Conić, Ljubica

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
9be14f6b-b9ff-4a83-89a2-6d57257ae5c9
  • Conić, Ljubica (3)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Outcome Bias in Judging Revenge Pornography Toward Women

Mijatović, Nevena; Lazarević, Aleksandra; Šljivić, Jasmina; Conić, Ljubica

(Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd, 2022)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Mijatović, Nevena
AU  - Lazarević, Aleksandra
AU  - Šljivić, Jasmina
AU  - Conić, Ljubica
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2935
AB  - Revenge pornography refers to any kind of uploading or publishing private photos or videos of someone without their consent. At the beginning of 2021, the public in the Balkans region found out about private groups on social networks, counting around 30,000 participants, mostly men, involved in revenge pornography toward women. Laws in Serbia do not explicitly prohibit revenge pornography. In this study, we wanted to examine whether legal consequences for the perpetrator would affect the negative public opinion of revenge pornography acts. The sample consisted of 509 participants (70% women), with an average age of 36.5 (SD = 13.2), and slightly more liberal according to self-assessment on a broad social attitudes scale ranging from 1 - liberal to 7 - conservative (M = 3.1, SD = 1.5). Firstly, all participants read a vignette describing a bogus case of a woman whose pictures a man posted online. Further, half of them read the second part about the legal consequences the perpetrator has suffered for his act - imprisonment, while the other half of participants read that he was not punished due to revenge pornography not being officially prohibited in our country. All participants provided judgment of the act itself on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 - very bad to 7 - very good, as well as their opinion on who is to blame for this act, also on a 7-point scale: 1 - the woman, 4 - both equally, 7 - the man. These judgements were provided twice, once after reading the first part of the vignette and after reading the second part. We expected that change in judgments would be led by outcome bias. Actually, in both of the judgment measurements, 90% of participants marked the act of the man as very bad. Due to the ceiling effect, we did not proceed with the planned analysis of change. The distribution of answers on the responsibility scale was trimodal (on word anchors) and negatively asymmetric because 52% of participants said that the man should take responsibility. We did not test if the change in victim-blaming is moderated by gender because of the insufficient number of men per experimental group. Whatsoever, a Wilcoxson signed-rank test (W = 50.50, p = .007) showed that all participants who read about the legal consequences blamed the perpetrator slightly more afterwards, which did not happen in the other group (W = 47.00, p = .054). Legal consequences can reduce victim-blaming and consequently form a social norm by which revenge pornography toward women is perceived as deviant behaviour.
PB  - Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd
C3  - [Knjiga rezimea] / XXVIII naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji
T1  - Outcome Bias in Judging Revenge Pornography Toward Women
IS  - 1
SP  - 117
EP  - 117
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2935
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Mijatović, Nevena and Lazarević, Aleksandra and Šljivić, Jasmina and Conić, Ljubica",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Revenge pornography refers to any kind of uploading or publishing private photos or videos of someone without their consent. At the beginning of 2021, the public in the Balkans region found out about private groups on social networks, counting around 30,000 participants, mostly men, involved in revenge pornography toward women. Laws in Serbia do not explicitly prohibit revenge pornography. In this study, we wanted to examine whether legal consequences for the perpetrator would affect the negative public opinion of revenge pornography acts. The sample consisted of 509 participants (70% women), with an average age of 36.5 (SD = 13.2), and slightly more liberal according to self-assessment on a broad social attitudes scale ranging from 1 - liberal to 7 - conservative (M = 3.1, SD = 1.5). Firstly, all participants read a vignette describing a bogus case of a woman whose pictures a man posted online. Further, half of them read the second part about the legal consequences the perpetrator has suffered for his act - imprisonment, while the other half of participants read that he was not punished due to revenge pornography not being officially prohibited in our country. All participants provided judgment of the act itself on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 - very bad to 7 - very good, as well as their opinion on who is to blame for this act, also on a 7-point scale: 1 - the woman, 4 - both equally, 7 - the man. These judgements were provided twice, once after reading the first part of the vignette and after reading the second part. We expected that change in judgments would be led by outcome bias. Actually, in both of the judgment measurements, 90% of participants marked the act of the man as very bad. Due to the ceiling effect, we did not proceed with the planned analysis of change. The distribution of answers on the responsibility scale was trimodal (on word anchors) and negatively asymmetric because 52% of participants said that the man should take responsibility. We did not test if the change in victim-blaming is moderated by gender because of the insufficient number of men per experimental group. Whatsoever, a Wilcoxson signed-rank test (W = 50.50, p = .007) showed that all participants who read about the legal consequences blamed the perpetrator slightly more afterwards, which did not happen in the other group (W = 47.00, p = .054). Legal consequences can reduce victim-blaming and consequently form a social norm by which revenge pornography toward women is perceived as deviant behaviour.",
publisher = "Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "[Knjiga rezimea] / XXVIII naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji",
title = "Outcome Bias in Judging Revenge Pornography Toward Women",
number = "1",
pages = "117-117",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2935"
}
Mijatović, N., Lazarević, A., Šljivić, J.,& Conić, L.. (2022). Outcome Bias in Judging Revenge Pornography Toward Women. in [Knjiga rezimea] / XXVIII naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji
Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd.(1), 117-117.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2935
Mijatović N, Lazarević A, Šljivić J, Conić L. Outcome Bias in Judging Revenge Pornography Toward Women. in [Knjiga rezimea] / XXVIII naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji. 2022;(1):117-117.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2935 .
Mijatović, Nevena, Lazarević, Aleksandra, Šljivić, Jasmina, Conić, Ljubica, "Outcome Bias in Judging Revenge Pornography Toward Women" in [Knjiga rezimea] / XXVIII naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji, no. 1 (2022):117-117,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2935 .

Who Blames Female Victims of Revenge Pornography?

Mijatović, Nevena; Conić, Ljubica; Lazarević, Aleksandra; Šljivić, Jasmina

(Beograd : Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, 2022)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Mijatović, Nevena
AU  - Conić, Ljubica
AU  - Lazarević, Aleksandra
AU  - Šljivić, Jasmina
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2934
AB  - Revenge pornography refers to any kind of uploading or publishing private photos or videos of someone without their consent. The public can often blame female victims of revenge pornography for engaging in the risky behaviour of taking nude pictures or videos in the first place. Certain individual and socio-demographic characteristics of the public can lead to victim-blaming. We wanted to see if characteristics relevant in the context of blaming rape victims for their victimisation, such as ambivalent sexism, moral foundations, conservatism, age and gender, contribute to blaming victims of revenge pornography. Convenient sample consisted of N = 364 participants (73.3% women), with an average age of 38.07 (SD = 13.74), and slightly more socio-liberal orientation, according to self-ssessment (a broad social attitudes 7-point scale ranging from 1-liberal to 7-conservative (M = 2.97, SD = 1.49)). In an online survey, participants were presented with a vignette describing a bogus case of a woman whose pictures a man posted on the internet. The participant's task was to assess who should take responsibility for this event on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1, meaning the woman, through 4, meaning both the woman and the man equally, to 7, meaning the man. The distribution of answers was trimodal (on word anchors) and negatively asymmetric because 52.2% of participants said that the man should take responsibility. After attributing responsibility, participants filled out the Ambivalent sexism inventory with 22 items (α = .91) and the Moral foundations questionnaire with 30 items (all five subscales, α = .66-.81). Regression model with sociodemographics, together with ambivalent sexism and moral progressivity, explained 19.8% of the variance in victim-blaming (F(5, 354) = 17.22, p < .001). Ambivalent sexism (β = -0.27, p < .001) contributed the most, followed by moral progressivity (β = 0.17, p = .01), while gender, age, and conservatism were not significant predictors. Content analysis of ambivalent sexist attitudes and less progressive moral foundations can help us create a substitute for the victim-blaming narrative around victims of revenge pornography which would still fit the mindset of current victim-blamers (e. g. “women take and share their private photos or videos to special men in their life to please them”). Besides the practical application, the study's findings contribute to the ongoing debate over the theoretical soundness of Moral foundations theory because holding less progressive moral foundations, which are exclusively proposed by this theory, leads to an apology for violence.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet
C3  - [Knjiga rezimea] / XXVIII naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji 31.mart–3. april 2022
T1  - Who Blames Female Victims of Revenge Pornography?
IS  - 1
SP  - 63
EP  - 63
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2934
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Mijatović, Nevena and Conić, Ljubica and Lazarević, Aleksandra and Šljivić, Jasmina",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Revenge pornography refers to any kind of uploading or publishing private photos or videos of someone without their consent. The public can often blame female victims of revenge pornography for engaging in the risky behaviour of taking nude pictures or videos in the first place. Certain individual and socio-demographic characteristics of the public can lead to victim-blaming. We wanted to see if characteristics relevant in the context of blaming rape victims for their victimisation, such as ambivalent sexism, moral foundations, conservatism, age and gender, contribute to blaming victims of revenge pornography. Convenient sample consisted of N = 364 participants (73.3% women), with an average age of 38.07 (SD = 13.74), and slightly more socio-liberal orientation, according to self-ssessment (a broad social attitudes 7-point scale ranging from 1-liberal to 7-conservative (M = 2.97, SD = 1.49)). In an online survey, participants were presented with a vignette describing a bogus case of a woman whose pictures a man posted on the internet. The participant's task was to assess who should take responsibility for this event on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1, meaning the woman, through 4, meaning both the woman and the man equally, to 7, meaning the man. The distribution of answers was trimodal (on word anchors) and negatively asymmetric because 52.2% of participants said that the man should take responsibility. After attributing responsibility, participants filled out the Ambivalent sexism inventory with 22 items (α = .91) and the Moral foundations questionnaire with 30 items (all five subscales, α = .66-.81). Regression model with sociodemographics, together with ambivalent sexism and moral progressivity, explained 19.8% of the variance in victim-blaming (F(5, 354) = 17.22, p < .001). Ambivalent sexism (β = -0.27, p < .001) contributed the most, followed by moral progressivity (β = 0.17, p = .01), while gender, age, and conservatism were not significant predictors. Content analysis of ambivalent sexist attitudes and less progressive moral foundations can help us create a substitute for the victim-blaming narrative around victims of revenge pornography which would still fit the mindset of current victim-blamers (e. g. “women take and share their private photos or videos to special men in their life to please them”). Besides the practical application, the study's findings contribute to the ongoing debate over the theoretical soundness of Moral foundations theory because holding less progressive moral foundations, which are exclusively proposed by this theory, leads to an apology for violence.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet",
journal = "[Knjiga rezimea] / XXVIII naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji 31.mart–3. april 2022",
title = "Who Blames Female Victims of Revenge Pornography?",
number = "1",
pages = "63-63",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2934"
}
Mijatović, N., Conić, L., Lazarević, A.,& Šljivić, J.. (2022). Who Blames Female Victims of Revenge Pornography?. in [Knjiga rezimea] / XXVIII naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji 31.mart–3. april 2022
Beograd : Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet.(1), 63-63.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2934
Mijatović N, Conić L, Lazarević A, Šljivić J. Who Blames Female Victims of Revenge Pornography?. in [Knjiga rezimea] / XXVIII naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji 31.mart–3. april 2022. 2022;(1):63-63.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2934 .
Mijatović, Nevena, Conić, Ljubica, Lazarević, Aleksandra, Šljivić, Jasmina, "Who Blames Female Victims of Revenge Pornography?" in [Knjiga rezimea] / XXVIII naučni skup Empirijska istraživanja u psihologiji 31.mart–3. april 2022, no. 1 (2022):63-63,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2934 .

Big Suppla: Challenging the Common View of the Supplements and Herbs Industry Affects the Willingness to Try and Recommend Their Products

Mijatović, Nevena; Šljivić, Jasmina; Tošić, Nemanja; Conić, Ljubica; Petrović, Marija; Žeželj, Iris

(Bratislava: Institute of Experimental Psychology Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences Slovak Academy of Sciences, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mijatović, Nevena
AU  - Šljivić, Jasmina
AU  - Tošić, Nemanja
AU  - Conić, Ljubica
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2786
AB  - Resorting to complementary/alternative medical (CAM) therapies can lead to bad health outcomes or interfere with officially recommended therapies. CAM use is, nevertheless, widespread and growing. This could be partially due to the perception of the CAM industry as powerless and non-profit oriented, in contrast to the pharmaceutical industry (“Big Pharma”). In reality, both industries are highly profitable and powerful; to highlight this similarity, science communicators coined the term “Big Suppla”. Drawing from a sample of 242 participants upon all exclusions, we experimentally tested whether varying these attributes in presenting the industries impacts consumers’ evaluation of the two categories of products (herbs and supplements) and their willingness to try and recommend them. We also tested whether the effect is moderated by conspiratorial thinking, and whether it is due to a change in trust. All hypotheses were pre-registered. As expected, participants who read the Big Suppla vignette decreased the endorsement of both supplements and herbs, whilst, against our hypotheses, there were no significant changes in endorsement in the contrasting “Baby Suppla” group. Conspiratorial thinking was related to more endorsement of CAM, but it did not moderate the experimental effects. We also did not observe the expected mediation by trust. Our most robust results corroborate the idea that challenging the myth of benevolence of the CAM industry makes people more critical in evaluating its products or considering their usage. They support the intuitions of science communicators who coined the term Big Suppla, and can help in tailoring public health messages.
PB  - Bratislava: Institute of Experimental Psychology Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences Slovak Academy of Sciences
T2  - Studia Psychologica
T1  - Big Suppla: Challenging the Common View of the Supplements and Herbs Industry Affects the Willingness to Try and Recommend Their Products
IS  - 1
VL  - 64
SP  - 91
EP  - 103
DO  - 10.31577/sp.2022.01.841
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mijatović, Nevena and Šljivić, Jasmina and Tošić, Nemanja and Conić, Ljubica and Petrović, Marija and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Resorting to complementary/alternative medical (CAM) therapies can lead to bad health outcomes or interfere with officially recommended therapies. CAM use is, nevertheless, widespread and growing. This could be partially due to the perception of the CAM industry as powerless and non-profit oriented, in contrast to the pharmaceutical industry (“Big Pharma”). In reality, both industries are highly profitable and powerful; to highlight this similarity, science communicators coined the term “Big Suppla”. Drawing from a sample of 242 participants upon all exclusions, we experimentally tested whether varying these attributes in presenting the industries impacts consumers’ evaluation of the two categories of products (herbs and supplements) and their willingness to try and recommend them. We also tested whether the effect is moderated by conspiratorial thinking, and whether it is due to a change in trust. All hypotheses were pre-registered. As expected, participants who read the Big Suppla vignette decreased the endorsement of both supplements and herbs, whilst, against our hypotheses, there were no significant changes in endorsement in the contrasting “Baby Suppla” group. Conspiratorial thinking was related to more endorsement of CAM, but it did not moderate the experimental effects. We also did not observe the expected mediation by trust. Our most robust results corroborate the idea that challenging the myth of benevolence of the CAM industry makes people more critical in evaluating its products or considering their usage. They support the intuitions of science communicators who coined the term Big Suppla, and can help in tailoring public health messages.",
publisher = "Bratislava: Institute of Experimental Psychology Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences Slovak Academy of Sciences",
journal = "Studia Psychologica",
title = "Big Suppla: Challenging the Common View of the Supplements and Herbs Industry Affects the Willingness to Try and Recommend Their Products",
number = "1",
volume = "64",
pages = "91-103",
doi = "10.31577/sp.2022.01.841"
}
Mijatović, N., Šljivić, J., Tošić, N., Conić, L., Petrović, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2022). Big Suppla: Challenging the Common View of the Supplements and Herbs Industry Affects the Willingness to Try and Recommend Their Products. in Studia Psychologica
Bratislava: Institute of Experimental Psychology Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences Slovak Academy of Sciences., 64(1), 91-103.
https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2022.01.841
Mijatović N, Šljivić J, Tošić N, Conić L, Petrović M, Žeželj I. Big Suppla: Challenging the Common View of the Supplements and Herbs Industry Affects the Willingness to Try and Recommend Their Products. in Studia Psychologica. 2022;64(1):91-103.
doi:10.31577/sp.2022.01.841 .
Mijatović, Nevena, Šljivić, Jasmina, Tošić, Nemanja, Conić, Ljubica, Petrović, Marija, Žeželj, Iris, "Big Suppla: Challenging the Common View of the Supplements and Herbs Industry Affects the Willingness to Try and Recommend Their Products" in Studia Psychologica, 64, no. 1 (2022):91-103,
https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2022.01.841 . .
3
2