General Public, Architecture, and Panning: The Curious Case of Auckland Civic Centre Scheme in Auckland, New Zealand (1924)
Конференцијски прилог (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Executed skillfully, architecture and planning projects shape public spaces for generations
to enjoy – executed poorly, for generations, to annoy. Architecture and urban planning are
essentially bound to the public domain – urban spaces are designed, and urban heritage is
protected, for the sake of the public. And yet, the role of the public is often overlooked in
discussions of architectural, planning and protection issues.
The Auckland Civic Centre Scheme example illustrates the impact the public can have on
shaping the urban environment. The largest city in New Zealand, Auckland is considered
the country’s capital of commerce. During the interwar period, Auckland Council decided to
grace their city with a center worthy of its progress. However, the taxpayers objected and
voted against the expensive scheme – eventually, the Council had to abandon the project.
The consequences of this act were far-reaching – to this day, Auckland lacks a recognizable
urban space that would ...operate as a symbol of civic sentiments and activities. Drawing from
the Auckland Civic Centre Scheme, this paper explores the strategies New Zealand interwar
architects and planners proposed for preparing the members of the public to take their rightful
place in the decision-making process.
Кључне речи:
New Zealand architecture and planning / interwar period / Auckland Civic Center Scheme / the role of the public / teaching of architectureИзвор:
Architectural Heritage and Urban Planning. 11 Scientific-Professional Conference, 2021Издавач:
- Beograd : Zavod za zaštitu spomenika grada
Колекције
Институција/група
IFDTTY - CONF AU - Mađanović, Milica PY - 2021 UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2665 AB - Executed skillfully, architecture and planning projects shape public spaces for generations to enjoy – executed poorly, for generations, to annoy. Architecture and urban planning are essentially bound to the public domain – urban spaces are designed, and urban heritage is protected, for the sake of the public. And yet, the role of the public is often overlooked in discussions of architectural, planning and protection issues. The Auckland Civic Centre Scheme example illustrates the impact the public can have on shaping the urban environment. The largest city in New Zealand, Auckland is considered the country’s capital of commerce. During the interwar period, Auckland Council decided to grace their city with a center worthy of its progress. However, the taxpayers objected and voted against the expensive scheme – eventually, the Council had to abandon the project. The consequences of this act were far-reaching – to this day, Auckland lacks a recognizable urban space that would operate as a symbol of civic sentiments and activities. Drawing from the Auckland Civic Centre Scheme, this paper explores the strategies New Zealand interwar architects and planners proposed for preparing the members of the public to take their rightful place in the decision-making process. PB - Beograd : Zavod za zaštitu spomenika grada C3 - Architectural Heritage and Urban Planning. 11 Scientific-Professional Conference T1 - General Public, Architecture, and Panning: The Curious Case of Auckland Civic Centre Scheme in Auckland, New Zealand (1924) UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2665 ER -
@conference{ author = "Mađanović, Milica", year = "2021", abstract = "Executed skillfully, architecture and planning projects shape public spaces for generations to enjoy – executed poorly, for generations, to annoy. Architecture and urban planning are essentially bound to the public domain – urban spaces are designed, and urban heritage is protected, for the sake of the public. And yet, the role of the public is often overlooked in discussions of architectural, planning and protection issues. The Auckland Civic Centre Scheme example illustrates the impact the public can have on shaping the urban environment. The largest city in New Zealand, Auckland is considered the country’s capital of commerce. During the interwar period, Auckland Council decided to grace their city with a center worthy of its progress. However, the taxpayers objected and voted against the expensive scheme – eventually, the Council had to abandon the project. The consequences of this act were far-reaching – to this day, Auckland lacks a recognizable urban space that would operate as a symbol of civic sentiments and activities. Drawing from the Auckland Civic Centre Scheme, this paper explores the strategies New Zealand interwar architects and planners proposed for preparing the members of the public to take their rightful place in the decision-making process.", publisher = "Beograd : Zavod za zaštitu spomenika grada", journal = "Architectural Heritage and Urban Planning. 11 Scientific-Professional Conference", title = "General Public, Architecture, and Panning: The Curious Case of Auckland Civic Centre Scheme in Auckland, New Zealand (1924)", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2665" }
Mađanović, M.. (2021). General Public, Architecture, and Panning: The Curious Case of Auckland Civic Centre Scheme in Auckland, New Zealand (1924). in Architectural Heritage and Urban Planning. 11 Scientific-Professional Conference Beograd : Zavod za zaštitu spomenika grada.. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2665
Mađanović M. General Public, Architecture, and Panning: The Curious Case of Auckland Civic Centre Scheme in Auckland, New Zealand (1924). in Architectural Heritage and Urban Planning. 11 Scientific-Professional Conference. 2021;. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2665 .
Mađanović, Milica, "General Public, Architecture, and Panning: The Curious Case of Auckland Civic Centre Scheme in Auckland, New Zealand (1924)" in Architectural Heritage and Urban Planning. 11 Scientific-Professional Conference (2021), https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_2665 .