TY  - CHAP
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2708
PB  - Priština: Institut za socijalne politike Musine Kokalari
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Kosovo – Srbija: Drugačiji pristup
T1  - Lokalni aktivizam kao izazov etnocentričnom modelu građanstva na Zapadnom Balkanu?
SP  - 121
EP  - 133
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2708
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2022",
publisher = "Priština: Institut za socijalne politike Musine Kokalari, Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Kosovo – Srbija: Drugačiji pristup",
booktitle = "Lokalni aktivizam kao izazov etnocentričnom modelu građanstva na Zapadnom Balkanu?",
pages = "121-133",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2708"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2022). Lokalni aktivizam kao izazov etnocentričnom modelu građanstva na Zapadnom Balkanu?. in Kosovo – Srbija: Drugačiji pristup
Priština: Institut za socijalne politike Musine Kokalari., 121-133.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2708

Vasiljević J. Lokalni aktivizam kao izazov etnocentričnom modelu građanstva na Zapadnom Balkanu?. in Kosovo – Srbija: Drugačiji pristup. 2022;:121-133.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2708 .

Vasiljević, Jelena, "Lokalni aktivizam kao izazov etnocentričnom modelu građanstva na Zapadnom Balkanu?" in Kosovo – Srbija: Drugačiji pristup (2022):121-133,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2708 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
AU  - Radovanović, Bojana
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2544
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd : Trag fondacija
T1  - Lokalne fondacije u Srbiji: Osnaživanje odozdo – uloga, izazovi i perspektive za razvoj lokalnih fondacija
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2544
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena and Radovanović, Bojana",
year = "2022",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd : Trag fondacija",
title = "Lokalne fondacije u Srbiji: Osnaživanje odozdo – uloga, izazovi i perspektive za razvoj lokalnih fondacija",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2544"
}

Vasiljević, J.,& Radovanović, B.. (2022). Lokalne fondacije u Srbiji: Osnaživanje odozdo – uloga, izazovi i perspektive za razvoj lokalnih fondacija. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2544

Vasiljević J, Radovanović B. Lokalne fondacije u Srbiji: Osnaživanje odozdo – uloga, izazovi i perspektive za razvoj lokalnih fondacija. 2022;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2544 .

Vasiljević, Jelena, Radovanović, Bojana, "Lokalne fondacije u Srbiji: Osnaživanje odozdo – uloga, izazovi i perspektive za razvoj lokalnih fondacija" (2022),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2544 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Đorđević, Ana
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2534
AB  - Participation in deliberative arenas is often lauded for its transformative impact on citizens’ attitudes, sense of agency and ability to formulate concrete policy proposals. The focus of this paper is the first ever deliberative mini public in Belgrade, centred on the topic of expanding the pedestrian zone and rerouting traffic in the city core. By relying on a set of qualitative and quantitative data collected before and after the deliberation, we aim to explore the effects of the public deliberation on the participants’ knowledge, attitudes and preferences. Our hypothesis was that participation in this deliberative process led to better understanding (enhanced knowledge) of the discussed topic and change in attitudes and preferences regarding its realization. The scope of this study is limited, given the non-experimental design and small sample. Overall, the results indicate that participants` knowledge on the topic of deliberation is enhanced, becoming more precise, elaborate and encompassing different perspectives. As for the attitudes and preferences, in most cases, around two-thirds of the sample changed their positions, while about a third of the sample changed sides, mostly agreeing less with the expansion of the pedestrian zone. The findings support the conclusion that, on a local level, deliberation has the capacity to inform and enhance competence for greater political participation.
AB  - Učešće u deliberativnim arenama često se pozitivno ocenjuje zbog transformativnog uticaja na stavove građana, na njihov osećaj moći delovanja i na njihovu sposobnost da formulišu konkretne predloge javnih politika. U fokusu ovog rada je prva deliberativna mini javnost u Beogradu, organizovana na temu proširenja pešačke zone i preusmeravanja saobraćaja u centralnom delu grada. Oslanjajući se na skup kvalitativnih i kvantitativnih podataka priku-pljenih pre i posle deliberacije, cilj nam je da istražimo efekte javne rasprave na znanje, sta-vove i preferencije učesnika. Naša hipoteza je da je učešće u ovom deliberativnom procesu dovelo do boljeg razumevanja (produbljenog znanja) diskutovane teme, kao i do promene stavova i preferencija u vezi s njenom realizacijom. Iako je opseg studije ograničen, s obzirom na njen neeksperimentalni dizajn i mali uzorak, izvedeni rezultati pokazuju da se znanje uče-snika o temi unapredilo, postalo preciznije, razrađenije i otvorenije za različite perspektive. Što se tiče stavova i preferencija, oko dve trećine uzorka je promenilo stav, po najvećem broju pitanja, dok je oko jedna trećina promenila stranu, uglavnom u pravcu manjeg slaganja s predlogom proširenja pešačke zone. Nalazi podržavaju zaključak da, na lokalnom nivou, deliberacija ima kapacitet da informiše učesnike i unapredi njihove kompetencije za šire političko učešće.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - The Effects of Deliberation on Citizen Knowledge, Attitudes and Preferences: A Case Study of a Belgrade Deliberative Mini Public
T1  - Efekti deliberacije na znanje, stavove i preferencije građana: studija slučaja beogradske deliberativne mini javnosti
IS  - 1
VL  - 33
SP  - 72
EP  - 97
DO  - 10.2298/FID2201072D
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Đorđević, Ana and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Participation in deliberative arenas is often lauded for its transformative impact on citizens’ attitudes, sense of agency and ability to formulate concrete policy proposals. The focus of this paper is the first ever deliberative mini public in Belgrade, centred on the topic of expanding the pedestrian zone and rerouting traffic in the city core. By relying on a set of qualitative and quantitative data collected before and after the deliberation, we aim to explore the effects of the public deliberation on the participants’ knowledge, attitudes and preferences. Our hypothesis was that participation in this deliberative process led to better understanding (enhanced knowledge) of the discussed topic and change in attitudes and preferences regarding its realization. The scope of this study is limited, given the non-experimental design and small sample. Overall, the results indicate that participants` knowledge on the topic of deliberation is enhanced, becoming more precise, elaborate and encompassing different perspectives. As for the attitudes and preferences, in most cases, around two-thirds of the sample changed their positions, while about a third of the sample changed sides, mostly agreeing less with the expansion of the pedestrian zone. The findings support the conclusion that, on a local level, deliberation has the capacity to inform and enhance competence for greater political participation., Učešće u deliberativnim arenama često se pozitivno ocenjuje zbog transformativnog uticaja na stavove građana, na njihov osećaj moći delovanja i na njihovu sposobnost da formulišu konkretne predloge javnih politika. U fokusu ovog rada je prva deliberativna mini javnost u Beogradu, organizovana na temu proširenja pešačke zone i preusmeravanja saobraćaja u centralnom delu grada. Oslanjajući se na skup kvalitativnih i kvantitativnih podataka priku-pljenih pre i posle deliberacije, cilj nam je da istražimo efekte javne rasprave na znanje, sta-vove i preferencije učesnika. Naša hipoteza je da je učešće u ovom deliberativnom procesu dovelo do boljeg razumevanja (produbljenog znanja) diskutovane teme, kao i do promene stavova i preferencija u vezi s njenom realizacijom. Iako je opseg studije ograničen, s obzirom na njen neeksperimentalni dizajn i mali uzorak, izvedeni rezultati pokazuju da se znanje uče-snika o temi unapredilo, postalo preciznije, razrađenije i otvorenije za različite perspektive. Što se tiče stavova i preferencija, oko dve trećine uzorka je promenilo stav, po najvećem broju pitanja, dok je oko jedna trećina promenila stranu, uglavnom u pravcu manjeg slaganja s predlogom proširenja pešačke zone. Nalazi podržavaju zaključak da, na lokalnom nivou, deliberacija ima kapacitet da informiše učesnike i unapredi njihove kompetencije za šire političko učešće.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "The Effects of Deliberation on Citizen Knowledge, Attitudes and Preferences: A Case Study of a Belgrade Deliberative Mini Public, Efekti deliberacije na znanje, stavove i preferencije građana: studija slučaja beogradske deliberativne mini javnosti",
number = "1",
volume = "33",
pages = "72-97",
doi = "10.2298/FID2201072D"
}

Đorđević, A.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2022). The Effects of Deliberation on Citizen Knowledge, Attitudes and Preferences: A Case Study of a Belgrade Deliberative Mini Public. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 33(1), 72-97.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2201072D

Đorđević A, Vasiljević J. The Effects of Deliberation on Citizen Knowledge, Attitudes and Preferences: A Case Study of a Belgrade Deliberative Mini Public. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2022;33(1):72-97.
doi:10.2298/FID2201072D .

Đorđević, Ana, Vasiljević, Jelena, "The Effects of Deliberation on Citizen Knowledge, Attitudes and Preferences: A Case Study of a Belgrade Deliberative Mini Public" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 33, no. 1 (2022):72-97,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2201072D . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2458
AB  - Kulturni  pristup  studijama  sećanja  posebno  naglašava  važnost tekstualizacije  i  vizualizacije  (kulturne  medijacije)  društveno  deljenih  sećanja  na prošlost. Međutim, dok se akcenat prevashodno stavlja na pitanja zašto neke predstave o prošlosti postaju dominantne u odnosu na druge, zašto se preferirane slike prošlosti menjaju tokom vremena, kao i kako se, pod kojim okolnostima i uz pomoć kojih aktera ove izmene u odabiru i predstavljanju „poželjne“ prošlosti odigravaju, manje se pažnje poklanja pitanju smene dominantnih medija kojima se slike prošlosti prenose. Istraživačko pitanje ovog rada jeste zašto u određenim društvenopolitičkim okolnostima i istorijskim periodima neke umetničke forme postaju naročito relevantne za kolektivne predstave  o  deljenoj  prošlosti.  Mogu  li  nam  same  umetničke  forme,  kao  mediji prenošenja poruka iz prošlosti, reći nešto o društveno-istorijskoj funkciji kolektivnog sećanja, kao i o samom društvu koje se na ovaj način „obraća“ svojoj prošlosti? U pokušaju da ponudi potvrdni odgovor na ovo pitanje, rad će se osvrnuti na favorizovane umetničke izraze sećanja na Drugi svetski rat u tri vremenska trenutka, u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji i nakon nje: radi se o okvirnim vremenskim periodima kada se sećanje na Drugi svetski rat: 1) ozvaničava i institucionalizuje kao narativ o partizanskoj borbi i pobedi; 2) osporava, te preoblikuje u „disidentski“ narativ; 3) preuzima od nekadašnjeg oficijelnog sećanja i pretvara u oblik društveno-kulturne kritike.
AB  - In memory studies, the importance of textualization and visualization (cultural mediation) of the socially shared memories of the past is particularly emphasized. However, while the accent is on the issues of the reasons for some
representations to become dominant in relation to others, why the preferred images of the past change over time, as well as of the circumstances and actors
that facilitate these changes in the choice and representation of the “desirable”
past, less attention is paid to the change in the dominant media through which
these images are transferred. This paper examines the reasons behind certain
socio-political circumstances and historical periods that render particularly relevant some artistic forms in collective representations of the shared past. Can
the artistic forms themselves, as the media of transfer of the messages from the
past, testify of the socio-historical function of collective memory, as well as of
the society that “addresses” its past in this manner? Aiming for the affirmative
answer to this question, the text discusses the favoured artistic expressions of the memory of the World War II in three chronological segments in the socialist
Yugoslavia and after its collapse, when the memory is 1) marked and institutionalized as the narrative of the partisans’ struggle and victory; 2) disputed and
reshaped as the “dissident” narrative; and 3) taken over from the former official
memory and transformed into a form of social-cultural critique.
PB  - Beograd: Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu
T2  - Etnoantropološki problemi
T1  - Memorijalizacija prošlosti kroz umetničke forme: sećanje na partizanski pokret tokom i nakon Jugoslavije
T1  - Memorialization of the Past through Artistic Forms: Rememberance of the Partisan Movement during and after Yugoslavia
IS  - 3
VL  - 16
SP  - 899
EP  - 915
DO  - 10.21301/eap.v16i3.11
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Kulturni  pristup  studijama  sećanja  posebno  naglašava  važnost tekstualizacije  i  vizualizacije  (kulturne  medijacije)  društveno  deljenih  sećanja  na prošlost. Međutim, dok se akcenat prevashodno stavlja na pitanja zašto neke predstave o prošlosti postaju dominantne u odnosu na druge, zašto se preferirane slike prošlosti menjaju tokom vremena, kao i kako se, pod kojim okolnostima i uz pomoć kojih aktera ove izmene u odabiru i predstavljanju „poželjne“ prošlosti odigravaju, manje se pažnje poklanja pitanju smene dominantnih medija kojima se slike prošlosti prenose. Istraživačko pitanje ovog rada jeste zašto u određenim društvenopolitičkim okolnostima i istorijskim periodima neke umetničke forme postaju naročito relevantne za kolektivne predstave  o  deljenoj  prošlosti.  Mogu  li  nam  same  umetničke  forme,  kao  mediji prenošenja poruka iz prošlosti, reći nešto o društveno-istorijskoj funkciji kolektivnog sećanja, kao i o samom društvu koje se na ovaj način „obraća“ svojoj prošlosti? U pokušaju da ponudi potvrdni odgovor na ovo pitanje, rad će se osvrnuti na favorizovane umetničke izraze sećanja na Drugi svetski rat u tri vremenska trenutka, u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji i nakon nje: radi se o okvirnim vremenskim periodima kada se sećanje na Drugi svetski rat: 1) ozvaničava i institucionalizuje kao narativ o partizanskoj borbi i pobedi; 2) osporava, te preoblikuje u „disidentski“ narativ; 3) preuzima od nekadašnjeg oficijelnog sećanja i pretvara u oblik društveno-kulturne kritike., In memory studies, the importance of textualization and visualization (cultural mediation) of the socially shared memories of the past is particularly emphasized. However, while the accent is on the issues of the reasons for some
representations to become dominant in relation to others, why the preferred images of the past change over time, as well as of the circumstances and actors
that facilitate these changes in the choice and representation of the “desirable”
past, less attention is paid to the change in the dominant media through which
these images are transferred. This paper examines the reasons behind certain
socio-political circumstances and historical periods that render particularly relevant some artistic forms in collective representations of the shared past. Can
the artistic forms themselves, as the media of transfer of the messages from the
past, testify of the socio-historical function of collective memory, as well as of
the society that “addresses” its past in this manner? Aiming for the affirmative
answer to this question, the text discusses the favoured artistic expressions of the memory of the World War II in three chronological segments in the socialist
Yugoslavia and after its collapse, when the memory is 1) marked and institutionalized as the narrative of the partisans’ struggle and victory; 2) disputed and
reshaped as the “dissident” narrative; and 3) taken over from the former official
memory and transformed into a form of social-cultural critique.",
publisher = "Beograd: Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu",
journal = "Etnoantropološki problemi",
title = "Memorijalizacija prošlosti kroz umetničke forme: sećanje na partizanski pokret tokom i nakon Jugoslavije, Memorialization of the Past through Artistic Forms: Rememberance of the Partisan Movement during and after Yugoslavia",
number = "3",
volume = "16",
pages = "899-915",
doi = "10.21301/eap.v16i3.11"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2021). Memorijalizacija prošlosti kroz umetničke forme: sećanje na partizanski pokret tokom i nakon Jugoslavije. in Etnoantropološki problemi
Beograd: Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu., 16(3), 899-915.
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i3.11

Vasiljević J. Memorijalizacija prošlosti kroz umetničke forme: sećanje na partizanski pokret tokom i nakon Jugoslavije. in Etnoantropološki problemi. 2021;16(3):899-915.
doi:10.21301/eap.v16i3.11 .

Vasiljević, Jelena, "Memorijalizacija prošlosti kroz umetničke forme: sećanje na partizanski pokret tokom i nakon Jugoslavije" in Etnoantropološki problemi, 16, no. 3 (2021):899-915,
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v16i3.11 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2121
AB  - Solidarity and citizenship are intertwined in a very complex manner, where the former
usually operates as the “social glue” for the latter, holding together its formal components such as rights, duties, and membership criteria. The “we” that sets the parameters
for membership and equality is not only legally defined but also discursively produced
and maintained. Here, the rhetoric of solidarity plays an important yet ambiguous role,
as it can advocate for interdependence and full inclusion while at the same time
solidifying the exclusionary “we.” The aim of this article is to show how solidarity
reasoning—the question of with whom we should be solidary and why—plays a functional role in maintaining citizenship agendas, and how this reasoning changes to support and enable shifts in these agendas. The dominant solidarity narratives that have
supported prevailing citizenship agendas in Serbia (and across the post-Yugoslav
space) over the last couple of decades will be discussed, as will counter-narratives that
have served to destabilize hegemonic agendas by envisioning citizenship communities
differently. Today, the ambiguous role solidarity can play within a citizenship agenda
becomes especially obvious in neoliberal regimes, where, as I will show in the case of
contemporary Serbia, calls for solidarity can be deployed to foster very distinct, arguably mutually opposing, kinds of political subjectivities and citizen activism.
PB  - SAGE Publishing
T2  - East European Politics and Societies and Cultures
T1  - Solidarity Reasoning and Citizenship Agendas: From Socialist Yugoslavia to Neoliberal Serbia
IS  - 10
VL  - 20
SP  - 1
EP  - 22
DO  - 10.1177/0888325420923023
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Solidarity and citizenship are intertwined in a very complex manner, where the former
usually operates as the “social glue” for the latter, holding together its formal components such as rights, duties, and membership criteria. The “we” that sets the parameters
for membership and equality is not only legally defined but also discursively produced
and maintained. Here, the rhetoric of solidarity plays an important yet ambiguous role,
as it can advocate for interdependence and full inclusion while at the same time
solidifying the exclusionary “we.” The aim of this article is to show how solidarity
reasoning—the question of with whom we should be solidary and why—plays a functional role in maintaining citizenship agendas, and how this reasoning changes to support and enable shifts in these agendas. The dominant solidarity narratives that have
supported prevailing citizenship agendas in Serbia (and across the post-Yugoslav
space) over the last couple of decades will be discussed, as will counter-narratives that
have served to destabilize hegemonic agendas by envisioning citizenship communities
differently. Today, the ambiguous role solidarity can play within a citizenship agenda
becomes especially obvious in neoliberal regimes, where, as I will show in the case of
contemporary Serbia, calls for solidarity can be deployed to foster very distinct, arguably mutually opposing, kinds of political subjectivities and citizen activism.",
publisher = "SAGE Publishing",
journal = "East European Politics and Societies and Cultures",
title = "Solidarity Reasoning and Citizenship Agendas: From Socialist Yugoslavia to Neoliberal Serbia",
number = "10",
volume = "20",
pages = "1-22",
doi = "10.1177/0888325420923023"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2020). Solidarity Reasoning and Citizenship Agendas: From Socialist Yugoslavia to Neoliberal Serbia. in East European Politics and Societies and Cultures
SAGE Publishing., 20(10), 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325420923023

Vasiljević J. Solidarity Reasoning and Citizenship Agendas: From Socialist Yugoslavia to Neoliberal Serbia. in East European Politics and Societies and Cultures. 2020;20(10):1-22.
doi:10.1177/0888325420923023 .

Vasiljević, Jelena, "Solidarity Reasoning and Citizenship Agendas: From Socialist Yugoslavia to Neoliberal Serbia" in East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 20, no. 10 (2020):1-22,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325420923023 . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2205
PB  - Novi Sad : Forum; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról
T1  - Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése
SP  - 5
EP  - 10
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2205
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Losoncz, Mark and Vasiljević, Jelena and Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2020",
publisher = "Novi Sad : Forum; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról",
booktitle = "Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése",
pages = "5-10",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2205"
}

Losoncz, M., Vasiljević, J.,& Zaharijević, A.. (2020). Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése. in Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról
Novi Sad : Forum; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 5-10.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2205

Losoncz M, Vasiljević J, Zaharijević A. Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése. in Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról. 2020;:5-10.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2205 .

Losoncz, Mark, Vasiljević, Jelena, Zaharijević, Adriana, "Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése" in Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról (2020):5-10,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2205 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Losoncz, Márk
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2461
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Novi Sad: Forum
T1  - Elköteleződés és kritika: Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2461
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Losoncz, Márk and Vasiljević, Jelena and Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2020",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Novi Sad: Forum",
title = "Elköteleződés és kritika: Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2461"
}

Losoncz, M., Vasiljević, J.,& Zaharijević, A.. (2020). Elköteleződés és kritika: Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2461

Losoncz M, Vasiljević J, Zaharijević A. Elköteleződés és kritika: Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról. 2020;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2461 .

Losoncz, Márk, Vasiljević, Jelena, Zaharijević, Adriana, "Elköteleződés és kritika: Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról" (2020),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2461 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
AU  - Losoncz, Márk
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2164
AB  - A tanulmánykötet a Belgrádi Egyetem Filozófiai és Társadalomelméleti
Intézetében évek óta zajló munkának és együttműködésnek az eredménye.
Ezt illetően érdemes kiemelni, hogy – bizonyos korábbi kezdeményezések
nyomán – 2014-ben alakult meg az intézetnek az elköteleződéssel
foglalkozó kutatócsoportja, Grupa za studije angažovanosti,
avagy Group for Social Engagement Studies néven. A csoport mindenekelőtt
olyan elméleti, illetve empirikus kutatások folytatását tűzte ki
céljául, melyek az angazsáltságot sokrétűségében ragadják meg, figyelembe
véve, ahogyan a fennálló normák és szabályok kritikai reflexióját
végzi, s ahogyan ezzel a társadalmi változások motorjává válik. Az
intézet nyitottsága és több szakterületre való figyelme nagyban segítette
az elköteleződésre vonatkozó vizsgálódások elmélyítését. Filozófusok,
szociológusok, irodalomtudósok, történészek, antropológusok, politikatudománnyal
foglalkozók, szlavisták és mások vállalták, hogy feltárják
e problémakör különböző vetületeit, a fogalomtörténeti mozzanatait,
a társadalomtudományi kutatásokban való alkalmazhatóságát vagy
a rokon jelenségekkel (aktivizmus, ellenállás stb.) való összefüggéseit.
Egyebek mellett abból a belátásból indultak ki, hogy az elköteleződés sui
generis, más cselekvési formákban nem feloldható tevékenység, és számos,
a társadalomelemzésben nem kellőképpen kiaknázott lehetőséget
rejt magában. Talán mondanunk sem kell, e megközelítés révén egyúttal
az a kérdés is felmerült, hogy vajon a tudományos tevékenység, és ezen
belül magának az elköteleződésnek a kutatása mennyiben lehet maga is
elkötelezetté. Jelentős részben az intézeti hagyományokból következett
az az attitűd, amely a nyilvános szerepvállalást, a kulcsfontosságú közvitákban
való részvételt és állásfoglalást az elköteleződéstanulmányok
elengedhetetlen folyományának tekintette.
PB  - Novi Sad: Forum
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Elkoteleződes es kritika, Tanulmanyok az angazsaltsagrol
EP  - 456
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2164
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana and Losoncz, Márk and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2020",
abstract = "A tanulmánykötet a Belgrádi Egyetem Filozófiai és Társadalomelméleti
Intézetében évek óta zajló munkának és együttműködésnek az eredménye.
Ezt illetően érdemes kiemelni, hogy – bizonyos korábbi kezdeményezések
nyomán – 2014-ben alakult meg az intézetnek az elköteleződéssel
foglalkozó kutatócsoportja, Grupa za studije angažovanosti,
avagy Group for Social Engagement Studies néven. A csoport mindenekelőtt
olyan elméleti, illetve empirikus kutatások folytatását tűzte ki
céljául, melyek az angazsáltságot sokrétűségében ragadják meg, figyelembe
véve, ahogyan a fennálló normák és szabályok kritikai reflexióját
végzi, s ahogyan ezzel a társadalmi változások motorjává válik. Az
intézet nyitottsága és több szakterületre való figyelme nagyban segítette
az elköteleződésre vonatkozó vizsgálódások elmélyítését. Filozófusok,
szociológusok, irodalomtudósok, történészek, antropológusok, politikatudománnyal
foglalkozók, szlavisták és mások vállalták, hogy feltárják
e problémakör különböző vetületeit, a fogalomtörténeti mozzanatait,
a társadalomtudományi kutatásokban való alkalmazhatóságát vagy
a rokon jelenségekkel (aktivizmus, ellenállás stb.) való összefüggéseit.
Egyebek mellett abból a belátásból indultak ki, hogy az elköteleződés sui
generis, más cselekvési formákban nem feloldható tevékenység, és számos,
a társadalomelemzésben nem kellőképpen kiaknázott lehetőséget
rejt magában. Talán mondanunk sem kell, e megközelítés révén egyúttal
az a kérdés is felmerült, hogy vajon a tudományos tevékenység, és ezen
belül magának az elköteleződésnek a kutatása mennyiben lehet maga is
elkötelezetté. Jelentős részben az intézeti hagyományokból következett
az az attitűd, amely a nyilvános szerepvállalást, a kulcsfontosságú közvitákban
való részvételt és állásfoglalást az elköteleződéstanulmányok
elengedhetetlen folyományának tekintette.",
publisher = "Novi Sad: Forum, Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Elkoteleződes es kritika, Tanulmanyok az angazsaltsagrol",
pages = "456",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2164"
}

Zaharijević, A., Losoncz, M.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2020). Elkoteleződes es kritika, Tanulmanyok az angazsaltsagrol. 
Novi Sad: Forum..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2164

Zaharijević A, Losoncz M, Vasiljević J. Elkoteleződes es kritika, Tanulmanyok az angazsaltsagrol. 2020;:null-456.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2164 .

Zaharijević, Adriana, Losoncz, Márk, Vasiljević, Jelena, "Elkoteleződes es kritika, Tanulmanyok az angazsaltsagrol" (2020),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2164 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2044
AB  - The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socioeconomic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.
PB  - Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento
T2  - Partecipazione E Conflitto
T1  - The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative
IS  - 3
VL  - 12
SP  - 898
EP  - 918
DO  - 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Ivković, Marjan and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socioeconomic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.",
publisher = "Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento",
journal = "Partecipazione E Conflitto",
title = "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative",
number = "3",
volume = "12",
pages = "898-918",
doi = "10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898"
}

Fiket, I., Ivković, M., Pudar Draško, G.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2019). The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. in Partecipazione E Conflitto
Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento., 12(3), 898-918.
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898

Fiket I, Ivković M, Pudar Draško G, Vasiljević J. The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. in Partecipazione E Conflitto. 2019;12(3):898-918.
doi:10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 .

Fiket, Irena, Ivković, Marjan, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Vasiljević, Jelena, "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative" in Partecipazione E Conflitto, 12, no. 3 (2019):898-918,
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 . .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Delibašić, Balša
AU  - Nikolić, Sara
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1946
AB  - Glavni cilj ovog istraživanja jeste mapiranje novih društvenih pokreta na Zapadnom Balkanu, pre svega u Srbiji i Makedoniji. Osnovna istraživačka namera bila nam je sticanje uvida u delovanje društvenih pokreta, razumevanje stavova i motiva aktivista i aktivistkinja, kao i mapiranje njihovih ideoloških i političkih orijentacija. Centralno mesto zauzima ispitivanje stavova (predstavnika i predstavnica) pokreta o razlozima i ciljevima njihovog delovanja, ispitivanje tog potencijala za demokratizaciju regiona, kao i potencijala za udruženo delovanje drugih društvenih pokreta. Takođe ispitivanjem smo obuhvatili i unutrašnju organizaciju pokreta, usvojene načine donošenja odluka, stepen njihove inkluzivnosti i demokratičnosti, ali i oblike političke komunikacije koji prkatikuju.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju
T1  - Demokratizacija odozdo: Formiranje i delovanje novih društvenih pokreta u Srbiji i Makedoniji
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1946
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Delibašić, Balša and Nikolić, Sara and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Glavni cilj ovog istraživanja jeste mapiranje novih društvenih pokreta na Zapadnom Balkanu, pre svega u Srbiji i Makedoniji. Osnovna istraživačka namera bila nam je sticanje uvida u delovanje društvenih pokreta, razumevanje stavova i motiva aktivista i aktivistkinja, kao i mapiranje njihovih ideoloških i političkih orijentacija. Centralno mesto zauzima ispitivanje stavova (predstavnika i predstavnica) pokreta o razlozima i ciljevima njihovog delovanja, ispitivanje tog potencijala za demokratizaciju regiona, kao i potencijala za udruženo delovanje drugih društvenih pokreta. Takođe ispitivanjem smo obuhvatili i unutrašnju organizaciju pokreta, usvojene načine donošenja odluka, stepen njihove inkluzivnosti i demokratičnosti, ali i oblike političke komunikacije koji prkatikuju.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju",
title = "Demokratizacija odozdo: Formiranje i delovanje novih društvenih pokreta u Srbiji i Makedoniji",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1946"
}

Delibašić, B., Nikolić, S.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2019). Demokratizacija odozdo: Formiranje i delovanje novih društvenih pokreta u Srbiji i Makedoniji. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1946

Delibašić B, Nikolić S, Vasiljević J. Demokratizacija odozdo: Formiranje i delovanje novih društvenih pokreta u Srbiji i Makedoniji. 2019;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1946 .

Delibašić, Balša, Nikolić, Sara, Vasiljević, Jelena, "Demokratizacija odozdo: Formiranje i delovanje novih društvenih pokreta u Srbiji i Makedoniji" (2019),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1946 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2000
AB  - Kakva je priroda odnosa između zajednice i solidarnosti; da li solidarnost konstituiše zajednicu ili, obrnuto, zajednica stvara solidarne veze; ima li solidarnost antagonizujućeg Drugog (solidarna borba protiv) i kako solidarnost konstituiše granice/zidove/mostove između nas i drugih/drugačijih; u čemu se sastoji politička priroda solidarnosti (za razliku od drugih društvenih odnosa pomoći, podrške, saradnje)? Inspirisana stalnom i gorljivom tematizacijom ovih pitanja unutar feminizma, u ovom tekstu ću se pak fokusirati na sam pojam-problem solidarnosti u društvenoj teoriji generalno, uverena da svaka teorijska refleksija o njemu, a naročito o njegovoj podrazumevanoj političkoj dimenziji, mora imati visoku relevantnost i za feministički teorijski i praktični angažman. U tekstu ću se prvo kratko osvrnuti na savremeni kontekst koji je reaktuelizovao interesovanje za solidarnost, te ukazati na pristupe ovoj temi koje lično smatram najproduktivnijim. Taj će me put neminovno dovesti i do problema adekvatne definicije, tj. do razloga zbog kojih je teško precizno definisati solidarnost. Potom ću se opet vratiti na savremenost i neke skorašnje pokušaje teoretisanja i problematizovanja solidarnosti – kao ideje, kao ponašanja, i kao stavova – te pokušati da uočim spone među njima, kao i da ukažem na neka otvorena pitanja i teme za čija dublja istraživanja snažno plediram
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Fakultet političkih nauka
T2  - Feministička teorija je za sve
T1  - (Nova) Razmišljanja o solidarnosti: od etike zajedništva do političkog principa zajednice
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2000
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Kakva je priroda odnosa između zajednice i solidarnosti; da li solidarnost konstituiše zajednicu ili, obrnuto, zajednica stvara solidarne veze; ima li solidarnost antagonizujućeg Drugog (solidarna borba protiv) i kako solidarnost konstituiše granice/zidove/mostove između nas i drugih/drugačijih; u čemu se sastoji politička priroda solidarnosti (za razliku od drugih društvenih odnosa pomoći, podrške, saradnje)? Inspirisana stalnom i gorljivom tematizacijom ovih pitanja unutar feminizma, u ovom tekstu ću se pak fokusirati na sam pojam-problem solidarnosti u društvenoj teoriji generalno, uverena da svaka teorijska refleksija o njemu, a naročito o njegovoj podrazumevanoj političkoj dimenziji, mora imati visoku relevantnost i za feministički teorijski i praktični angažman. U tekstu ću se prvo kratko osvrnuti na savremeni kontekst koji je reaktuelizovao interesovanje za solidarnost, te ukazati na pristupe ovoj temi koje lično smatram najproduktivnijim. Taj će me put neminovno dovesti i do problema adekvatne definicije, tj. do razloga zbog kojih je teško precizno definisati solidarnost. Potom ću se opet vratiti na savremenost i neke skorašnje pokušaje teoretisanja i problematizovanja solidarnosti – kao ideje, kao ponašanja, i kao stavova – te pokušati da uočim spone među njima, kao i da ukažem na neka otvorena pitanja i teme za čija dublja istraživanja snažno plediram",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Fakultet političkih nauka",
journal = "Feministička teorija je za sve",
booktitle = "(Nova) Razmišljanja o solidarnosti: od etike zajedništva do političkog principa zajednice",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2000"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2019). (Nova) Razmišljanja o solidarnosti: od etike zajedništva do političkog principa zajednice. in Feministička teorija je za sve
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Fakultet političkih nauka..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2000

Vasiljević J. (Nova) Razmišljanja o solidarnosti: od etike zajedništva do političkog principa zajednice. in Feministička teorija je za sve. 2019;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2000 .

Vasiljević, Jelena, "(Nova) Razmišljanja o solidarnosti: od etike zajedništva do političkog principa zajednice" in Feministička teorija je za sve (2019),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2000 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2639
AB  - The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different
types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens’ protests,
social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of
instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of
the greater efficiency of socio-economic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse
of “neoliberal instrumentalism” and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms
of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative
named “anti-instrumentalist discourse”. Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let
Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for
the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Water-front project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3)
semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative
PB  - University of Salento, SIBA
T2  - Partecipazione e Conflitto The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies
T1  - The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative
VL  - 12
DO  - 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Ivković, Marjan and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different
types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens’ protests,
social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of
instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of
the greater efficiency of socio-economic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse
of “neoliberal instrumentalism” and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms
of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative
named “anti-instrumentalist discourse”. Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let
Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for
the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Water-front project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3)
semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative",
publisher = "University of Salento, SIBA",
journal = "Partecipazione e Conflitto The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies",
title = "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative",
volume = "12",
doi = "10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898"
}

Fiket, I., Ivković, M., Pudar Draško, G.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2019). The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. in Partecipazione e Conflitto The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies
University of Salento, SIBA., 12.
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898

Fiket I, Ivković M, Pudar Draško G, Vasiljević J. The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. in Partecipazione e Conflitto The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies. 2019;12.
doi:10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 .

Fiket, Irena, Ivković, Marjan, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Vasiljević, Jelena, "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative" in Partecipazione e Conflitto The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies, 12 (2019),
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317?journalCode=fbss20
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2021
AB  - This paper provides a comparative analysis of social movements’ characteristics and capacities to struggle against illiberal tendencies and incite political change in Serbia and North Macedonia. First, we discuss the illiberal elements of political regimes in the countries in question, Serbia and North Macedonia. Then, we provide a comprehensive overview of progressive social movements in the two countries, formed and organized as a response to different authoritarian and non-democratic tendencies. Finally, we point to some differences in their organizing, coalition-forging and issue-defining principles, which, we believe, may help to explain the relative success of social movements in North Macedonia in producing relevant political outcomes, compared to the weak political impact of social movements in Serbia. Empirical data were collected during the summer of 2018 through in-depth interviews with members of social movements in North Macedonia and Serbia.
PB  - Taylor & Francis Online
T2  - Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
T1  - Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia
DO  - 10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Fiket, Irena and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "This paper provides a comparative analysis of social movements’ characteristics and capacities to struggle against illiberal tendencies and incite political change in Serbia and North Macedonia. First, we discuss the illiberal elements of political regimes in the countries in question, Serbia and North Macedonia. Then, we provide a comprehensive overview of progressive social movements in the two countries, formed and organized as a response to different authoritarian and non-democratic tendencies. Finally, we point to some differences in their organizing, coalition-forging and issue-defining principles, which, we believe, may help to explain the relative success of social movements in North Macedonia in producing relevant political outcomes, compared to the weak political impact of social movements in Serbia. Empirical data were collected during the summer of 2018 through in-depth interviews with members of social movements in North Macedonia and Serbia.",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
journal = "Southeast European and Black Sea Studies",
title = "Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia",
doi = "10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317"
}

Pudar Draško, G., Fiket, I.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2019). Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia. in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Taylor & Francis Online..
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317

Pudar Draško G, Fiket I, Vasiljević J. Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia. in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 2019;.
doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317 .

Pudar Draško, Gazela, Fiket, Irena, Vasiljević, Jelena, "Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia" in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies (2019),
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317 . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2022
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Engaging (for) Social Change. Towards New Forms of Collective Action
T1  - Social Engagement and Personal Activism: Some Research Reflection and Fieldnotes from Conversations with Activists in Two Belgrade Protest Initiatives
SP  - 303
EP  - 313
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2022
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Engaging (for) Social Change. Towards New Forms of Collective Action",
booktitle = "Social Engagement and Personal Activism: Some Research Reflection and Fieldnotes from Conversations with Activists in Two Belgrade Protest Initiatives",
pages = "303-313",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2022"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2019). Social Engagement and Personal Activism: Some Research Reflection and Fieldnotes from Conversations with Activists in Two Belgrade Protest Initiatives. in Engaging (for) Social Change. Towards New Forms of Collective Action
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 303-313.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2022

Vasiljević J. Social Engagement and Personal Activism: Some Research Reflection and Fieldnotes from Conversations with Activists in Two Belgrade Protest Initiatives. in Engaging (for) Social Change. Towards New Forms of Collective Action. 2019;:303-313.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2022 .

Vasiljević, Jelena, "Social Engagement and Personal Activism: Some Research Reflection and Fieldnotes from Conversations with Activists in Two Belgrade Protest Initiatives" in Engaging (for) Social Change. Towards New Forms of Collective Action (2019):303-313,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2022 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/sarajevo/15414.pdf
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2001
PB  - Sarajevo : Friedrich Ebert Stiftung
C3  - Political Culture in Southeast Europe Navigating between Democratic and Authoritarian Beliefs and Practices
T1  - How to “Expand Popular Capacities”? Some Critical Observations on Political Culture in the Western Balkans
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2001
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Sarajevo : Friedrich Ebert Stiftung",
journal = "Political Culture in Southeast Europe Navigating between Democratic and Authoritarian Beliefs and Practices",
title = "How to “Expand Popular Capacities”? Some Critical Observations on Political Culture in the Western Balkans",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2001"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2019). How to “Expand Popular Capacities”? Some Critical Observations on Political Culture in the Western Balkans. in Political Culture in Southeast Europe Navigating between Democratic and Authoritarian Beliefs and Practices
Sarajevo : Friedrich Ebert Stiftung..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2001

Vasiljević J. How to “Expand Popular Capacities”? Some Critical Observations on Political Culture in the Western Balkans. in Political Culture in Southeast Europe Navigating between Democratic and Authoritarian Beliefs and Practices. 2019;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2001 .

Vasiljević, Jelena, "How to “Expand Popular Capacities”? Some Critical Observations on Political Culture in the Western Balkans" in Political Culture in Southeast Europe Navigating between Democratic and Authoritarian Beliefs and Practices (2019),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2001 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1608
AB  - The break-up of Yugoslavia disintegrated the Yugoslav citizenship regime,
and new communities of citizens and citizenship regulations were born. Since the
identitarian and lived aspects of citizenship are inseparable from its formal and legal
aspects, (not) having the ‘right’ personal documents and (not) being recognized as the
‘right’ kind of citizen had profound effects on the lives of many individuals. Relying
on the concept of documentality and stressing the feature of documents as being constitutive
of social reality, this article analyses personal narratives illustrating the lived
experience of citizenship transformations after the break-up of Yugoslavia.
T2  - Nations and Nationalism
T1  - Citizenship as social object in the aftermath of the Yugoslav break-up
DO  - 10.1111/nana.12389
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The break-up of Yugoslavia disintegrated the Yugoslav citizenship regime,
and new communities of citizens and citizenship regulations were born. Since the
identitarian and lived aspects of citizenship are inseparable from its formal and legal
aspects, (not) having the ‘right’ personal documents and (not) being recognized as the
‘right’ kind of citizen had profound effects on the lives of many individuals. Relying
on the concept of documentality and stressing the feature of documents as being constitutive
of social reality, this article analyses personal narratives illustrating the lived
experience of citizenship transformations after the break-up of Yugoslavia.",
journal = "Nations and Nationalism",
title = "Citizenship as social object in the aftermath of the Yugoslav break-up",
doi = "10.1111/nana.12389"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2018). Citizenship as social object in the aftermath of the Yugoslav break-up. in Nations and Nationalism.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12389

Vasiljević J. Citizenship as social object in the aftermath of the Yugoslav break-up. in Nations and Nationalism. 2018;.
doi:10.1111/nana.12389 .

Vasiljević, Jelena, "Citizenship as social object in the aftermath of the Yugoslav break-up" in Nations and Nationalism (2018),
https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12389 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=708
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1975
AB  - This essay takes a critical and reflective look at two recently published books on contentious politics in the Balkans and Eastern Europe: Social Movements in the Balkans (ed. by F. Bieber and D. Brentin, Routledge 2018) and Ideology and Social Protests in Eastern Europe (V. Stoyanova, Routledge 2018). Focusing on regions somewhat neglected in scholarly analyses of the recent global upsurge of protests, these books aim to fill the gap by highlighting some contextual and regional specificities: a position of economic and geo-political (semi)periphery, weak or unconsolidated democratic institutions, post-socialist and transitional environments, societal (ethnic) divisions, etc. By critically assessing both contributions, in a manner that looks for their complementarity, this essay: examines the characteristics of popular mobilizations and grievances in Southeast and Eastern Europe; questions dominant narratives of political and economic transition and EU integration; re-evaluates socialist heritage and post-socialist political trajectories; discusses the (im) possibilities of articulating political alternatives to representative democracy and free market economy; and addresses the burden of conflicting memories and attitudes towards the region’s socialist past (and, in case of post-Yugoslav states, ethnic conflicts from the 1990s).
AB  - Ovaj rad se kritički i polemički osvrće na dve nedavno objavljene knjige o politikama osporavanja na Balkanu i u Istočnoj Evropi: Social Movements in the Balkans (prir. F. Bieber i D. Brentint, Routledge 2018) i Ideology and Social Protests in Eastern Europe (V. Stoyanova, Routledge 2018). Fokusom na regione koji su donekle zapostavljeni u akademskim analizama nedavnih globalnih talasa protesta, ove dve knjige nameravaju da popune tu prazninu, te osvetle neke od kontekstualnih i regionalnih specifičnosti: položaj na ekonomskoj i geopolitičkoj (polu)periferiji, slabe i nekonsolidovane demokratske institucije, postsocijalistički i tranzicioni uslovi, društvene (etničke) podele itd. Kritički procenjujući obe studije i sagledavajući ih u njihovoj komplementarnosti ovaj rad se dotiče sledećih problema: karakterisike masovnih mobilizacija i protesta u Jugoistočnoj i Istočnoj Evropi; propitivanje vladajućih narativa o političkoj i ekonomskoj tranziciji i evropskim integracijama; ponovno vrednovanje socijalističkog nasleđa i postsocijalističkih političkih putanja; (ne)mogućnost artikulisanja političkih alternativa predstavničkoj demokratiji i tržišnoj ekonomiji; teret sukobljenih sećanja i stavova prema socijalističkoj prošlosti.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Contentious Politics in the European (Post-Socialist) (Semi-)Periphery: Mapping Rebellion and Social Protests in Southeast and Eastern Europe
IS  - 4
VL  - 29
SP  - 615
EP  - 626
DO  - 10.2298/FID1804615V
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2018",
abstract = "This essay takes a critical and reflective look at two recently published books on contentious politics in the Balkans and Eastern Europe: Social Movements in the Balkans (ed. by F. Bieber and D. Brentin, Routledge 2018) and Ideology and Social Protests in Eastern Europe (V. Stoyanova, Routledge 2018). Focusing on regions somewhat neglected in scholarly analyses of the recent global upsurge of protests, these books aim to fill the gap by highlighting some contextual and regional specificities: a position of economic and geo-political (semi)periphery, weak or unconsolidated democratic institutions, post-socialist and transitional environments, societal (ethnic) divisions, etc. By critically assessing both contributions, in a manner that looks for their complementarity, this essay: examines the characteristics of popular mobilizations and grievances in Southeast and Eastern Europe; questions dominant narratives of political and economic transition and EU integration; re-evaluates socialist heritage and post-socialist political trajectories; discusses the (im) possibilities of articulating political alternatives to representative democracy and free market economy; and addresses the burden of conflicting memories and attitudes towards the region’s socialist past (and, in case of post-Yugoslav states, ethnic conflicts from the 1990s)., Ovaj rad se kritički i polemički osvrće na dve nedavno objavljene knjige o politikama osporavanja na Balkanu i u Istočnoj Evropi: Social Movements in the Balkans (prir. F. Bieber i D. Brentint, Routledge 2018) i Ideology and Social Protests in Eastern Europe (V. Stoyanova, Routledge 2018). Fokusom na regione koji su donekle zapostavljeni u akademskim analizama nedavnih globalnih talasa protesta, ove dve knjige nameravaju da popune tu prazninu, te osvetle neke od kontekstualnih i regionalnih specifičnosti: položaj na ekonomskoj i geopolitičkoj (polu)periferiji, slabe i nekonsolidovane demokratske institucije, postsocijalistički i tranzicioni uslovi, društvene (etničke) podele itd. Kritički procenjujući obe studije i sagledavajući ih u njihovoj komplementarnosti ovaj rad se dotiče sledećih problema: karakterisike masovnih mobilizacija i protesta u Jugoistočnoj i Istočnoj Evropi; propitivanje vladajućih narativa o političkoj i ekonomskoj tranziciji i evropskim integracijama; ponovno vrednovanje socijalističkog nasleđa i postsocijalističkih političkih putanja; (ne)mogućnost artikulisanja političkih alternativa predstavničkoj demokratiji i tržišnoj ekonomiji; teret sukobljenih sećanja i stavova prema socijalističkoj prošlosti.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Contentious Politics in the European (Post-Socialist) (Semi-)Periphery: Mapping Rebellion and Social Protests in Southeast and Eastern Europe",
number = "4",
volume = "29",
pages = "615-626",
doi = "10.2298/FID1804615V"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2018). Contentious Politics in the European (Post-Socialist) (Semi-)Periphery: Mapping Rebellion and Social Protests in Southeast and Eastern Europe. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 29(4), 615-626.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1804615V

Vasiljević J. Contentious Politics in the European (Post-Socialist) (Semi-)Periphery: Mapping Rebellion and Social Protests in Southeast and Eastern Europe. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2018;29(4):615-626.
doi:10.2298/FID1804615V .

Vasiljević, Jelena, "Contentious Politics in the European (Post-Socialist) (Semi-)Periphery: Mapping Rebellion and Social Protests in Southeast and Eastern Europe" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 29, no. 4 (2018):615-626,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1804615V . .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1606
PB  - Novi Sad; Beograd : Akademska knjiga; Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1606
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena and Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2017",
publisher = "Novi Sad; Beograd : Akademska knjiga; Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1606"
}

Vasiljević, J.,& Zaharijević, A.. (2017). Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti. 
Novi Sad; Beograd : Akademska knjiga; Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1606

Vasiljević J, Zaharijević A. Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti. 2017;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1606 .

Vasiljević, Jelena, Zaharijević, Adriana, "Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti" (2017),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1606 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1607
PB  - Novi Sad; Beograd : Akademska knjiga; Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti
T1  - Može li građanstvo biti zasnovano na solidarnosti?
SP  - 107
EP  - 122
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1607
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2017",
publisher = "Novi Sad; Beograd : Akademska knjiga; Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti",
booktitle = "Može li građanstvo biti zasnovano na solidarnosti?",
pages = "107-122",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1607"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2017). Može li građanstvo biti zasnovano na solidarnosti?. in Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti
Novi Sad; Beograd : Akademska knjiga; Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 107-122.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1607

Vasiljević J. Može li građanstvo biti zasnovano na solidarnosti?. in Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti. 2017;:107-122.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1607 .

Vasiljević, Jelena, "Može li građanstvo biti zasnovano na solidarnosti?" in Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti (2017):107-122,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1607 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1479
AB  - „The Right to Have Rights“ in Theory of Citizenship beyond Sovereignty
 
The institution of citizenship is characterized by its ambivalence with regard to the notions
(and values) of inclusion/exclusion, rights/disempowerment, belonging/otherness.
Historically and conceptually, citizenship has been developing in symbiosis with the ideas of
equality, freedom, protection of rights and full membership in the political community. In
this respect its emancipatory legacy is beyond doubt. In addition, the critique of abstractness
of human rights, mostly developed by Hannah Arendt, influenced contemporary assertions
that human rights and freedoms have little significance outside the framework of the state
institution of citizenship. On the other hand, one could claim that citizenship represents
legalized discrimination as it a priori presupposes a distinction between citizens and non-citizens as legitimate. Moreover, as citizenship one holds predetermines to a great extent
one's life chances, it can be said to occupy a „pivotal place in the over-all segmentary
architecture of the nation-state system“ (Brubaker). This citizenship paradox, its
simultaneous emancipative and discriminative role, reveals itself more openly when
confronted with the problems of refugees, irregular migration and statelessness. This paper
analyzes these tensions and questions the possibility of their overcoming within the
framework of the so-called citizenship beyond sovereignty.
AB  - The  institution  of  citizenship  is  characterized  by  its  ambivalence  with  regard  to  the  notions  (and     values)     of     inclusion/exclusion,     rights/disempowerment,     belonging/otherness.     Historically and conceptually, citizenship has been developing in symbiosis with the ideas of equality,  freedom,  protection  of  rights  and  full  membership  in  the  political  community.  In  this respect its emancipatory legacy is beyond doubt. In addition, the critique of abstractness of  human  rights,  mostly  developed  by  Hannah  Arendt,  influenced  contemporary  assertions  that  human  rights  and  freedoms  have  little  significance  outside  the  framework  of  the  state  institution  of  citizenship.  On  the  other  hand,  one  could  claim  that  citizenship  represents  legalized  discrimination  as  it  a  priori  presupposes  a  distinction  between  citizens  and  non-citizens  as  legitimate.  Moreover,  as  citizenship  one  holds  predetermines  to  a  great  extent  one's  life  chances,  it  can  be  said  to  occupy  a  „pivotal  place  in  the  over-all  segmentary  architecture   of   the   nation-state   system“   (Brubaker).   This   citizenship   paradox,   its   simultaneous   emancipative   and   discriminative   role,   reveals   itself   more   openly   when   confronted  with  the  problems  of  refugees,  irregular  migration  and  statelessness.  This  paper  analyzes  these  tensions  and  questions  the  possibility  of  their  overcoming  within  the  framework of the so-called citizenship beyond sovereignty.
T2  - Glasnik Etnografskog Instituta SANU
T1  - "Pravo na prava" u teoriji građanstva izvan suverenosti
T1  - „The Right to Have Rights“ in Theory of Citizenship beyond Sovereignty
IS  - 3
VL  - 65
SP  - 497
EP  - 511
DO  - 10.2298/GEI1703497V
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2017",
abstract = "„The Right to Have Rights“ in Theory of Citizenship beyond Sovereignty
 
The institution of citizenship is characterized by its ambivalence with regard to the notions
(and values) of inclusion/exclusion, rights/disempowerment, belonging/otherness.
Historically and conceptually, citizenship has been developing in symbiosis with the ideas of
equality, freedom, protection of rights and full membership in the political community. In
this respect its emancipatory legacy is beyond doubt. In addition, the critique of abstractness
of human rights, mostly developed by Hannah Arendt, influenced contemporary assertions
that human rights and freedoms have little significance outside the framework of the state
institution of citizenship. On the other hand, one could claim that citizenship represents
legalized discrimination as it a priori presupposes a distinction between citizens and non-citizens as legitimate. Moreover, as citizenship one holds predetermines to a great extent
one's life chances, it can be said to occupy a „pivotal place in the over-all segmentary
architecture of the nation-state system“ (Brubaker). This citizenship paradox, its
simultaneous emancipative and discriminative role, reveals itself more openly when
confronted with the problems of refugees, irregular migration and statelessness. This paper
analyzes these tensions and questions the possibility of their overcoming within the
framework of the so-called citizenship beyond sovereignty., The  institution  of  citizenship  is  characterized  by  its  ambivalence  with  regard  to  the  notions  (and     values)     of     inclusion/exclusion,     rights/disempowerment,     belonging/otherness.     Historically and conceptually, citizenship has been developing in symbiosis with the ideas of equality,  freedom,  protection  of  rights  and  full  membership  in  the  political  community.  In  this respect its emancipatory legacy is beyond doubt. In addition, the critique of abstractness of  human  rights,  mostly  developed  by  Hannah  Arendt,  influenced  contemporary  assertions  that  human  rights  and  freedoms  have  little  significance  outside  the  framework  of  the  state  institution  of  citizenship.  On  the  other  hand,  one  could  claim  that  citizenship  represents  legalized  discrimination  as  it  a  priori  presupposes  a  distinction  between  citizens  and  non-citizens  as  legitimate.  Moreover,  as  citizenship  one  holds  predetermines  to  a  great  extent  one's  life  chances,  it  can  be  said  to  occupy  a  „pivotal  place  in  the  over-all  segmentary  architecture   of   the   nation-state   system“   (Brubaker).   This   citizenship   paradox,   its   simultaneous   emancipative   and   discriminative   role,   reveals   itself   more   openly   when   confronted  with  the  problems  of  refugees,  irregular  migration  and  statelessness.  This  paper  analyzes  these  tensions  and  questions  the  possibility  of  their  overcoming  within  the  framework of the so-called citizenship beyond sovereignty.",
journal = "Glasnik Etnografskog Instituta SANU",
title = ""Pravo na prava" u teoriji građanstva izvan suverenosti, „The Right to Have Rights“ in Theory of Citizenship beyond Sovereignty",
number = "3",
volume = "65",
pages = "497-511",
doi = "10.2298/GEI1703497V"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2017). "Pravo na prava" u teoriji građanstva izvan suverenosti. in Glasnik Etnografskog Instituta SANU, 65(3), 497-511.
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1703497V

Vasiljević J. "Pravo na prava" u teoriji građanstva izvan suverenosti. in Glasnik Etnografskog Instituta SANU. 2017;65(3):497-511.
doi:10.2298/GEI1703497V .

Vasiljević, Jelena, ""Pravo na prava" u teoriji građanstva izvan suverenosti" in Glasnik Etnografskog Instituta SANU, 65, no. 3 (2017):497-511,
https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1703497V . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1398
AB  - his review essay takes a critical look at two recently published edited 
volumes, both focusing on the notion and problems of solidarity. 
Solidarity: Theory and Practice  (Laitinen and Pessi, eds.) attempts to unpack the complex idea of solidaristic practice by looking at a whole range of related concepts, such as the social brain, collective intentionality, empathy, work, and voluntary organizations. The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies (Banting and Kymlicka, eds.), on the other hand, focuses on a concrete problem: the generation and maintenance of redistributive solidarity within societies marked by diversity. Still, both volumes take a thorough and systematic look at existing scholarship on solidarity, and by encompassing both the theoretical and 
the empirical, mark a significant step forward in deepening our understanding 
of the role and place of solidarity in general social theory.
AB  - Ovaj tekst donosi kritički osvrt na dva recentna zbornika koji se fokusiraju na 
problemske aspekte pojma solidarnosti. Solidarity: Theory and Practice (prir. Laitinen 
and Pessi) razmatra kompleksnu ideju solidarnih praksi kroz čitav niz pojmova 
kao što su društveni mozak (social brain), kolektivna intencionalnost, empatija, 
rad, dobrovoljne organizacije. The Strains of Commitment: the Political Sources of 
Solidarity in Diverse Societies (prir. Banting and Kymlicka) se, pak, usredsređuje 
na konkretan problem: kako kreirati i održati redistributivnu solidarnost unutar 
diverzifikovanih društava. Ono što je zajedničko za oba zbornika jeste temeljan 
i sistematski pregled postojećeg naučnog znanja o solidarnosti, kao i nastojanje 
da se, obuhvatanjem kako teorijskih tako i empirijskih istraživanja, načini značajan korak ka boljem razumevanju uloge i mesta pojma solidarnosti u društvenoj i političkoj misl
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Reflecting on the Principles and Problems of Solidarity: Arto Laitinen and Anne Birgitta Pessi (eds.),  Solidarity: Theory and Practice , Lexington Books, Lanham, 2015. / Keith  Banting and Will Kymlicka (eds.),  The Strains of Commitment:  the Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies , Oxford  University Press, Oxford, 2017.
T1  - Promišljanje principa i problema solidarnosti:  Kritički osvrt na zbornike  Solidarity  (prir. Laitinen and Pessi)  i  The Strains of Commitment  (prir. Banting and Kymlicka)
IS  - 4
VL  - 28
SP  - 1175
EP  - 1192
DO  - 10.2298/FID1704175V
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2017",
abstract = "his review essay takes a critical look at two recently published edited 
volumes, both focusing on the notion and problems of solidarity. 
Solidarity: Theory and Practice  (Laitinen and Pessi, eds.) attempts to unpack the complex idea of solidaristic practice by looking at a whole range of related concepts, such as the social brain, collective intentionality, empathy, work, and voluntary organizations. The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies (Banting and Kymlicka, eds.), on the other hand, focuses on a concrete problem: the generation and maintenance of redistributive solidarity within societies marked by diversity. Still, both volumes take a thorough and systematic look at existing scholarship on solidarity, and by encompassing both the theoretical and 
the empirical, mark a significant step forward in deepening our understanding 
of the role and place of solidarity in general social theory., Ovaj tekst donosi kritički osvrt na dva recentna zbornika koji se fokusiraju na 
problemske aspekte pojma solidarnosti. Solidarity: Theory and Practice (prir. Laitinen 
and Pessi) razmatra kompleksnu ideju solidarnih praksi kroz čitav niz pojmova 
kao što su društveni mozak (social brain), kolektivna intencionalnost, empatija, 
rad, dobrovoljne organizacije. The Strains of Commitment: the Political Sources of 
Solidarity in Diverse Societies (prir. Banting and Kymlicka) se, pak, usredsređuje 
na konkretan problem: kako kreirati i održati redistributivnu solidarnost unutar 
diverzifikovanih društava. Ono što je zajedničko za oba zbornika jeste temeljan 
i sistematski pregled postojećeg naučnog znanja o solidarnosti, kao i nastojanje 
da se, obuhvatanjem kako teorijskih tako i empirijskih istraživanja, načini značajan korak ka boljem razumevanju uloge i mesta pojma solidarnosti u društvenoj i političkoj misl",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Reflecting on the Principles and Problems of Solidarity: Arto Laitinen and Anne Birgitta Pessi (eds.),  Solidarity: Theory and Practice , Lexington Books, Lanham, 2015. / Keith  Banting and Will Kymlicka (eds.),  The Strains of Commitment:  the Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies , Oxford  University Press, Oxford, 2017., Promišljanje principa i problema solidarnosti:  Kritički osvrt na zbornike  Solidarity  (prir. Laitinen and Pessi)  i  The Strains of Commitment  (prir. Banting and Kymlicka)",
number = "4",
volume = "28",
pages = "1175-1192",
doi = "10.2298/FID1704175V"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2017). Reflecting on the Principles and Problems of Solidarity: Arto Laitinen and Anne Birgitta Pessi (eds.),  Solidarity: Theory and Practice , Lexington Books, Lanham, 2015. / Keith  Banting and Will Kymlicka (eds.),  The Strains of Commitment:  the Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies , Oxford  University Press, Oxford, 2017.. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 28(4), 1175-1192.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1704175V

Vasiljević J. Reflecting on the Principles and Problems of Solidarity: Arto Laitinen and Anne Birgitta Pessi (eds.),  Solidarity: Theory and Practice , Lexington Books, Lanham, 2015. / Keith  Banting and Will Kymlicka (eds.),  The Strains of Commitment:  the Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies , Oxford  University Press, Oxford, 2017.. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2017;28(4):1175-1192.
doi:10.2298/FID1704175V .

Vasiljević, Jelena, "Reflecting on the Principles and Problems of Solidarity: Arto Laitinen and Anne Birgitta Pessi (eds.),  Solidarity: Theory and Practice , Lexington Books, Lanham, 2015. / Keith  Banting and Will Kymlicka (eds.),  The Strains of Commitment:  the Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies , Oxford  University Press, Oxford, 2017." in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 28, no. 4 (2017):1175-1192,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1704175V . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar D.
AU  - Đorđević, Edward
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/378
PB  - Beograd; Novi Sad : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Akademska knjiga
T2  - Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti
T1  - Engagement + (Joint) Commitment.
O obavezi da se deluje zajedno
SP  - 34
EP  - 37
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_378
ER  - 

@inbook{
editor = "Zaharijević, Adriana, Vasiljević, Jelena",
author = "Bojanić, Petar D. and Đorđević, Edward",
year = "2017",
publisher = "Beograd; Novi Sad : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Akademska knjiga",
journal = "Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti",
booktitle = "Engagement + (Joint) Commitment.
O obavezi da se deluje zajedno",
pages = "34-37",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_378"
}

Zaharijević, A., Vasiljević, J., Bojanić, P. D.,& Đorđević, E.. (2017). Engagement + (Joint) Commitment.
O obavezi da se deluje zajedno. in Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti
Beograd; Novi Sad : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Akademska knjiga., 34-37.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_378

Zaharijević A, Vasiljević J, Bojanić PD, Đorđević E. Engagement + (Joint) Commitment.
O obavezi da se deluje zajedno. in Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti. 2017;:34-37.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_378 .

Zaharijević, Adriana, Vasiljević, Jelena, Bojanić, Petar D., Đorđević, Edward, "Engagement + (Joint) Commitment.
O obavezi da se deluje zajedno" in Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti (2017):34-37,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_378 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=383&path%5B%5D=383
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1852
AB  - In a broader sense, this article is interested in solidarity as a politically
operational concept. To be able to answer more general questions – like
What does it mean to base a political community on the principles of solidarity? Can
acts of solidarity be used not only to help (support) others, but with the aim to change
power relations and constitute new political orders as well? – we must first situate
solidarity in relation to some already established frameworks of thinking about
the political community. It is within theories and models of citizenship that I want
to situate my exploration of the political value of solidarity in this paper. Firstly,
if we want to go beyond isolated gestures and actions of solidarity, to question
its general capacities for political reordering, we need to firmly anchor it in broad
concepts that capture the ideals and visions of political community. Without a
doubt, citizenship is one such concept. Secondly, there is hardly a theory or approach
to citizenship that does not presuppose some aspects of solidarity as
foundational. Finally, and closely related to the previous point, citizenship and
solidarity, although often conceptually intertwined, form a paradoxical duo, reflecting
further potential paradoxes that may arise from endeavours to engage
solidarity as a political principle. In short, citizenship is a simultaneously inclusive
and exclusive notion, incorporating the idea that some sort of boundary encircles
a body of citizens (most often, but not exclusively, nation-state boundaries),
despite the fact that solidarity loses much of its meaning when expected to
operate and be exercised within certain imposed limits.
AB  - U ši rem smi slu, ovaj rad se ba vi so li dar no šću kao po li tič ki ope ra tiv nim poj mom.
Ka ko bi smo mo gli da od go vo ri mo na op šti ja pi ta nja, po put: Šta zna či za sno va ti
po li tič ku za jed ni cu na prin ci pi ma so li dar no sti? Mo gu li ak ti so li dar no sti po slu ži ti ne
sa mo kao po moć (podrška) drugima, već i u ci lju pro me ne od no sa mo ći i konstituisanja
no vih politič kih pore daka, is pr va mo ra mo po zi ci o ni ra ti so li dar nost spram ne kih
već eta bli ra nih okvi ra mi šlje nja o po li tič koj za jed ni ci. U ovom ra du raz mo tri ću
po li tič ku vred nost so li dar no sti unu tar raz li či tih te o ri ja i mo de la gra đan tva. Kao
pr vo, uko li ko nas za ni ma so li dar nost iz van izo lo va nih ge sta i ak ci ja, te uko li ko
is pi tu je mo op šti je ka pa ci te te ovog poj ma za pro iz vo đe nje no vih po li tič kih po reda
ka, mo ra mo ga usi dri ti u po sto ja ne, a ipak do volj no ši ro ke kon cep tu al ne okvi re
ko ji sa dr že u se bi pro ble me ide a la i vi zi ja po li tič ke za jed ni ce. Bez sum nje, građan
stvo je je dan ta kav okvir. Uz to, sko ro da i ne ma te o ri je ili si ste mat skog pristu
pa gra đan stvu ko ji ne pod ra zu me va ne ke od aspe ka ta so li dar no sti kao svo je
ele men tar ne po stav ke. Ko nač no, u bli skoj ve zi s pret hod no re če nim, gra đan stvo
i so li dar nost, iako sto je u poj mov noj sve zi, sa či nja va ju pa ra dok sa lan par iz če ga
se mo gu pro iz ve sti i ne ki bu du ći po ten ci jal ni pa ra dok si s ob zi rom na po du hva te
an ga žo va nja so li dar no sti kao po li tič kog prin ci pa. Ukrat ko, gra đan stvo je ujed no
in klu zi van i is klju ču ju ći po jam, ko ji u se bi sa dr ži ide ju gra ni ce ko ja ob u hva ta te lo
gra đan stva (naj če šće, ma da ne is klju či vo, gra ni ce na ci je-dr ža ve), dok so li dar nost
uglav nom gu bi svoj smi sao uko li ko se oče ku je da bu de pri me nji va na unu tar odre
đe nih na met nu tih gra ni ca.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - The possibilities and constraints of engaging solidarity in citizenship
T1  - Mogućnosti i ograničenja angažovanja solidarnosti u građanstvu
IS  - 2
VL  - 27
SP  - 373
EP  - 386
DO  - 10.2298/FID1602373V
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2016",
abstract = "In a broader sense, this article is interested in solidarity as a politically
operational concept. To be able to answer more general questions – like
What does it mean to base a political community on the principles of solidarity? Can
acts of solidarity be used not only to help (support) others, but with the aim to change
power relations and constitute new political orders as well? – we must first situate
solidarity in relation to some already established frameworks of thinking about
the political community. It is within theories and models of citizenship that I want
to situate my exploration of the political value of solidarity in this paper. Firstly,
if we want to go beyond isolated gestures and actions of solidarity, to question
its general capacities for political reordering, we need to firmly anchor it in broad
concepts that capture the ideals and visions of political community. Without a
doubt, citizenship is one such concept. Secondly, there is hardly a theory or approach
to citizenship that does not presuppose some aspects of solidarity as
foundational. Finally, and closely related to the previous point, citizenship and
solidarity, although often conceptually intertwined, form a paradoxical duo, reflecting
further potential paradoxes that may arise from endeavours to engage
solidarity as a political principle. In short, citizenship is a simultaneously inclusive
and exclusive notion, incorporating the idea that some sort of boundary encircles
a body of citizens (most often, but not exclusively, nation-state boundaries),
despite the fact that solidarity loses much of its meaning when expected to
operate and be exercised within certain imposed limits., U ši rem smi slu, ovaj rad se ba vi so li dar no šću kao po li tič ki ope ra tiv nim poj mom.
Ka ko bi smo mo gli da od go vo ri mo na op šti ja pi ta nja, po put: Šta zna či za sno va ti
po li tič ku za jed ni cu na prin ci pi ma so li dar no sti? Mo gu li ak ti so li dar no sti po slu ži ti ne
sa mo kao po moć (podrška) drugima, već i u ci lju pro me ne od no sa mo ći i konstituisanja
no vih politič kih pore daka, is pr va mo ra mo po zi ci o ni ra ti so li dar nost spram ne kih
već eta bli ra nih okvi ra mi šlje nja o po li tič koj za jed ni ci. U ovom ra du raz mo tri ću
po li tič ku vred nost so li dar no sti unu tar raz li či tih te o ri ja i mo de la gra đan tva. Kao
pr vo, uko li ko nas za ni ma so li dar nost iz van izo lo va nih ge sta i ak ci ja, te uko li ko
is pi tu je mo op šti je ka pa ci te te ovog poj ma za pro iz vo đe nje no vih po li tič kih po reda
ka, mo ra mo ga usi dri ti u po sto ja ne, a ipak do volj no ši ro ke kon cep tu al ne okvi re
ko ji sa dr že u se bi pro ble me ide a la i vi zi ja po li tič ke za jed ni ce. Bez sum nje, građan
stvo je je dan ta kav okvir. Uz to, sko ro da i ne ma te o ri je ili si ste mat skog pristu
pa gra đan stvu ko ji ne pod ra zu me va ne ke od aspe ka ta so li dar no sti kao svo je
ele men tar ne po stav ke. Ko nač no, u bli skoj ve zi s pret hod no re če nim, gra đan stvo
i so li dar nost, iako sto je u poj mov noj sve zi, sa či nja va ju pa ra dok sa lan par iz če ga
se mo gu pro iz ve sti i ne ki bu du ći po ten ci jal ni pa ra dok si s ob zi rom na po du hva te
an ga žo va nja so li dar no sti kao po li tič kog prin ci pa. Ukrat ko, gra đan stvo je ujed no
in klu zi van i is klju ču ju ći po jam, ko ji u se bi sa dr ži ide ju gra ni ce ko ja ob u hva ta te lo
gra đan stva (naj če šće, ma da ne is klju či vo, gra ni ce na ci je-dr ža ve), dok so li dar nost
uglav nom gu bi svoj smi sao uko li ko se oče ku je da bu de pri me nji va na unu tar odre
đe nih na met nu tih gra ni ca.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "The possibilities and constraints of engaging solidarity in citizenship, Mogućnosti i ograničenja angažovanja solidarnosti u građanstvu",
number = "2",
volume = "27",
pages = "373-386",
doi = "10.2298/FID1602373V"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2016). The possibilities and constraints of engaging solidarity in citizenship. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 27(2), 373-386.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1602373V

Vasiljević J. The possibilities and constraints of engaging solidarity in citizenship. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2016;27(2):373-386.
doi:10.2298/FID1602373V .

Vasiljević, Jelena, "The possibilities and constraints of engaging solidarity in citizenship" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 27, no. 2 (2016):373-386,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1602373V . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1609
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
C3  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - Vulnerability, infrastructure, and (non)violence: preliminary thoughts on Judith Butler’s Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly
IS  - 1
VL  - 27
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1609
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2016",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Vulnerability, infrastructure, and (non)violence: preliminary thoughts on Judith Butler’s Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly",
number = "1",
volume = "27",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1609"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2016). Vulnerability, infrastructure, and (non)violence: preliminary thoughts on Judith Butler’s Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. in Filozofija i društvo
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 27(1).
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1609

Vasiljević J. Vulnerability, infrastructure, and (non)violence: preliminary thoughts on Judith Butler’s Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. in Filozofija i društvo. 2016;27(1).
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1609 .

Vasiljević, Jelena, "Vulnerability, infrastructure, and (non)violence: preliminary thoughts on Judith Butler’s Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly" in Filozofija i društvo, 27, no. 1 (2016),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1609 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1605
PB  - Novi Sad; Beograd : Mediterran Publishing; Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Antropologija građanstva
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1605
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2016",
publisher = "Novi Sad; Beograd : Mediterran Publishing; Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Antropologija građanstva",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1605"
}

Vasiljević, J.. (2016). Antropologija građanstva. 
Novi Sad; Beograd : Mediterran Publishing; Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1605

Vasiljević J. Antropologija građanstva. 2016;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1605 .

Vasiljević, Jelena, "Antropologija građanstva" (2016),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1605 .