TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bešlin, Milivoj
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Delibašić, Balša
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2779
AB  - We address the specific, leftist dissent in socialist Yugoslavia that was centred around the Praxis intellectual school. Our aim is to show the divergent paths that strongly marked the legacy of the group’s Serbian wing. Tracing the intellectual engagement of two prominent figures that ended on completely opposite ends of the political spectrum – Mihailo Marković and Miladin Životić – we want to show that the inception of Yugoslavia’s bloody dissolution can be traced back to the very core of what could be called orthodox left dissent. We analyse the “truly leftist” politics of Mihailo Marković during the 1968 protests, which devolved into support for the police and apologia for war and nationalism in the 1990s. We compare his central intellectual role in instituting a nationalist brand of socialism in Serbia to the public engagement of Miladin Životić, whose marginalization stands as reminder of those who dared to oppose the dominant nationalist narratives and offered a vision of life together
PB  - Praha: Filosofický ústav Akademie věd ČR, v. v. i.
T2  - Contradictions: A Journal for Critical Thought
T1  - Aporias and contradictions of the (post-)Yugoslav left: orthodoxy in a praxis way
IS  - 2
VL  - 5
SP  - 107
EP  - 120
DO  - 10.46957/con.2021.2.6
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bešlin, Milivoj and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Delibašić, Balša",
year = "2021",
abstract = "We address the specific, leftist dissent in socialist Yugoslavia that was centred around the Praxis intellectual school. Our aim is to show the divergent paths that strongly marked the legacy of the group’s Serbian wing. Tracing the intellectual engagement of two prominent figures that ended on completely opposite ends of the political spectrum – Mihailo Marković and Miladin Životić – we want to show that the inception of Yugoslavia’s bloody dissolution can be traced back to the very core of what could be called orthodox left dissent. We analyse the “truly leftist” politics of Mihailo Marković during the 1968 protests, which devolved into support for the police and apologia for war and nationalism in the 1990s. We compare his central intellectual role in instituting a nationalist brand of socialism in Serbia to the public engagement of Miladin Životić, whose marginalization stands as reminder of those who dared to oppose the dominant nationalist narratives and offered a vision of life together",
publisher = "Praha: Filosofický ústav Akademie věd ČR, v. v. i.",
journal = "Contradictions: A Journal for Critical Thought",
title = "Aporias and contradictions of the (post-)Yugoslav left: orthodoxy in a praxis way",
number = "2",
volume = "5",
pages = "107-120",
doi = "10.46957/con.2021.2.6"
}

Bešlin, M., Pudar Draško, G.,& Delibašić, B.. (2021). Aporias and contradictions of the (post-)Yugoslav left: orthodoxy in a praxis way. in Contradictions: A Journal for Critical Thought
Praha: Filosofický ústav Akademie věd ČR, v. v. i.., 5(2), 107-120.
https://doi.org/10.46957/con.2021.2.6

Bešlin M, Pudar Draško G, Delibašić B. Aporias and contradictions of the (post-)Yugoslav left: orthodoxy in a praxis way. in Contradictions: A Journal for Critical Thought. 2021;5(2):107-120.
doi:10.46957/con.2021.2.6 .

Bešlin, Milivoj, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Delibašić, Balša, "Aporias and contradictions of the (post-)Yugoslav left: orthodoxy in a praxis way" in Contradictions: A Journal for Critical Thought, 5, no. 2 (2021):107-120,
https://doi.org/10.46957/con.2021.2.6 . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Delibašić, Balša
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2327
AB  - Razlozi izostanka šire građanske antiautoritarne mobilizacije u savremenoj Srbiji mogu biti jasniji ukoliko se temeljnije osvrnemo na uslove nastajanja i nestajanja pokreta Otpor, nosioca značajnog dela aktivnosti koje su prethodile i vodile petooktobarskim promenama. Uporednom analizom dostupnih istraživanja među nekadašnjim članstvom Otpora i aktivistima savremenih
pokreta pokazaćemo značajne sličnosti u percepciji političkog konteksta između 2000. i kraja druge decenije XXI veka. Sa druge strane, kontekstualna analiza ukazuje na značajne razlike između ova dva vremenska trenutka u pogledu moći delanja (agency) angažovanih aktera u političkoj areni Srbije. Uspeh Otpora u stvaranju efikasnog zajedničkog subjekta promena, bez obzira na ideološku heterogenost članova pokreta, nužno je razmotriti u protivstavu sa neuspehom njegovog opstanka kao društvenog i/ili političkog aktera upravo zbog te heterogenosti. Možemo li govoriti o naučenim lekcijama, odnosno da li je Otpor u politici paradigma otpora politici građana Srbije?
AB  - The reasons for absence of broad civic anti-authoritarian activism in contemporary Serbia can be gleaned from a closer look at the circumstances of emergence and disappearance of the movement Otpor [Resistance], which played a major role in the lead-up and events of October 5th, 2000. Through a comparative analysis of available studies of former Otpor members, as well as other activists of various movements, we show significant overlap in perception of the political context of 2000 and the end of the 2010s. On the other hand, context analysis also shows significant differences between these two moments regarding the agency of actors on the Serbian political stage. Otpor’s success in producing an efficient common subject of change, despite internal ideological heterogeneity, must be weighed against the counter claim of failure to endure as  social and/or political actor (precisely due to its internal differences). Can we speak of lessons learned? Could Resistance in politics be the source of civic resistance towards politics in Serbia?
PB  - Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka
T2  - Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra
T1  - Otpor ka politici
T1  - Resistance to Politics
SP  - 71
EP  - 88
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2327
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Delibašić, Balša",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Razlozi izostanka šire građanske antiautoritarne mobilizacije u savremenoj Srbiji mogu biti jasniji ukoliko se temeljnije osvrnemo na uslove nastajanja i nestajanja pokreta Otpor, nosioca značajnog dela aktivnosti koje su prethodile i vodile petooktobarskim promenama. Uporednom analizom dostupnih istraživanja među nekadašnjim članstvom Otpora i aktivistima savremenih
pokreta pokazaćemo značajne sličnosti u percepciji političkog konteksta između 2000. i kraja druge decenije XXI veka. Sa druge strane, kontekstualna analiza ukazuje na značajne razlike između ova dva vremenska trenutka u pogledu moći delanja (agency) angažovanih aktera u političkoj areni Srbije. Uspeh Otpora u stvaranju efikasnog zajedničkog subjekta promena, bez obzira na ideološku heterogenost članova pokreta, nužno je razmotriti u protivstavu sa neuspehom njegovog opstanka kao društvenog i/ili političkog aktera upravo zbog te heterogenosti. Možemo li govoriti o naučenim lekcijama, odnosno da li je Otpor u politici paradigma otpora politici građana Srbije?, The reasons for absence of broad civic anti-authoritarian activism in contemporary Serbia can be gleaned from a closer look at the circumstances of emergence and disappearance of the movement Otpor [Resistance], which played a major role in the lead-up and events of October 5th, 2000. Through a comparative analysis of available studies of former Otpor members, as well as other activists of various movements, we show significant overlap in perception of the political context of 2000 and the end of the 2010s. On the other hand, context analysis also shows significant differences between these two moments regarding the agency of actors on the Serbian political stage. Otpor’s success in producing an efficient common subject of change, despite internal ideological heterogeneity, must be weighed against the counter claim of failure to endure as  social and/or political actor (precisely due to its internal differences). Can we speak of lessons learned? Could Resistance in politics be the source of civic resistance towards politics in Serbia?",
publisher = "Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka",
journal = "Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra",
booktitle = "Otpor ka politici, Resistance to Politics",
pages = "71-88",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2327"
}

Pudar Draško, G.,& Delibašić, B.. (2020). Otpor ka politici. in Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra
Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka., 71-88.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2327

Pudar Draško G, Delibašić B. Otpor ka politici. in Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra. 2020;:71-88.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2327 .

Pudar Draško, Gazela, Delibašić, Balša, "Otpor ka politici" in Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra (2020):71-88,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2327 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Delibašić, Balša
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2325
AB  - Рад се бави практичним импликацијама које је теорија изнета у најпознатијем делу Франца Нојмана имала на Нирнбeршке процесе. У првом делу изложене су основне теоријске поставке Бехемота, али и суштина дебате између Нојмана и Фридриха Полока о природи капитализма, односно нацистичког режима. У другом делу се анализира утицај поставки изнетих у Бехемоту на креирање концептуалног оквира за подизање оптужница против водећих индустријалаца Трећег рајха и приказује истраживачки рад Нојмана и његовог тима на припреми материјала за ова суђења.
AB  - The paper deals with the practical implications that Franz Neumann’s most
famous work had on Nuremberg trials. The first part sets out the basic theoretical assumptions of Behemoth, but also the essence of the debate between
Neumann and Friedrich Pollock on the nature of capitalism and the Nazi
regime. The next part analyzes the impact of the Neumann’s findings from
Behemoth on the creation of a conceptual framework for indictments against leading industrialists of the Third Reich. But also presents the research
work of Neumann and his team in preparing material for these trials.
PB  - Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka
T2  - Godišnjak fakulteta političkih nauka
T1  - Behemot Franca Nojmana - praktične implikacije na Nirnberške procese
T1  - Franz Neumann’s Behemoth: Practical Implications on The Nuremberg Trial
IS  - 1
VL  - 23
SP  - 77
EP  - 94
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2325
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Delibašić, Balša",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Рад се бави практичним импликацијама које је теорија изнета у најпознатијем делу Франца Нојмана имала на Нирнбeршке процесе. У првом делу изложене су основне теоријске поставке Бехемота, али и суштина дебате између Нојмана и Фридриха Полока о природи капитализма, односно нацистичког режима. У другом делу се анализира утицај поставки изнетих у Бехемоту на креирање концептуалног оквира за подизање оптужница против водећих индустријалаца Трећег рајха и приказује истраживачки рад Нојмана и његовог тима на припреми материјала за ова суђења., The paper deals with the practical implications that Franz Neumann’s most
famous work had on Nuremberg trials. The first part sets out the basic theoretical assumptions of Behemoth, but also the essence of the debate between
Neumann and Friedrich Pollock on the nature of capitalism and the Nazi
regime. The next part analyzes the impact of the Neumann’s findings from
Behemoth on the creation of a conceptual framework for indictments against leading industrialists of the Third Reich. But also presents the research
work of Neumann and his team in preparing material for these trials.",
publisher = "Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka",
journal = "Godišnjak fakulteta političkih nauka",
title = "Behemot Franca Nojmana - praktične implikacije na Nirnberške procese, Franz Neumann’s Behemoth: Practical Implications on The Nuremberg Trial",
number = "1",
volume = "23",
pages = "77-94",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2325"
}

Delibašić, B.. (2020). Behemot Franca Nojmana - praktične implikacije na Nirnberške procese. in Godišnjak fakulteta političkih nauka
Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka., 23(1), 77-94.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2325

Delibašić B. Behemot Franca Nojmana - praktične implikacije na Nirnberške procese. in Godišnjak fakulteta političkih nauka. 2020;23(1):77-94.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2325 .

Delibašić, Balša, "Behemot Franca Nojmana - praktične implikacije na Nirnberške procese" in Godišnjak fakulteta političkih nauka, 23, no. 1 (2020):77-94,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2325 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Delibašić, Balša
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=752
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1987
AB  - Richard Mills, The Politi cs of Football in Yugoslavia: Sport, Nati onalism and the State, I. B. Tauris, London/New York, 2018
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Richard Mills, The Politi cs of Football in Yugoslavia: Sport, Nati onalism and the State, I. B. Tauris, London/New York, 2018
IS  - 2
VL  - 30
SP  - 312
EP  - 313
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1987
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Delibašić, Balša",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Richard Mills, The Politi cs of Football in Yugoslavia: Sport, Nati onalism and the State, I. B. Tauris, London/New York, 2018",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Richard Mills, The Politi cs of Football in Yugoslavia: Sport, Nati onalism and the State, I. B. Tauris, London/New York, 2018",
number = "2",
volume = "30",
pages = "312-313",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1987"
}

Delibašić, B.. (2019). Richard Mills, The Politi cs of Football in Yugoslavia: Sport, Nati onalism and the State, I. B. Tauris, London/New York, 2018. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 30(2), 312-313.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1987

Delibašić B. Richard Mills, The Politi cs of Football in Yugoslavia: Sport, Nati onalism and the State, I. B. Tauris, London/New York, 2018. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2019;30(2):312-313.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1987 .

Delibašić, Balša, "Richard Mills, The Politi cs of Football in Yugoslavia: Sport, Nati onalism and the State, I. B. Tauris, London/New York, 2018" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 30, no. 2 (2019):312-313,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1987 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Delibašić, Balša
AU  - Pudar Drasko, Gazela
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2649
AB  - U fokusu ove studije nalazi se moć delanja žena koje zauzimaju istaknute funkcije na državnim univerzitetima u Srbiji. Pošli smo od pretpostavke da su naše
akterke, najobrazovanije žene u ovom društvu, one čija moć delanja može da
doprinese unapređenju položaja drugih žena. Budući da žene čine najveći deo
zaposlenih u obrazovanju i nauci, njihovo prisustvo i osvajanje pozicija u sferama koje im po tradiciji ne pripadaju, od značaja su i za eliminisanje rodnih
nejednakosti i stereotipnih stavova i u široj društvenoj zajednici. Želeli smo da
ispitamo kako one same sagledavaju svoj životni i karijerni put, i da li smatraju
da je biti žena igralo neku ulogu na tom putu. Dekonstrukcijom uvreženih, ali
i onih manje primetnih stereotipa, težili smo da omeđimo granice rodne ravnopravnosti u najobrazovanijim krugovima našeg društva, u kom i dalje preovlađuje patrijarhalna matrica. Motner i Edvards (Mauthner & Edwards 2010)
razlikuju žene od feministkinja na položajima u akademiji, gde potonje karakteriše svest o rodnoj neravnopravnosti kao intersekcionalnom fenomenu koji prožima visoko obrazovanje i nauku, kao i posvećenost promenama u pravcu veće
društvene jednakosti. Polazeći od ove distinkcije, namera nam je bila da mapiramo da li među akterkama, ali i akterima studije, postoji feminističko liderstvo
i potencijal za promene zatečenog stanja.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja
T1  - Uvod
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2649
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Delibašić, Balša and Pudar Drasko, Gazela",
year = "2018",
abstract = "U fokusu ove studije nalazi se moć delanja žena koje zauzimaju istaknute funkcije na državnim univerzitetima u Srbiji. Pošli smo od pretpostavke da su naše
akterke, najobrazovanije žene u ovom društvu, one čija moć delanja može da
doprinese unapređenju položaja drugih žena. Budući da žene čine najveći deo
zaposlenih u obrazovanju i nauci, njihovo prisustvo i osvajanje pozicija u sferama koje im po tradiciji ne pripadaju, od značaja su i za eliminisanje rodnih
nejednakosti i stereotipnih stavova i u široj društvenoj zajednici. Želeli smo da
ispitamo kako one same sagledavaju svoj životni i karijerni put, i da li smatraju
da je biti žena igralo neku ulogu na tom putu. Dekonstrukcijom uvreženih, ali
i onih manje primetnih stereotipa, težili smo da omeđimo granice rodne ravnopravnosti u najobrazovanijim krugovima našeg društva, u kom i dalje preovlađuje patrijarhalna matrica. Motner i Edvards (Mauthner & Edwards 2010)
razlikuju žene od feministkinja na položajima u akademiji, gde potonje karakteriše svest o rodnoj neravnopravnosti kao intersekcionalnom fenomenu koji prožima visoko obrazovanje i nauku, kao i posvećenost promenama u pravcu veće
društvene jednakosti. Polazeći od ove distinkcije, namera nam je bila da mapiramo da li među akterkama, ali i akterima studije, postoji feminističko liderstvo
i potencijal za promene zatečenog stanja.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja",
booktitle = "Uvod",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2649"
}

Fiket, I., Delibašić, B.,& Pudar Drasko, G.. (2018). Uvod. in Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2649

Fiket I, Delibašić B, Pudar Drasko G. Uvod. in Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja. 2018;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2649 .

Fiket, Irena, Delibašić, Balša, Pudar Drasko, Gazela, "Uvod" in Univerziteti između meritokratije i patrijarhata : žene i moć delanja (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2649 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Delibašić, Balša
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1908
AB  - The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has suffered the same fate as all other two-unit federations. The purpose of its creation was the desire of the state authorities in Belgrade to keep the continuity of the former state. In the negotiation process, each republic (i.e. party that was in power), wanted to create out of the federation what was most needed at the time. In the analysis of the political life of the federation, it can be seen two five-year periods. The first is the period that starts with its formation and lasts until the split in the Montenegrin ruling party. The main characteristic of that period was the paralysis of the federal system. There were almost no federal institutions that successfully performed its role during this period. The reason wasn’t only the powerlessness of these authorities to constitute and establish its authority, but also the obstruction of the authorities. The second period that can be identified starts with the beginning of the breaking of the federal coalition and lasts until the end of the federal state itself. When the Federal Constitutional Court appeared as a political actor with the intention to resolve an intense electoral dispute in the smaller Republic, the constitutional agreement on which the state rested: “there is no federal interference in the republic’s affairs” – was disrupted. The demolition of the constitutional/coalition agreement also meant the demolition of the entire state.
AB  - Savezna Republika Jugoslavija po svom raspadu nije bila predmet ozbiljne politikološke analize u stručnoj literaturi. Ovaj rad ima za cilj da razmotri okolnosti u kojima je nastala i funkcionisala ova federacija. Osnovna postavka je da je Savezna Republika Jugoslavija nastala kao dogovor partijskih oligarhija u dve republike članice i da se u srži konstitucionalnog dogovora nalazio pakt o nemešanju u republičke poslove od strane federalnih organa, te da je federacija doživela krah onda kada je ovaj dogovor bio narušen.
PB  - Београд : Центар за хуманистичке науке ,,Синтезис“
T2  - Sintezis
T1  - Savezna Republika Jugoslavija – paradigma paralisanog sistema
T1  - The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia – a paradigm of the paralyzed system
IS  - 1
VL  - 7
SP  - 21
EP  - 55
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1908
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Delibašić, Balša",
year = "2015",
abstract = "The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has suffered the same fate as all other two-unit federations. The purpose of its creation was the desire of the state authorities in Belgrade to keep the continuity of the former state. In the negotiation process, each republic (i.e. party that was in power), wanted to create out of the federation what was most needed at the time. In the analysis of the political life of the federation, it can be seen two five-year periods. The first is the period that starts with its formation and lasts until the split in the Montenegrin ruling party. The main characteristic of that period was the paralysis of the federal system. There were almost no federal institutions that successfully performed its role during this period. The reason wasn’t only the powerlessness of these authorities to constitute and establish its authority, but also the obstruction of the authorities. The second period that can be identified starts with the beginning of the breaking of the federal coalition and lasts until the end of the federal state itself. When the Federal Constitutional Court appeared as a political actor with the intention to resolve an intense electoral dispute in the smaller Republic, the constitutional agreement on which the state rested: “there is no federal interference in the republic’s affairs” – was disrupted. The demolition of the constitutional/coalition agreement also meant the demolition of the entire state., Savezna Republika Jugoslavija po svom raspadu nije bila predmet ozbiljne politikološke analize u stručnoj literaturi. Ovaj rad ima za cilj da razmotri okolnosti u kojima je nastala i funkcionisala ova federacija. Osnovna postavka je da je Savezna Republika Jugoslavija nastala kao dogovor partijskih oligarhija u dve republike članice i da se u srži konstitucionalnog dogovora nalazio pakt o nemešanju u republičke poslove od strane federalnih organa, te da je federacija doživela krah onda kada je ovaj dogovor bio narušen.",
publisher = "Београд : Центар за хуманистичке науке ,,Синтезис“",
journal = "Sintezis",
title = "Savezna Republika Jugoslavija – paradigma paralisanog sistema, The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia – a paradigm of the paralyzed system",
number = "1",
volume = "7",
pages = "21-55",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1908"
}

Delibašić, B.. (2015). Savezna Republika Jugoslavija – paradigma paralisanog sistema. in Sintezis
Београд : Центар за хуманистичке науке ,,Синтезис“., 7(1), 21-55.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1908

Delibašić B. Savezna Republika Jugoslavija – paradigma paralisanog sistema. in Sintezis. 2015;7(1):21-55.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1908 .

Delibašić, Balša, "Savezna Republika Jugoslavija – paradigma paralisanog sistema" in Sintezis, 7, no. 1 (2015):21-55,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1908 .