Приказ основних података о документу

The Common Field of Identity and Difference: Speculative and Social Theory

dc.creatorKrstić, Predrag
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-01T10:16:43Z
dc.date.available2017-11-01T10:16:43Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier0351-4706 (Tisak)
dc.identifier1848-2309 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/769
dc.identifier.urihttps://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=124988
dc.description.abstractOvaj rad želi u dilemama s kojima se suočavaju suvremene društvene znanosti pri nastojanju artikuliranja koncepcije kolektivnog identiteta prepoznati motive mišljenja identiteta koje je već iskušavala spekulativna filozofska tradicija. Čini se da jednim zaobilaznim i tako reći »empirijskim« putem prve ponavljaju paradokse potonje: udarajući na samu granicu diskurzivnog poimanja identiteta, svjedoče o unutrašnjoj proturječnosti i, istovremeno, neophodnosti njegovog instaliranja. Oba pristupa ustanovljuju neizbježnu »dijalektičku« suigru identiteta i razlike, koji se, čak i u svojim radikalnim samoafirmacijama, međusobno podrazumijevaju, konstituiraju i podržavaju. Upitno, međutim, (p)ostaje koliko je takva njihova »apstraktna« strukturalna su-upućenost operativna, kao i je li moguće misliti mimo ili preko nje.srp
dc.description.abstractIn confronting dilemmas of contemporary social science when attempting to articulate the concept of collective identity, this paper would try to recognize the motives of thinking the identity that has already been tried by the speculative philosophical tradition. It appears that in roundabout, so called “empirical” way the former are repeating the paradox of the latter: aiming at the boundary of the discursive understanding of the identity, they testify inner contradictions, and at the same time, necessity of establishing it. Both approaches ascertain unavoidable “dialectical” inter-play of the identity and the difference, that even in their radical self affirmation, imply, constitute, and endorse one another. However, there is still the question of how much is this “abstract” structural co-dependency operative, and also, is it possible to think past it or over it.en
dc.format32 (2012) 3-18
dc.languagesr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/43007/RS//
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceFilozofska istraživanjasrp
dc.subjectpolitika identiteta
dc.subjectpolitics of identity
dc.subjectfilozofija razlike
dc.subjectphilosophy of difference
dc.titleZajedničko polje identiteta i razlike: spekulativna i socijalna teorijasr
dc.titleThe Common Field of Identity and Difference: Speculative and Social Theoryeng
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dcterms.abstractКрстић, Предраг; Заједничко поље идентитета и разлике: спекулативна и социјална теорија;
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.volume32
dc.citation.spage3
dc.citation.epage18
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/3305/01_Krstic.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_769


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу