The Current Debate: (C+M) E and Ultimate Harm
Aktuelna debata : (K+M) P i konačna šteta
Abstract
Persson and Savulescu (2011b) is a largely successful defense of the position promoted in Persson and Savulescu (2008) against Fenton’s critique of this position in Fenton (2009). However, one of Fenton’s essential censures has remained without response: if moral enhancement (ME) is to occur at the genetic or biological level, as Persson and Savulescu suppose it can and ought to, it will not be possible without significant scientific progress, including cognitive enhancement (CE) by bio-medical means. I will offer a response here to this critique Fenton raised—a response Persson and Savulecu did not give. It will be based on the concept of “integrated neuro-enhancement”, abbreviated (C+M) E.
Keywords:
ultimate harm / integrated neuro-enhancement / moral enhancement / cognitive enhancementSource:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2012, 87-96Funding / projects:
- Rare Diseases:Molecular Pathophysiology, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Modalities and Social, Ethical and Legal Aspects (RS-41004)
- Studying climate change and its influence on environment: impacts, adaptation and mitigation (RS-43007)
Institution/Community
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Rakić, Vojin PY - 2012 UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/560 AB - Persson and Savulescu (2011b) is a largely successful defense of the position promoted in Persson and Savulescu (2008) against Fenton’s critique of this position in Fenton (2009). However, one of Fenton’s essential censures has remained without response: if moral enhancement (ME) is to occur at the genetic or biological level, as Persson and Savulescu suppose it can and ought to, it will not be possible without significant scientific progress, including cognitive enhancement (CE) by bio-medical means. I will offer a response here to this critique Fenton raised—a response Persson and Savulecu did not give. It will be based on the concept of “integrated neuro-enhancement”, abbreviated (C+M) E. T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society T1 - The Current Debate: (C+M) E and Ultimate Harm T1 - Aktuelna debata : (K+M) P i konačna šteta SP - 87 EP - 96 DO - 10.2298/FID1204087R ER -
@article{ editor = "Milidrag, Predrag", author = "Rakić, Vojin", year = "2012", abstract = "Persson and Savulescu (2011b) is a largely successful defense of the position promoted in Persson and Savulescu (2008) against Fenton’s critique of this position in Fenton (2009). However, one of Fenton’s essential censures has remained without response: if moral enhancement (ME) is to occur at the genetic or biological level, as Persson and Savulescu suppose it can and ought to, it will not be possible without significant scientific progress, including cognitive enhancement (CE) by bio-medical means. I will offer a response here to this critique Fenton raised—a response Persson and Savulecu did not give. It will be based on the concept of “integrated neuro-enhancement”, abbreviated (C+M) E.", journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society", title = "The Current Debate: (C+M) E and Ultimate Harm, Aktuelna debata : (K+M) P i konačna šteta", pages = "87-96", doi = "10.2298/FID1204087R" }
Milidrag, P.,& Rakić, V.. (2012). The Current Debate: (C+M) E and Ultimate Harm. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1204087R
Milidrag P, Rakić V. The Current Debate: (C+M) E and Ultimate Harm. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2012;:87-96. doi:10.2298/FID1204087R .
Milidrag, Predrag, Rakić, Vojin, "The Current Debate: (C+M) E and Ultimate Harm" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2012):87-96, https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1204087R . .