Show simple item record

Rousseau and Marx: Convergence or Divergence?

dc.contributor.editorMilidrag, Predrag
dc.creatorLošonc, Alpar
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-01T10:16:26Z
dc.date.available2017-11-01T10:16:26Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier0353-5738
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/651
dc.description.abstractRousseau and Marx represent two paradigmatic variants of a radical opposition to the world. Without a doubt, there are significant moments of convergence between these thinkers, for instance in terms of division of labour, or in respect to the self-commandment. However, it is our contention that despite certain currents in literature, the tendencies of divergence are stronger than convergence, therefore, we argue that these thinkers signify two different variants of radical thought. We base these differences in a reading of Rousseau that focuses on collective authenticity, justice, self-presentation of people and protest against envy. Marx cannot be read from the perspective of the intensified crisis of non-authenticity, in fact, his critique of political economy generates a reflexive field (overcoming of the wage labour, etc.), which is deeply divergent compared to Rousseau.eng
dc.format23 3 (2012) 176-198
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagesr
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceFilozofija i društvomul
dc.subjectdivision of labour
dc.subjectcritic of political economy
dc.subjectjustice
dc.subjectpeople
dc.subjectauthenticity
dc.titleRuso i Marks : konvergencija ili divergencija?srp
dc.titleRousseau and Marx: Convergence or Divergence?eng
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dcterms.abstractЛошонц, Aлпар; Русо и Маркс: конвергенција или дивергенција?;
dc.citation.spage176
dc.citation.epage198
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/FID1203176L
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs//bitstream/id/5046/649.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record