This critique is focused on a small theory regarding the constituting of a group through the simultaneous exclusion of some other group. Is it possible, then, to produce social and nonsocial acts (negative social acts) at the same time? Or is it possible to construct a group which acts ‘genocidally’, meaning that it destroys another group or “the groupness” of a group, and at the same time affirm its own unity and its ontological stability? (I have used the word ‘institution’ in the title, since we are dealing with a group that is lasting, and not temporary.) Finally, does this thematization of the group through intergroup antagonism have anything to do with Lemkin’s word genocide’?
Keywords:
group / grupa / genocid / genocide / convention / konvencija / negativni akti / negative acts / socijalni genocid / social genocide
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2013, 123-134
TY - JOUR
AU - Bojanić, Petar D.
PY - 2013
UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/954
AB - This critique is focused on a small theory regarding the constituting of a group through the simultaneous exclusion of some other group. Is it possible, then, to produce social and nonsocial acts (negative social acts) at the same time? Or is it possible to construct a group which acts ‘genocidally’, meaning that it destroys another group or “the groupness” of a group, and at the same time affirm its own unity and its ontological stability? (I have used the word ‘institution’ in the title, since we are dealing with a group that is lasting, and not temporary.) Finally, does this thematization of the group through intergroup antagonism have anything to do with Lemkin’s word genocide’?
T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1 - Institucija grupe i genocidna delovanja
T1 - The Institution of group and genocidal acts
SP - 123
EP - 134
DO - 10.2298/FID1303123B
ER -
@article{
editor = "Jovanov, Rastko",
author = "Bojanić, Petar D.",
year = "2013",
abstract = "This critique is focused on a small theory regarding the constituting of a group through the simultaneous exclusion of some other group. Is it possible, then, to produce social and nonsocial acts (negative social acts) at the same time? Or is it possible to construct a group which acts ‘genocidally’, meaning that it destroys another group or “the groupness” of a group, and at the same time affirm its own unity and its ontological stability? (I have used the word ‘institution’ in the title, since we are dealing with a group that is lasting, and not temporary.) Finally, does this thematization of the group through intergroup antagonism have anything to do with Lemkin’s word genocide’?",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Institucija grupe i genocidna delovanja, The Institution of group and genocidal acts",
pages = "123-134",
doi = "10.2298/FID1303123B"
}
Jovanov, R.,& Bojanić, P. D.. (2013). Institucija grupe i genocidna delovanja. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 123-134.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1303123B
Jovanov R, Bojanić PD. Institucija grupe i genocidna delovanja. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2013;:123-134.
doi:10.2298/FID1303123B .
Jovanov, Rastko, Bojanić, Petar D., "Institucija grupe i genocidna delovanja" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2013):123-134,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1303123B . .
