Ivković, M., Petrović Trifunović, T.,& Prodanović, S..The Burden of Systemic Legitimization in Socialist Yugoslavia: Discursive Reduction of Kosovo Protests. in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations: Figuring out the Enemy
Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge., 61-79.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2591

Ivković M, Petrović Trifunović T, Prodanović S. The Burden of Systemic Legitimization in Socialist Yugoslavia: Discursive Reduction of Kosovo Protests. in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations: Figuring out the Enemy.:61-79.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2591 .

Ivković, Marjan, Petrović Trifunović, Tamara, Prodanović, Srđan, "The Burden of Systemic Legitimization in Socialist Yugoslavia: Discursive Reduction of Kosovo Protests" in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations: Figuring out the Enemy:61-79,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2591 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Lipij, Ana
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3743
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Priručnik kritike
T1  - Jezičko-pragmatička kritika
SP  - 421
EP  - 464
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3743
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Lipij, Ana",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Priručnik kritike",
booktitle = "Jezičko-pragmatička kritika",
pages = "421-464",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3743"
}

Ivković, M.,& Lipij, A.. (2023). Jezičko-pragmatička kritika. in Priručnik kritike
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 421-464.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3743

Ivković M, Lipij A. Jezičko-pragmatička kritika. in Priručnik kritike. 2023;:421-464.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3743 .

Ivković, Marjan, Lipij, Ana, "Jezičko-pragmatička kritika" in Priručnik kritike (2023):421-464,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3743 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Balunović, Filip
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Schmelz, Natascha
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3711
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Priručnik kritike
T1  - Kritička teorija društva
SP  - 191
EP  - 230
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3711
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Balunović, Filip and Ivković, Marjan and Schmelz, Natascha",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Priručnik kritike",
booktitle = "Kritička teorija društva",
pages = "191-230",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3711"
}

Balunović, F., Ivković, M.,& Schmelz, N.. (2023). Kritička teorija društva. in Priručnik kritike
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 191-230.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3711

Balunović F, Ivković M, Schmelz N. Kritička teorija društva. in Priručnik kritike. 2023;:191-230.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3711 .

Balunović, Filip, Ivković, Marjan, Schmelz, Natascha, "Kritička teorija društva" in Priručnik kritike (2023):191-230,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3711 .

Ivković, M.,& Radinković, Ž.. (2023). Priručnik kritike. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3704

Ivković M, Radinković Ž. Priručnik kritike. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3704 .

Ivković, Marjan, Radinković, Željko, "Priručnik kritike" (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3704 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3172
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praksis
T1  - Burdijeizam i kritička teorija
SP  - 167
EP  - 193
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3172
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praksis",
booktitle = "Burdijeizam i kritička teorija",
pages = "167-193",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3172"
}

Ivković, M.. (2023). Burdijeizam i kritička teorija. in Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praksis
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 167-193.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3172

Ivković M. Burdijeizam i kritička teorija. in Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praksis. 2023;:167-193.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3172 .

Ivković, Marjan, "Burdijeizam i kritička teorija" in Pjer Burdije: radikalna misao i praksis (2023):167-193,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3172 .

TY  - GEN
AU  - Zarić, Zona
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3610
PB  - Milano : Mimesis
T2  - Refusing to Be Silent. Engaged Conversations With Leading Intellectuals
T1  - Cannibalistic Capitalism and The Meaning of Socialism in the 21st Century. Nancy Fraser
SP  - 129
EP  - 142
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3610
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Zarić, Zona and Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Milano : Mimesis",
journal = "Refusing to Be Silent. Engaged Conversations With Leading Intellectuals",
title = "Cannibalistic Capitalism and The Meaning of Socialism in the 21st Century. Nancy Fraser",
pages = "129-142",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3610"
}

Zarić, Z.,& Ivković, M.. (2023). Cannibalistic Capitalism and The Meaning of Socialism in the 21st Century. Nancy Fraser. in Refusing to Be Silent. Engaged Conversations With Leading Intellectuals
Milano : Mimesis., 129-142.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3610

Zarić Z, Ivković M. Cannibalistic Capitalism and The Meaning of Socialism in the 21st Century. Nancy Fraser. in Refusing to Be Silent. Engaged Conversations With Leading Intellectuals. 2023;:129-142.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3610 .

Zarić, Zona, Ivković, Marjan, "Cannibalistic Capitalism and The Meaning of Socialism in the 21st Century. Nancy Fraser" in Refusing to Be Silent. Engaged Conversations With Leading Intellectuals (2023):129-142,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3610 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/1564
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2857
AB  - Building on the analyses of cultural hegemony in the works of Nancy Fraser and Wendy Brown, I argue in the paper that the historic bloc (order of cultural hegemony) of post-Fordist capitalism is characterized by a particular dynamic between several ‘axes’ of hegemony that gives rise to the ‘paradox of engagement/disengagement’. The ‘progressive-expertocratic’ axis of hegemony creates a subject-position of the ‘engaged self’, a figure embodying a certain promise of political agency that is simultaneously obstructed by other, depoliticizing axes of hegemony. This dynamic is conducive to the rise of contemporary right-wing authoritarianism, which purports to fulfill this promise of political agency through a series of displacements – the counterhegemonic left, I argue, has so far not formulated an effective alternative to this strategy. In the second part, I explore the potential of Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition, in particular his concept of ‘interpersonal respect’, for grounding a left strategy of connecting (mutually articulating) the hegemonic figure of the ‘engaged self’ with a progressive politics of social transformation. To that end, I elaborate Honneth’s perspective by means of an argument about the role of trust in the context of societal crises that Igor Cvejić, Srđan Prodanović and I have recently formulated.
AB  - Gradeći na temeljima analize kulturne hegemonije u delima Nensi Frejzer i Vendi Braun, u ovom radu argumentujem da se istorijski blok (poredak hegemonije) postfordističkog kapitalizma karakteriše specifičnom interakcijom nekoliko ’osa’ hegemonije koja proizvodi ’paradoks angažmana/dezangažmana’. Osa hegemonije koju nazivam ’progresivno-ekspertokratskom’ konstituiše subjektnu poziciju ’angažovanog sopstva’, figuru koja otelovljuje određeno obećanje moći političkog delanja koje je istovremeno opstruirano drugim, depolitizujućim osama hegemonije. Ova dinamika pogoduje rastu savremenog desnog autoritarizma, koji pretenduje da ispuni ovo obećanje moći političkog delanja kroz seriju određenih izmeštanja – kontrahegemona levica, sa druge strane, nije do sada formulisala efektivnu alternativu ovoj strategiji. U drugom delu rada, istražujem potancijal teorije priznanja Aksela Honeta, prevashodno njegove koncepcije ’interpersonalnog poštovanja’, kao teorijskog temelja leve strategije povezivanja (međusobne artikulacije) hegemone figure ’angažovanog sopstva’ sa progresivnom politikom društvene transformacije. U tu svrhu, elaboriram donekle Honetovu perspektivu pomoću argumenata o ulozi poverenja u kontekstu društvenih kriza koje sam nedavno formulisao sa Igorom Cvejićem i Srđanom Prodanovićem.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - Recognition as a Counterhegemonic Strategy
T1  - Priznanje kao kontrahegemona strategija
IS  - 2
VL  - 34
SP  - 257
EP  - 272
DO  - 10.2298/FID2302257I
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Building on the analyses of cultural hegemony in the works of Nancy Fraser and Wendy Brown, I argue in the paper that the historic bloc (order of cultural hegemony) of post-Fordist capitalism is characterized by a particular dynamic between several ‘axes’ of hegemony that gives rise to the ‘paradox of engagement/disengagement’. The ‘progressive-expertocratic’ axis of hegemony creates a subject-position of the ‘engaged self’, a figure embodying a certain promise of political agency that is simultaneously obstructed by other, depoliticizing axes of hegemony. This dynamic is conducive to the rise of contemporary right-wing authoritarianism, which purports to fulfill this promise of political agency through a series of displacements – the counterhegemonic left, I argue, has so far not formulated an effective alternative to this strategy. In the second part, I explore the potential of Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition, in particular his concept of ‘interpersonal respect’, for grounding a left strategy of connecting (mutually articulating) the hegemonic figure of the ‘engaged self’ with a progressive politics of social transformation. To that end, I elaborate Honneth’s perspective by means of an argument about the role of trust in the context of societal crises that Igor Cvejić, Srđan Prodanović and I have recently formulated., Gradeći na temeljima analize kulturne hegemonije u delima Nensi Frejzer i Vendi Braun, u ovom radu argumentujem da se istorijski blok (poredak hegemonije) postfordističkog kapitalizma karakteriše specifičnom interakcijom nekoliko ’osa’ hegemonije koja proizvodi ’paradoks angažmana/dezangažmana’. Osa hegemonije koju nazivam ’progresivno-ekspertokratskom’ konstituiše subjektnu poziciju ’angažovanog sopstva’, figuru koja otelovljuje određeno obećanje moći političkog delanja koje je istovremeno opstruirano drugim, depolitizujućim osama hegemonije. Ova dinamika pogoduje rastu savremenog desnog autoritarizma, koji pretenduje da ispuni ovo obećanje moći političkog delanja kroz seriju određenih izmeštanja – kontrahegemona levica, sa druge strane, nije do sada formulisala efektivnu alternativu ovoj strategiji. U drugom delu rada, istražujem potancijal teorije priznanja Aksela Honeta, prevashodno njegove koncepcije ’interpersonalnog poštovanja’, kao teorijskog temelja leve strategije povezivanja (međusobne artikulacije) hegemone figure ’angažovanog sopstva’ sa progresivnom politikom društvene transformacije. U tu svrhu, elaboriram donekle Honetovu perspektivu pomoću argumenata o ulozi poverenja u kontekstu društvenih kriza koje sam nedavno formulisao sa Igorom Cvejićem i Srđanom Prodanovićem.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "Recognition as a Counterhegemonic Strategy, Priznanje kao kontrahegemona strategija",
number = "2",
volume = "34",
pages = "257-272",
doi = "10.2298/FID2302257I"
}

Ivković, M.. (2023). Recognition as a Counterhegemonic Strategy. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 34(2), 257-272.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2302257I

Ivković M. Recognition as a Counterhegemonic Strategy. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2023;34(2):257-272.
doi:10.2298/FID2302257I .

Ivković, Marjan, "Recognition as a Counterhegemonic Strategy" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 34, no. 2 (2023):257-272,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2302257I . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3575
AB  - Addressing the relationship among social critique, violence, and domination, Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination examines a critique of violent and unjust social arrangements that transcends the Enlightenment/postmodern opposition. This critique surpasses the “reflexive violence” of classical enlightenment universalism without committing the “violence of reflexivity” by negating any possibility of collective radical social engagement. The unifying thread of the collection, edited by Marjan Ivković, Adriana Zaharijević, and Gazela Pudar-Draško, is a sensitivity to the field of tension created by these extremes, especially for the issue of how to articulate a non-violent critique that is nevertheless “militant,” in the sense that it creates a rupture in an institutionalized order of violence. In Part One, the contributors examine the theoretical resources that help us move beyond the reflexive violence of the classical Enlightenment social critique in our quest for justice and non-domination. Part Two brings together nuanced attempts to reconsider the dominant modern understandings of violence, subjectivity, and society without succumbing to the violence of reflexivity that characterizes radically anti-Enlightenment standpoints.
PB  - Lexington Books
T2  - Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination
T1  - Introduction
SP  - 1
EP  - 13
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3575
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Zaharijević, Adriana and Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Addressing the relationship among social critique, violence, and domination, Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination examines a critique of violent and unjust social arrangements that transcends the Enlightenment/postmodern opposition. This critique surpasses the “reflexive violence” of classical enlightenment universalism without committing the “violence of reflexivity” by negating any possibility of collective radical social engagement. The unifying thread of the collection, edited by Marjan Ivković, Adriana Zaharijević, and Gazela Pudar-Draško, is a sensitivity to the field of tension created by these extremes, especially for the issue of how to articulate a non-violent critique that is nevertheless “militant,” in the sense that it creates a rupture in an institutionalized order of violence. In Part One, the contributors examine the theoretical resources that help us move beyond the reflexive violence of the classical Enlightenment social critique in our quest for justice and non-domination. Part Two brings together nuanced attempts to reconsider the dominant modern understandings of violence, subjectivity, and society without succumbing to the violence of reflexivity that characterizes radically anti-Enlightenment standpoints.",
publisher = "Lexington Books",
journal = "Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination",
booktitle = "Introduction",
pages = "1-13",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3575"
}

Ivković, M., Zaharijević, A.,& Pudar Draško, G.. (2022). Introduction. in Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination
Lexington Books., 1-13.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3575

Ivković M, Zaharijević A, Pudar Draško G. Introduction. in Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination. 2022;:1-13.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3575 .

Ivković, Marjan, Zaharijević, Adriana, Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Introduction" in Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination (2022):1-13,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3575 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Marjan, Ivković
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2557
AB  - Addressing the relationship among social critique, violence, and domination, Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination examines a critique of violent and unjust social arrangements that transcends the Enlightenment/postmodern opposition. This critique surpasses the “reflexive violence” of classical enlightenment universalism without committing the “violence of reflexivity” by negating any possibility of collective radical social engagement. The unifying thread of the collection, edited by Marjan Ivković, Adriana Zaharijević, and Gazela Pudar-Draško, is a sensitivity to the field of tension created by these extremes, especially for the issue of how to articulate a non-violent critique that is nevertheless “militant,” in the sense that it creates a rupture in an institutionalized order of violence. In Part One, the contributors examine the theoretical resources that help us move beyond the reflexive violence of the classical Enlightenment social critique in our quest for justice and non-domination. Part Two brings together nuanced attempts to reconsider the dominant modern understandings of violence, subjectivity, and society without succumbing to the violence of reflexivity that characterizes radically anti-Enlightenment standpoints.
PB  - Lexington Books
T1  - Violence and Reflexivity The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2557
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Marjan, Ivković and Zaharijević, Adriana and Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Addressing the relationship among social critique, violence, and domination, Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination examines a critique of violent and unjust social arrangements that transcends the Enlightenment/postmodern opposition. This critique surpasses the “reflexive violence” of classical enlightenment universalism without committing the “violence of reflexivity” by negating any possibility of collective radical social engagement. The unifying thread of the collection, edited by Marjan Ivković, Adriana Zaharijević, and Gazela Pudar-Draško, is a sensitivity to the field of tension created by these extremes, especially for the issue of how to articulate a non-violent critique that is nevertheless “militant,” in the sense that it creates a rupture in an institutionalized order of violence. In Part One, the contributors examine the theoretical resources that help us move beyond the reflexive violence of the classical Enlightenment social critique in our quest for justice and non-domination. Part Two brings together nuanced attempts to reconsider the dominant modern understandings of violence, subjectivity, and society without succumbing to the violence of reflexivity that characterizes radically anti-Enlightenment standpoints.",
publisher = "Lexington Books",
title = "Violence and Reflexivity The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2557"
}

Marjan, I., Zaharijević, A.,& Pudar Draško, G.. (2022). Violence and Reflexivity The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination. 
Lexington Books..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2557

Marjan I, Zaharijević A, Pudar Draško G. Violence and Reflexivity The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination. 2022;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2557 .

Marjan, Ivković, Zaharijević, Adriana, Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Violence and Reflexivity The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination" (2022),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2557 .

TY  - GEN
AU  - Zarić, Zona
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3619
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Angažovane reči
T1  - Nensi Frejzer: Kanibalistički kapitalizam i značenje socijalizma u XXI veku
SP  - 133
EP  - 148
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3619
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Zarić, Zona and Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2022",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Angažovane reči",
title = "Nensi Frejzer: Kanibalistički kapitalizam i značenje socijalizma u XXI veku",
pages = "133-148",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3619"
}

Zarić, Z.,& Ivković, M.. (2022). Nensi Frejzer: Kanibalistički kapitalizam i značenje socijalizma u XXI veku. in Angažovane reči
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 133-148.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3619

Zarić Z, Ivković M. Nensi Frejzer: Kanibalistički kapitalizam i značenje socijalizma u XXI veku. in Angažovane reči. 2022;:133-148.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3619 .

Zarić, Zona, Ivković, Marjan, "Nensi Frejzer: Kanibalistički kapitalizam i značenje socijalizma u XXI veku" in Angažovane reči (2022):133-148,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3619 .

TY  - GEN
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Janković, Miloš
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2894
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd: Institut za demokratski angažman jugoistočne Evrope
T1  - Na šta mislimo kada kažemo... Nove utopije
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2894
ER  - 

@misc{
author = "Prodanović, Srđan and Ivković, Marjan and Janković, Miloš",
year = "2022",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd: Institut za demokratski angažman jugoistočne Evrope",
title = "Na šta mislimo kada kažemo... Nove utopije",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2894"
}

Prodanović, S., Ivković, M.,& Janković, M.. (2022). Na šta mislimo kada kažemo... Nove utopije. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2894

Prodanović S, Ivković M, Janković M. Na šta mislimo kada kažemo... Nove utopije. 2022;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2894 .

Prodanović, Srđan, Ivković, Marjan, Janković, Miloš, "Na šta mislimo kada kažemo... Nove utopije" (2022),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2894 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Urošević, Milan
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/955
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2389
AB  - This paper presents three interconnected examinations of Asger Sørensen’s arguments in Capitalism, Alienation and Critique, which thematize Sørensen’s overarching understanding of the relationship between theory and practice: his general methodological perspective on critical theory, its distinctive epistemology and its anchoring in the empirical world. The paper authors each try to push Sørensen on these crucial points by considering how Sørensen’s variant of critical theory actually operates, scrutinizing in more detail the particular relationship between the ‘experience of injustice’, which for Sørensen constitutes the empirical foothold for critical theory, and the theoretical diagnosis of social reality which the critical theorist should formulate against the backdrop of this experience.
AB  - Ovaj rad predstavlja tri povezana ispitivanja argumentacije Asgera Serensena u Kapitalizmu, 
otuđenju i kritici, koja tematizuju Serensenovo generalno razumevanje odnosa teorije i prak se, drugim rečima njegovu metodološku perspektivu u pogledu kritičke teorije, njene speci fične epistemologije i njene ukorenjenosti u empirijskom svetu. Marjan Ivković, Srđan Pro danović i Milan Urošević nastoje da problematizuju Serensenovo stanovište razmatrajući 
način na koji Serensenova kritička teorija zapravo funkcioniše, analizirajući detaljnije odnos 
između ,iskustva nepravdeʻ, koje za Serensena predstavlja empirijsko uporište kritičke teo rije, i teorijske dijagnoze društvene stvarnosti koju kritički teoretičar formuliše na temelju 
tog iskustva
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Theory caught up in dialectics: Some reflections on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique
T1  - Teorija uhvaćena u dijalektiku: neke refleksije o Kapitalizmu, otuđenju  i kritici Asgera Serensena
IS  - 1
VL  - 32
SP  - 11
EP  - 21
DO  - 10.2298/FID2101011I
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Prodanović, Srđan and Urošević, Milan",
year = "2021",
abstract = "This paper presents three interconnected examinations of Asger Sørensen’s arguments in Capitalism, Alienation and Critique, which thematize Sørensen’s overarching understanding of the relationship between theory and practice: his general methodological perspective on critical theory, its distinctive epistemology and its anchoring in the empirical world. The paper authors each try to push Sørensen on these crucial points by considering how Sørensen’s variant of critical theory actually operates, scrutinizing in more detail the particular relationship between the ‘experience of injustice’, which for Sørensen constitutes the empirical foothold for critical theory, and the theoretical diagnosis of social reality which the critical theorist should formulate against the backdrop of this experience., Ovaj rad predstavlja tri povezana ispitivanja argumentacije Asgera Serensena u Kapitalizmu, 
otuđenju i kritici, koja tematizuju Serensenovo generalno razumevanje odnosa teorije i prak se, drugim rečima njegovu metodološku perspektivu u pogledu kritičke teorije, njene speci fične epistemologije i njene ukorenjenosti u empirijskom svetu. Marjan Ivković, Srđan Pro danović i Milan Urošević nastoje da problematizuju Serensenovo stanovište razmatrajući 
način na koji Serensenova kritička teorija zapravo funkcioniše, analizirajući detaljnije odnos 
između ,iskustva nepravdeʻ, koje za Serensena predstavlja empirijsko uporište kritičke teo rije, i teorijske dijagnoze društvene stvarnosti koju kritički teoretičar formuliše na temelju 
tog iskustva",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Theory caught up in dialectics: Some reflections on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique, Teorija uhvaćena u dijalektiku: neke refleksije o Kapitalizmu, otuđenju  i kritici Asgera Serensena",
number = "1",
volume = "32",
pages = "11-21",
doi = "10.2298/FID2101011I"
}

Ivković, M., Prodanović, S.,& Urošević, M.. (2021). Theory caught up in dialectics: Some reflections on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 32(1), 11-21.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2101011I

Ivković M, Prodanović S, Urošević M. Theory caught up in dialectics: Some reflections on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2021;32(1):11-21.
doi:10.2298/FID2101011I .

Ivković, Marjan, Prodanović, Srđan, Urošević, Milan, "Theory caught up in dialectics: Some reflections on Asger Sørensen’s capitalism, alienation and critique" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 32, no. 1 (2021):11-21,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2101011I . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2136
AB  - U radu se analiziraju dominantni rečnici kritike pandemijske politike u  Srbiji,  koji  se  posmatraju  kao  reprezentativni  za  ocenu  emancipa-tornog potencijala pandemije uopšte, u smislu njenog potencijala za delegitimizaciju neoliberalne demokratije. Rad razmatra dva rečnika koji poseduju izvesni kritički potencijal u ovom pogledu – tzv. proce-duralistički liberalno-demokratski i rečnik „života ispred ekonomije“ –  da  bi  zatim  ukazao  na  nemogućnost  ovih  rečnika  da  pandemijsku  politiku shvate kao formu društvene dominacije kojom se nastoji ot-kloniti pretnja po legitimnost poretka. Autor analizira prirodu domi-nacije koja se može iščitati iz glavnog narativa pandemijske politike – narativa o „nedisciplinovanim građanima“, i zaključuje da je posredi manifestacija „kompleksne dominacije“ (Lik Boltanski) koja posedu-je  strukturu  „normativnog  paradoksa“  (Aksel  Honet  i  Martin  Hart-man).  Naposletku,  rad  predstavlja  nacrt  alternativne  leve  kritike  pandemijske politike koja razvija preliminarni model „intersubjektiv-nog konstituisanja“ lične autonomije unutar demokratske javne sfere kao bazičnog preduslova za osećanje građanske solidarnosti.
AB  - The  paper  analyzes  dominant  vocabularies  of  the  critique  of  the  official  Covid-19  pandemic  policy  in  Serbia,  which  are  considered  representative  of  the  general  emancipatory potential of the pandemic, in the sense of its potential to delegitimize neoliberal  democracy.  The  paper  examines  two  such  vocabularies  which  possess  a  certain critical potential in this respect – the “proceduralist liberal-democratic” one and the vocabulary of “life before economy” – in order to point to the incapacity of these vocabularies to grasp the state pandemic policy as a form of social domination which  counters  the  threat  to  the  legitimacy  of  the  political  order  created  by  the  pandemic. The author analyzes the nature of social domination that can be read out of  the  main  narrative  of  the  pandemic  policy  –  the  narrative  of  “undisciplined  citizens” – and concludes that this is a type of “complex domination” (Luc Boltanski) which  possesses  the  structure  of  a  “normative  paradox”  (Axel  Honneth  and  Martin  Hartmann). Finally, the paper presents an outline of an alternative left critique of the pandemic  policy  which  formulates  a  preliminary  model  of  the  “intersubjective  constitution”  of  personal  autonomy  in  the  democratic  public  sphere  as  the  basic  precondition for the capcacity of citizens to express mutual solidarity.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
T1  - Solidarnost i autonomija u kontekstu pandemije: dominantni rečnici kritike i skica alternative
T1  - Solidarity and Autonomy in the Context of the Pandemic: Dominant Vocabularies of Critique and an Outline of an Alternative
IS  - 2
VL  - 1
SP  - 229
EP  - 247
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.4304608
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2020",
abstract = "U radu se analiziraju dominantni rečnici kritike pandemijske politike u  Srbiji,  koji  se  posmatraju  kao  reprezentativni  za  ocenu  emancipa-tornog potencijala pandemije uopšte, u smislu njenog potencijala za delegitimizaciju neoliberalne demokratije. Rad razmatra dva rečnika koji poseduju izvesni kritički potencijal u ovom pogledu – tzv. proce-duralistički liberalno-demokratski i rečnik „života ispred ekonomije“ –  da  bi  zatim  ukazao  na  nemogućnost  ovih  rečnika  da  pandemijsku  politiku shvate kao formu društvene dominacije kojom se nastoji ot-kloniti pretnja po legitimnost poretka. Autor analizira prirodu domi-nacije koja se može iščitati iz glavnog narativa pandemijske politike – narativa o „nedisciplinovanim građanima“, i zaključuje da je posredi manifestacija „kompleksne dominacije“ (Lik Boltanski) koja posedu-je  strukturu  „normativnog  paradoksa“  (Aksel  Honet  i  Martin  Hart-man).  Naposletku,  rad  predstavlja  nacrt  alternativne  leve  kritike  pandemijske politike koja razvija preliminarni model „intersubjektiv-nog konstituisanja“ lične autonomije unutar demokratske javne sfere kao bazičnog preduslova za osećanje građanske solidarnosti., The  paper  analyzes  dominant  vocabularies  of  the  critique  of  the  official  Covid-19  pandemic  policy  in  Serbia,  which  are  considered  representative  of  the  general  emancipatory potential of the pandemic, in the sense of its potential to delegitimize neoliberal  democracy.  The  paper  examines  two  such  vocabularies  which  possess  a  certain critical potential in this respect – the “proceduralist liberal-democratic” one and the vocabulary of “life before economy” – in order to point to the incapacity of these vocabularies to grasp the state pandemic policy as a form of social domination which  counters  the  threat  to  the  legitimacy  of  the  political  order  created  by  the  pandemic. The author analyzes the nature of social domination that can be read out of  the  main  narrative  of  the  pandemic  policy  –  the  narrative  of  “undisciplined  citizens” – and concludes that this is a type of “complex domination” (Luc Boltanski) which  possesses  the  structure  of  a  “normative  paradox”  (Axel  Honneth  and  Martin  Hartmann). Finally, the paper presents an outline of an alternative left critique of the pandemic  policy  which  formulates  a  preliminary  model  of  the  “intersubjective  constitution”  of  personal  autonomy  in  the  democratic  public  sphere  as  the  basic  precondition for the capcacity of citizens to express mutual solidarity.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva",
title = "Solidarnost i autonomija u kontekstu pandemije: dominantni rečnici kritike i skica alternative, Solidarity and Autonomy in the Context of the Pandemic: Dominant Vocabularies of Critique and an Outline of an Alternative",
number = "2",
volume = "1",
pages = "229-247",
doi = "10.5281/zenodo.4304608"
}

Ivković, M.. (2020). Solidarnost i autonomija u kontekstu pandemije: dominantni rečnici kritike i skica alternative. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 1(2), 229-247.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304608

Ivković M. Solidarnost i autonomija u kontekstu pandemije: dominantni rečnici kritike i skica alternative. in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva. 2020;1(2):229-247.
doi:10.5281/zenodo.4304608 .

Ivković, Marjan, "Solidarnost i autonomija u kontekstu pandemije: dominantni rečnici kritike i skica alternative" in Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva, 1, no. 2 (2020):229-247,
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304608 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2044
AB  - The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socioeconomic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.
PB  - Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento
T2  - Partecipazione E Conflitto
T1  - The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative
IS  - 3
VL  - 12
SP  - 898
EP  - 918
DO  - 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Ivković, Marjan and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socioeconomic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.",
publisher = "Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento",
journal = "Partecipazione E Conflitto",
title = "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative",
number = "3",
volume = "12",
pages = "898-918",
doi = "10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898"
}

Fiket, I., Ivković, M., Pudar Draško, G.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2019). The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. in Partecipazione E Conflitto
Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento., 12(3), 898-918.
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898

Fiket I, Ivković M, Pudar Draško G, Vasiljević J. The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. in Partecipazione E Conflitto. 2019;12(3):898-918.
doi:10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 .

Fiket, Irena, Ivković, Marjan, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Vasiljević, Jelena, "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative" in Partecipazione E Conflitto, 12, no. 3 (2019):898-918,
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 . .

Ivković, M.,& Prodanović, S.. (2019). ENGAGING (for) Social Change : towards new forms of collective action. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2875

Ivković M, Prodanović S. ENGAGING (for) Social Change : towards new forms of collective action. 2019;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2875 .

Ivković, Marjan, Prodanović, Srđan, "ENGAGING (for) Social Change : towards new forms of collective action" (2019),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2875 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3157
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Engaging (For) Social Change: Towards New Forms Of Collective Action
T1  - Engagement and Complex Domination: The Emancipatory Potential of Contingency
SP  - 126
EP  - 149
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3157
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Engaging (For) Social Change: Towards New Forms Of Collective Action",
booktitle = "Engagement and Complex Domination: The Emancipatory Potential of Contingency",
pages = "126-149",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3157"
}

Ivković, M.,& Prodanović, S.. (2019). Engagement and Complex Domination: The Emancipatory Potential of Contingency. in Engaging (For) Social Change: Towards New Forms Of Collective Action
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 126-149.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3157

Ivković M, Prodanović S. Engagement and Complex Domination: The Emancipatory Potential of Contingency. in Engaging (For) Social Change: Towards New Forms Of Collective Action. 2019;:126-149.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3157 .

Ivković, Marjan, Prodanović, Srđan, "Engagement and Complex Domination: The Emancipatory Potential of Contingency" in Engaging (For) Social Change: Towards New Forms Of Collective Action (2019):126-149,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3157 .

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2940
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Engaging (for) Social Change: Towards New Forms of Collective Action
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2940
ER  - 

@book{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Engaging (for) Social Change: Towards New Forms of Collective Action",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2940"
}

Ivković, M.,& Prodanović, S.. (2019). Engaging (for) Social Change: Towards New Forms of Collective Action. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2940

Ivković M, Prodanović S. Engaging (for) Social Change: Towards New Forms of Collective Action. 2019;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2940 .

Ivković, Marjan, Prodanović, Srđan, "Engaging (for) Social Change: Towards New Forms of Collective Action" (2019),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2940 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Petrović Trifunović, Tamara
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2589
PB  - Cambridge University Press (CUP)
T2  - Nationalities Papers
T1  - The Hybrid Discourse of the Serbian Antibureaucratic Revolution
IS  - 4
VL  - 47
SP  - 597
EP  - 612
DO  - 10.1017/nps.2019.40
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Petrović Trifunović, Tamara and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press (CUP)",
journal = "Nationalities Papers",
title = "The Hybrid Discourse of the Serbian Antibureaucratic Revolution",
number = "4",
volume = "47",
pages = "597-612",
doi = "10.1017/nps.2019.40"
}

Ivković, M., Petrović Trifunović, T.,& Prodanović, S.. (2019). The Hybrid Discourse of the Serbian Antibureaucratic Revolution. in Nationalities Papers
Cambridge University Press (CUP)., 47(4), 597-612.
https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2019.40

Ivković M, Petrović Trifunović T, Prodanović S. The Hybrid Discourse of the Serbian Antibureaucratic Revolution. in Nationalities Papers. 2019;47(4):597-612.
doi:10.1017/nps.2019.40 .

Ivković, Marjan, Petrović Trifunović, Tamara, Prodanović, Srđan, "The Hybrid Discourse of the Serbian Antibureaucratic Revolution" in Nationalities Papers, 47, no. 4 (2019):597-612,
https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2019.40 . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3158
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - O pravu i drugim srodnim temama
T1  - Pravna država kao poredak socijalne slobode i vladavine refleksivnosti: normativno utemeljenje pred izazovom delegitimizacije
SP  - 163
EP  - 181
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3158
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2018",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "O pravu i drugim srodnim temama",
booktitle = "Pravna država kao poredak socijalne slobode i vladavine refleksivnosti: normativno utemeljenje pred izazovom delegitimizacije",
pages = "163-181",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3158"
}

Ivković, M.,& Prodanović, S.. (2018). Pravna država kao poredak socijalne slobode i vladavine refleksivnosti: normativno utemeljenje pred izazovom delegitimizacije. in O pravu i drugim srodnim temama
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 163-181.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3158

Ivković M, Prodanović S. Pravna država kao poredak socijalne slobode i vladavine refleksivnosti: normativno utemeljenje pred izazovom delegitimizacije. in O pravu i drugim srodnim temama. 2018;:163-181.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3158 .

Ivković, Marjan, Prodanović, Srđan, "Pravna država kao poredak socijalne slobode i vladavine refleksivnosti: normativno utemeljenje pred izazovom delegitimizacije" in O pravu i drugim srodnim temama (2018):163-181,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3158 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Matković, Aleksandar
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1681
AB  - The article focuses on the new anti-neoliberal social movements in post-Socialist Serbia, most notably the Belgrade movement “ We Won’ t Let Belgrade D(r)own” . It does this by proposing an
analytical framework for analysing the way they deploy their critique of what the authors term “ neoliberal instrumentalism”, a discourse of justification that legitimises the curtailing of
democracy in the name of economic efficiency. The article also addresses Igor  Štiks’ s “ disaggregation thesis” and suggests that, rather than being a “ failure” , the disaggregation of the
movements such as “ We Won’ t Let Belgrade D(r)own” at the initial stage of their development can be an advantage for mobilising specific segments of the population.
PB  - Milton Park : Taylor and Francis
T2  - Journal of East European Politics
T1  - Neoliberal Instrumentalism and the Fight Against it: the We 	Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own Movement
IS  - 1
VL  - 34
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1681
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Matković, Aleksandar",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The article focuses on the new anti-neoliberal social movements in post-Socialist Serbia, most notably the Belgrade movement “ We Won’ t Let Belgrade D(r)own” . It does this by proposing an
analytical framework for analysing the way they deploy their critique of what the authors term “ neoliberal instrumentalism”, a discourse of justification that legitimises the curtailing of
democracy in the name of economic efficiency. The article also addresses Igor  Štiks’ s “ disaggregation thesis” and suggests that, rather than being a “ failure” , the disaggregation of the
movements such as “ We Won’ t Let Belgrade D(r)own” at the initial stage of their development can be an advantage for mobilising specific segments of the population.",
publisher = "Milton Park : Taylor and Francis",
journal = "Journal of East European Politics",
title = "Neoliberal Instrumentalism and the Fight Against it: the We 	Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own Movement",
number = "1",
volume = "34",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1681"
}

Ivković, M.,& Matković, A.. (2018). Neoliberal Instrumentalism and the Fight Against it: the We 	Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own Movement. in Journal of East European Politics
Milton Park : Taylor and Francis., 34(1).
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1681

Ivković M, Matković A. Neoliberal Instrumentalism and the Fight Against it: the We 	Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own Movement. in Journal of East European Politics. 2018;34(1).
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1681 .

Ivković, Marjan, Matković, Aleksandar, "Neoliberal Instrumentalism and the Fight Against it: the We 	Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own Movement" in Journal of East European Politics, 34, no. 1 (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1681 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Trajković, Đurđa
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1680
PB  - Argument Verlag
T2  - Contexts of Reception of Race, Nation, 	Class: Ambiguous Identities
T1  - Reception without Receptivity: Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous  	Identities in the Region of Former Yugoslavia
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1680
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Trajković, Đurđa",
year = "2018",
publisher = "Argument Verlag",
journal = "Contexts of Reception of Race, Nation, 	Class: Ambiguous Identities",
booktitle = "Reception without Receptivity: Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous  	Identities in the Region of Former Yugoslavia",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1680"
}

Ivković, M.,& Trajković, Đ.. (2018). Reception without Receptivity: Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous  	Identities in the Region of Former Yugoslavia. in Contexts of Reception of Race, Nation, 	Class: Ambiguous Identities
Argument Verlag..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1680

Ivković M, Trajković Đ. Reception without Receptivity: Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous  	Identities in the Region of Former Yugoslavia. in Contexts of Reception of Race, Nation, 	Class: Ambiguous Identities. 2018;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1680 .

Ivković, Marjan, Trajković, Đurđa, "Reception without Receptivity: Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous  	Identities in the Region of Former Yugoslavia" in Contexts of Reception of Race, Nation, 	Class: Ambiguous Identities (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1680 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=710
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1977
AB  - Alessandro Ferrara, Rousseau and Critical Theory, Leiden, Brill, 2017
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Alessandro Ferrara, Rousseau and Critical Theory, Leiden, Brill, 2017
IS  - 4
VL  - 29
SP  - 634
EP  - 635
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1977
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Alessandro Ferrara, Rousseau and Critical Theory, Leiden, Brill, 2017",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Alessandro Ferrara, Rousseau and Critical Theory, Leiden, Brill, 2017",
number = "4",
volume = "29",
pages = "634-635",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1977"
}

Ivković, M.. (2018). Alessandro Ferrara, Rousseau and Critical Theory, Leiden, Brill, 2017. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 29(4), 634-635.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1977

Ivković M. Alessandro Ferrara, Rousseau and Critical Theory, Leiden, Brill, 2017. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2018;29(4):634-635.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1977 .

Ivković, Marjan, "Alessandro Ferrara, Rousseau and Critical Theory, Leiden, Brill, 2017" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 29, no. 4 (2018):634-635,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1977 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ferrara, Alessandro
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Lončar, Jelena
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Simeunović, Bojana
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1428
AB  - In this symposium, Alessandro Ferrara’s recent book The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism – an attempt to expand the framework of Rawls’ political liberalism in order to enable it to meet the challenge of today’s hyperpluralism – is discussed from a variety of angles by four contributors. Among the themes addressed are the potential of political liberalism for grounding a critical attitude; the different potential for accommodation offered by political liberalism for religious and moral, as opposed to economic, pluralism; Rawls’ implicit understanding of truth; the prospects of true democracy in ethnically divided societies that embrace consociationalist and particularly consensualist forms of governance; and the proper role of human rights in paths from decency to democracy from the perspective of an expanded political liberalism. In the final section, Alessandro Ferrara replies to his critics and accepts some of their suggestions.
PB  - London: SAGE Publications LTD.
PB  - London : Political Studies Association
T2  - Political Studies Review
T1  - Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism
IS  - 3
VL  - 15
SP  - 368
EP  - 390
DO  - 10.1177/1478929916645359
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ferrara, Alessandro and Ivković, Marjan and Lončar, Jelena and Prodanović, Srđan and Simeunović, Bojana",
year = "2017",
abstract = "In this symposium, Alessandro Ferrara’s recent book The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism – an attempt to expand the framework of Rawls’ political liberalism in order to enable it to meet the challenge of today’s hyperpluralism – is discussed from a variety of angles by four contributors. Among the themes addressed are the potential of political liberalism for grounding a critical attitude; the different potential for accommodation offered by political liberalism for religious and moral, as opposed to economic, pluralism; Rawls’ implicit understanding of truth; the prospects of true democracy in ethnically divided societies that embrace consociationalist and particularly consensualist forms of governance; and the proper role of human rights in paths from decency to democracy from the perspective of an expanded political liberalism. In the final section, Alessandro Ferrara replies to his critics and accepts some of their suggestions.",
publisher = "London: SAGE Publications LTD., London : Political Studies Association",
journal = "Political Studies Review",
title = "Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism",
number = "3",
volume = "15",
pages = "368-390",
doi = "10.1177/1478929916645359"
}

Ferrara, A., Ivković, M., Lončar, J., Prodanović, S.,& Simeunović, B.. (2017). Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism. in Political Studies Review
London: SAGE Publications LTD.., 15(3), 368-390.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916645359

Ferrara A, Ivković M, Lončar J, Prodanović S, Simeunović B. Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism. in Political Studies Review. 2017;15(3):368-390.
doi:10.1177/1478929916645359 .

Ferrara, Alessandro, Ivković, Marjan, Lončar, Jelena, Prodanović, Srđan, Simeunović, Bojana, "Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism" in Political Studies Review, 15, no. 3 (2017):368-390,
https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916645359 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1682
AB  - The paper reconstructs Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of the classical-liberal conception of autonomy and his articulation of an alternative view of personal autonomy as the property of certain types of intersubjective relations of recognition in modernity, developed most systematically in Honneth’s recent work Freedom’s Right (Das Recht der Freiheit). The analysis of Freedom’s
Right focuses on reconstructing Honneth’s critique of the ‘negative’ and ‘reflexive’ types of freedom (autonomy) articulated within the liberal tradition, and contrasting the former two with the conception of ‘social freedom’ (the intersubjectivist conception of autonomy) that Honneth formulates through a detailed ‘normative reconstruction of modernity’. Finally, the paper considers the proximity of Honneth’s ‘Hegelian liberalism’ to communitarianism.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - The Intersubjectivist Conception of Autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian Critique of Liberalism
IS  - 1
VL  - 28
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1682
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2017",
abstract = "The paper reconstructs Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of the classical-liberal conception of autonomy and his articulation of an alternative view of personal autonomy as the property of certain types of intersubjective relations of recognition in modernity, developed most systematically in Honneth’s recent work Freedom’s Right (Das Recht der Freiheit). The analysis of Freedom’s
Right focuses on reconstructing Honneth’s critique of the ‘negative’ and ‘reflexive’ types of freedom (autonomy) articulated within the liberal tradition, and contrasting the former two with the conception of ‘social freedom’ (the intersubjectivist conception of autonomy) that Honneth formulates through a detailed ‘normative reconstruction of modernity’. Finally, the paper considers the proximity of Honneth’s ‘Hegelian liberalism’ to communitarianism.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "The Intersubjectivist Conception of Autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian Critique of Liberalism",
number = "1",
volume = "28",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1682"
}

Ivković, M.. (2017). The Intersubjectivist Conception of Autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian Critique of Liberalism. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 28(1).
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1682

Ivković M. The Intersubjectivist Conception of Autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian Critique of Liberalism. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2017;28(1).
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1682 .

Ivković, Marjan, "The Intersubjectivist Conception of Autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian Critique of Liberalism" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 28, no. 1 (2017),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1682 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1364
AB  - The paper reconstructs Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of the classical-liberal conception of autonomy and his articulation of an alternative view of personal autonomy as the property of certain types of intersubjective relations of recognition in modernity, developed most systematically in Honneth’s
recent work Freedom’s Right (Das Recht der Freiheit). The analysis of Freedom’s Right focuses on reconstructing Honneth’s critique of the ‘negative’ and ‘reflexive’ types of freedom (autonomy) articulated within the liberal tradition, and contrasting the former two with the conception of ‘social freedom’ (the intersubjectivist conception of autonomy) that Honneth formulates through a detailed ‘normative reconstruction of modernity’. Finally, the paper considers the proximity of Honneth’s ‘Hegelian liberalism’ to communitarianism.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - The intersubjectivist conception of autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of liberalism
IS  - 1
VL  - 28
SP  - 74
EP  - 89
EP  - 
DO  - 10.2298/FID1701074I
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2017",
abstract = "The paper reconstructs Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of the classical-liberal conception of autonomy and his articulation of an alternative view of personal autonomy as the property of certain types of intersubjective relations of recognition in modernity, developed most systematically in Honneth’s
recent work Freedom’s Right (Das Recht der Freiheit). The analysis of Freedom’s Right focuses on reconstructing Honneth’s critique of the ‘negative’ and ‘reflexive’ types of freedom (autonomy) articulated within the liberal tradition, and contrasting the former two with the conception of ‘social freedom’ (the intersubjectivist conception of autonomy) that Honneth formulates through a detailed ‘normative reconstruction of modernity’. Finally, the paper considers the proximity of Honneth’s ‘Hegelian liberalism’ to communitarianism.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "The intersubjectivist conception of autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of liberalism",
number = "1",
volume = "28",
pages = "74-89-",
doi = "10.2298/FID1701074I"
}

Ivković, M.. (2017). The intersubjectivist conception of autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of liberalism. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 28(1), 74-89.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1701074I

Ivković M. The intersubjectivist conception of autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of liberalism. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2017;28(1):74-89.
doi:10.2298/FID1701074I .

Ivković, Marjan, "The intersubjectivist conception of autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of liberalism" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 28, no. 1 (2017):74-89,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1701074I . .