@article{
author = "Radovanovic, Bojana and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Rad se bavi preciznijim određivanjem pojmova opšteg dobra, javnog
interesa i zajedničkog sagledavajući njihovu upotrebu u političkoj filozofiji i
političkim naukama u istorijskoj perspektivi. Opšte dobro je od davnina bila jedna
od ključnih tema moralne i političke filozofije. Danas se kao sinonim za termin
opšteg dobra često koristi pojam javnog interesa. Ipak, nastojaćemo da pokažemo
da oni nose donekle drugačije značenje. Skorašnji značajan odjek dugovekovne
debate o opštem dobru može se prepoznati u raspravama oko pojma zajedničkog
(eng. commons) koji se odnosi na kulturne, materijalne i intelektualne resurse na
čije korišćenje pravo polažu svi članovi određene zajednice. Sva tri pojma pomažu
dubljem razumevanju dobrobiti zajednice i načina da se ta dobrobit ostvari, iako
proučavani autori u svojim teorijama različito naglašavaju značaj kolektiviteta ili
individue. Pojam opšteg dobra se, posebno za predmoderne mislioce, odnosio na
dobro zajednice iz kojeg sledi dobro njenih članova, pa se stoga pozivanje na interese
pojedinaca smatralo nemoralnim. Kasnije, s razvojem koncepta javnog interesa,
pojedinac je postavljen u centar promišljanja, a dobrobit zajednice dovedena
u vezu sa onim što je u interesu njenih članova. Naposletku, pojam zajedničkog
vraća kolektivitet u igru, a „zajedništvo“ postaje ključni termin u rešavanju pitanja
degradacije i održivosti širokog spektra dobara., The paper endeavours to offer a closer definition of the concepts
of common good, public interest and the commons, analysing their usage in a
contemporary and historical perspective. The common good has been one of the key
subjects of moral and political philosophy since ancient times. Today, the term public
interest is often used as a synonym for the term common good. However, we will try
to show that they carry a somewhat different meaning. A recent significant echo of
the long-standing debate on the common good can be recognized in the discussions
surrounding the concept of commons, which refers to cultural, material and
intellectual resources to which all members of a community claim the right to use.
All three notions contribute to a deeper understanding of community well-being and
the way to realize that well-being. However, authors that are studied in the paper
emphasize differently the importance of the collectivity and the individual in that
process. The concept of the common good, especially for pre-modern thinkers, refers
to the good of the community from which follows the good of its members, while
the appealing to the interests of individuals is considered immoral. Later, with the
development of the concept of public interest, the individual is placed in the centre
of consideration, and the well-being of the community is brought into relation with
what is in the interest of its members. Ultimately, the notion of the commons brings
the collectivity back to focus, and “togetherness” becomes a key term in addressing
the issues of degradation and sustainability of a wide range of goods.",
publisher = "Beograd: Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije",
journal = "Sociologija",
title = "Opšte dobro, javni interes i zajedničko: konceptualna razgraničenja u istorijskoj perspektivi i savremene dileme",
number = "3",
volume = "LXV",
pages = "337-355",
doi = "10.2298/SOC221116015R"
}
