Show simple item record

Aktuelna debata : (K+M) P i konačna šteta

dc.contributor.editorMilidrag, Predrag
dc.creatorRakić, Vojin
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-01T10:16:09Z
dc.date.available2017-11-01T10:16:09Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier0353-5738
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/560
dc.description.abstractPersson and Savulescu (2011b) is a largely successful defense of the position promoted in Persson and Savulescu (2008) against Fenton’s critique of this position in Fenton (2009). However, one of Fenton’s essential censures has remained without response: if moral enhancement (ME) is to occur at the genetic or biological level, as Persson and Savulescu suppose it can and ought to, it will not be possible without significant scientific progress, including cognitive enhancement (CE) by bio-medical means. I will offer a response here to this critique Fenton raised—a response Persson and Savulecu did not give. It will be based on the concept of “integrated neuro-enhancement”, abbreviated (C+M) E.eng
dc.format23 4 (2012) 87-96
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/41004/RS//
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/43007/RS//
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceFilozofija i društvomul
dc.subjectultimate harm
dc.subjectintegrated neuro-enhancement
dc.subjectmoral enhancement
dc.subjectcognitive enhancement
dc.titleThe Current Debate: (C+M) E and Ultimate Harmeng
dc.titleAktuelna debata : (K+M) P i konačna štetasrp
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dcterms.abstractРакић, Војин; Aктуелна дебата: (К+М) П и коначна штета;
dc.citation.spage87
dc.citation.epage96
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/FID1204087R
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs//bitstream/id/4997/558.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record