Show simple item record

dc.creatorBojanić, Petar D.
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-01T10:15:44Z
dc.date.available2017-11-01T10:15:44Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier2542-2278
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/391
dc.description.abstractTh e general idea of the article is to compare Deleuze’s theory of the institution, which emerges in the context of various infl uences of French phenomenology and philosophy of law, with Searle’s theory and the latest Anglo-Saxon theories of the institution, and the new institutionalism. Deleuze carelessly diff erentiates infl uences and fragments copied or taken over from Hume, Saint-Just, de Sade, Renard, Hauriou, Durkheim, Malinowski and others and in the end completely succeeds in relegating to oblivion his ingenious project from 1953, Instincts and Institutions (Instincts et institutions). Th e consequences of such writing and theoretical work call into question the status of the theory of the institution and replace it with intuition and recognition that the thematisation of the institution is an impossible task. Th us the author of the article attempts to ‘integrate’ this impossibility to systematically think or explain the fi gure of institution into the framework of the great and pioneering work of Saint- Just, Hume, Deleuze, Gehlen and Searle.eng
dc.format32 2 (2016) 4-14
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceВестник Санкт-Петербургского Университетаrus
dc.titleGilles Deleuze on Institution and Violence [Žil Delez o instituciji i nasilju]eng
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dcterms.abstractБојанић, Петар Д.
dc.citation.spage4
dc.citation.epage14
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs//bitstream/id/4933/389.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record