Show simple item record

Prednosti integrisanja agonizma i deliberacije

dc.contributor.editorMilidrag, Predrag
dc.creatorKnops, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-01T10:16:14Z
dc.date.available2017-11-01T10:16:14Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier0353-5738
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/580
dc.description.abstractIn “Agonism as Deliberation” (Knops 2007) I suggest a reconciliation between Mouffe’s agonist version of democracy, adjusted to preserve consistency, and deliberation. Here I reply to two subsequent criticisms of this project: Gürsözlü (2009) and Fives (2009). Although both hold agonism and deliberation incompatible impossible, they do so from opposing perspectives. Gürsözlü defends Mouffe’s agonism as distinct and coherent on the basis of what he considers a correct understanding of her concept of hegemony. Fives argues Mouffe’s approach is separate but incoherent, and should be rejected. Against these two conflicting positions, I seek to demonstrate not only that integration between agonism and democracy is possible, but that it has distinct benefits for both agonism and deliberative theory. Divested of its contradictory assertion that universal rational consensus is impossible in principle, agonism can be interpreted as theory of the moment of difference within a broader deliberative dialectic that seeks to move from more to less partial consensus. Conceived in this way, we can better appreciate how these two approaches can complement one another, in pursuing shared goals, rather than the static and unnecessary opposition offered by the two critics I address here.eng
dc.format23 4 (2012) 151-169
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceFilozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Societymul
dc.subjectHabermas, Jirgen
dc.subjectMouffe
dc.subjectdeliberation
dc.subjectagonism
dc.subjectdemocracy
dc.titleIntegrating Agonism with Deliberation – Realising the Benefitseng
dc.titlePrednosti integrisanja agonizma i deliberacijesr
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dcterms.abstractКнопс, Aндреw; Предности интегрисања агонизма и делиберације;
dc.citation.spage151
dc.citation.epage169
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/FID1204151K
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/5009/578.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record