Ruso i Marks : konvergencija ili divergencija?
Rousseau and Marx: Convergence or Divergence?
Apstrakt
Rousseau and Marx represent two paradigmatic variants of a radical opposition to the world. Without a doubt, there are significant moments of convergence between these thinkers, for instance in terms of division of labour, or in respect to the self-commandment. However, it is our contention that despite certain currents in literature, the tendencies of divergence are stronger than convergence, therefore, we argue that these thinkers signify two different variants of radical thought. We base these differences in a reading of Rousseau that focuses on collective authenticity, justice, self-presentation of people and protest against envy. Marx cannot be read from the perspective of the intensified crisis of non-authenticity, in fact, his critique of political economy generates a reflexive field (overcoming of the wage labour, etc.), which is deeply divergent compared to Rousseau.
Ključne reči:
division of labour / critic of political economy / justice / people / authenticityIzvor:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2012, 176-198Institucija/grupa
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Lošonc, Alpar PY - 2012 UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/651 AB - Rousseau and Marx represent two paradigmatic variants of a radical opposition to the world. Without a doubt, there are significant moments of convergence between these thinkers, for instance in terms of division of labour, or in respect to the self-commandment. However, it is our contention that despite certain currents in literature, the tendencies of divergence are stronger than convergence, therefore, we argue that these thinkers signify two different variants of radical thought. We base these differences in a reading of Rousseau that focuses on collective authenticity, justice, self-presentation of people and protest against envy. Marx cannot be read from the perspective of the intensified crisis of non-authenticity, in fact, his critique of political economy generates a reflexive field (overcoming of the wage labour, etc.), which is deeply divergent compared to Rousseau. T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society T1 - Ruso i Marks : konvergencija ili divergencija? T1 - Rousseau and Marx: Convergence or Divergence? SP - 176 EP - 198 DO - 10.2298/FID1203176L ER -
@article{ editor = "Milidrag, Predrag", author = "Lošonc, Alpar", year = "2012", abstract = "Rousseau and Marx represent two paradigmatic variants of a radical opposition to the world. Without a doubt, there are significant moments of convergence between these thinkers, for instance in terms of division of labour, or in respect to the self-commandment. However, it is our contention that despite certain currents in literature, the tendencies of divergence are stronger than convergence, therefore, we argue that these thinkers signify two different variants of radical thought. We base these differences in a reading of Rousseau that focuses on collective authenticity, justice, self-presentation of people and protest against envy. Marx cannot be read from the perspective of the intensified crisis of non-authenticity, in fact, his critique of political economy generates a reflexive field (overcoming of the wage labour, etc.), which is deeply divergent compared to Rousseau.", journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society", title = "Ruso i Marks : konvergencija ili divergencija?, Rousseau and Marx: Convergence or Divergence?", pages = "176-198", doi = "10.2298/FID1203176L" }
Milidrag, P.,& Lošonc, A.. (2012). Ruso i Marks : konvergencija ili divergencija?. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 176-198. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1203176L
Milidrag P, Lošonc A. Ruso i Marks : konvergencija ili divergencija?. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2012;:176-198. doi:10.2298/FID1203176L .
Milidrag, Predrag, Lošonc, Alpar, "Ruso i Marks : konvergencija ili divergencija?" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2012):176-198, https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1203176L . .