TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ristić, Marko
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2884
AB  - This paper aims at hypothesizing that the issue of technology could never be considered separate from the creative act. We develop the hypothesis starting from Heidegger’s
opposition of technology and the poietic, which we interpret through the dialectic between the
performative and constative function of the hand. To overcome the Heideggerian problem of
Enframing, we introduce the question of singularity inherent in every poietic activity which,
however, does not result in conceiving technology as an instrument. When defining the nature
of such poietic singularization we employ Spinoza’s concept of an inadequate idea – an idea
that involves its cause but does not explain it. The inherent negativity of the inadequate idea
generates the sphere in which the new appears as radical otherness. But in order to produce the
new, that is, to perform it, technology has to be conceptualized and thus made an instrument
– a singular instrument of the creative act.
PB  - Belgrade: Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University
T2  - AM Journal of Art and Media Studies
T1  - The Conceptual Act of (Non)Instrumentality
IS  - 29
SP  - 1
EP  - 11
DO  - 10.25038/am.v0i29.536
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ristić, Marko and Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2022",
abstract = "This paper aims at hypothesizing that the issue of technology could never be considered separate from the creative act. We develop the hypothesis starting from Heidegger’s
opposition of technology and the poietic, which we interpret through the dialectic between the
performative and constative function of the hand. To overcome the Heideggerian problem of
Enframing, we introduce the question of singularity inherent in every poietic activity which,
however, does not result in conceiving technology as an instrument. When defining the nature
of such poietic singularization we employ Spinoza’s concept of an inadequate idea – an idea
that involves its cause but does not explain it. The inherent negativity of the inadequate idea
generates the sphere in which the new appears as radical otherness. But in order to produce the
new, that is, to perform it, technology has to be conceptualized and thus made an instrument
– a singular instrument of the creative act.",
publisher = "Belgrade: Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University",
journal = "AM Journal of Art and Media Studies",
title = "The Conceptual Act of (Non)Instrumentality",
number = "29",
pages = "1-11",
doi = "10.25038/am.v0i29.536"
}

Ristić, M.,& Vesnić, S.. (2022). The Conceptual Act of (Non)Instrumentality. in AM Journal of Art and Media Studies
Belgrade: Faculty of Media and Communications, Singidunum University.(29), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i29.536

Ristić M, Vesnić S. The Conceptual Act of (Non)Instrumentality. in AM Journal of Art and Media Studies. 2022;(29):1-11.
doi:10.25038/am.v0i29.536 .

Ristić, Marko, Vesnić, Snežana, "The Conceptual Act of (Non)Instrumentality" in AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, no. 29 (2022):1-11,
https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i29.536 . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Cvejić, Igor
AU  - Čipranić, Miloš
AU  - Lošonc, Mark
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2038
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet
T2  - Živeti zajedno
T1  - Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice
SP  - 375
EP  - 381
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2038
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Cvejić, Igor and Čipranić, Miloš and Lošonc, Mark and Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet",
journal = "Živeti zajedno",
booktitle = "Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice",
pages = "375-381",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2038"
}

Bojanić, P., Cvejić, I., Čipranić, M., Lošonc, M.,& Vesnić, S.. (2019). Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice. in Živeti zajedno
Univerzitet u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet., 375-381.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2038

Bojanić P, Cvejić I, Čipranić M, Lošonc M, Vesnić S. Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice. in Živeti zajedno. 2019;:375-381.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2038 .

Bojanić, Petar, Cvejić, Igor, Čipranić, Miloš, Lošonc, Mark, Vesnić, Snežana, "Arhitektonska realnost ili lice zajednice" in Živeti zajedno (2019):375-381,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2038 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vesnić, Snežana
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1395
AB  - Two great theories – one in philosophy, one in architecture – emerge 
nearly simultaneously in the twentieth century: Gilles Deleuze’s understanding of the “concept,” that is, defining philosophy as an activity that produces concepts, and Peter Eisenman’s idea of the “project” as a platform, “position,” or “theory” of an architect. My intention is to suggest and problematize the idea of the concept as “capacity” or “potentiality” implying the production of a multitude of “concepts” or varying “conceptions.” Deleuze’s great significance for architecture of this 
century allowed for the construction of the “concept” as “author’s potential,” the source of activity and creative architectural acts. An 
architectural concept, determined in the course of the text, and thanks to which architectural terminology is redefined, could potentially be quite useful in philosophy and theory of the subject.
AB  - Dve velike teorije – jedna u filozofiji, jedna u arhitekturi – pojavljuju se skoro simultano u dvadesetom veku: Žil Delezovo razumevanje „koncepta“, odnosno, definisanje filozofije kao aktivnosti koja „proizvodi“ koncepte, i Piter Аjzenmanova 
ideja „projekta“ kao platforme, „stanovišta“, ili „teorije“ (jednog) arhitekte. Moja namera je da predložim i problematizujem ideju koncepta kao „kapaciteta“ ili „potencijalnosti“, implicirajući proizvodnju mnoštva „koncepata“ ili „koncepcija“. 
Delezov veliki značaj za arhitekturu ovog veka omogućio je konstrukciju „koncepta“ kao „autorskog potencijalа“, izvora aktivnosti i stvaralačkih arhitektonskih akata. Arhitektonski  koncept, koji se odredjuje u ovom tekstu, i zahvaljujući kome se redefiniše arhitektonska terminologija, potencijalno može da bude veoma koristan u filozofiji i teoriji subjekta.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - What Is an Architectural Concept? The “Concept” of Deleuze and “Project” of Eisenman
T1  - Šta je  arhitektonski  koncept? „Koncept“ kod Deleza i „projekt“ kod Аjzenmana
IS  - 4
VL  - 28
SP  - 1122
EP  - 1135
DO  - 10.2298/FID1704122V
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vesnić, Snežana",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Two great theories – one in philosophy, one in architecture – emerge 
nearly simultaneously in the twentieth century: Gilles Deleuze’s understanding of the “concept,” that is, defining philosophy as an activity that produces concepts, and Peter Eisenman’s idea of the “project” as a platform, “position,” or “theory” of an architect. My intention is to suggest and problematize the idea of the concept as “capacity” or “potentiality” implying the production of a multitude of “concepts” or varying “conceptions.” Deleuze’s great significance for architecture of this 
century allowed for the construction of the “concept” as “author’s potential,” the source of activity and creative architectural acts. An 
architectural concept, determined in the course of the text, and thanks to which architectural terminology is redefined, could potentially be quite useful in philosophy and theory of the subject., Dve velike teorije – jedna u filozofiji, jedna u arhitekturi – pojavljuju se skoro simultano u dvadesetom veku: Žil Delezovo razumevanje „koncepta“, odnosno, definisanje filozofije kao aktivnosti koja „proizvodi“ koncepte, i Piter Аjzenmanova 
ideja „projekta“ kao platforme, „stanovišta“, ili „teorije“ (jednog) arhitekte. Moja namera je da predložim i problematizujem ideju koncepta kao „kapaciteta“ ili „potencijalnosti“, implicirajući proizvodnju mnoštva „koncepata“ ili „koncepcija“. 
Delezov veliki značaj za arhitekturu ovog veka omogućio je konstrukciju „koncepta“ kao „autorskog potencijalа“, izvora aktivnosti i stvaralačkih arhitektonskih akata. Arhitektonski  koncept, koji se odredjuje u ovom tekstu, i zahvaljujući kome se redefiniše arhitektonska terminologija, potencijalno može da bude veoma koristan u filozofiji i teoriji subjekta.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "What Is an Architectural Concept? The “Concept” of Deleuze and “Project” of Eisenman, Šta je  arhitektonski  koncept? „Koncept“ kod Deleza i „projekt“ kod Аjzenmana",
number = "4",
volume = "28",
pages = "1122-1135",
doi = "10.2298/FID1704122V"
}

Vesnić, S.. (2017). What Is an Architectural Concept? The “Concept” of Deleuze and “Project” of Eisenman. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 28(4), 1122-1135.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1704122V

Vesnić S. What Is an Architectural Concept? The “Concept” of Deleuze and “Project” of Eisenman. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2017;28(4):1122-1135.
doi:10.2298/FID1704122V .

Vesnić, Snežana, "What Is an Architectural Concept? The “Concept” of Deleuze and “Project” of Eisenman" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 28, no. 4 (2017):1122-1135,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1704122V . .