TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar, Gazela
AU  - Bakić, Jovo
PY  - 2009
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/706
AB  - In spite of the growing literature on discourse analysis, the relationship of discourse to violent/non-violent outcomes of conflict is an under-researched area. This book combines theories on ethnic conflict, identity construction and discourse analysis with a comprehensive and inclusive survey of the countries of the former Yugoslavia. It presents an understanding of the interrelationship between 'words' and 'deeds' grounded through an extensively close analysis of film, television and newspapers samples taken from the period. This combination of ground-breaking applications of theory with detailed empirical case studies will make Media Discourse and the Yugoslav Conflicts of key interest to scholars across a range of social sciences including sociology, discourse analysis, media, conflict and peace studies as well as those concerned with ethnopolitical conflict.
PB  - Farnham : Ashgate Publishing
T2  - Media Discourse and the Yugoslav Conflicts
T1  - The Yugoslav Succession Wars and the War for Symbolic Hegemony
SP  - 105
EP  - 128
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_706
ER  - 

@inbook{
editor = "Kolsto, Pal",
author = "Pudar, Gazela and Bakić, Jovo",
year = "2009",
abstract = "In spite of the growing literature on discourse analysis, the relationship of discourse to violent/non-violent outcomes of conflict is an under-researched area. This book combines theories on ethnic conflict, identity construction and discourse analysis with a comprehensive and inclusive survey of the countries of the former Yugoslavia. It presents an understanding of the interrelationship between 'words' and 'deeds' grounded through an extensively close analysis of film, television and newspapers samples taken from the period. This combination of ground-breaking applications of theory with detailed empirical case studies will make Media Discourse and the Yugoslav Conflicts of key interest to scholars across a range of social sciences including sociology, discourse analysis, media, conflict and peace studies as well as those concerned with ethnopolitical conflict.",
publisher = "Farnham : Ashgate Publishing",
journal = "Media Discourse and the Yugoslav Conflicts",
booktitle = "The Yugoslav Succession Wars and the War for Symbolic Hegemony",
pages = "105-128",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_706"
}

Kolsto, P., Pudar, G.,& Bakić, J.. (2009). The Yugoslav Succession Wars and the War for Symbolic Hegemony. in Media Discourse and the Yugoslav Conflicts
Farnham : Ashgate Publishing., 105-128.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_706

Kolsto P, Pudar G, Bakić J. The Yugoslav Succession Wars and the War for Symbolic Hegemony. in Media Discourse and the Yugoslav Conflicts. 2009;:105-128.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_706 .

Kolsto, Pal, Pudar, Gazela, Bakić, Jovo, "The Yugoslav Succession Wars and the War for Symbolic Hegemony" in Media Discourse and the Yugoslav Conflicts (2009):105-128,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_706 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kolsto, Pal
PY  - 2007
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/79
AB  - In many ethnic conflicts and civil wars in the 20th century the cultural differences between the warring groups were very small. The bloody conflicts between Serbs, Croatians, and Bosnians during the breakup of Yugoslavia are a case in point. This observation has led some commentators to conclude that a lack of objective cultural markers between groups may itself be conducive to violence: When the members of two groups are difficult to tell apart, violence is inserted in order to create identity boundaries between them. One particular version of this theory goes under the name ‘narcissism of minor differences’. This expression goes back to Sigmund Freud, who applied it both to individual psychology and in his philosophy of culture. The notion has been largely ignored by practicing psychotherapists, but over the last decades, however, it has been discovered by journalists and social scientists and applied to cases of collective rather than individual violence. The present article examines some of the articles and books that expound the ‘the narcissism of minor differences’-concept in order to assess the explanatory strength and weaknesses of this theory.
PB  - Beograd: za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - The 'narcissism of minor differences' theory : Can it explain ethnic conflict?
SP  - 153
EP  - 171
DO  - 10.2298/FID0702153K
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kolsto, Pal",
year = "2007",
abstract = "In many ethnic conflicts and civil wars in the 20th century the cultural differences between the warring groups were very small. The bloody conflicts between Serbs, Croatians, and Bosnians during the breakup of Yugoslavia are a case in point. This observation has led some commentators to conclude that a lack of objective cultural markers between groups may itself be conducive to violence: When the members of two groups are difficult to tell apart, violence is inserted in order to create identity boundaries between them. One particular version of this theory goes under the name ‘narcissism of minor differences’. This expression goes back to Sigmund Freud, who applied it both to individual psychology and in his philosophy of culture. The notion has been largely ignored by practicing psychotherapists, but over the last decades, however, it has been discovered by journalists and social scientists and applied to cases of collective rather than individual violence. The present article examines some of the articles and books that expound the ‘the narcissism of minor differences’-concept in order to assess the explanatory strength and weaknesses of this theory.",
publisher = "Beograd: za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "The 'narcissism of minor differences' theory : Can it explain ethnic conflict?",
pages = "153-171",
doi = "10.2298/FID0702153K"
}

Kolsto, P.. (2007). The 'narcissism of minor differences' theory : Can it explain ethnic conflict?. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd: za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 153-171.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0702153K

Kolsto P. The 'narcissism of minor differences' theory : Can it explain ethnic conflict?. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2007;:153-171.
doi:10.2298/FID0702153K .

Kolsto, Pal, "The 'narcissism of minor differences' theory : Can it explain ethnic conflict?" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society (2007):153-171,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0702153K . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kolsto, Pal
PY  - 2007
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/77
AB  - In many ethnic conflicts and civil wars in the 20th century the cultural differences between the warring groups were very small. The bloody conflicts
between Serbs, Croatians, and Bosnians during the breakup of Yugoslavia are a case
in point. This observation has led some commentators to conclude that a lack of ob-
jective cultural markers between groups may itself be conducive to violence: When
the members of two groups are difficult to tell apart, violence is inserted in order to
create identity boundaries between them.
One particular version of this theory goes under the name ‘narcissism of mi-
nor differences’. This expression goes back to Sigmund Freud, who applied it both to
individual psychology and in his philosophy of culture. The notion has been largely
ignored by practicing psychotherapists, but over the last decades, however, it has
been discovered by journalists and social scientists and applied to cases of collective
rather than individual violence. The present article examines some of the articles and
books that expound the ‘the narcissism of minor differences’-concept in order to as-
sess the explanatory strength and weaknesses of this theory.
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - The ‘narcissism of minor differences’-theory : can it explain ethnic conflict?
SP  - 153
EP  - 171
DO  - 10.2298/FID0702153K
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kolsto, Pal",
year = "2007",
abstract = "In many ethnic conflicts and civil wars in the 20th century the cultural differences between the warring groups were very small. The bloody conflicts
between Serbs, Croatians, and Bosnians during the breakup of Yugoslavia are a case
in point. This observation has led some commentators to conclude that a lack of ob-
jective cultural markers between groups may itself be conducive to violence: When
the members of two groups are difficult to tell apart, violence is inserted in order to
create identity boundaries between them.
One particular version of this theory goes under the name ‘narcissism of mi-
nor differences’. This expression goes back to Sigmund Freud, who applied it both to
individual psychology and in his philosophy of culture. The notion has been largely
ignored by practicing psychotherapists, but over the last decades, however, it has
been discovered by journalists and social scientists and applied to cases of collective
rather than individual violence. The present article examines some of the articles and
books that expound the ‘the narcissism of minor differences’-concept in order to as-
sess the explanatory strength and weaknesses of this theory.",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "The ‘narcissism of minor differences’-theory : can it explain ethnic conflict?",
pages = "153-171",
doi = "10.2298/FID0702153K"
}

Kolsto, P.. (2007). The ‘narcissism of minor differences’-theory : can it explain ethnic conflict?. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 153-171.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0702153K

Kolsto P. The ‘narcissism of minor differences’-theory : can it explain ethnic conflict?. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2007;:153-171.
doi:10.2298/FID0702153K .

Kolsto, Pal, "The ‘narcissism of minor differences’-theory : can it explain ethnic conflict?" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society (2007):153-171,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0702153K . .