TY  - JOUR
AU  - Predrag, Milidrag
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1488
AB  - Toma Akvinski tvrdi da je biće (ens) ono što je prvo spoznato razumom, te da se njime ništa ne može shvatiti ako nije biće. Ta se primarnost bića u radu analizira sa spoznajne strane (biće kao primum cognitum) i s metafizičke strane (biće kao actus essendi). U tom kontekstu, razmotren je i pojam svođenja (resolutio) kao načina dolaska do spoznaje bića, kao i odnos bića spram transcendentalije stvar (res).
AB  - Thomas Aquinas claims that ens is the first known by the intellect; and that it is not possible to conceive anything if it is not an ens. That firstnes of being is analyzed from its epistemological aspect (ens as primim cognitum) as well as from metaphysical one (ens as actus essendi). In that context; the notion of resolutio is considered and the relation of being and transcendental notion of thing (res).
PB  - Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo
T2  - Theoria
T1  - Biće (ens) kao maxime primum kod Tome Akvinskog
IS  - 2
VL  - 60
SP  - 174
EP  - 189
DO  - 10.2298/THEO1702174M
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Predrag, Milidrag",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Toma Akvinski tvrdi da je biće (ens) ono što je prvo spoznato razumom, te da se njime ništa ne može shvatiti ako nije biće. Ta se primarnost bića u radu analizira sa spoznajne strane (biće kao primum cognitum) i s metafizičke strane (biće kao actus essendi). U tom kontekstu, razmotren je i pojam svođenja (resolutio) kao načina dolaska do spoznaje bića, kao i odnos bića spram transcendentalije stvar (res)., Thomas Aquinas claims that ens is the first known by the intellect; and that it is not possible to conceive anything if it is not an ens. That firstnes of being is analyzed from its epistemological aspect (ens as primim cognitum) as well as from metaphysical one (ens as actus essendi). In that context; the notion of resolutio is considered and the relation of being and transcendental notion of thing (res).",
publisher = "Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo",
journal = "Theoria",
title = "Biće (ens) kao maxime primum kod Tome Akvinskog",
number = "2",
volume = "60",
pages = "174-189",
doi = "10.2298/THEO1702174M"
}

Predrag, M.. (2017). Biće (ens) kao maxime primum kod Tome Akvinskog. in Theoria
Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo., 60(2), 174-189.
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1702174M

Predrag M. Biće (ens) kao maxime primum kod Tome Akvinskog. in Theoria. 2017;60(2):174-189.
doi:10.2298/THEO1702174M .

Predrag, Milidrag, "Biće (ens) kao maxime primum kod Tome Akvinskog" in Theoria, 60, no. 2 (2017):174-189,
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1702174M . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Predrag, Milidrag
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://epub.ff.uns.ac.rs/index.php/arhe/article/view/2077
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1489
AB  - U tekstu su analizirane neke od najvažnijih realnih kompozicija u metafizici Tome Akvinskog, kompozicije forme i materije, supozita i prirode, supstancije i akcidencije, te akta i potencije. Potencija i akt jesu na jedan način poistovećeni s drugim principima utoliko što potencija i akt označavaju izvesne konstitutivne tendencije koje drugi principi imaju kao nešto zajedničko. Zbog ograničenosti prostora nije razmatrana najpoznatija i najtemeljnija kompozicija za Akvinčevu metafiziku, ona suštine i bivstvovanja (esse) u stvorenim bićima.
AB  - The article analyzes some of the most important real compositions in Aquinas’s metaphysics: form and matter, supposit and nature, substance and accident, as well as act and potency. On some way, act and potency are identified with the other principles insofar as they designate certain constitutive tendencies which other principles have as common. Because of the lack of the space, the most important composition for the Aquinas’s metaphysics have not been considered that is the real composition between esse and essence in created beings.
PB  - Novi Sad : Filozofski fakultet
T2  - Arhe
T1  - O nekim realnim kompozicijama u Akvinčevoj metafizici
IS  - 27
VL  - 14
SP  - 119
EP  - 140
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1489
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Predrag, Milidrag",
year = "2017",
abstract = "U tekstu su analizirane neke od najvažnijih realnih kompozicija u metafizici Tome Akvinskog, kompozicije forme i materije, supozita i prirode, supstancije i akcidencije, te akta i potencije. Potencija i akt jesu na jedan način poistovećeni s drugim principima utoliko što potencija i akt označavaju izvesne konstitutivne tendencije koje drugi principi imaju kao nešto zajedničko. Zbog ograničenosti prostora nije razmatrana najpoznatija i najtemeljnija kompozicija za Akvinčevu metafiziku, ona suštine i bivstvovanja (esse) u stvorenim bićima., The article analyzes some of the most important real compositions in Aquinas’s metaphysics: form and matter, supposit and nature, substance and accident, as well as act and potency. On some way, act and potency are identified with the other principles insofar as they designate certain constitutive tendencies which other principles have as common. Because of the lack of the space, the most important composition for the Aquinas’s metaphysics have not been considered that is the real composition between esse and essence in created beings.",
publisher = "Novi Sad : Filozofski fakultet",
journal = "Arhe",
title = "O nekim realnim kompozicijama u Akvinčevoj metafizici",
number = "27",
volume = "14",
pages = "119-140",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1489"
}

Predrag, M.. (2017). O nekim realnim kompozicijama u Akvinčevoj metafizici. in Arhe
Novi Sad : Filozofski fakultet., 14(27), 119-140.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1489

Predrag M. O nekim realnim kompozicijama u Akvinčevoj metafizici. in Arhe. 2017;14(27):119-140.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1489 .

Predrag, Milidrag, "O nekim realnim kompozicijama u Akvinčevoj metafizici" in Arhe, 14, no. 27 (2017):119-140,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1489 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Predrag, Milidrag
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1486
AB  - There are traces of very diverse Eastern and Western lines of thought in The Matrix
Trilogy2, which speaks eloquently about its richness of ideas. Being ‘philosophical’
The Matrix Trilogy is not a boring film and long-winded; instead of talking endlessly,
the characters are working ceaselessly, and that work is changing them. In
this paper, I will try to interpret the changes in the main character, Neo, against the
background of some classic ideas about the human being in Western philosophy.
The main theses of this text are the following: In The Matrix Trilogy, Platonist,
Cartesian and Hegelian ideas about man are clearly recognizable. On their general
plain, plots of the films express movement (progress?) from Plato via Descartes
to Hegel3 – and further.
T2  - From Humanism to Meta-, Post- and Transhumanism?
T1  - Post-humanism of The Matrix Trilogy
SP  - 307
EP  - 320
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1486
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Predrag, Milidrag",
year = "2016",
abstract = "There are traces of very diverse Eastern and Western lines of thought in The Matrix
Trilogy2, which speaks eloquently about its richness of ideas. Being ‘philosophical’
The Matrix Trilogy is not a boring film and long-winded; instead of talking endlessly,
the characters are working ceaselessly, and that work is changing them. In
this paper, I will try to interpret the changes in the main character, Neo, against the
background of some classic ideas about the human being in Western philosophy.
The main theses of this text are the following: In The Matrix Trilogy, Platonist,
Cartesian and Hegelian ideas about man are clearly recognizable. On their general
plain, plots of the films express movement (progress?) from Plato via Descartes
to Hegel3 – and further.",
journal = "From Humanism to Meta-, Post- and Transhumanism?",
booktitle = "Post-humanism of The Matrix Trilogy",
pages = "307-320",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1486"
}

Predrag, M.. (2016). Post-humanism of The Matrix Trilogy. in From Humanism to Meta-, Post- and Transhumanism?, 307-320.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1486

Predrag M. Post-humanism of The Matrix Trilogy. in From Humanism to Meta-, Post- and Transhumanism?. 2016;:307-320.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1486 .

Predrag, Milidrag, "Post-humanism of The Matrix Trilogy" in From Humanism to Meta-, Post- and Transhumanism? (2016):307-320,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1486 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Predrag, Milidrag
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1485
AB  - U tekstu se analizira Tomin dokaz za realnu razliku između bivstvovanja i suštine iz četvrtog dela spisa O biću i suštini, u kontekstu akcidentalnog i esencijalnog karaktera bivstvovanja u njegovoj metafizici. Detaljno se analiziraju sve tri faze dokaza i brani se teza da se tek po okončanju treće faze, tj. nakon dokaza da je Bog tantum esse može tvrditi da je dokazana realna razlika između suštine i bivstvovanja. Posebno se naglašava uloga prve faze dokaza, argumenta intellectus essentiae, za sagledavanje akcidentalnog karaktera bivstvovanja. U poslednjem delu rada, na osnovu zaključaka dokaza iz De entea, problem dvostrukog karaktera bivstvovanja tumači se na zaleđu dve vrste uzročnosti, delotvorne i formalne, pokazuje se razlika između njih, te se objašnjava njihov odnos kada je reč o bivstvovanju neke stvari.
AB  - The article analyzes Aquinas’ argument for the real distinction between esse and essence in De ente et essentia IV, in the context of accidental and essential character of esse in his metaphysics. All three phases of the argument are analyzed in detail and the defended thesis is is that after third phase of the argument, i.e. after the proof that God is tantum esse is possible to claim that the real distinction is proved. In last part of the article, on the basis of the conclusions of the De ente proof, the problem of twofold character of being is interpreted against the background of two kinds of causality, efficient and formal.
PB  - Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo
T2  - Theoria
T1  - Akvinac o realnoj razlici i dvostrukom određenju esse
IS  - 2
VL  - 58
SP  - 5
EP  - 32
DO  - 10.2298/THEO1502005M
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Predrag, Milidrag",
year = "2015",
abstract = "U tekstu se analizira Tomin dokaz za realnu razliku između bivstvovanja i suštine iz četvrtog dela spisa O biću i suštini, u kontekstu akcidentalnog i esencijalnog karaktera bivstvovanja u njegovoj metafizici. Detaljno se analiziraju sve tri faze dokaza i brani se teza da se tek po okončanju treće faze, tj. nakon dokaza da je Bog tantum esse može tvrditi da je dokazana realna razlika između suštine i bivstvovanja. Posebno se naglašava uloga prve faze dokaza, argumenta intellectus essentiae, za sagledavanje akcidentalnog karaktera bivstvovanja. U poslednjem delu rada, na osnovu zaključaka dokaza iz De entea, problem dvostrukog karaktera bivstvovanja tumači se na zaleđu dve vrste uzročnosti, delotvorne i formalne, pokazuje se razlika između njih, te se objašnjava njihov odnos kada je reč o bivstvovanju neke stvari., The article analyzes Aquinas’ argument for the real distinction between esse and essence in De ente et essentia IV, in the context of accidental and essential character of esse in his metaphysics. All three phases of the argument are analyzed in detail and the defended thesis is is that after third phase of the argument, i.e. after the proof that God is tantum esse is possible to claim that the real distinction is proved. In last part of the article, on the basis of the conclusions of the De ente proof, the problem of twofold character of being is interpreted against the background of two kinds of causality, efficient and formal.",
publisher = "Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo",
journal = "Theoria",
title = "Akvinac o realnoj razlici i dvostrukom određenju esse",
number = "2",
volume = "58",
pages = "5-32",
doi = "10.2298/THEO1502005M"
}

Predrag, M.. (2015). Akvinac o realnoj razlici i dvostrukom određenju esse. in Theoria
Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo., 58(2), 5-32.
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1502005M

Predrag M. Akvinac o realnoj razlici i dvostrukom određenju esse. in Theoria. 2015;58(2):5-32.
doi:10.2298/THEO1502005M .

Predrag, Milidrag, "Akvinac o realnoj razlici i dvostrukom određenju esse" in Theoria, 58, no. 2 (2015):5-32,
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1502005M . .