,& Petrović-Trifunović, T.. (2016). Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije. in Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Beton..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1686

Ivković M, Prodanović S, Petrović-Trifunović T. Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije. in Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa. 2016;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1686 .

Ivković, Marjan, Prodanović, Srđan, Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara, "Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije" in Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa (2016),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1686 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
AU  - Petrović Trifunović, Tamara
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://www.cambridgescholars.com/download/sample/63399
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1516
AB  - Why Still Education? will appeal to researchers of education – scholars and students alike – in the fields of philosophy, sociology, pedagogy, andragogy, psychology, political theory, anthropology, and history, as well as experts in education management and educational practitioners, such as teachers and textbook authors. The question posed by the title is separated in the book into three more specific questions; the first of which, titled “Education for What?”, investigates the eternal issue the purpose of education. The second section, which examines the most appropriate approaches and expected outcomes for a child-centred perspective, is called “Education for Whom?”; and the third part, “Whose Education?”, takes national, gender and other subtle or self-explanatory characteristics of education and looks at them from the standpoint of discrimination. The volume offers nine different chapters, which provide illuminating and interesting answers to these questions, and, thus, allow them to be more thoroughly resolved and enable rational discourse about them.
PB  - Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars
T2  - Why Still Education
T1  - A Question Mark over Education: Introduction into the Aporias of Contemporary Educational Theory and Praxis
SP  - 1
EP  - 5
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1516
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Krstić, Predrag and Petrović Trifunović, Tamara and Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Why Still Education? will appeal to researchers of education – scholars and students alike – in the fields of philosophy, sociology, pedagogy, andragogy, psychology, political theory, anthropology, and history, as well as experts in education management and educational practitioners, such as teachers and textbook authors. The question posed by the title is separated in the book into three more specific questions; the first of which, titled “Education for What?”, investigates the eternal issue the purpose of education. The second section, which examines the most appropriate approaches and expected outcomes for a child-centred perspective, is called “Education for Whom?”; and the third part, “Whose Education?”, takes national, gender and other subtle or self-explanatory characteristics of education and looks at them from the standpoint of discrimination. The volume offers nine different chapters, which provide illuminating and interesting answers to these questions, and, thus, allow them to be more thoroughly resolved and enable rational discourse about them.",
publisher = "Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars",
journal = "Why Still Education",
booktitle = "A Question Mark over Education: Introduction into the Aporias of Contemporary Educational Theory and Praxis",
pages = "1-5",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1516"
}

Krstić, P., Petrović Trifunović, T.,& Pudar Draško, G.. (2016). A Question Mark over Education: Introduction into the Aporias of Contemporary Educational Theory and Praxis. in Why Still Education
Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars., 1-5.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1516

Krstić P, Petrović Trifunović T, Pudar Draško G. A Question Mark over Education: Introduction into the Aporias of Contemporary Educational Theory and Praxis. in Why Still Education. 2016;:1-5.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1516 .

Krstić, Predrag, Petrović Trifunović, Tamara, Pudar Draško, Gazela, "A Question Mark over Education: Introduction into the Aporias of Contemporary Educational Theory and Praxis" in Why Still Education (2016):1-5,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1516 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Petrović Trifunović, Tamara
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=382&path%5B%5D=382
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1854
AB  - Late 20th century developments in social sciences and humanities have
placed particular focus on the symbolic aspects of reproduction of social order,
stressing the importance of discursive work in the process. It has become
widely accepted that discourse is profoundly embedded in society and culture,
and hence, closely related also to all forms of power and social inequality. Therefore,
it rightfully assumes a central position among the research objects of
contemporary social sciences. The aim of this article is to critically examine the
impact of the interpretive turn on the study of culture and symbolic registers of
society. The analysis focuses on three approaches to the study of discourse,
culture and society: critical discourse analysis, Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology of
culture and Jeffrey Alexander’s strong program in cultural sociology. These approaches
are further analyzed according to their position within Burawoy’s division
of sociological labor, particularly between critical and public (engaged) sociology.
Finally, the author suggests that engagement in detailed reconstructions
of discursive manifestations of power, symbolic struggles and/or discursive codes
in a society can provide valuable insight that could open up space for social
engagement. However, in order to fully grasp the importance of symbolic aspects
for the everyday reproduction of social order, the focus of analysis must also be
placed on the role cultural traits and practices (understood as a discursive resources
like any other) play in constructing stratificational categories, identities
and distinctions, masking the very roots of inequalities that created the perceived
cultural differences in the first place.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Between the Critical and the Engaged: On the Importance of Studying Symbolic Aspects of the Reproduction of Social Order
T1  - Između kritičkog i angažovanog: zašto je važno istraživati simboličke aspekte reprodukcije društvenog poretka
IS  - 2
VL  - 27
SP  - 407
EP  - 418
DO  - 10.2298/FID1602407P
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Petrović Trifunović, Tamara",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Late 20th century developments in social sciences and humanities have
placed particular focus on the symbolic aspects of reproduction of social order,
stressing the importance of discursive work in the process. It has become
widely accepted that discourse is profoundly embedded in society and culture,
and hence, closely related also to all forms of power and social inequality. Therefore,
it rightfully assumes a central position among the research objects of
contemporary social sciences. The aim of this article is to critically examine the
impact of the interpretive turn on the study of culture and symbolic registers of
society. The analysis focuses on three approaches to the study of discourse,
culture and society: critical discourse analysis, Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology of
culture and Jeffrey Alexander’s strong program in cultural sociology. These approaches
are further analyzed according to their position within Burawoy’s division
of sociological labor, particularly between critical and public (engaged) sociology.
Finally, the author suggests that engagement in detailed reconstructions
of discursive manifestations of power, symbolic struggles and/or discursive codes
in a society can provide valuable insight that could open up space for social
engagement. However, in order to fully grasp the importance of symbolic aspects
for the everyday reproduction of social order, the focus of analysis must also be
placed on the role cultural traits and practices (understood as a discursive resources
like any other) play in constructing stratificational categories, identities
and distinctions, masking the very roots of inequalities that created the perceived
cultural differences in the first place.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Between the Critical and the Engaged: On the Importance of Studying Symbolic Aspects of the Reproduction of Social Order, Između kritičkog i angažovanog: zašto je važno istraživati simboličke aspekte reprodukcije društvenog poretka",
number = "2",
volume = "27",
pages = "407-418",
doi = "10.2298/FID1602407P"
}

Petrović Trifunović, T.. (2016). Between the Critical and the Engaged: On the Importance of Studying Symbolic Aspects of the Reproduction of Social Order. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 27(2), 407-418.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1602407P

Petrović Trifunović T. Between the Critical and the Engaged: On the Importance of Studying Symbolic Aspects of the Reproduction of Social Order. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2016;27(2):407-418.
doi:10.2298/FID1602407P .

Petrović Trifunović, Tamara, "Between the Critical and the Engaged: On the Importance of Studying Symbolic Aspects of the Reproduction of Social Order" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 27, no. 2 (2016):407-418,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1602407P . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1614
AB  - U ovom radu ćemo nastojati da ispitamo u kojoj meri je egalitaristički rečnik jugoslovenskog
socijalizma bio u stanju da ponudi alternativni okvir za interpretaciju savremenih
srpsko-albanskih odnosa. Inicijalna hipoteza polazi od toga da je jugoslovenska
elita – usled eksperimentalnog karaktera samoupravnog socijalizma koji je podrazumevao
određene kompromise sa liberalnim kapitalizmom – bila strukturalno prinuđena
da sistematično negira socijalni aspekt demonstracija koje su na Kosovu odvijale
tokom 1968, 1981. i 1988 godine. Primenom kritičke analize diskursa na štampane
medije (Politika, Večernje novosti i Borba), pokušaćemo da pokažemo kako je vladajuća
nomenklatura složene političko-ekonomske aspekte bunta isključivo tretirala kao izraz
nacionalizma. Ova diskurzivna strategija je samim akterima sugerisala da je nacionalizam
zajednički imenitelj za ekonomsku, političku i etničku jednakost. Krajnje posledice
ovakvih diskurzivnih redukcija će biti prikazane kroz analizu medijskog
izveštavanja sa demonstracija na Kosovu i mitinga „Bratstva i jedinstva“ u Beogradu
1988. godine, gde je primetno zatvaranje prostora za ne-nacionalističko tumačenje
bilo koje vrste socijalnog bunta, ali i postepeno odustajanje aktera od artikulisanja
sopstvenog iskustva nepravde u socijalnom ključu.
AB  - In this paper we examine to which extent was egalitarian vocabulary of Yugoslav socialism
able to provide an alternative framework for interpretation of Serbian-Albanian
relations. Our initial hypothesis is that – due to the experimental nature of Yugoslav
self-management socialism, which implied certain compromises with liberal
capitalism – the Yugoslav elite was structurally bound to systematically negate the
social aspect of protests that took place in Kosovo in 1968, 1981 and 1988. Using critical
discourse analysis on daily newspapers (Politika, Večernje novosti and Borba), we
show how the nomenclature treated the complex social-political aspects of the social
uprisings exclusively as a manifestation of nationalism. To the actors involved, this
discursive strategy suggested that nationalism is a common denominator for economic,
political and ethnic equality. Final consequences of these discursive strategies will
be shown through analysis of media coverage of protests in Kosovo and the “Brotherhood
and Unity” meeting that took place Belgrade in 1988, wherein we can see that
there is little space left for non-nationalistic interpretation of any kind of social uprising,
both in media and actors’ perspective.
PB  - Beograd : KPZ Beton
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa
T1  - Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije
T1  - Serbian-Albanian Relations in Socialist Yugoslavia: Protests in Kosovo and the Burden of Systemic Legitimization
SP  - 153
EP  - 173
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1614
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2015",
abstract = "U ovom radu ćemo nastojati da ispitamo u kojoj meri je egalitaristički rečnik jugoslovenskog
socijalizma bio u stanju da ponudi alternativni okvir za interpretaciju savremenih
srpsko-albanskih odnosa. Inicijalna hipoteza polazi od toga da je jugoslovenska
elita – usled eksperimentalnog karaktera samoupravnog socijalizma koji je podrazumevao
određene kompromise sa liberalnim kapitalizmom – bila strukturalno prinuđena
da sistematično negira socijalni aspekt demonstracija koje su na Kosovu odvijale
tokom 1968, 1981. i 1988 godine. Primenom kritičke analize diskursa na štampane
medije (Politika, Večernje novosti i Borba), pokušaćemo da pokažemo kako je vladajuća
nomenklatura složene političko-ekonomske aspekte bunta isključivo tretirala kao izraz
nacionalizma. Ova diskurzivna strategija je samim akterima sugerisala da je nacionalizam
zajednički imenitelj za ekonomsku, političku i etničku jednakost. Krajnje posledice
ovakvih diskurzivnih redukcija će biti prikazane kroz analizu medijskog
izveštavanja sa demonstracija na Kosovu i mitinga „Bratstva i jedinstva“ u Beogradu
1988. godine, gde je primetno zatvaranje prostora za ne-nacionalističko tumačenje
bilo koje vrste socijalnog bunta, ali i postepeno odustajanje aktera od artikulisanja
sopstvenog iskustva nepravde u socijalnom ključu., In this paper we examine to which extent was egalitarian vocabulary of Yugoslav socialism
able to provide an alternative framework for interpretation of Serbian-Albanian
relations. Our initial hypothesis is that – due to the experimental nature of Yugoslav
self-management socialism, which implied certain compromises with liberal
capitalism – the Yugoslav elite was structurally bound to systematically negate the
social aspect of protests that took place in Kosovo in 1968, 1981 and 1988. Using critical
discourse analysis on daily newspapers (Politika, Večernje novosti and Borba), we
show how the nomenclature treated the complex social-political aspects of the social
uprisings exclusively as a manifestation of nationalism. To the actors involved, this
discursive strategy suggested that nationalism is a common denominator for economic,
political and ethnic equality. Final consequences of these discursive strategies will
be shown through analysis of media coverage of protests in Kosovo and the “Brotherhood
and Unity” meeting that took place Belgrade in 1988, wherein we can see that
there is little space left for non-nationalistic interpretation of any kind of social uprising,
both in media and actors’ perspective.",
publisher = "Beograd : KPZ Beton, Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa",
booktitle = "Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije, Serbian-Albanian Relations in Socialist Yugoslavia: Protests in Kosovo and the Burden of Systemic Legitimization",
pages = "153-173",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1614"
}

Ivković, M., Petrović-Trifunović, T.,& Prodanović, S.. (2015). Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije. in Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa
Beograd : KPZ Beton., 153-173.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1614

Ivković M, Petrović-Trifunović T, Prodanović S. Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije. in Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa. 2015;:153-173.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1614 .

Ivković, Marjan, Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara, Prodanović, Srđan, "Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije" in Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa (2015):153-173,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1614 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Milutinović Bojanić, Sanja
AU  - Petrović Trifunović, Tamara
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1631
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju
T2  - MIND THE GAP(S): Family, Socialization and Gender
T1  - Mind the Gap(s) – From Socialization to Gender in Family and Beyond
SP  - 11
EP  - 25
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1631
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Milutinović Bojanić, Sanja and Petrović Trifunović, Tamara",
year = "2014",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju",
journal = "MIND THE GAP(S): Family, Socialization and Gender",
booktitle = "Mind the Gap(s) – From Socialization to Gender in Family and Beyond",
pages = "11-25",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1631"
}

Pudar Draško, G., Milutinović Bojanić, S.,& Petrović Trifunović, T.. (2014). Mind the Gap(s) – From Socialization to Gender in Family and Beyond. in MIND THE GAP(S): Family, Socialization and Gender
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 11-25.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1631

Pudar Draško G, Milutinović Bojanić S, Petrović Trifunović T. Mind the Gap(s) – From Socialization to Gender in Family and Beyond. in MIND THE GAP(S): Family, Socialization and Gender. 2014;:11-25.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1631 .

Pudar Draško, Gazela, Milutinović Bojanić, Sanja, Petrović Trifunović, Tamara, "Mind the Gap(s) – From Socialization to Gender in Family and Beyond" in MIND THE GAP(S): Family, Socialization and Gender (2014):11-25,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1631 .