TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3656
AB  - Rad predstavlja svojevrsnu apologiju humanitarizma. U njemu se navode motivi i argumenti koji ga suprotstavljaju humanizmu. Prvi dio rada posvećen je, međutim, njihovom zajedničkom povijesnom nastupu – ne bi li se uočilo da se ne mogu neproturječno smatrati istovjetnim ili nadopunjavajućim. Drugi dio rada izlaže glavne tipove suvremene kritike humanizma i proishodećih “ideologija”, dok se u trećem dijelu rada, nadovezujući se na njih, ilustrativno zagovara humanitaristička alternativa kao protuotrov humanističkoj “aroganciji”. U završnom dijelu rada iskušavaju se dileme i granice važenja humanitarizma, ne bi li se, u protustavu prema humanizmu, odredila domena njegovog prava i predložio jedan njegov odmjeren – korektivni i regulatorni – diskurzivni i djelatni status.
AB  - The work represents a kind of apology for humanitarianism. It states the motives and arguments that oppose it to humanism. However, the first part of the work is dedicated to their joint historical appearance––to notice that they cannot be considered identical or complementary without contradiction. The second part of the paper presents the main types of contemporary criticism of humanism and the resulting “ideologies” while the third part of the paper, building on them, illustratively advocates a humanitarian alternative as an antidote to humanistic “arrogance.” In the final part of the work, the dilemmas and limits of the validity of humanitarianism are tested to determine the domain of its right in opposition to humanism and propose its well-measured––corrective and regulatory––discursive and effective status.
PB  - Zagreb : Udruga za promicanje filozofije
T2  - Prolegomena: časopis za filozofiju
T1  - Humanitarizam vs. humanizam
IS  - 2
VL  - 22
SP  - 207
EP  - 229
DO  - 10.26362/20230203
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Krstić, Predrag and Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Rad predstavlja svojevrsnu apologiju humanitarizma. U njemu se navode motivi i argumenti koji ga suprotstavljaju humanizmu. Prvi dio rada posvećen je, međutim, njihovom zajedničkom povijesnom nastupu – ne bi li se uočilo da se ne mogu neproturječno smatrati istovjetnim ili nadopunjavajućim. Drugi dio rada izlaže glavne tipove suvremene kritike humanizma i proishodećih “ideologija”, dok se u trećem dijelu rada, nadovezujući se na njih, ilustrativno zagovara humanitaristička alternativa kao protuotrov humanističkoj “aroganciji”. U završnom dijelu rada iskušavaju se dileme i granice važenja humanitarizma, ne bi li se, u protustavu prema humanizmu, odredila domena njegovog prava i predložio jedan njegov odmjeren – korektivni i regulatorni – diskurzivni i djelatni status., The work represents a kind of apology for humanitarianism. It states the motives and arguments that oppose it to humanism. However, the first part of the work is dedicated to their joint historical appearance––to notice that they cannot be considered identical or complementary without contradiction. The second part of the paper presents the main types of contemporary criticism of humanism and the resulting “ideologies” while the third part of the paper, building on them, illustratively advocates a humanitarian alternative as an antidote to humanistic “arrogance.” In the final part of the work, the dilemmas and limits of the validity of humanitarianism are tested to determine the domain of its right in opposition to humanism and propose its well-measured––corrective and regulatory––discursive and effective status.",
publisher = "Zagreb : Udruga za promicanje filozofije",
journal = "Prolegomena: časopis za filozofiju",
title = "Humanitarizam vs. humanizam",
number = "2",
volume = "22",
pages = "207-229",
doi = "10.26362/20230203"
}

Krstić, P.,& Radovanović, B.. (2023). Humanitarizam vs. humanizam. in Prolegomena: časopis za filozofiju
Zagreb : Udruga za promicanje filozofije., 22(2), 207-229.
https://doi.org/10.26362/20230203

Krstić P, Radovanović B. Humanitarizam vs. humanizam. in Prolegomena: časopis za filozofiju. 2023;22(2):207-229.
doi:10.26362/20230203 .

Krstić, Predrag, Radovanović, Bojana, "Humanitarizam vs. humanizam" in Prolegomena: časopis za filozofiju, 22, no. 2 (2023):207-229,
https://doi.org/10.26362/20230203 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radovanovic, Bojana
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3205
AB  - U ovom radu autori nastoje da ponude pregled različitih učenja koja se
svrstavaju pod kapu humanizma. Mada se rad prevashodno usredsređuje na humani-
stičke doktrine, teoriju humanizma često nije jednostavno razlučiti od huma-
nizma u praksi, te će svakako biti referisano na različite praktične programe
humanizma. I u jednom i u drugom slučaju ispostavlja se da je humanizam toliko
razuđen, ako ne i bezobalan pojam, da je možda uputnije govoriti o humanizmima, u
množini. Iako jedan pregledni članak ne može da predoči podrobnu i sveobuhvatnu
istoriju (ideje) humanizma i sve varijacije kroz koje je on prošao i prolazi kod
svojih značajnih zastupnika, autori veruju da čitaocima može pružiti osnov za
razumevanje i okvir za dalja istraživanja i promišljanja humanizma/humanizama.
AB  - In this paper, the authors have offered an overview of various teachings that fall
under the umbrella of humanism. Although the paper primarily focuses on the humanist
doctrine, it is often not easy to distinguish the theory of humanism from humanism in
practice. In both cases, it turns out that humanism is such a wide-ranging concept that
perhaps it is instructive to talk about humanisms instead. Although a single review article
cannot present a detailed and comprehensive history of (the idea of) humanism and all
the variations it has gone through, the authors believe that this work can provide readers
with a basis for understanding and a framework for further research and reflection on
humanism/humanisms.
PB  - Beograd : Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka
T2  - Kultura - Review for the Theory and Sociology of Culture and for the Cultural Policy
T1  - Humanizam i humanizmi: (Ra)stezanje pojma
VL  - 177
SP  - 5
EP  - 21
DO  - 10.5937/kultura2277005K
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radovanovic, Bojana and Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2023",
abstract = "U ovom radu autori nastoje da ponude pregled različitih učenja koja se
svrstavaju pod kapu humanizma. Mada se rad prevashodno usredsređuje na humani-
stičke doktrine, teoriju humanizma često nije jednostavno razlučiti od huma-
nizma u praksi, te će svakako biti referisano na različite praktične programe
humanizma. I u jednom i u drugom slučaju ispostavlja se da je humanizam toliko
razuđen, ako ne i bezobalan pojam, da je možda uputnije govoriti o humanizmima, u
množini. Iako jedan pregledni članak ne može da predoči podrobnu i sveobuhvatnu
istoriju (ideje) humanizma i sve varijacije kroz koje je on prošao i prolazi kod
svojih značajnih zastupnika, autori veruju da čitaocima može pružiti osnov za
razumevanje i okvir za dalja istraživanja i promišljanja humanizma/humanizama., In this paper, the authors have offered an overview of various teachings that fall
under the umbrella of humanism. Although the paper primarily focuses on the humanist
doctrine, it is often not easy to distinguish the theory of humanism from humanism in
practice. In both cases, it turns out that humanism is such a wide-ranging concept that
perhaps it is instructive to talk about humanisms instead. Although a single review article
cannot present a detailed and comprehensive history of (the idea of) humanism and all
the variations it has gone through, the authors believe that this work can provide readers
with a basis for understanding and a framework for further research and reflection on
humanism/humanisms.",
publisher = "Beograd : Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka",
journal = "Kultura - Review for the Theory and Sociology of Culture and for the Cultural Policy",
title = "Humanizam i humanizmi: (Ra)stezanje pojma",
volume = "177",
pages = "5-21",
doi = "10.5937/kultura2277005K"
}

Radovanovic, B.,& Krstić, P.. (2023). Humanizam i humanizmi: (Ra)stezanje pojma. in Kultura - Review for the Theory and Sociology of Culture and for the Cultural Policy
Beograd : Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka., 177, 5-21.
https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura2277005K

Radovanovic B, Krstić P. Humanizam i humanizmi: (Ra)stezanje pojma. in Kultura - Review for the Theory and Sociology of Culture and for the Cultural Policy. 2023;177:5-21.
doi:10.5937/kultura2277005K .

Radovanovic, Bojana, Krstić, Predrag, "Humanizam i humanizmi: (Ra)stezanje pojma" in Kultura - Review for the Theory and Sociology of Culture and for the Cultural Policy, 177 (2023):5-21,
https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura2277005K . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radovanovic, Bojana
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3008
AB  - Rad se bavi preciznijim određivanjem pojmova opšteg dobra, javnog
interesa i zajedničkog sagledavajući njihovu upotrebu u političkoj filozofiji i
političkim naukama u istorijskoj perspektivi. Opšte dobro je od davnina bila jedna
od ključnih tema moralne i političke filozofije. Danas se kao sinonim za termin
opšteg dobra često koristi pojam javnog interesa. Ipak, nastojaćemo da pokažemo
da oni nose donekle drugačije značenje. Skorašnji značajan odjek dugovekovne
debate o opštem dobru može se prepoznati u raspravama oko pojma zajedničkog
(eng. commons) koji se odnosi na kulturne, materijalne i intelektualne resurse na
čije korišćenje pravo polažu svi članovi određene zajednice. Sva tri pojma pomažu
dubljem razumevanju dobrobiti zajednice i načina da se ta dobrobit ostvari, iako
proučavani autori u svojim teorijama različito naglašavaju značaj kolektiviteta ili
individue. Pojam opšteg dobra se, posebno za predmoderne mislioce, odnosio na
dobro zajednice iz kojeg sledi dobro njenih članova, pa se stoga pozivanje na interese
pojedinaca smatralo nemoralnim. Kasnije, s razvojem koncepta javnog interesa,
pojedinac je postavljen u centar promišljanja, a dobrobit zajednice dovedena
u vezu sa onim što je u interesu njenih članova. Naposletku, pojam zajedničkog
vraća kolektivitet u igru, a „zajedništvo“ postaje ključni termin u rešavanju pitanja
degradacije i održivosti širokog spektra dobara.
AB  - The paper endeavours to offer a closer definition of the concepts
of common good, public interest and the commons, analysing their usage in a
contemporary and historical perspective. The common good has been one of the key
subjects of moral and political philosophy since ancient times. Today, the term public
interest is often used as a synonym for the term common good. However, we will try
to show that they carry a somewhat different meaning. A recent significant echo of
the long-standing debate on the common good can be recognized in the discussions
surrounding the concept of commons, which refers to cultural, material and
intellectual resources to which all members of a community claim the right to use.
All three notions contribute to a deeper understanding of community well-being and
the way to realize that well-being. However, authors that are studied in the paper
emphasize differently the importance of the collectivity and the individual in that
process. The concept of the common good, especially for pre-modern thinkers, refers
to the good of the community from which follows the good of its members, while
the appealing to the interests of individuals is considered immoral. Later, with the
development of the concept of public interest, the individual is placed in the centre
of consideration, and the well-being of the community is brought into relation with
what is in the interest of its members. Ultimately, the notion of the commons brings
the collectivity back to focus, and “togetherness” becomes a key term in addressing
the issues of degradation and sustainability of a wide range of goods.
PB  - Beograd: Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije
T2  - Sociologija
T1  - Opšte dobro, javni interes i zajedničko: konceptualna razgraničenja u istorijskoj perspektivi i savremene dileme
IS  - 3
VL  - LXV
SP  - 337
EP  - 355
DO  - 10.2298/SOC221116015R
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radovanovic, Bojana and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Rad se bavi preciznijim određivanjem pojmova opšteg dobra, javnog
interesa i zajedničkog sagledavajući njihovu upotrebu u političkoj filozofiji i
političkim naukama u istorijskoj perspektivi. Opšte dobro je od davnina bila jedna
od ključnih tema moralne i političke filozofije. Danas se kao sinonim za termin
opšteg dobra često koristi pojam javnog interesa. Ipak, nastojaćemo da pokažemo
da oni nose donekle drugačije značenje. Skorašnji značajan odjek dugovekovne
debate o opštem dobru može se prepoznati u raspravama oko pojma zajedničkog
(eng. commons) koji se odnosi na kulturne, materijalne i intelektualne resurse na
čije korišćenje pravo polažu svi članovi određene zajednice. Sva tri pojma pomažu
dubljem razumevanju dobrobiti zajednice i načina da se ta dobrobit ostvari, iako
proučavani autori u svojim teorijama različito naglašavaju značaj kolektiviteta ili
individue. Pojam opšteg dobra se, posebno za predmoderne mislioce, odnosio na
dobro zajednice iz kojeg sledi dobro njenih članova, pa se stoga pozivanje na interese
pojedinaca smatralo nemoralnim. Kasnije, s razvojem koncepta javnog interesa,
pojedinac je postavljen u centar promišljanja, a dobrobit zajednice dovedena
u vezu sa onim što je u interesu njenih članova. Naposletku, pojam zajedničkog
vraća kolektivitet u igru, a „zajedništvo“ postaje ključni termin u rešavanju pitanja
degradacije i održivosti širokog spektra dobara., The paper endeavours to offer a closer definition of the concepts
of common good, public interest and the commons, analysing their usage in a
contemporary and historical perspective. The common good has been one of the key
subjects of moral and political philosophy since ancient times. Today, the term public
interest is often used as a synonym for the term common good. However, we will try
to show that they carry a somewhat different meaning. A recent significant echo of
the long-standing debate on the common good can be recognized in the discussions
surrounding the concept of commons, which refers to cultural, material and
intellectual resources to which all members of a community claim the right to use.
All three notions contribute to a deeper understanding of community well-being and
the way to realize that well-being. However, authors that are studied in the paper
emphasize differently the importance of the collectivity and the individual in that
process. The concept of the common good, especially for pre-modern thinkers, refers
to the good of the community from which follows the good of its members, while
the appealing to the interests of individuals is considered immoral. Later, with the
development of the concept of public interest, the individual is placed in the centre
of consideration, and the well-being of the community is brought into relation with
what is in the interest of its members. Ultimately, the notion of the commons brings
the collectivity back to focus, and “togetherness” becomes a key term in addressing
the issues of degradation and sustainability of a wide range of goods.",
publisher = "Beograd: Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije",
journal = "Sociologija",
title = "Opšte dobro, javni interes i zajedničko: konceptualna razgraničenja u istorijskoj perspektivi i savremene dileme",
number = "3",
volume = "LXV",
pages = "337-355",
doi = "10.2298/SOC221116015R"
}

Radovanovic, B.,& Prodanović, S.. (2023). Opšte dobro, javni interes i zajedničko: konceptualna razgraničenja u istorijskoj perspektivi i savremene dileme. in Sociologija
Beograd: Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije., LXV(3), 337-355.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC221116015R

Radovanovic B, Prodanović S. Opšte dobro, javni interes i zajedničko: konceptualna razgraničenja u istorijskoj perspektivi i savremene dileme. in Sociologija. 2023;LXV(3):337-355.
doi:10.2298/SOC221116015R .

Radovanovic, Bojana, Prodanović, Srđan, "Opšte dobro, javni interes i zajedničko: konceptualna razgraničenja u istorijskoj perspektivi i savremene dileme" in Sociologija, LXV, no. 3 (2023):337-355,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC221116015R . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3668
AB  - U okvru ovog članka tematizovano je pitanje moralnog ponašanja u kontekstu grupnog finansiranja lečenja. Grupno finansiranje u medicinske svrhe, koje podrazumeva prikupljanje sredstava od većeg broja donatora putem javnog poziva, uglavnom putem platformi na internetu, rastući je fenomen širom sveta. Lečenje je daleko najvažnija svrha kojoj donatori u Srbiji posvećuju svoje resurse. U okviru članka analiziran je princip dobročinstva iz perspektive osnovnih etičkih teorija – utilitarizma, kantovske deontologije i etike vrline, a potom razmotreno da li je podrška lečenju pitanje dobročinstva ili pitanje pravde. Argumentuje se da su zdravstvene potrebe moralno važne i da društvo ima obavezu da pruži zdravstvenu zaštitu kako bi garantovalo jednake mogućnosti. Praksa grupnog finansiranja lečenja pod tim pretpostavkama ukazuje na manjkavost zdravstvenog sistema, te na činjenicu da se kolektivne dužnosti pravde ne izvršavaju. U odsustvu zdravstvenog sistema koji zadovoljava te potrebe, grupno finansiranje lečenja potencijalno je opravdan pokušaj da se isprave manjkavosti zdravstvenog sistema kroz izvršavanje individualne obaveze dobročinstva. U članku se argumentuje da je neophodno i moralno poželjno delovanje na dva, samo naizgled suprotstavljena, koloseka – donirati novac za lečenje, uz istovremeno zalaganje za izgradnju sistema u kojem će lečenje biti garantovano pravo, a ne stvar spremnosti sugrađana da ispune svoju moralnu obavezu. Kao što činjenica da oni koji su dužni da obezbede zdravstvenu zaštitu, a to ne čine, nije alibi da se ne pritekne u pomoć onima kojima je ona preko potrebna, tako ni odgovor na taj moralni apel ne bi trebalo da znači mirenje sa sistemskom nepravdom, ili čak njeno regenerisanje u tom pogledu.
AB  - Crowdfunding for medical purposes, which involves the collection of funds from a large number of donors through a public appeal mainly through Internet platforms, is a growing phenomenon worldwide. Medical treatment is by far the most important purpose to which donors in Serbia dedicate their resources. This article focuses on the issue of moral behaviour in the context of medical crowdfunding. It analyses the beneficence principle from the perspective of core ethical theories - utilitarianism, Kantian deontology, and virtue ethics. It then discusses whether the support for treatment is in the realm of duty of charity or duty of justice. It is argued that health needs are morally important, and that society has an obligation to provide health care to guarantee equal opportunities. The appearance of the crowdfunding for medical treatments indicates the shortcomings of the health system, and that the collective duties of justice are not fulfilled. In the absence of a health system that meets the needs of all members of a society, medical crowdfunding can be seen as a potentially justifiable attempt to correct it, as it offers the opportunity for the fulfilment of individual obligations of beneficence. The article argues that it is necessary and morally desirable to act on two apparently opposing tracks - to donate money for medical treatments, while at the same time advocating for the health care system in which treatment will be a guaranteed right, and not a matter of fellow citizens' willingness to fulfil their moral obligation.
PB  - Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo
T2  - Theoria
T1  - Dobročinstvo: moralni status lečenja putem humanitarnih akcija
IS  - 4
VL  - 66
SP  - 133
EP  - 146
DO  - 10.2298/THEO2304133R
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2023",
abstract = "U okvru ovog članka tematizovano je pitanje moralnog ponašanja u kontekstu grupnog finansiranja lečenja. Grupno finansiranje u medicinske svrhe, koje podrazumeva prikupljanje sredstava od većeg broja donatora putem javnog poziva, uglavnom putem platformi na internetu, rastući je fenomen širom sveta. Lečenje je daleko najvažnija svrha kojoj donatori u Srbiji posvećuju svoje resurse. U okviru članka analiziran je princip dobročinstva iz perspektive osnovnih etičkih teorija – utilitarizma, kantovske deontologije i etike vrline, a potom razmotreno da li je podrška lečenju pitanje dobročinstva ili pitanje pravde. Argumentuje se da su zdravstvene potrebe moralno važne i da društvo ima obavezu da pruži zdravstvenu zaštitu kako bi garantovalo jednake mogućnosti. Praksa grupnog finansiranja lečenja pod tim pretpostavkama ukazuje na manjkavost zdravstvenog sistema, te na činjenicu da se kolektivne dužnosti pravde ne izvršavaju. U odsustvu zdravstvenog sistema koji zadovoljava te potrebe, grupno finansiranje lečenja potencijalno je opravdan pokušaj da se isprave manjkavosti zdravstvenog sistema kroz izvršavanje individualne obaveze dobročinstva. U članku se argumentuje da je neophodno i moralno poželjno delovanje na dva, samo naizgled suprotstavljena, koloseka – donirati novac za lečenje, uz istovremeno zalaganje za izgradnju sistema u kojem će lečenje biti garantovano pravo, a ne stvar spremnosti sugrađana da ispune svoju moralnu obavezu. Kao što činjenica da oni koji su dužni da obezbede zdravstvenu zaštitu, a to ne čine, nije alibi da se ne pritekne u pomoć onima kojima je ona preko potrebna, tako ni odgovor na taj moralni apel ne bi trebalo da znači mirenje sa sistemskom nepravdom, ili čak njeno regenerisanje u tom pogledu., Crowdfunding for medical purposes, which involves the collection of funds from a large number of donors through a public appeal mainly through Internet platforms, is a growing phenomenon worldwide. Medical treatment is by far the most important purpose to which donors in Serbia dedicate their resources. This article focuses on the issue of moral behaviour in the context of medical crowdfunding. It analyses the beneficence principle from the perspective of core ethical theories - utilitarianism, Kantian deontology, and virtue ethics. It then discusses whether the support for treatment is in the realm of duty of charity or duty of justice. It is argued that health needs are morally important, and that society has an obligation to provide health care to guarantee equal opportunities. The appearance of the crowdfunding for medical treatments indicates the shortcomings of the health system, and that the collective duties of justice are not fulfilled. In the absence of a health system that meets the needs of all members of a society, medical crowdfunding can be seen as a potentially justifiable attempt to correct it, as it offers the opportunity for the fulfilment of individual obligations of beneficence. The article argues that it is necessary and morally desirable to act on two apparently opposing tracks - to donate money for medical treatments, while at the same time advocating for the health care system in which treatment will be a guaranteed right, and not a matter of fellow citizens' willingness to fulfil their moral obligation.",
publisher = "Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo",
journal = "Theoria",
title = "Dobročinstvo: moralni status lečenja putem humanitarnih akcija",
number = "4",
volume = "66",
pages = "133-146",
doi = "10.2298/THEO2304133R"
}

Radovanović, B.. (2023). Dobročinstvo: moralni status lečenja putem humanitarnih akcija. in Theoria
Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo., 66(4), 133-146.
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2304133R

Radovanović B. Dobročinstvo: moralni status lečenja putem humanitarnih akcija. in Theoria. 2023;66(4):133-146.
doi:10.2298/THEO2304133R .

Radovanović, Bojana, "Dobročinstvo: moralni status lečenja putem humanitarnih akcija" in Theoria, 66, no. 4 (2023):133-146,
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2304133R . .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2544
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd : Trag fondacija
T1  - Lokalne fondacije u Srbiji: Osnaživanje odozdo – uloga, izazovi i perspektive za razvoj lokalnih fondacija
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2544
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena and Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2022",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd : Trag fondacija",
title = "Lokalne fondacije u Srbiji: Osnaživanje odozdo – uloga, izazovi i perspektive za razvoj lokalnih fondacija",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2544"
}

Vasiljević, J.,& Radovanović, B.. (2022). Lokalne fondacije u Srbiji: Osnaživanje odozdo – uloga, izazovi i perspektive za razvoj lokalnih fondacija. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2544

Vasiljević J, Radovanović B. Lokalne fondacije u Srbiji: Osnaživanje odozdo – uloga, izazovi i perspektive za razvoj lokalnih fondacija. 2022;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2544 .

Vasiljević, Jelena, Radovanović, Bojana, "Lokalne fondacije u Srbiji: Osnaživanje odozdo – uloga, izazovi i perspektive za razvoj lokalnih fondacija" (2022),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2544 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2692
AB  - This paper focuses on Kant’s moral theory and how it can guide our actions in philanthropy. Philanthropy is usually defined as a voluntary action aimed at relieving suffering and improving the quality of lives of others. It has been argued that, within the framework of Kant’s theory, it is our duty to be beneficent, sacrificing a part of our welfare for others. The duty of beneficence is a wide one. Interpreters of Kant disagree on what the wide duty of beneficence requires. While a few argue that it only requires that we provide help sometimes, others hold that the duty of beneficence should be seen as more demanding, particularly in cases of emergency when help is urgently required. We are morally obliged to promote the happiness of others, but the duty of beneficence does not tell us whose happiness and how much of our resources to give. Other than emergency cases, in fulfilling the duty of beneficence, we can prioritize the ends of those near and dear to us who concern us more. Moreover, on condition that we are not indifferent to others, it is morally permissible to prioritize our ends. Finally, the paper argues that it is not always straightforward what kind of action is required in helping someone in need, and that beneficence in Kantian terms is not limited to the philanthropic sector.
AB  - U fokusu ovog rada je Kantova moralna teorija i na koji način ona može da usmerava naše odluke u domenu filantropije. Filantropija se obično definiše kao dobrovoljna radnja koja ima za cilj ublažavanje patnje i poboljšanje kvaliteta života drugih. Dobročinstvo je u okviru Kantove teorije dužnost. Kantovi interpretatori se ne slažu oko toga šta zahteva dužnost dobročinstva. Dok neki tvrde da je dovoljno da samo ponekad pružimo pomoć , drugi smatraju da bi dužnost dobročinstva trebalo posmatrati kao zahtevniju, posebno u hitnim slučajevima kada se pružanje pomoći smatra striktno obaveznom. Moralno smo dužni da unapređujemo sreć u drugih, ali nam dužnost dobročinstva ne govori čiju sreć u i koliko svojih sredstava u te svrhe treba da posvetimo. Osim kada su hitni slučajevi u pitanju, u ispunjavanju dužnosti dobročinstva, možemo dati prednost onima koji su nam bliski i dragi. Štaviše, pod uslovom da nismo ravnodušni prema drugima, moralno je dozvoljeno da dajemo prioritet sopstvenim ciljevima. Konačno, u radu se tvrdi da nije uvek nedvosmisleno koju konkretno radnju treba preduzeti da bismo postupali u skladu sa dužnošću dobročinstva, te da dobročinstvo u kantovskim terminima nije ograničeno na filantropski sektor.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - Kant’s Moral Theory as a Guide in Philanthropy
T1  - Kantova moralna teorija kao vodilja u filantropiji
IS  - 3
VL  - 33
SP  - 585
EP  - 600
DO  - 10.2298/FID2203585R
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2022",
abstract = "This paper focuses on Kant’s moral theory and how it can guide our actions in philanthropy. Philanthropy is usually defined as a voluntary action aimed at relieving suffering and improving the quality of lives of others. It has been argued that, within the framework of Kant’s theory, it is our duty to be beneficent, sacrificing a part of our welfare for others. The duty of beneficence is a wide one. Interpreters of Kant disagree on what the wide duty of beneficence requires. While a few argue that it only requires that we provide help sometimes, others hold that the duty of beneficence should be seen as more demanding, particularly in cases of emergency when help is urgently required. We are morally obliged to promote the happiness of others, but the duty of beneficence does not tell us whose happiness and how much of our resources to give. Other than emergency cases, in fulfilling the duty of beneficence, we can prioritize the ends of those near and dear to us who concern us more. Moreover, on condition that we are not indifferent to others, it is morally permissible to prioritize our ends. Finally, the paper argues that it is not always straightforward what kind of action is required in helping someone in need, and that beneficence in Kantian terms is not limited to the philanthropic sector., U fokusu ovog rada je Kantova moralna teorija i na koji način ona može da usmerava naše odluke u domenu filantropije. Filantropija se obično definiše kao dobrovoljna radnja koja ima za cilj ublažavanje patnje i poboljšanje kvaliteta života drugih. Dobročinstvo je u okviru Kantove teorije dužnost. Kantovi interpretatori se ne slažu oko toga šta zahteva dužnost dobročinstva. Dok neki tvrde da je dovoljno da samo ponekad pružimo pomoć , drugi smatraju da bi dužnost dobročinstva trebalo posmatrati kao zahtevniju, posebno u hitnim slučajevima kada se pružanje pomoći smatra striktno obaveznom. Moralno smo dužni da unapređujemo sreć u drugih, ali nam dužnost dobročinstva ne govori čiju sreć u i koliko svojih sredstava u te svrhe treba da posvetimo. Osim kada su hitni slučajevi u pitanju, u ispunjavanju dužnosti dobročinstva, možemo dati prednost onima koji su nam bliski i dragi. Štaviše, pod uslovom da nismo ravnodušni prema drugima, moralno je dozvoljeno da dajemo prioritet sopstvenim ciljevima. Konačno, u radu se tvrdi da nije uvek nedvosmisleno koju konkretno radnju treba preduzeti da bismo postupali u skladu sa dužnošću dobročinstva, te da dobročinstvo u kantovskim terminima nije ograničeno na filantropski sektor.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "Kant’s Moral Theory as a Guide in Philanthropy, Kantova moralna teorija kao vodilja u filantropiji",
number = "3",
volume = "33",
pages = "585-600",
doi = "10.2298/FID2203585R"
}

Radovanović, B.. (2022). Kant’s Moral Theory as a Guide in Philanthropy. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 33(3), 585-600.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2203585R

Radovanović B. Kant’s Moral Theory as a Guide in Philanthropy. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2022;33(3):585-600.
doi:10.2298/FID2203585R .

Radovanović, Bojana, "Kant’s Moral Theory as a Guide in Philanthropy" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 33, no. 3 (2022):585-600,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2203585R . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Крстић, Предраг
AU  - Радовановић, Бојана
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3097
AB  - У овом раду аутори настоје да понуде преглед различитих учења која се сврставају под капу хуманизма. Мада се рад превасходно усредсређује на хуманистичке доктрине, теорију хуманизма често није једноставно разлучити од хуманизма у пракси, те ће свакако бити реферисано на различите практичне програме хуманизма. И у једном и у другом случају испоставља се да је хуманизам толико разуђен, ако не и безобалан појам, да је можда упутније говорити о хуманизмима, у множини. Иако један прегледни чланак не може да предочи подробну и свеобухватну историју (идеје) хуманизма и све варијације кроз које је он прошао и пролази код својих значајних заступника, аутори верују да читаоцима може пружити основ за разумевање и оквир за даља истраживања и промишљања хуманизма/хуманизама.
AB  - In this paper, the authors have offered an overview of various teachings that fall
under the umbrella of humanism. Although the paper primarily focuses on the humanist doctrine, it is often not easy to distinguish the theory of humanism from humanism in practice. In both cases, it turns out that humanism is such a wide-ranging concept that perhaps it is instructive to talk about humanisms instead. Although a single review article cannot present a detailed and comprehensive history of (the idea of) humanism and all the variations it has gone through, the authors believe that this work can provide readers with a basis for understanding and a framework for further research and reflection on humanism/humanisms.
PB  - Beograd : Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka
T2  - Kultura: časopis za teoriju i sociologiju kulture i kulturnu politiku
T1  - Хуманизам и хуманизми: (ра)стезање појма
T1  - Humanism and humanisms: stretching the term
IS  - 177
SP  - 5
EP  - 21
DO  - 10.5937/kultura2277005K
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Крстић, Предраг and Радовановић, Бојана",
year = "2022",
abstract = "У овом раду аутори настоје да понуде преглед различитих учења која се сврставају под капу хуманизма. Мада се рад превасходно усредсређује на хуманистичке доктрине, теорију хуманизма често није једноставно разлучити од хуманизма у пракси, те ће свакако бити реферисано на различите практичне програме хуманизма. И у једном и у другом случају испоставља се да је хуманизам толико разуђен, ако не и безобалан појам, да је можда упутније говорити о хуманизмима, у множини. Иако један прегледни чланак не може да предочи подробну и свеобухватну историју (идеје) хуманизма и све варијације кроз које је он прошао и пролази код својих значајних заступника, аутори верују да читаоцима може пружити основ за разумевање и оквир за даља истраживања и промишљања хуманизма/хуманизама., In this paper, the authors have offered an overview of various teachings that fall
under the umbrella of humanism. Although the paper primarily focuses on the humanist doctrine, it is often not easy to distinguish the theory of humanism from humanism in practice. In both cases, it turns out that humanism is such a wide-ranging concept that perhaps it is instructive to talk about humanisms instead. Although a single review article cannot present a detailed and comprehensive history of (the idea of) humanism and all the variations it has gone through, the authors believe that this work can provide readers with a basis for understanding and a framework for further research and reflection on humanism/humanisms.",
publisher = "Beograd : Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka",
journal = "Kultura: časopis za teoriju i sociologiju kulture i kulturnu politiku",
title = "Хуманизам и хуманизми: (ра)стезање појма, Humanism and humanisms: stretching the term",
number = "177",
pages = "5-21",
doi = "10.5937/kultura2277005K"
}

Крстић, П.,& Радовановић, Б.. (2022). Хуманизам и хуманизми: (ра)стезање појма. in Kultura: časopis za teoriju i sociologiju kulture i kulturnu politiku
Beograd : Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka.(177), 5-21.
https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura2277005K

Крстић П, Радовановић Б. Хуманизам и хуманизми: (ра)стезање појма. in Kultura: časopis za teoriju i sociologiju kulture i kulturnu politiku. 2022;(177):5-21.
doi:10.5937/kultura2277005K .

Крстић, Предраг, Радовановић, Бојана, "Хуманизам и хуманизми: (ра)стезање појма" in Kultura: časopis za teoriju i sociologiju kulture i kulturnu politiku, no. 177 (2022):5-21,
https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura2277005K . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3007
AB  - Serbian citizens associate philanthropy with “helping people in need.” They believe that any kind of help, not only financial and material, is philanthropy. Accounting for the local context, the definition of philanthropy is “voluntarily dedicating one’s non-material and material resources for the benefit of others or the common good.” Thus, philanthropy includes volunteering time and donating money and possessions to formal organizations, informal groups, and individuals. 
Philanthropy, in some forms, has been present in Serbia since its beginnings. However, the nonprofit sector  has never had a prominent role in the social welfare provision. During the socialist period spanning the second half of the 20th century, the state oversaw social welfare. Although the welfare system has moved from a socialist to a more liberal model since the beginning of the 21st century, citizens of Serbia still view the state as the essential factor in the welfare system by expanding the responsibilities of individuals and their families.  
The nonprofit sector is relatively young and small. Between 2001 and 2012, the legal framework for the functioning of the nonprofit sector was adopted. It was in line with European standards. Nonprofit organizations in Serbia operate through forms of associations, endowments, and foundations. A certain number of organizations are positioned for dealing with specific issues, and they have relatively well-developed capacities for advocacy and policy dialogue.
In contrast, most of the nonprofits still have low advocacy and policy capacities. Strategical planning is rarely practiced, monitoring and evaluation are also weak. The sector is not homogenous when it comes to fundraising, with some organizations being professional, while others, most likely those small and are still at the embryonic phase of fundraising. The majority of nonprofit organizations face financial instability.
The nonprofit sector has only fragmented relationships with the state. Governmental funding of the nonprofits is available at all three levels: central, provincial, and local. These funding opportunities are directed towards projects or programs. However, the criteria for the public financial support need to be better defined and implemented. The nonprofits are exempted from tax on grants, donations, membership dues, and non-economic sources of income. For tax benefits for donors, exemptions exist for corporate donors but not for individual donors. 
Additionally, the majority of Serbian citizens participate in some form of philanthropy. Informal practices are more prevalent than formal, in terms of both giving money and giving time, though the process of institutionalization of philanthropy is notable in the past couple of years. In recent years, partnerships and initiatives aiming at building a better environment for philanthropy have appeared, effects of which are still to be seen. Though the study of philanthropy as an academic discipline lacks prominence, there has been an increased interest in this research field during the past couple of years.
PB  - IU Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, Indianapolis, IN
T2  - Philanthropy in a Different Perspective: Voices from Ethiopia, Nigeria and Serbia
T1  - Civil Society Sector and Philanthropy in Serbia: Informality, Institutionalization and Changing Environment
SP  - 67
EP  - 84
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3007
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Serbian citizens associate philanthropy with “helping people in need.” They believe that any kind of help, not only financial and material, is philanthropy. Accounting for the local context, the definition of philanthropy is “voluntarily dedicating one’s non-material and material resources for the benefit of others or the common good.” Thus, philanthropy includes volunteering time and donating money and possessions to formal organizations, informal groups, and individuals. 
Philanthropy, in some forms, has been present in Serbia since its beginnings. However, the nonprofit sector  has never had a prominent role in the social welfare provision. During the socialist period spanning the second half of the 20th century, the state oversaw social welfare. Although the welfare system has moved from a socialist to a more liberal model since the beginning of the 21st century, citizens of Serbia still view the state as the essential factor in the welfare system by expanding the responsibilities of individuals and their families.  
The nonprofit sector is relatively young and small. Between 2001 and 2012, the legal framework for the functioning of the nonprofit sector was adopted. It was in line with European standards. Nonprofit organizations in Serbia operate through forms of associations, endowments, and foundations. A certain number of organizations are positioned for dealing with specific issues, and they have relatively well-developed capacities for advocacy and policy dialogue.
In contrast, most of the nonprofits still have low advocacy and policy capacities. Strategical planning is rarely practiced, monitoring and evaluation are also weak. The sector is not homogenous when it comes to fundraising, with some organizations being professional, while others, most likely those small and are still at the embryonic phase of fundraising. The majority of nonprofit organizations face financial instability.
The nonprofit sector has only fragmented relationships with the state. Governmental funding of the nonprofits is available at all three levels: central, provincial, and local. These funding opportunities are directed towards projects or programs. However, the criteria for the public financial support need to be better defined and implemented. The nonprofits are exempted from tax on grants, donations, membership dues, and non-economic sources of income. For tax benefits for donors, exemptions exist for corporate donors but not for individual donors. 
Additionally, the majority of Serbian citizens participate in some form of philanthropy. Informal practices are more prevalent than formal, in terms of both giving money and giving time, though the process of institutionalization of philanthropy is notable in the past couple of years. In recent years, partnerships and initiatives aiming at building a better environment for philanthropy have appeared, effects of which are still to be seen. Though the study of philanthropy as an academic discipline lacks prominence, there has been an increased interest in this research field during the past couple of years.",
publisher = "IU Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, Indianapolis, IN",
journal = "Philanthropy in a Different Perspective: Voices from Ethiopia, Nigeria and Serbia",
booktitle = "Civil Society Sector and Philanthropy in Serbia: Informality, Institutionalization and Changing Environment",
pages = "67-84",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3007"
}

Radovanović, B.. (2021). Civil Society Sector and Philanthropy in Serbia: Informality, Institutionalization and Changing Environment. in Philanthropy in a Different Perspective: Voices from Ethiopia, Nigeria and Serbia
IU Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, Indianapolis, IN., 67-84.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3007

Radovanović B. Civil Society Sector and Philanthropy in Serbia: Informality, Institutionalization and Changing Environment. in Philanthropy in a Different Perspective: Voices from Ethiopia, Nigeria and Serbia. 2021;:67-84.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3007 .

Radovanović, Bojana, "Civil Society Sector and Philanthropy in Serbia: Informality, Institutionalization and Changing Environment" in Philanthropy in a Different Perspective: Voices from Ethiopia, Nigeria and Serbia (2021):67-84,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3007 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2502
AB  - Filantropija nikoga ne ostavlja ravnodušnim.
Divimo se herojstvu osobe koja ulazi u kuću zahvaćenu požarom
kako bi spasila postradale. Pozivamo jedni druge na
humanost kako bismo prikupili dovoljno sredstava za lečenje
obolelog deteta. Istovremeno, kritikujemo društvo u kojem
lečenje zavisi od dobre volje sugrađana, zahtevajući socijalnu
pravdu a ne milostinju. Ali, da li uopšte mislimo na
isto kada govorimo o filantropiji? O čemu (sve)
govorimo kada govorimo o njoj?
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o filantropiji
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2502
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Filantropija nikoga ne ostavlja ravnodušnim.
Divimo se herojstvu osobe koja ulazi u kuću zahvaćenu požarom
kako bi spasila postradale. Pozivamo jedni druge na
humanost kako bismo prikupili dovoljno sredstava za lečenje
obolelog deteta. Istovremeno, kritikujemo društvo u kojem
lečenje zavisi od dobre volje sugrađana, zahtevajući socijalnu
pravdu a ne milostinju. Ali, da li uopšte mislimo na
isto kada govorimo o filantropiji? O čemu (sve)
govorimo kada govorimo o njoj?",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o filantropiji",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2502"
}

Radovanović, B.. (2021). O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o filantropiji. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2502

Radovanović B. O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o filantropiji. 2021;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2502 .

Radovanović, Bojana, "O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o filantropiji" (2021),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2502 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Konjović, Marko
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2330
PB  - Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Blagostanje, razvoj i društvena Pravda: uvod u pristup zasnovan na sposobnostima
T1  - Zašto treba da razmišljamo o sposobnostima?
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2330
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Konjović, Marko and Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2020",
publisher = "Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga, Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Blagostanje, razvoj i društvena Pravda: uvod u pristup zasnovan na sposobnostima",
booktitle = "Zašto treba da razmišljamo o sposobnostima?",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2330"
}

Konjović, M.,& Radovanović, B.. (2020). Zašto treba da razmišljamo o sposobnostima?. in Blagostanje, razvoj i društvena Pravda: uvod u pristup zasnovan na sposobnostima
Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2330

Konjović M, Radovanović B. Zašto treba da razmišljamo o sposobnostima?. in Blagostanje, razvoj i društvena Pravda: uvod u pristup zasnovan na sposobnostima. 2020;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2330 .

Konjović, Marko, Radovanović, Bojana, "Zašto treba da razmišljamo o sposobnostima?" in Blagostanje, razvoj i društvena Pravda: uvod u pristup zasnovan na sposobnostima (2020),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2330 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
AU  - Simeunović, Ivana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2159
AB  - In this paper, we focus on individual factors that influence on people to engage in formal volunteering, providing empirical evidence from Serbia. We discussed Batson’s four-motive theory of communal actions. The majority of Serbian volunteers reportedly dedicated their time in order to contribute to the community and to help people in need. Thus, they were driven by collectivism and altruism. The lack of time, lack of solicitation for volunteering and being unable to make long-term commitments were reported as the main barriers to volunteering. Serbian volunteers rarely obtain material and non-material benefits from volunteering, and they do not perceive volunteering as a valuable tool for job success. Then, we focused on Schwartz value theory and its potential to explain pro-social behaviour. Our findings based on descriptive statistics and the independent samples t test show that self-transcendence values are more important for Serbian volunteers than self-enhancement values, and that self-transcendence values are more emphasized among volunteers than among non-volunteers. However, we also found that on average volunteers score higher on self-enhancement value orientation than nonvolunteers. Our findings, based on multiple regression models, cannot confirm that, controlled for other factors, volunteers and non-volunteers have different value orientations. Finally, according to the logistic regression models, Serbian volunteers are more likely to be found among younger, better-educated population, with higher scores on the scale of self-transcendence value orientations.
AB  - U okviru ovog rada analizirali smo individualne faktore koji utiču na pojedince da se uključe u formalno volontiranje, kroz empirijsku analizu podataka iz Srbije. U radu smo razmotrili Bejtsonovu (Batson) teoriju četiri motiva koji pokreću delovanje usmereno ka opštem dobru. Najveći broj volontera u Srbiji, prema njihovim odgovorima, pokreće želja da doprinesu zajednici i želja da pomognu onima kojima je pomoć potrebna, te možemo reći da ih pokreću kolektivizam i altruizam. Nedostatak vremena, odsustvo poziva da se priključe volonterskim akcijama i nemogućnost da se dugoročno obavežu, najčešće su barijere volontiranju u Srbiji. Volonteri retko ostvaruju materijalne i nematerijalne koristi od volontiranja, a volontiranje ne doživljavaju kao sredstvo za ostvarenje uspeha u poslu. Zatim smo se fokusirali na Švarcovu (Schwartz) teoriju vrednosti i njen potencijal da objasni prosocijalno ponašanje. Na osnovu deskriptivne statističke analize i t testa možemo da zaključimo da su vrednosti samotranscedencije važnije za volontere od vrednosti samo-poboljšanja, kao i da su vrednosti samo-transcedencije više naglašene među volonterima nego među onima koji ne volontiraju. Međutim, i vrednosti samo-poboljšanja su takođe izraženije među volonterima nego među građanima koji se ne uključuju u volonterske akcije. Rezultati naše analize zasnovani na višestrukoj regresiji, ne mogu potvrditi da volonteri i oni koji ne volontiraju imaju drugačije vrednosne orijentacije, u smislu samo-transcedencije i samo-poboljšanja. Na kraju, na osnovu logističke regresije, možemo da zaključimo da se volonteri češće nalaze među mlađom populacijom, obrazovanijom populacijom i onom sa izraženijom vrednosnom orijentacijom samo-transcedencije.
PB  - Beograd : Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije
T2  - Sociologija / Sociology
T1  - Who Volunteers in Serbia? Motives and Value Orientations Of Serbian Volunteers
T1  - Ko volontira u Srbiji? Motivacija i vrednosne orijentacije volontera u Srbiji
IS  - 2
VL  - 62
SP  - 269
EP  - 292
DO  - 10.2298/SOC2002269R
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radovanović, Bojana and Simeunović, Ivana",
year = "2020",
abstract = "In this paper, we focus on individual factors that influence on people to engage in formal volunteering, providing empirical evidence from Serbia. We discussed Batson’s four-motive theory of communal actions. The majority of Serbian volunteers reportedly dedicated their time in order to contribute to the community and to help people in need. Thus, they were driven by collectivism and altruism. The lack of time, lack of solicitation for volunteering and being unable to make long-term commitments were reported as the main barriers to volunteering. Serbian volunteers rarely obtain material and non-material benefits from volunteering, and they do not perceive volunteering as a valuable tool for job success. Then, we focused on Schwartz value theory and its potential to explain pro-social behaviour. Our findings based on descriptive statistics and the independent samples t test show that self-transcendence values are more important for Serbian volunteers than self-enhancement values, and that self-transcendence values are more emphasized among volunteers than among non-volunteers. However, we also found that on average volunteers score higher on self-enhancement value orientation than nonvolunteers. Our findings, based on multiple regression models, cannot confirm that, controlled for other factors, volunteers and non-volunteers have different value orientations. Finally, according to the logistic regression models, Serbian volunteers are more likely to be found among younger, better-educated population, with higher scores on the scale of self-transcendence value orientations., U okviru ovog rada analizirali smo individualne faktore koji utiču na pojedince da se uključe u formalno volontiranje, kroz empirijsku analizu podataka iz Srbije. U radu smo razmotrili Bejtsonovu (Batson) teoriju četiri motiva koji pokreću delovanje usmereno ka opštem dobru. Najveći broj volontera u Srbiji, prema njihovim odgovorima, pokreće želja da doprinesu zajednici i želja da pomognu onima kojima je pomoć potrebna, te možemo reći da ih pokreću kolektivizam i altruizam. Nedostatak vremena, odsustvo poziva da se priključe volonterskim akcijama i nemogućnost da se dugoročno obavežu, najčešće su barijere volontiranju u Srbiji. Volonteri retko ostvaruju materijalne i nematerijalne koristi od volontiranja, a volontiranje ne doživljavaju kao sredstvo za ostvarenje uspeha u poslu. Zatim smo se fokusirali na Švarcovu (Schwartz) teoriju vrednosti i njen potencijal da objasni prosocijalno ponašanje. Na osnovu deskriptivne statističke analize i t testa možemo da zaključimo da su vrednosti samotranscedencije važnije za volontere od vrednosti samo-poboljšanja, kao i da su vrednosti samo-transcedencije više naglašene među volonterima nego među onima koji ne volontiraju. Međutim, i vrednosti samo-poboljšanja su takođe izraženije među volonterima nego među građanima koji se ne uključuju u volonterske akcije. Rezultati naše analize zasnovani na višestrukoj regresiji, ne mogu potvrditi da volonteri i oni koji ne volontiraju imaju drugačije vrednosne orijentacije, u smislu samo-transcedencije i samo-poboljšanja. Na kraju, na osnovu logističke regresije, možemo da zaključimo da se volonteri češće nalaze među mlađom populacijom, obrazovanijom populacijom i onom sa izraženijom vrednosnom orijentacijom samo-transcedencije.",
publisher = "Beograd : Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije",
journal = "Sociologija / Sociology",
title = "Who Volunteers in Serbia? Motives and Value Orientations Of Serbian Volunteers, Ko volontira u Srbiji? Motivacija i vrednosne orijentacije volontera u Srbiji",
number = "2",
volume = "62",
pages = "269-292",
doi = "10.2298/SOC2002269R"
}

Radovanović, B.,& Simeunović, I.. (2020). Who Volunteers in Serbia? Motives and Value Orientations Of Serbian Volunteers. in Sociologija / Sociology
Beograd : Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije., 62(2), 269-292.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC2002269R

Radovanović B, Simeunović I. Who Volunteers in Serbia? Motives and Value Orientations Of Serbian Volunteers. in Sociologija / Sociology. 2020;62(2):269-292.
doi:10.2298/SOC2002269R .

Radovanović, Bojana, Simeunović, Ivana, "Who Volunteers in Serbia? Motives and Value Orientations Of Serbian Volunteers" in Sociologija / Sociology, 62, no. 2 (2020):269-292,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC2002269R . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3207
AB  - Engagement entails a combination of attention and activity, it is a purposeful investment of energy. There are many types of engagement, such as for example political engagement, when the attention and activity are focused on influencing government actions; associational engagement, referring to all forms of associational life without political object, etc.. We can be engaged as individuals (for example in our intellectual pursuits) or as collectives when we join forces with others for the same cause. Engagement may be turned towards and bring about social change, but it may as well be focused on the preservation of existing rules. Volunteerism or volunteering refers to a voluntary, public, formally organised and unpaid activity. It means contribution of one’s time, talents and strengths for the benefit of others or the collective good. Voluntary activities may vary from preparing meals at the shelter for homeless people, providing free of charge legal advice in a trade union to organisation of events within an environmental NGO. Activism refers to an action on behalf of a special cause, which goes beyond the conventional (Martin 2007). The cause can range from minority’s rights protection, safe working conditions to world peace, while the action may be a boycott, protest marches, canvassing etc.. It is often argued that volunteerism provides short-term, palliative solutions to social problems, based on individuals’ personal feelings and abilities, while activism is seen as giving long-term answers to be built in institutions. However, same combination of attention and activity can be seen as both activism and volunteerism. Though in some respects contested concepts, engagement, volunteering and activism are deeply intertwined. This paper aims at sketching boundaries and overlaps between the three concepts.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - ENGAGING (for) Social Change : towards new forms of collective action
T1  - Social Engagement, Volunteering and Activism: Boundaries and Overlaps
SP  - 70
EP  - 86
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3207
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Engagement entails a combination of attention and activity, it is a purposeful investment of energy. There are many types of engagement, such as for example political engagement, when the attention and activity are focused on influencing government actions; associational engagement, referring to all forms of associational life without political object, etc.. We can be engaged as individuals (for example in our intellectual pursuits) or as collectives when we join forces with others for the same cause. Engagement may be turned towards and bring about social change, but it may as well be focused on the preservation of existing rules. Volunteerism or volunteering refers to a voluntary, public, formally organised and unpaid activity. It means contribution of one’s time, talents and strengths for the benefit of others or the collective good. Voluntary activities may vary from preparing meals at the shelter for homeless people, providing free of charge legal advice in a trade union to organisation of events within an environmental NGO. Activism refers to an action on behalf of a special cause, which goes beyond the conventional (Martin 2007). The cause can range from minority’s rights protection, safe working conditions to world peace, while the action may be a boycott, protest marches, canvassing etc.. It is often argued that volunteerism provides short-term, palliative solutions to social problems, based on individuals’ personal feelings and abilities, while activism is seen as giving long-term answers to be built in institutions. However, same combination of attention and activity can be seen as both activism and volunteerism. Though in some respects contested concepts, engagement, volunteering and activism are deeply intertwined. This paper aims at sketching boundaries and overlaps between the three concepts.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "ENGAGING (for) Social Change : towards new forms of collective action",
booktitle = "Social Engagement, Volunteering and Activism: Boundaries and Overlaps",
pages = "70-86",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3207"
}

Radovanović, B.. (2019). Social Engagement, Volunteering and Activism: Boundaries and Overlaps. in ENGAGING (for) Social Change : towards new forms of collective action
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 70-86.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3207

Radovanović B. Social Engagement, Volunteering and Activism: Boundaries and Overlaps. in ENGAGING (for) Social Change : towards new forms of collective action. 2019;:70-86.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3207 .

Radovanović, Bojana, "Social Engagement, Volunteering and Activism: Boundaries and Overlaps" in ENGAGING (for) Social Change : towards new forms of collective action (2019):70-86,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3207 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2427
AB  - Volunteering is conceptualised as an activity when time is given freely
to benefit another person, group or cause. Such activity can be done through formal
organisations and informal groups, but time can also be given directly to people in
need. However, volunteering to formal organisations tend to predominate in the
research, and our knowledge on the factors that promote such behaviour mostly
comes from countries where this form of giving time is well developed, particularly
from Anglo-Saxon and Western and Northern European countries. Focussing
on three forms of giving time in Serbia: volunteering to formal organisations,
volunteering in informal groups and helping individuals, this paper seeks to
address these gaps in the literature. Data analysed in this paper come from the first
encompassing national survey on pro-social behaviour (N= 1,528) carried out in
Serbia in 2014. This research shows that providing direct help to people (71.2%) is
by far a more common activity than volunteering to formal organisations (27.7%)
and participating in the activities of informal groups (22.8%). There are differences
in giving time according to socio-demographic characteristics. In general,
respondents who reported giving time are likely to be found among the younger
population, among students and those without health problems. Also, different
socio-demographic groups of population engage in different forms of giving time.
AB  - Volontiranje se definiše kao aktivnost kada se dobrovoljno posvećuje
vreme za dobrobit druge osobe ili grupe, ili kako bi se podržao određeni cilj.
Ove aktivnosti se mogu obavljati u okviru organizacija i neformalnih grupa,
ali se vreme može posvetiti i neposredno osobama kojima je podrška potrebna.
Međutim, istraživanje ovog fenomena fokusirano je na volontiranje u formalnim
organizacijama, a naše znanje o faktorima koji pospešuju takvo ponašanje
uglavnom dolazi iz istraživanja sprovedenih u zemljama gde su ove prakse
zastupljene, posebno iz anglo-saksonskih područja. Predmet ovog rada su tri forme davanja vremena: volontiranje u okviru organizacija, učešće u aktivnostima za
dobrobit zajednice u okviru neformalnih grupa i pružanje neposredne pomoći
pojedincima. Analizirajući empirijske podatke iz originalnog istraživanja
sprovedenog na reprezentativnom uzorku (N=1528) u Srbiji 2014. godine, ovaj
rad daje doprinos literaturi. Istraživanje pokazuje da je pružanje direktne pomoći
(71,2%) daleko zastupljenija aktivnost od volontiranja u organizacijama (27,2%)
i neformalnim grupama (22.8%). Postoje razlike u davanju vremena između
različitih socio-demografskih grupa. Generalno gledano, ispitanici koji su naveli da
su posvetili svoje vremen za dobrobit drugih ili za postizanje zajedničkog dobra
nalaze se uglavnom među mlađom populacijom, među studentima i onima bez
zdravstvenih problema. Međutim, različite socio-demografske grupe stanovništva
se uključuju u različizte oblike davanja vremena.
PB  - Beograd: Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije
T2  - Sociologija / Sociology
T1  - Volunteering and Helping in Serbia: Main Characteristics
T1  - Volontiranje i pomaganje u Srbiji: osnovne odlike
IS  - 1
VL  - 61
SP  - 133
EP  - 152
DO  - 10.2298/SOC1901133R
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Volunteering is conceptualised as an activity when time is given freely
to benefit another person, group or cause. Such activity can be done through formal
organisations and informal groups, but time can also be given directly to people in
need. However, volunteering to formal organisations tend to predominate in the
research, and our knowledge on the factors that promote such behaviour mostly
comes from countries where this form of giving time is well developed, particularly
from Anglo-Saxon and Western and Northern European countries. Focussing
on three forms of giving time in Serbia: volunteering to formal organisations,
volunteering in informal groups and helping individuals, this paper seeks to
address these gaps in the literature. Data analysed in this paper come from the first
encompassing national survey on pro-social behaviour (N= 1,528) carried out in
Serbia in 2014. This research shows that providing direct help to people (71.2%) is
by far a more common activity than volunteering to formal organisations (27.7%)
and participating in the activities of informal groups (22.8%). There are differences
in giving time according to socio-demographic characteristics. In general,
respondents who reported giving time are likely to be found among the younger
population, among students and those without health problems. Also, different
socio-demographic groups of population engage in different forms of giving time., Volontiranje se definiše kao aktivnost kada se dobrovoljno posvećuje
vreme za dobrobit druge osobe ili grupe, ili kako bi se podržao određeni cilj.
Ove aktivnosti se mogu obavljati u okviru organizacija i neformalnih grupa,
ali se vreme može posvetiti i neposredno osobama kojima je podrška potrebna.
Međutim, istraživanje ovog fenomena fokusirano je na volontiranje u formalnim
organizacijama, a naše znanje o faktorima koji pospešuju takvo ponašanje
uglavnom dolazi iz istraživanja sprovedenih u zemljama gde su ove prakse
zastupljene, posebno iz anglo-saksonskih područja. Predmet ovog rada su tri forme davanja vremena: volontiranje u okviru organizacija, učešće u aktivnostima za
dobrobit zajednice u okviru neformalnih grupa i pružanje neposredne pomoći
pojedincima. Analizirajući empirijske podatke iz originalnog istraživanja
sprovedenog na reprezentativnom uzorku (N=1528) u Srbiji 2014. godine, ovaj
rad daje doprinos literaturi. Istraživanje pokazuje da je pružanje direktne pomoći
(71,2%) daleko zastupljenija aktivnost od volontiranja u organizacijama (27,2%)
i neformalnim grupama (22.8%). Postoje razlike u davanju vremena između
različitih socio-demografskih grupa. Generalno gledano, ispitanici koji su naveli da
su posvetili svoje vremen za dobrobit drugih ili za postizanje zajedničkog dobra
nalaze se uglavnom među mlađom populacijom, među studentima i onima bez
zdravstvenih problema. Međutim, različite socio-demografske grupe stanovništva
se uključuju u različizte oblike davanja vremena.",
publisher = "Beograd: Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije",
journal = "Sociologija / Sociology",
title = "Volunteering and Helping in Serbia: Main Characteristics, Volontiranje i pomaganje u Srbiji: osnovne odlike",
number = "1",
volume = "61",
pages = "133-152",
doi = "10.2298/SOC1901133R"
}

Radovanović, B.. (2019). Volunteering and Helping in Serbia: Main Characteristics. in Sociologija / Sociology
Beograd: Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije., 61(1), 133-152.
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1901133R

Radovanović B. Volunteering and Helping in Serbia: Main Characteristics. in Sociologija / Sociology. 2019;61(1):133-152.
doi:10.2298/SOC1901133R .

Radovanović, Bojana, "Volunteering and Helping in Serbia: Main Characteristics" in Sociologija / Sociology, 61, no. 1 (2019):133-152,
https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1901133R . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID1901122R
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1955
AB  - This paper discusses the relations between three forms of altruism: behavioural, evolutionary and motivational. Altruism in a behavioural sense is an act that benefits another person. It can range from volunteering to a charity and helping a neighbour, to giving money to a non-profit organisation or donating blood. People often dedicate their material and nonmaterial resources for the benefit of others to gain psychological, social and material benefits for themselves. Thus, their altruistic acts are driven by egoistic motivation. Also, the final goal of an altruistic act may be the increase in the welfare of a group or adherence to a certain moral principle or a social norm. However, at least sometimes, the welfare of others is the ultimate goal of our actions, when our altruistic acts are performed from altruistic motivation. In evolutionary sense, altruism means the sacrifice of reproductive success for the benefit of other organisms. According to evolutionary theories, behaviour which promotes the reproductive success of the receiver at the cost of the actor is favoured by natural selection, because it is either beneficial for the altruist in the long run, or for his genes, or for the group he belongs to. However, altruism among people emerges as a distinctly human combination of innate and learned behaviours. Not only do we benefit the members of our own group, but we are capable of transcending our tribalistic instincts and putting the benefit of strangers at our own personal expense as our ultimate goal.
AB  - Ovaj rad govori o odnosima između altruizma u bihejvioralnom, evolutivnom i motivacionom smilsu. Altruizam u smislu ponašanja je radnja u kojoj akter snosi trošak (materijalni ili nematerijalni) a od koje benefit ima druga osoba. Može da se kreć e od volontiranja za neprofitne organizacije i pružanja pomoći osobama u nevolji, do davanju novca u dobrotvorne svrhe ili doniranja krvi. Ljudi često posveć uju svoje materijalne i nematerijalne resurse u korist drugih kako bi stekli psihološke, socijalne i materijalne koristi za sebe. Tada su njihova altruistična dela vođena egoističnim motivima. Takođe, krajnji cilj altruističnog čina može biti poveć anje blagostanja grupe ili poštovanje određenog moralnog principa ili društvene norme. U evolucionom smislu, altruizam znači žrtvovanje reproduktivnog uspeha u korist drugih organizama. Prirodna selekcija favorizuje ovakvo ponašanje kada je ono ili korisno za altruistu na duži rok, ili za njegove gene, ili za grupu kojoj pripada. Međutim, altruizam među ljudima se javlja kao jedinstvena kombinacija urođenog i naučenog ponašanja. Ne samo da postupamo s ciljem povećanja sopstvenog blagostanja i blagostanja članova grupe kojoj pripadamo, već često postupamo u korist potpunih stranaca, imajući kao krajnji cilj njihovo blagostanje, kada naše altruistično ponašanje proističe iz altruistične motivacije.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Altruism in Behavioural, Motivational and Evolutionary Sense
IS  - 1
VL  - 30
SP  - 122
EP  - 134
DO  - 10.2298/FID1901122R
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2019",
abstract = "This paper discusses the relations between three forms of altruism: behavioural, evolutionary and motivational. Altruism in a behavioural sense is an act that benefits another person. It can range from volunteering to a charity and helping a neighbour, to giving money to a non-profit organisation or donating blood. People often dedicate their material and nonmaterial resources for the benefit of others to gain psychological, social and material benefits for themselves. Thus, their altruistic acts are driven by egoistic motivation. Also, the final goal of an altruistic act may be the increase in the welfare of a group or adherence to a certain moral principle or a social norm. However, at least sometimes, the welfare of others is the ultimate goal of our actions, when our altruistic acts are performed from altruistic motivation. In evolutionary sense, altruism means the sacrifice of reproductive success for the benefit of other organisms. According to evolutionary theories, behaviour which promotes the reproductive success of the receiver at the cost of the actor is favoured by natural selection, because it is either beneficial for the altruist in the long run, or for his genes, or for the group he belongs to. However, altruism among people emerges as a distinctly human combination of innate and learned behaviours. Not only do we benefit the members of our own group, but we are capable of transcending our tribalistic instincts and putting the benefit of strangers at our own personal expense as our ultimate goal., Ovaj rad govori o odnosima između altruizma u bihejvioralnom, evolutivnom i motivacionom smilsu. Altruizam u smislu ponašanja je radnja u kojoj akter snosi trošak (materijalni ili nematerijalni) a od koje benefit ima druga osoba. Može da se kreć e od volontiranja za neprofitne organizacije i pružanja pomoći osobama u nevolji, do davanju novca u dobrotvorne svrhe ili doniranja krvi. Ljudi često posveć uju svoje materijalne i nematerijalne resurse u korist drugih kako bi stekli psihološke, socijalne i materijalne koristi za sebe. Tada su njihova altruistična dela vođena egoističnim motivima. Takođe, krajnji cilj altruističnog čina može biti poveć anje blagostanja grupe ili poštovanje određenog moralnog principa ili društvene norme. U evolucionom smislu, altruizam znači žrtvovanje reproduktivnog uspeha u korist drugih organizama. Prirodna selekcija favorizuje ovakvo ponašanje kada je ono ili korisno za altruistu na duži rok, ili za njegove gene, ili za grupu kojoj pripada. Međutim, altruizam među ljudima se javlja kao jedinstvena kombinacija urođenog i naučenog ponašanja. Ne samo da postupamo s ciljem povećanja sopstvenog blagostanja i blagostanja članova grupe kojoj pripadamo, već često postupamo u korist potpunih stranaca, imajući kao krajnji cilj njihovo blagostanje, kada naše altruistično ponašanje proističe iz altruistične motivacije.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Altruism in Behavioural, Motivational and Evolutionary Sense",
number = "1",
volume = "30",
pages = "122-134",
doi = "10.2298/FID1901122R"
}

Radovanović, B.. (2019). Altruism in Behavioural, Motivational and Evolutionary Sense. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 30(1), 122-134.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901122R

Radovanović B. Altruism in Behavioural, Motivational and Evolutionary Sense. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2019;30(1):122-134.
doi:10.2298/FID1901122R .

Radovanović, Bojana, "Altruism in Behavioural, Motivational and Evolutionary Sense" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 30, no. 1 (2019):122-134,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901122R . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=685
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1825
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Pamala Wiepking and Femida Handy (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Philanthropy, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
IS  - 3
VL  - 29
SP  - 455
EP  - 456
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1825
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2018",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Pamala Wiepking and Femida Handy (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Philanthropy, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.",
number = "3",
volume = "29",
pages = "455-456",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1825"
}

Radovanović, B.. (2018). Pamala Wiepking and Femida Handy (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Philanthropy, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 29(3), 455-456.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1825

Radovanović B. Pamala Wiepking and Femida Handy (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Philanthropy, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2018;29(3):455-456.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1825 .

Radovanović, Bojana, "Pamala Wiepking and Femida Handy (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Philanthropy, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015." in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 29, no. 3 (2018):455-456,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1825 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://www.library.ien.bg.ac.rs/index.php/zb/article/view/489
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1520
AB  - Industrija, a posebno prerađivačka industrija, osnovni je pokretač privrednog
razvoja. Bez aktivne države putem industrijske politike razvoj industrije nije moguć.
Mada je Vlada Republike Srbije donela strateški dokument „Strategija i politika
razvoja industrije Srbije u period 2011-2020“, mere iznete u ovom dokumentu nisu
u skladu sa načelima industrijske politike. Ovaj dokument industrijsku politiku vidi
kao privatizaciju i liberalizaciju uz podršku otvaranju novih preduzeća bez obzira u
kom su sektoru, dok je upravo aktivna promocija i zaštita tzv. „šumpeterijalnskih
aktivnosti“ neophodna za reindustrijalizaciju zemlje. U okviru ovog rada smo
pokazali da su danas najrazvijenije zemlje sveta u toku procesa sustizanja
tadašnjih svetskih lidera koristile aktivnu ulogu države u podsticanju razvoja
njihove tada mlade industrije. Mada ne koriste naziv industrijske politike, većina
vlada razvijenih kapitalističkih privreda i dalje interveniše na tržištu i utiče na
privredu. Ove intervencije su najčešće opisane kao „politike konkurentnosti“ i
mnoge zemlje su donele programe s ciljem da povećaju konkurentnost svojih
privreda, prvenstveno kroz ulaganja u istraživanje i razvoj. Za privredni razvoj
Srbije od ključnog je značaja aktivna uloga države da kroz mere industrijske
politike podstakne revitalizaciju industrije.
AB  - Industry, particularly manufacturing, is the main driver of economic development.
Without an active state through an industrial policy industrial development is not
possible. Although the Government of the Republic of Serbia adopted the
document Strategy and Policy of Industrial Development of Serbia in the period
2011-2020, the measures presented in this document are not in accordance with
the main tenets of industrial policy. In this document, industrial policy is seen as
privatization and liberalization with the support for new enterprises regardless of
the sector in which they operate. However, active promotion of so called
“Schumpeterian activities” is essential for (re)industrialization of a country. In this
paper we showed that the most developed countries in their process of catching
up with the leaders of the time carefully fostered and incentivised development of
their infant industries. Although they often do not use the name of industrial
policy, most governments of developed capitalist economies intervene in the
market and affect the economy in a highly selective manner. These interventions
are the most often described as a "competition policy", and many countries have
announced programs aimed to raise competitiveness, which typically focus on
incentives for research and development and innovation. Thus, for the economic
development of Serbia the state should have an essential role. It should encourage
revitalization of manufacturing through industrial policy.
PB  - Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka
T2  - Strukturne promene u Srbiji – dosadašnji rezultati i perspektive
T1  - Neophodnost industrijske politike za reindustrijalizaciju Srbije
T1  - The necessity of an industrial policy for reindustrialisation of the Republic of Serbia
SP  - 65
EP  - 77
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1520
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Industrija, a posebno prerađivačka industrija, osnovni je pokretač privrednog
razvoja. Bez aktivne države putem industrijske politike razvoj industrije nije moguć.
Mada je Vlada Republike Srbije donela strateški dokument „Strategija i politika
razvoja industrije Srbije u period 2011-2020“, mere iznete u ovom dokumentu nisu
u skladu sa načelima industrijske politike. Ovaj dokument industrijsku politiku vidi
kao privatizaciju i liberalizaciju uz podršku otvaranju novih preduzeća bez obzira u
kom su sektoru, dok je upravo aktivna promocija i zaštita tzv. „šumpeterijalnskih
aktivnosti“ neophodna za reindustrijalizaciju zemlje. U okviru ovog rada smo
pokazali da su danas najrazvijenije zemlje sveta u toku procesa sustizanja
tadašnjih svetskih lidera koristile aktivnu ulogu države u podsticanju razvoja
njihove tada mlade industrije. Mada ne koriste naziv industrijske politike, većina
vlada razvijenih kapitalističkih privreda i dalje interveniše na tržištu i utiče na
privredu. Ove intervencije su najčešće opisane kao „politike konkurentnosti“ i
mnoge zemlje su donele programe s ciljem da povećaju konkurentnost svojih
privreda, prvenstveno kroz ulaganja u istraživanje i razvoj. Za privredni razvoj
Srbije od ključnog je značaja aktivna uloga države da kroz mere industrijske
politike podstakne revitalizaciju industrije., Industry, particularly manufacturing, is the main driver of economic development.
Without an active state through an industrial policy industrial development is not
possible. Although the Government of the Republic of Serbia adopted the
document Strategy and Policy of Industrial Development of Serbia in the period
2011-2020, the measures presented in this document are not in accordance with
the main tenets of industrial policy. In this document, industrial policy is seen as
privatization and liberalization with the support for new enterprises regardless of
the sector in which they operate. However, active promotion of so called
“Schumpeterian activities” is essential for (re)industrialization of a country. In this
paper we showed that the most developed countries in their process of catching
up with the leaders of the time carefully fostered and incentivised development of
their infant industries. Although they often do not use the name of industrial
policy, most governments of developed capitalist economies intervene in the
market and affect the economy in a highly selective manner. These interventions
are the most often described as a "competition policy", and many countries have
announced programs aimed to raise competitiveness, which typically focus on
incentives for research and development and innovation. Thus, for the economic
development of Serbia the state should have an essential role. It should encourage
revitalization of manufacturing through industrial policy.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka",
journal = "Strukturne promene u Srbiji – dosadašnji rezultati i perspektive",
booktitle = "Neophodnost industrijske politike za reindustrijalizaciju Srbije, The necessity of an industrial policy for reindustrialisation of the Republic of Serbia",
pages = "65-77",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1520"
}

Radovanović, B.. (2015). Neophodnost industrijske politike za reindustrijalizaciju Srbije. in Strukturne promene u Srbiji – dosadašnji rezultati i perspektive
Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka., 65-77.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1520

Radovanović B. Neophodnost industrijske politike za reindustrijalizaciju Srbije. in Strukturne promene u Srbiji – dosadašnji rezultati i perspektive. 2015;:65-77.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1520 .

Radovanović, Bojana, "Neophodnost industrijske politike za reindustrijalizaciju Srbije" in Strukturne promene u Srbiji – dosadašnji rezultati i perspektive (2015):65-77,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1520 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Ocokoljić, Slobodan
AU  - Kleut, Jelena
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1473
AB  - Svrha studije je dubinsko sagledavanje problema i izazova sa kojima se suočavaju mladi istraživači na fakultetima, naučno-istraživačkim institutima i u organizacijama civilnog društva. Studija je nastala na osnovu fokus-grupnog intervjua sa 20 mladih istraživača i na osnovu diskusije tokom okruglog stola o položaju mladih istraživača u društvenim naukama. Pored metode fokus grupe korišćena je i analiza relevantne sekundarne literature, kao i strateškog i zakonskog okvira. Ključni nalazi dobijeni istraživanjem su da mladi istraživači u društvenim naukama pokušavaju da kombinuju rad u sektoru visokog obrazovanja i naučnog istraživanja i rad u neprofitnom sektoru, te da nedostatke u jednom sektoru pokušavaju da nadomeste radom u drugom. Mladi istraživači na fakultetima i institutima navode nedovoljnu finansijsku podršku za empirijska istraživanja i male plate kao osnovni razlog za dodatni rad u organizacijama civilnog društva (OCD). Uslovi rada u neprofitnom sektoru se smatraju boljim zbog efikasnije administrativne podrške i fleksibilnijih procedura u pisanju projektnih predloga i sprovođenju projekata. Pored toga, rad u organizacijama civilnog društva vidi se i kao prilika za sticanje znanja iz oblasti upravljanja projektima. Nemogućnost da se fokusiraju na doktorski rad i nedostatak finansijskih sredstava za terenska istraživanja predstavljaju najveću prepreku u radu mladih istraživača na fakultetima i institutima. Mladi, zaposleni na institutima i fakultetima, obično su angažovani u nastavi, zatim u sprovođenju projekata koje finansira ministarstvo, kao i na projektima međunarodnih donatora i imaju obaveze rada na svojim doktorskim tezama kako bi mogli da zadrže stečena zvanja i napreduju u profesiji. Sa druge strane, istraživači u OCD koje su projektno finansirane istovremeno rade na nekoliko često vrlo tematski različitih projekata kako bi iz projektnih fondova pokrili svoje plate. Stoga obe grupe mladih istraživača sebe percipiraju kao „rastrzane na 1000 strana“ što se na kraju odražava na kvalitet naučne produkcije.
AB  - The aim of this study is to provide in-depth analysis of problems and challenges that young researcher are facing during their work at the universities, research institutes and civil society organizations. Study is developed on the basis of focus group interview held with 20 young researchers and on the basis of round table discussion about the position of young researchers in the social science research sector. Beside the focus group method, analysis of relevant secondary literature and legal and strategic framework was used. Key findings are that young researchers in the social sciences are trying to combine activities in the sector of higher education and scientific research and work in non-profit sector. In this way they are trying to overcome weaknesses of one specific sector by using advantages of other sectors. 
Young researchers from faculties and institutes claim that insufficient financial support for empirical research and low salaries are primary reasons for their additional activities in the civil society organizations. Conditions for work in this sector are perceived as better due to more funds for field work and more efficient administrative support in project implementation. In addition, work in the CSOs is also a chance for acquiring skills in project management. Consequently, inability to focus on their PhD thesis and lack of financial means for field work are the biggest obstacles for young researcher engaged with the faculties and institutes. Researchers employed in these organizations are usually engaged in teaching, in implementation of the projects financed by the Ministry, in the projects supported by international donors and they have commitments regarding their PhD thesis in order to keep their academic positions. On the other hand, researchers from CSOs which are funded by the project are working simultaneously on several thematically different projects in order to cover their salaries from the project funds. That's why both groups of researchers defined themselves as "overloaded". As a final consequence this leads to low quality of scientific production.
PB  - Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka
T1  - Uslovi rada i status mladih istraživača na univerzitetima, institutima i u nevladinom sektoru
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1473
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Ocokoljić, Slobodan and Kleut, Jelena and Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Svrha studije je dubinsko sagledavanje problema i izazova sa kojima se suočavaju mladi istraživači na fakultetima, naučno-istraživačkim institutima i u organizacijama civilnog društva. Studija je nastala na osnovu fokus-grupnog intervjua sa 20 mladih istraživača i na osnovu diskusije tokom okruglog stola o položaju mladih istraživača u društvenim naukama. Pored metode fokus grupe korišćena je i analiza relevantne sekundarne literature, kao i strateškog i zakonskog okvira. Ključni nalazi dobijeni istraživanjem su da mladi istraživači u društvenim naukama pokušavaju da kombinuju rad u sektoru visokog obrazovanja i naučnog istraživanja i rad u neprofitnom sektoru, te da nedostatke u jednom sektoru pokušavaju da nadomeste radom u drugom. Mladi istraživači na fakultetima i institutima navode nedovoljnu finansijsku podršku za empirijska istraživanja i male plate kao osnovni razlog za dodatni rad u organizacijama civilnog društva (OCD). Uslovi rada u neprofitnom sektoru se smatraju boljim zbog efikasnije administrativne podrške i fleksibilnijih procedura u pisanju projektnih predloga i sprovođenju projekata. Pored toga, rad u organizacijama civilnog društva vidi se i kao prilika za sticanje znanja iz oblasti upravljanja projektima. Nemogućnost da se fokusiraju na doktorski rad i nedostatak finansijskih sredstava za terenska istraživanja predstavljaju najveću prepreku u radu mladih istraživača na fakultetima i institutima. Mladi, zaposleni na institutima i fakultetima, obično su angažovani u nastavi, zatim u sprovođenju projekata koje finansira ministarstvo, kao i na projektima međunarodnih donatora i imaju obaveze rada na svojim doktorskim tezama kako bi mogli da zadrže stečena zvanja i napreduju u profesiji. Sa druge strane, istraživači u OCD koje su projektno finansirane istovremeno rade na nekoliko često vrlo tematski različitih projekata kako bi iz projektnih fondova pokrili svoje plate. Stoga obe grupe mladih istraživača sebe percipiraju kao „rastrzane na 1000 strana“ što se na kraju odražava na kvalitet naučne produkcije., The aim of this study is to provide in-depth analysis of problems and challenges that young researcher are facing during their work at the universities, research institutes and civil society organizations. Study is developed on the basis of focus group interview held with 20 young researchers and on the basis of round table discussion about the position of young researchers in the social science research sector. Beside the focus group method, analysis of relevant secondary literature and legal and strategic framework was used. Key findings are that young researchers in the social sciences are trying to combine activities in the sector of higher education and scientific research and work in non-profit sector. In this way they are trying to overcome weaknesses of one specific sector by using advantages of other sectors. 
Young researchers from faculties and institutes claim that insufficient financial support for empirical research and low salaries are primary reasons for their additional activities in the civil society organizations. Conditions for work in this sector are perceived as better due to more funds for field work and more efficient administrative support in project implementation. In addition, work in the CSOs is also a chance for acquiring skills in project management. Consequently, inability to focus on their PhD thesis and lack of financial means for field work are the biggest obstacles for young researcher engaged with the faculties and institutes. Researchers employed in these organizations are usually engaged in teaching, in implementation of the projects financed by the Ministry, in the projects supported by international donors and they have commitments regarding their PhD thesis in order to keep their academic positions. On the other hand, researchers from CSOs which are funded by the project are working simultaneously on several thematically different projects in order to cover their salaries from the project funds. That's why both groups of researchers defined themselves as "overloaded". As a final consequence this leads to low quality of scientific production.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka",
title = "Uslovi rada i status mladih istraživača na univerzitetima, institutima i u nevladinom sektoru",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1473"
}

Ocokoljić, S., Kleut, J.,& Radovanović, B.. (2015). Uslovi rada i status mladih istraživača na univerzitetima, institutima i u nevladinom sektoru. 
Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1473

Ocokoljić S, Kleut J, Radovanović B. Uslovi rada i status mladih istraživača na univerzitetima, institutima i u nevladinom sektoru. 2015;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1473 .

Ocokoljić, Slobodan, Kleut, Jelena, Radovanović, Bojana, "Uslovi rada i status mladih istraživača na univerzitetima, institutima i u nevladinom sektoru" (2015),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1473 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Krstić, Nemanja
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1472
AB  - Svrha studije je pregled i analiza problema i izazova sa kojima se suočavaju mladi istraživači prilikom odlaska na studije u inostranstvo i povratka u Srbiju. Studija je zasnovana na analizi sekundarnih podataka, strateškog i zakonodavnog okvira, te fokus-grupnog intervjua sa 20 mladih istraživača i diskusije tokom okruglog stola o položaju mladih istraživača u društvenim naukama. Nalazi studije ukazuju da su u Srbiji studenti često prinuđeni na mobilnost, usled niskog stepena ulaganja u naučno istraživačku delatnost i nemogućnosti usavršavanja na domaćim ustanovama. Želja za odlaskom kod mladih istraživača je veoma izražena, naročito usled loših socio-ekonomskih uslova i slabih mogućnosti za zapošljavanje i/ili napredovanje. Mladi se vraćaju u zemlju uglavnom kada moraju, zbog isticanja vize i perioda legalnog boravka u drugoj zemlji, kao i nemogućnosti pronalaska stalnog posla u inostranstvu Studija obrađuje i problem nostrifikacije diploma, koji je predstavljao veliku prepreku mladim istraživačima povratnicima. Takođe, daje se osvrt na faktore koje mlade istraživače opredeljuju na ostanak u Srbiji, gde se najviše ističu stipendije i pronalazak posla.
AB  - The purpose of the study is to review and analyse the problems and challenges that young researchers face when going abroad to study and upon their return to Serbia. The study is based on secondary data analysis, analysis of the strategic and legislative framework, focus-group interviews with 20 young researchers and discussions during the round table on the position of young researchers in the social sciences. The findings indicate that students from Serbia are often forced to mobility, due to low level of investment in scientific research activities and training inability at domestic institutions. The desire to leave is very strong, especially due to poor socio-economic conditions and poor employment opportunities and/or the chances for professional development. Young people return to the country mainly when they have to, due to visa expiry and the inability to find a permanent job abroad. The study analyses the problem of degree recognition, which has been a major obstacle to young returnees so far. It also gives an overview on the factors that motivate the young researchers to stay in Serbia, where scholarships and finding a job are definitely the most prominent.
PB  - Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka
T1  - Studiranje u inostranstvu i povratak u Srbiju
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1472
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Krstić, Nemanja and Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Svrha studije je pregled i analiza problema i izazova sa kojima se suočavaju mladi istraživači prilikom odlaska na studije u inostranstvo i povratka u Srbiju. Studija je zasnovana na analizi sekundarnih podataka, strateškog i zakonodavnog okvira, te fokus-grupnog intervjua sa 20 mladih istraživača i diskusije tokom okruglog stola o položaju mladih istraživača u društvenim naukama. Nalazi studije ukazuju da su u Srbiji studenti često prinuđeni na mobilnost, usled niskog stepena ulaganja u naučno istraživačku delatnost i nemogućnosti usavršavanja na domaćim ustanovama. Želja za odlaskom kod mladih istraživača je veoma izražena, naročito usled loših socio-ekonomskih uslova i slabih mogućnosti za zapošljavanje i/ili napredovanje. Mladi se vraćaju u zemlju uglavnom kada moraju, zbog isticanja vize i perioda legalnog boravka u drugoj zemlji, kao i nemogućnosti pronalaska stalnog posla u inostranstvu Studija obrađuje i problem nostrifikacije diploma, koji je predstavljao veliku prepreku mladim istraživačima povratnicima. Takođe, daje se osvrt na faktore koje mlade istraživače opredeljuju na ostanak u Srbiji, gde se najviše ističu stipendije i pronalazak posla., The purpose of the study is to review and analyse the problems and challenges that young researchers face when going abroad to study and upon their return to Serbia. The study is based on secondary data analysis, analysis of the strategic and legislative framework, focus-group interviews with 20 young researchers and discussions during the round table on the position of young researchers in the social sciences. The findings indicate that students from Serbia are often forced to mobility, due to low level of investment in scientific research activities and training inability at domestic institutions. The desire to leave is very strong, especially due to poor socio-economic conditions and poor employment opportunities and/or the chances for professional development. Young people return to the country mainly when they have to, due to visa expiry and the inability to find a permanent job abroad. The study analyses the problem of degree recognition, which has been a major obstacle to young returnees so far. It also gives an overview on the factors that motivate the young researchers to stay in Serbia, where scholarships and finding a job are definitely the most prominent.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka",
title = "Studiranje u inostranstvu i povratak u Srbiju",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1472"
}

Pudar Draško, G., Krstić, N.,& Radovanović, B.. (2015). Studiranje u inostranstvu i povratak u Srbiju. 
Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1472

Pudar Draško G, Krstić N, Radovanović B. Studiranje u inostranstvu i povratak u Srbiju. 2015;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1472 .

Pudar Draško, Gazela, Krstić, Nemanja, Radovanović, Bojana, "Studiranje u inostranstvu i povratak u Srbiju" (2015),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1472 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Kleut, Jelena
AU  - Ocokoljić, Slobodan
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1471
AB  - Predmet ove studije su položaj i uslovi za rad mladih istraživača u društvenim i humanističkim
naukama u Srbiji i, konkretno, mehanizmi podrške koje imaju na raspolaganju. Ključna pitanja
na koje studija pruža odgovore su: 1) koje su osnovne socio-ekonomske karakteristike mladih
istraživača (porodično stanje, primanja, stambena situacija); 2) koje mere podrške su dostupne
mladim istraživačima, u kojoj meri se koriste i šta o njima misle doktorandi; 3) kako mladi
istraživači procenjuju uslove u kojima rade. Studija se temelji jednim delom na analizi
dokumenata i izveštaja relevantnih domaćih institucija i organizacija. S obzirom na to da se mere
unapređenja položaja mladih istraživača sprovode u kontekstu pridruživanja Srbije Evropskom
visokoobrazovnom prostoru i Evropskom istraživačkom prostoru, analizi domaćih mera
prethodni kratki pregled evropskih iskustava. Drugi, značajniji, deo rezultata potiče iz anketnog
istraživanja u kojem je učestvovalo 356 doktoranada iz oblasti društvenih i humanističkih
nauka. Među doktorandima mogu da se uoče četiri osnovne grupe u odnosu na status koji imaju
u naučno-obrazovnom sistemu: asistenti, istraživači saradnici, stipendisti i doktorandi bez
naučnih zvanja. Rezultati istraživanja pokazuju da više od polovine doktoranada nema naučna
zvanja i ne učestvuje u naučnim projektima koje realizuju njihove matične institucije. U celini
posmatrano mladi istraživači nezadovoljni su svojim materijalnim položajem, uslovima za rad,
kao i podrškom institucija i Ministarstva prosvete, nauke i tehnološkog razvoja. Preko polovine
doktoranada nema adekvatno rešeno stambeno pitanje (žive kod roditelja ili u iznajmljenim
stanovima) i ovo je jedan od najznačajnijih problema mladih istraživača. Školarine za doktorske
studije izuzetno su visoke, a tek manji broj doktoranada ima status budžetskih studenata.
Nedostatak sredstava za naučne skupove i studijske boravke u inostranstvu, nedostupnost
literature i nedovoljna materijalna sredstva za istraživanja predstavljaju najveće probleme za
naučni razvoj mladih istraživača.
AB  - The subject of this study is status and working conditions of the young researchers in
humanities and social sciences in Serbia, and in particular support mechanisms that are
available to them. The key questions that the study answers are: 1) what are basic socioeconomic
characteristics of young researchers (family status, income, housing situation); 2)
what types of support are available to young researchers, to what extent are they used and what
doctoral students think of them; 3) how young researchers assess the conditions in which they
work. The study was based partly on an analysis of documents and reports of relevant local
institutions and organizations. Considering that measures to improve the position of young
researchers are conducted in the context of Serbian integration into the European Higher
Education Area and European Research Area, the analysis of domestic measures is preceded by a
brief overview of European experiences. The second, more important, part of the results
originates from research survey, which included 356 doctoral students in the field of social
sciences and humanities. Among doctoral students four basic groups according to the status they
have in the scientific-educational system can be identifies: teaching assistants, research
assistants, stipend holders and doctoral students without scientific titles. The survey results
show that more than half of doctoral students do not have scientific positions and do not
participate in the research projects implemented by their home institution. On the whole, the
young researchers are dissatisfied with their material position, working conditions, as well as
with support provided by their institutions and the Ministry of Education, Science and
Technological Development. More than half of doctoral students do not have housing problem
adequately solved (they live with parents or in rented apartments) and this is one of the most
important problems of young researchers. Scholarships for doctoral studies are extremely high,
and only a small number of doctoral students have the status of funded students. Lack of funds
for scientific conferences and study trips abroad, the unavailability of literature and lack of funds
for research are the biggest problems for the scientific development of young researchers.
PB  - Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka
T1  - Mehanizmi podrške i uslovi za rad mladih istraživača u društvenim naukama
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1471
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Kleut, Jelena and Ocokoljić, Slobodan and Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Predmet ove studije su položaj i uslovi za rad mladih istraživača u društvenim i humanističkim
naukama u Srbiji i, konkretno, mehanizmi podrške koje imaju na raspolaganju. Ključna pitanja
na koje studija pruža odgovore su: 1) koje su osnovne socio-ekonomske karakteristike mladih
istraživača (porodično stanje, primanja, stambena situacija); 2) koje mere podrške su dostupne
mladim istraživačima, u kojoj meri se koriste i šta o njima misle doktorandi; 3) kako mladi
istraživači procenjuju uslove u kojima rade. Studija se temelji jednim delom na analizi
dokumenata i izveštaja relevantnih domaćih institucija i organizacija. S obzirom na to da se mere
unapređenja položaja mladih istraživača sprovode u kontekstu pridruživanja Srbije Evropskom
visokoobrazovnom prostoru i Evropskom istraživačkom prostoru, analizi domaćih mera
prethodni kratki pregled evropskih iskustava. Drugi, značajniji, deo rezultata potiče iz anketnog
istraživanja u kojem je učestvovalo 356 doktoranada iz oblasti društvenih i humanističkih
nauka. Među doktorandima mogu da se uoče četiri osnovne grupe u odnosu na status koji imaju
u naučno-obrazovnom sistemu: asistenti, istraživači saradnici, stipendisti i doktorandi bez
naučnih zvanja. Rezultati istraživanja pokazuju da više od polovine doktoranada nema naučna
zvanja i ne učestvuje u naučnim projektima koje realizuju njihove matične institucije. U celini
posmatrano mladi istraživači nezadovoljni su svojim materijalnim položajem, uslovima za rad,
kao i podrškom institucija i Ministarstva prosvete, nauke i tehnološkog razvoja. Preko polovine
doktoranada nema adekvatno rešeno stambeno pitanje (žive kod roditelja ili u iznajmljenim
stanovima) i ovo je jedan od najznačajnijih problema mladih istraživača. Školarine za doktorske
studije izuzetno su visoke, a tek manji broj doktoranada ima status budžetskih studenata.
Nedostatak sredstava za naučne skupove i studijske boravke u inostranstvu, nedostupnost
literature i nedovoljna materijalna sredstva za istraživanja predstavljaju najveće probleme za
naučni razvoj mladih istraživača., The subject of this study is status and working conditions of the young researchers in
humanities and social sciences in Serbia, and in particular support mechanisms that are
available to them. The key questions that the study answers are: 1) what are basic socioeconomic
characteristics of young researchers (family status, income, housing situation); 2)
what types of support are available to young researchers, to what extent are they used and what
doctoral students think of them; 3) how young researchers assess the conditions in which they
work. The study was based partly on an analysis of documents and reports of relevant local
institutions and organizations. Considering that measures to improve the position of young
researchers are conducted in the context of Serbian integration into the European Higher
Education Area and European Research Area, the analysis of domestic measures is preceded by a
brief overview of European experiences. The second, more important, part of the results
originates from research survey, which included 356 doctoral students in the field of social
sciences and humanities. Among doctoral students four basic groups according to the status they
have in the scientific-educational system can be identifies: teaching assistants, research
assistants, stipend holders and doctoral students without scientific titles. The survey results
show that more than half of doctoral students do not have scientific positions and do not
participate in the research projects implemented by their home institution. On the whole, the
young researchers are dissatisfied with their material position, working conditions, as well as
with support provided by their institutions and the Ministry of Education, Science and
Technological Development. More than half of doctoral students do not have housing problem
adequately solved (they live with parents or in rented apartments) and this is one of the most
important problems of young researchers. Scholarships for doctoral studies are extremely high,
and only a small number of doctoral students have the status of funded students. Lack of funds
for scientific conferences and study trips abroad, the unavailability of literature and lack of funds
for research are the biggest problems for the scientific development of young researchers.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka",
title = "Mehanizmi podrške i uslovi za rad mladih istraživača u društvenim naukama",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1471"
}

Kleut, J., Ocokoljić, S.,& Radovanović, B.. (2015). Mehanizmi podrške i uslovi za rad mladih istraživača u društvenim naukama. 
Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1471

Kleut J, Ocokoljić S, Radovanović B. Mehanizmi podrške i uslovi za rad mladih istraživača u društvenim naukama. 2015;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1471 .

Kleut, Jelena, Ocokoljić, Slobodan, Radovanović, Bojana, "Mehanizmi podrške i uslovi za rad mladih istraživača u društvenim naukama" (2015),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1471 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Krstić, Nemanja
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1423
AB  - Cilj ove studije je da pruži prikaz toga kako doktorandi/tkinje iz društveno-humanističkih
oblasti percipiraju i ocenjuju različite aspekte programa doktorskih studija, kao i programe
neformalnog obrazovanja. Studija se temelji jednim delom na analizi strateško zakonodavnog
okvira doktorskih programa i programa neformalnog obrazovanja u zemlji. Budući da se
reforme visokog obrazovanja sprovode u kontekstu pridruživanja Srbije Evropskom
visokoobrazovnom prostoru i Evropskom istraživačkom prostoru, analizi domaćeg prethodni
kratki pregled evropskog okvira doktorskih studija. Drugi, značajniji, deo studije čine rezultati
anketnog istraživanja u kojem je učestvovalo 356 doktoranada iz oblasti društvenih i
humanističkih nauka. Rezultati istraživanja pokazuju da postoji čitav niz oblasti u okviru
programa doktorskih studija kojima doktorandi nisu zadovojni. Najpre, internacionalnost
fakulteta je na niskom nivou. Studenti nisu zadovoljni udelom gostujućih inostranih predavača,
kao ni saradnjom sa inostranim fakultetima i mogućnostima za mobilnost i razmenu. Tome se
pridružuje i nedovoljna interdisciplinarnost studijskih programa. Kada se govori o ishodima
studiranja, doktorandi su podeljenog mišljenja. Na jednoj strani stoji mišljenje da su teorijska
znanja dovoljno opsežna da omogućuju da studenti kroz svoje doktorske radove daju doprinos
rastu teorijskog znanja. Na drugoj, stoji ocena da studije ne opremaju veštinama i znanjima koja
su neophodna za realizaciju empirijskih i primenjenih istraživanja. Doktorandi su generalno
zadovoljni načinom ocenjivanja njihovog rada, kao i saradnjom sa mentorima i drugim
profesorima. Što se formalno-tehničkih aspekata studiranja tiče, rezultati ukazuju na nužnost da
se povećaju ulaganja u obezbeđivanje adekvatnijih prostorija za rad i bolji pristup relevantnoj
literaturi, ali i najvažnije, korekciju visina školarina. Čak dve trećine studenata nezadovoljno je
visinom školarine na doktorskim studijama. Sumirajući rezultate iskustva sa neformalnim
obrazovanjem, možemo reći da doktorandi vide neformalno obrazovanje kao izvor znanja i
veština koje nisu imali priliku da steknu u formalnom obrazovanju. Na kraju, naglasimo da, iako
se državnim strategijama prepoznaju glavni nedostaci doktorskih studija, te iako je prepoznat
veliki broj neusklađenosti između programa trećeg stepena obrazovanja u Srbiji i određenih
evropskih principa, neophodno je konkretnije aktiviranje državnih institucija u proces
podsticaja reformi, ali i još važnije, njihove konačne primene u praksi.
AB  - The aim of this study is to provide an overview of how PhD students perceive and evaluate
different aspects of doctoral programs, as well as programs of informal education. The study is
based partly on an analysis of strategic and legislative framework of doctoral programs and
informal education programs in the country. Since the higher education reform has been
implemented in the context of Serbia's accession to the European Higher Education Area and
European Research Area, a brief overview of the European framework of doctoral studies is
provided. The central part of the study is the analysis of a survey, which included 356 doctoral
students in the field of social sciences and humanities. The research results show that there is a
whole range of areas within doctoral programs which PhD students are dissatisfied. Firstly,
internationalization is at a low level. Students are not satisfied with the number of visiting
international lecturers, as well as with the cooperation with foreign universities and
opportunities for mobility and exchange. In addition, the lack of interdisciplinary programmes is stressed. There are divided opinions about the outcomes of study. On the one hand, there is the view that theoretical knowledge they acquire is broad enough to allow students to contribute to its growth. On the other hand, there is the assessment that the studies do not equip students with the skills and knowledge that are necessary for realization of empirical and applied research. PhD students are generally satisfied with the evaluation of their work, as well as with the cooperation with mentors and other professors. When it comes to formal and technical aspects of studying, the results point to the need to increase investment in the provision of adequate facilities for work and better access to literature. A correction of tuition fees is perceived as an urgent need, since as much as two-thirds of students are dissatisfied with the amount of tuition fees they pay. Summing up the experience of informal education, we can say that doctoral candidates see informal education as a source of knowledge and skills that they do have the opportunity to gain through formal education. Finally, we would like to emphasize that national strategies recognize the main shortcomings of doctoral studies and they also recognize a large number of discrepancies between the programs of the third level of education in Serbia and certain European principles. However, it is necessary that the state institutions incentivise process of reforms, and most importantly, that they assure their implementation in the practice.
PB  - Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka
T1  - Studijski program i neformalno obrazovanje iz perspektive mladih istraživača
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1423
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Krstić, Nemanja and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2015",
abstract = "Cilj ove studije je da pruži prikaz toga kako doktorandi/tkinje iz društveno-humanističkih
oblasti percipiraju i ocenjuju različite aspekte programa doktorskih studija, kao i programe
neformalnog obrazovanja. Studija se temelji jednim delom na analizi strateško zakonodavnog
okvira doktorskih programa i programa neformalnog obrazovanja u zemlji. Budući da se
reforme visokog obrazovanja sprovode u kontekstu pridruživanja Srbije Evropskom
visokoobrazovnom prostoru i Evropskom istraživačkom prostoru, analizi domaćeg prethodni
kratki pregled evropskog okvira doktorskih studija. Drugi, značajniji, deo studije čine rezultati
anketnog istraživanja u kojem je učestvovalo 356 doktoranada iz oblasti društvenih i
humanističkih nauka. Rezultati istraživanja pokazuju da postoji čitav niz oblasti u okviru
programa doktorskih studija kojima doktorandi nisu zadovojni. Najpre, internacionalnost
fakulteta je na niskom nivou. Studenti nisu zadovoljni udelom gostujućih inostranih predavača,
kao ni saradnjom sa inostranim fakultetima i mogućnostima za mobilnost i razmenu. Tome se
pridružuje i nedovoljna interdisciplinarnost studijskih programa. Kada se govori o ishodima
studiranja, doktorandi su podeljenog mišljenja. Na jednoj strani stoji mišljenje da su teorijska
znanja dovoljno opsežna da omogućuju da studenti kroz svoje doktorske radove daju doprinos
rastu teorijskog znanja. Na drugoj, stoji ocena da studije ne opremaju veštinama i znanjima koja
su neophodna za realizaciju empirijskih i primenjenih istraživanja. Doktorandi su generalno
zadovoljni načinom ocenjivanja njihovog rada, kao i saradnjom sa mentorima i drugim
profesorima. Što se formalno-tehničkih aspekata studiranja tiče, rezultati ukazuju na nužnost da
se povećaju ulaganja u obezbeđivanje adekvatnijih prostorija za rad i bolji pristup relevantnoj
literaturi, ali i najvažnije, korekciju visina školarina. Čak dve trećine studenata nezadovoljno je
visinom školarine na doktorskim studijama. Sumirajući rezultate iskustva sa neformalnim
obrazovanjem, možemo reći da doktorandi vide neformalno obrazovanje kao izvor znanja i
veština koje nisu imali priliku da steknu u formalnom obrazovanju. Na kraju, naglasimo da, iako
se državnim strategijama prepoznaju glavni nedostaci doktorskih studija, te iako je prepoznat
veliki broj neusklađenosti između programa trećeg stepena obrazovanja u Srbiji i određenih
evropskih principa, neophodno je konkretnije aktiviranje državnih institucija u proces
podsticaja reformi, ali i još važnije, njihove konačne primene u praksi., The aim of this study is to provide an overview of how PhD students perceive and evaluate
different aspects of doctoral programs, as well as programs of informal education. The study is
based partly on an analysis of strategic and legislative framework of doctoral programs and
informal education programs in the country. Since the higher education reform has been
implemented in the context of Serbia's accession to the European Higher Education Area and
European Research Area, a brief overview of the European framework of doctoral studies is
provided. The central part of the study is the analysis of a survey, which included 356 doctoral
students in the field of social sciences and humanities. The research results show that there is a
whole range of areas within doctoral programs which PhD students are dissatisfied. Firstly,
internationalization is at a low level. Students are not satisfied with the number of visiting
international lecturers, as well as with the cooperation with foreign universities and
opportunities for mobility and exchange. In addition, the lack of interdisciplinary programmes is stressed. There are divided opinions about the outcomes of study. On the one hand, there is the view that theoretical knowledge they acquire is broad enough to allow students to contribute to its growth. On the other hand, there is the assessment that the studies do not equip students with the skills and knowledge that are necessary for realization of empirical and applied research. PhD students are generally satisfied with the evaluation of their work, as well as with the cooperation with mentors and other professors. When it comes to formal and technical aspects of studying, the results point to the need to increase investment in the provision of adequate facilities for work and better access to literature. A correction of tuition fees is perceived as an urgent need, since as much as two-thirds of students are dissatisfied with the amount of tuition fees they pay. Summing up the experience of informal education, we can say that doctoral candidates see informal education as a source of knowledge and skills that they do have the opportunity to gain through formal education. Finally, we would like to emphasize that national strategies recognize the main shortcomings of doctoral studies and they also recognize a large number of discrepancies between the programs of the third level of education in Serbia and certain European principles. However, it is necessary that the state institutions incentivise process of reforms, and most importantly, that they assure their implementation in the practice.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka",
title = "Studijski program i neformalno obrazovanje iz perspektive mladih istraživača",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1423"
}

Krstić, N., Pudar Draško, G.,& Radovanović, B.. (2015). Studijski program i neformalno obrazovanje iz perspektive mladih istraživača. 
Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1423

Krstić N, Pudar Draško G, Radovanović B. Studijski program i neformalno obrazovanje iz perspektive mladih istraživača. 2015;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1423 .

Krstić, Nemanja, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Radovanović, Bojana, "Studijski program i neformalno obrazovanje iz perspektive mladih istraživača" (2015),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1423 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/256
AB  - U okviru ovog rada analizirali smo Senov koncept kontrapreferen- cijalnog izbora. Sen ovim konceptom ukazuje na slabosti teorije racionalnog izbora, prema kojoj donosilac odluka uvek može biti viđen kao neko ko maksimizira svoju korisnost, a svaki njegov izbor kao opcija koja mu pruža najviši nivo blagostanja. Sen tvrdi da u nekim situacijama biramo opcije koje nam donose niži nivo korisnosti u odnosu na onaj koji bismo ostvarili da smo izabrali neku drugu opciju koja nam je bila na raspolaganju. To je slučaj kada izbor vršimo na osnovu moralnih načela, kada postupamo iz dužnosti. Sen ovakvu radnju naziva radnjom iz obaveze. Kada postupamo iz obaveze mi zapravo zanemarujemo svoje preferencije i vršimo kontrapreferencijalni izbor, kako Sen tvrdi. U okviru ovog rada pokazaćemo da, nasuprot Senovoj tvrdnji, i radnju iz obaveze možemo objasniti teorijom racionalnog izbora. Međutim, ako bilo koji izbor koji činimo može biti objašnjen ovom teorijom, kada u sve što činimo može biti učitana maksimizacija korisnosti, onda se raznolikost motiva koji nas pokreću gubi i eksplanatorna moć teorije racionalnog izbora dovodi u pitanje.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - Radnja iz obaveze : teorija racionalnog izbora i Senov koncept kontrapreferencijalnog izbora
SP  - 313
EP  - 322
DO  - 10.2298/FID1403313R
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2014",
abstract = "U okviru ovog rada analizirali smo Senov koncept kontrapreferen- cijalnog izbora. Sen ovim konceptom ukazuje na slabosti teorije racionalnog izbora, prema kojoj donosilac odluka uvek može biti viđen kao neko ko maksimizira svoju korisnost, a svaki njegov izbor kao opcija koja mu pruža najviši nivo blagostanja. Sen tvrdi da u nekim situacijama biramo opcije koje nam donose niži nivo korisnosti u odnosu na onaj koji bismo ostvarili da smo izabrali neku drugu opciju koja nam je bila na raspolaganju. To je slučaj kada izbor vršimo na osnovu moralnih načela, kada postupamo iz dužnosti. Sen ovakvu radnju naziva radnjom iz obaveze. Kada postupamo iz obaveze mi zapravo zanemarujemo svoje preferencije i vršimo kontrapreferencijalni izbor, kako Sen tvrdi. U okviru ovog rada pokazaćemo da, nasuprot Senovoj tvrdnji, i radnju iz obaveze možemo objasniti teorijom racionalnog izbora. Međutim, ako bilo koji izbor koji činimo može biti objašnjen ovom teorijom, kada u sve što činimo može biti učitana maksimizacija korisnosti, onda se raznolikost motiva koji nas pokreću gubi i eksplanatorna moć teorije racionalnog izbora dovodi u pitanje.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "Radnja iz obaveze : teorija racionalnog izbora i Senov koncept kontrapreferencijalnog izbora",
pages = "313-322",
doi = "10.2298/FID1403313R"
}

Radovanović, B.. (2014). Radnja iz obaveze : teorija racionalnog izbora i Senov koncept kontrapreferencijalnog izbora. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 313-322.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1403313R

Radovanović B. Radnja iz obaveze : teorija racionalnog izbora i Senov koncept kontrapreferencijalnog izbora. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2014;:313-322.
doi:10.2298/FID1403313R .

Radovanović, Bojana, "Radnja iz obaveze : teorija racionalnog izbora i Senov koncept kontrapreferencijalnog izbora" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society (2014):313-322,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1403313R . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1524
AB  - The aim of this paper is two-fold. On the one hand, it aims at presenting discussion on advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to well-being, its indicators and measures. On the other, it aims at presenting empirical evidence on the level of well-being of the peoples in the Western Balkan region.
Although resources are necessary for the good-quality life, personal well-being cannot be fully assessed by looking only at the resources people have command of. The alternatives areto focus on people’s subjective well-being, then to create certain objective measure of well-being, as the one within human development approach, or the combination of the two, as within gross national happiness concept or happy planet approach. According to the available data on well-being in the countries of the Western Balkan region for 2012, Croatia is the only country in the region that belongs to a group of upper middle income countries, and which also records high human development. The others  are  middle  income  countries  with  medium  level  of  human  development.  It  is  interesting noticing that Albania, which is with Bosnia and Herzegovina at the bottom of the list based on the gross national income (GNI) per capita and human development index (HDI), is region’s leader in the happy  planet  index  (HPI),  and  among  top  20  countries  in  the  world  based  on  this  indicator, particularly due to low level of ecological footprint. According the data on the subjective well-being, we can notice that the greatest satisfaction with one’s life is experienced by the people in Croatia. It is also noticeable that reportedly more people in the Western Balkans experience positive feelings than they feel the negative.
AB  - Cilj  ovog  rada  je  dvostruk.  Sa  jedne  strane,  on ima  za  cilj  analizu  prednosti  i nedostataka različitih pristupa blagostanju, a sa druge da predstavi empirijske podatke o stepenu blagostanja  u  zemljama  Zapadnog  Balkana.  Iako  su  finansijska  sredstva  neophodna  za  kvalitetan život,  ona  ne  mogu  biti  adekvatan  indikator  blagostanja.  Alternative  su  formiranje  subjektivnog pokazatelja  blagostanja,  potraga  za  objektivnim  merilima,  kakav  je  koncept  ljudskog  razvoja,  ili kombinacija ova dva pristupa, kao u slučaju bruto društvene sreće ili pristupa srećne planete. Prema raspoloživim podacima o blagostanja u zemljama Zapadnog Balkana za 2012. godinu, Hrvatska je jedina  zemlja  u  regionu  koja  pripada  grupi  zemalja 
sa  gornjim  srednjim  dohotkom  po  glavi stanovnika, koja takođe beleži i visok nivo ljudskog razvoja. Ostale zemlje su u grupi zemalja sa srednjim dohotkom po glavi stanovnika i srednjim nivoom ljudskog razvoja. Zanimljivo je primetiti i to da Albanija, koja je sa Bosnom i Hercegovinom na dnu liste na osnovu bruto nacionalnog dohotka (BND) po glavi stanovnika i indeksa ljudskog razvoja (HDI), regionalni lider prema indeksu srećne planete (HPI) i među prvih 20 zemalja u svetu prema ovom pokazatelju, prenstveno zbog niskog nivoa ekološkog otiska. Što se tiče subjektivnih pokazatelja blagostanja, najveće zadovoljstvo svojim životom doživljavaju stanovnici Hrvatske. Primetno je i da veći broj ispitanika u zemljama Zapadnog Balkana svedoči da doživljavaju pozitivna osećanja nego što je to broj onih koji svedoče o negativni.
PB  - Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka
T2  - Economic Analysis
T1  - Well-Being – Resources, Happiness and Capabilities: Theoretical Discussions and the Evidence from the Western Balkans
T1  - Blagostanje - resursi, sreća i sposobnosti: teorijska ana liza i stanje na Zapadnom Balkanu
IS  - 3-4
VL  - 46
SP  - 152
EP  - 163
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1524
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2013",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is two-fold. On the one hand, it aims at presenting discussion on advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to well-being, its indicators and measures. On the other, it aims at presenting empirical evidence on the level of well-being of the peoples in the Western Balkan region.
Although resources are necessary for the good-quality life, personal well-being cannot be fully assessed by looking only at the resources people have command of. The alternatives areto focus on people’s subjective well-being, then to create certain objective measure of well-being, as the one within human development approach, or the combination of the two, as within gross national happiness concept or happy planet approach. According to the available data on well-being in the countries of the Western Balkan region for 2012, Croatia is the only country in the region that belongs to a group of upper middle income countries, and which also records high human development. The others  are  middle  income  countries  with  medium  level  of  human  development.  It  is  interesting noticing that Albania, which is with Bosnia and Herzegovina at the bottom of the list based on the gross national income (GNI) per capita and human development index (HDI), is region’s leader in the happy  planet  index  (HPI),  and  among  top  20  countries  in  the  world  based  on  this  indicator, particularly due to low level of ecological footprint. According the data on the subjective well-being, we can notice that the greatest satisfaction with one’s life is experienced by the people in Croatia. It is also noticeable that reportedly more people in the Western Balkans experience positive feelings than they feel the negative., Cilj  ovog  rada  je  dvostruk.  Sa  jedne  strane,  on ima  za  cilj  analizu  prednosti  i nedostataka različitih pristupa blagostanju, a sa druge da predstavi empirijske podatke o stepenu blagostanja  u  zemljama  Zapadnog  Balkana.  Iako  su  finansijska  sredstva  neophodna  za  kvalitetan život,  ona  ne  mogu  biti  adekvatan  indikator  blagostanja.  Alternative  su  formiranje  subjektivnog pokazatelja  blagostanja,  potraga  za  objektivnim  merilima,  kakav  je  koncept  ljudskog  razvoja,  ili kombinacija ova dva pristupa, kao u slučaju bruto društvene sreće ili pristupa srećne planete. Prema raspoloživim podacima o blagostanja u zemljama Zapadnog Balkana za 2012. godinu, Hrvatska je jedina  zemlja  u  regionu  koja  pripada  grupi  zemalja 
sa  gornjim  srednjim  dohotkom  po  glavi stanovnika, koja takođe beleži i visok nivo ljudskog razvoja. Ostale zemlje su u grupi zemalja sa srednjim dohotkom po glavi stanovnika i srednjim nivoom ljudskog razvoja. Zanimljivo je primetiti i to da Albanija, koja je sa Bosnom i Hercegovinom na dnu liste na osnovu bruto nacionalnog dohotka (BND) po glavi stanovnika i indeksa ljudskog razvoja (HDI), regionalni lider prema indeksu srećne planete (HPI) i među prvih 20 zemalja u svetu prema ovom pokazatelju, prenstveno zbog niskog nivoa ekološkog otiska. Što se tiče subjektivnih pokazatelja blagostanja, najveće zadovoljstvo svojim životom doživljavaju stanovnici Hrvatske. Primetno je i da veći broj ispitanika u zemljama Zapadnog Balkana svedoči da doživljavaju pozitivna osećanja nego što je to broj onih koji svedoče o negativni.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka",
journal = "Economic Analysis",
title = "Well-Being – Resources, Happiness and Capabilities: Theoretical Discussions and the Evidence from the Western Balkans, Blagostanje - resursi, sreća i sposobnosti: teorijska ana liza i stanje na Zapadnom Balkanu",
number = "3-4",
volume = "46",
pages = "152-163",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1524"
}

Radovanović, B.. (2013). Well-Being – Resources, Happiness and Capabilities: Theoretical Discussions and the Evidence from the Western Balkans. in Economic Analysis
Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka., 46(3-4), 152-163.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1524

Radovanović B. Well-Being – Resources, Happiness and Capabilities: Theoretical Discussions and the Evidence from the Western Balkans. in Economic Analysis. 2013;46(3-4):152-163.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1524 .

Radovanović, Bojana, "Well-Being – Resources, Happiness and Capabilities: Theoretical Discussions and the Evidence from the Western Balkans" in Economic Analysis, 46, no. 3-4 (2013):152-163,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1524 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
AU  - Kočović, Milica
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://www.library.ien.bg.ac.rs/index.php/zb/article/view/480
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1526
AB  - This paper argues that industrial policy, defined as a conscious effort on the part of government to
encourage and promote a specific industry or sector, is an indispensable tool for economic
development. Serbia is experiencing a process of de-industrialisation since 1990s. During the period 2001-2012 its industry has been growing at an average annual rate of 0.2%, but it however still did not reach the output of the late 1989. The share of industry in GDP has been decreased, as well as the share in the labour productivity. Moreover, employment in industry has sharply decreased. Serbian exports are dominated mostly by primary and labour- and resource-intensive products making unfavourable export structure. This paper argues that devastated industry of Serbia cannot recover without conscious efforts on the part of government.
PB  - Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka
T2  - Economic Sciences on the Crossroad
T1  - Industrial Policy for Economic Development: The Perspectives for Serbia
SP  - 216
EP  - 226
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1526
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Radovanović, Bojana and Kočović, Milica",
year = "2013",
abstract = "This paper argues that industrial policy, defined as a conscious effort on the part of government to
encourage and promote a specific industry or sector, is an indispensable tool for economic
development. Serbia is experiencing a process of de-industrialisation since 1990s. During the period 2001-2012 its industry has been growing at an average annual rate of 0.2%, but it however still did not reach the output of the late 1989. The share of industry in GDP has been decreased, as well as the share in the labour productivity. Moreover, employment in industry has sharply decreased. Serbian exports are dominated mostly by primary and labour- and resource-intensive products making unfavourable export structure. This paper argues that devastated industry of Serbia cannot recover without conscious efforts on the part of government.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka",
journal = "Economic Sciences on the Crossroad",
booktitle = "Industrial Policy for Economic Development: The Perspectives for Serbia",
pages = "216-226",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1526"
}

Radovanović, B.,& Kočović, M.. (2013). Industrial Policy for Economic Development: The Perspectives for Serbia. in Economic Sciences on the Crossroad
Beograd : Institut ekonomskih nauka., 216-226.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1526

Radovanović B, Kočović M. Industrial Policy for Economic Development: The Perspectives for Serbia. in Economic Sciences on the Crossroad. 2013;:216-226.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1526 .

Radovanović, Bojana, Kočović, Milica, "Industrial Policy for Economic Development: The Perspectives for Serbia" in Economic Sciences on the Crossroad (2013):216-226,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1526 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pržulj, Živka
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://www.library.ien.bg.ac.rs/index.php/zb/article/download/473/426
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1523
AB  - The aim of this chapter is to examine whether corporate governance in Serbia is
based on affirmation of responsible and ethical conduct. The concept of corporate
governance refers to the system by which companies are managed and controlled in
order to generate long term economic value for its shareholders, while respecting the
interests of stakeholders and society as a whole. Companies’ responsibility towards
their stakeholders is recognized as a principle of good corporate governance. In this
chapter, we present results of the poll on the managers’ attitudes towards business
ethics and corporate social responsibility in Serbian business environment. We found
out that managers are uniformed in the belief that companies have responsibilities
towards their stakeholders: employees, business partners, suppliers, customers,
community and environment. In addition, they are of the opinion that ethical
behaviour and business success could go along, and also that immoral conduct is not
justified in business. Nevertheless, most of examined managers see current business
environment in Serbia as an uncompromising struggle. We can conclude that while
managers’ attitudes towards business form a solid basis for the affirmation of
principles and improved corporate governance, the perception of business
environment as an uncompromising struggle indicate that current business practice
in Serbia, in fact, hinder ethical and responsible conduct and reflect its opposite.
PB  - Coimbra : Faculty of Economics of the University of Coimbra
T2  - Managing Structural Changes: Trends and Requirements
T1  - Affirmation of Principles and Improved Corporate Governance in Serbia - Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility
SP  - 346
EP  - 359
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1523
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Pržulj, Živka and Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2012",
abstract = "The aim of this chapter is to examine whether corporate governance in Serbia is
based on affirmation of responsible and ethical conduct. The concept of corporate
governance refers to the system by which companies are managed and controlled in
order to generate long term economic value for its shareholders, while respecting the
interests of stakeholders and society as a whole. Companies’ responsibility towards
their stakeholders is recognized as a principle of good corporate governance. In this
chapter, we present results of the poll on the managers’ attitudes towards business
ethics and corporate social responsibility in Serbian business environment. We found
out that managers are uniformed in the belief that companies have responsibilities
towards their stakeholders: employees, business partners, suppliers, customers,
community and environment. In addition, they are of the opinion that ethical
behaviour and business success could go along, and also that immoral conduct is not
justified in business. Nevertheless, most of examined managers see current business
environment in Serbia as an uncompromising struggle. We can conclude that while
managers’ attitudes towards business form a solid basis for the affirmation of
principles and improved corporate governance, the perception of business
environment as an uncompromising struggle indicate that current business practice
in Serbia, in fact, hinder ethical and responsible conduct and reflect its opposite.",
publisher = "Coimbra : Faculty of Economics of the University of Coimbra",
journal = "Managing Structural Changes: Trends and Requirements",
booktitle = "Affirmation of Principles and Improved Corporate Governance in Serbia - Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility",
pages = "346-359",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1523"
}

Pržulj, Ž.,& Radovanović, B.. (2012). Affirmation of Principles and Improved Corporate Governance in Serbia - Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. in Managing Structural Changes: Trends and Requirements
Coimbra : Faculty of Economics of the University of Coimbra., 346-359.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1523

Pržulj Ž, Radovanović B. Affirmation of Principles and Improved Corporate Governance in Serbia - Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. in Managing Structural Changes: Trends and Requirements. 2012;:346-359.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1523 .

Pržulj, Živka, Radovanović, Bojana, "Affirmation of Principles and Improved Corporate Governance in Serbia - Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility" in Managing Structural Changes: Trends and Requirements (2012):346-359,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1523 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/419
AB  - Each of us makes a number of decisions, from the less important to those with far-reaching consequences. As members of different groups, we are also actors of group decision making. In order to make a rational decision, a choice-making procedure must satisfy a number of assumptions (conditions) of rationality. In addition, when it comes to group decisions, those procedures should also be “fair.” However, it is not possible to define a procedure of choice-making that would transform individual orders of alternatives based on preferences of perfectly rational individuals into a single social order and still meet conditions of rationality and ethics. The theory of deliberative democracy appeared in response to the impossibility of Social Choice theory. The basic assumption of deliberative democracy is that individuals adjust their preferences taking into account interests of the community. They are open for discussion with other group members and are willing to change their attitudes in order to achieve common interests. Ideally, group members come to an agreement during public discussion (deliberation). Still, this concept cannot completely overcome all the difficulties posed by the theory of social choice. Specifically, there is no solution for strategic and manipulative behavior of individuals. Also, the concept of deliberative democracy faces certain problems particular to this approach, such as, to name but a few, problems with the establishment of equality of participants in the debate and their motivation, as well as problems with the organization of public hearings.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Individualno odlučivanje, grupno odlučivanje i deliberacija
T1  - Individual Decision Making, Group Decision Making and Deliberation
SP  - 147
EP  - 167
DO  - 10.2298/FID1202147R
ER  - 

@article{
editor = "Milidrag, Predrag",
author = "Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2012",
abstract = "Each of us makes a number of decisions, from the less important to those with far-reaching consequences. As members of different groups, we are also actors of group decision making. In order to make a rational decision, a choice-making procedure must satisfy a number of assumptions (conditions) of rationality. In addition, when it comes to group decisions, those procedures should also be “fair.” However, it is not possible to define a procedure of choice-making that would transform individual orders of alternatives based on preferences of perfectly rational individuals into a single social order and still meet conditions of rationality and ethics. The theory of deliberative democracy appeared in response to the impossibility of Social Choice theory. The basic assumption of deliberative democracy is that individuals adjust their preferences taking into account interests of the community. They are open for discussion with other group members and are willing to change their attitudes in order to achieve common interests. Ideally, group members come to an agreement during public discussion (deliberation). Still, this concept cannot completely overcome all the difficulties posed by the theory of social choice. Specifically, there is no solution for strategic and manipulative behavior of individuals. Also, the concept of deliberative democracy faces certain problems particular to this approach, such as, to name but a few, problems with the establishment of equality of participants in the debate and their motivation, as well as problems with the organization of public hearings.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Individualno odlučivanje, grupno odlučivanje i deliberacija, Individual Decision Making, Group Decision Making and Deliberation",
pages = "147-167",
doi = "10.2298/FID1202147R"
}

Milidrag, P.,& Radovanović, B.. (2012). Individualno odlučivanje, grupno odlučivanje i deliberacija. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 147-167.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1202147R

Milidrag P, Radovanović B. Individualno odlučivanje, grupno odlučivanje i deliberacija. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2012;:147-167.
doi:10.2298/FID1202147R .

Milidrag, Predrag, Radovanović, Bojana, "Individualno odlučivanje, grupno odlučivanje i deliberacija" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2012):147-167,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1202147R . .