The Integrative Potential of Contemporary Perspectives on the Nature/Culture Conceptual Relationship
Integrativni potencijal savremenih perspektiva na konceptualni odnos prirode i kulture
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
In this paper, I analyze and compare Maria Kronfeldner’s and Tim Ingold’s views on the conceptual relationship between nature and culture. I show that despite the differences, their views remain close particularly in terms of their integrative potential. The ultimate purpose of this examination is to lay the groundwork for further research on the problem of conceptual integration between sociocultural anthropology and evolutionary psychology. The paper comprises four main sections. First, I briefly explore the history of Darwinism to show how nature and culture were conceptualized within this framework. Second, I deal with Kronfeldner’s separationist stance and Ingold’s holistic perspective on the nature/culture conceptual relationship. Third, I discuss the implications of their views on the choice of research heuristics in the sciences that study human nature and cultures. While I interpret Ingold as supporting methodological integration, Kronfelder argues for a version of integrative... pluralism. Lastly, I provide an outlook for further discussions on conceptual integration and integrative pluralism.
U ovom radu analiziram i upoređujem tvrdnje Marie Kronfeldner i Tima Ingolda o konceptualnom odnosu prirode i kulture. Pokazujem da uprkos razlikama, njihovi stavovi ostaju bliski,
posebno u pogledu njihovog integrativnog potencijala. Krajnji cilj ovog istraživanja je postavljanje osnova za dalje ispitivanje problema konceptualne integracije između sociokulturne
antropologije i evolucione psihologije. Rad se sastoji od četiri glavna dela. Prvo, ukratko istražujem istoriju darvinizma kako bih pokazala na koji način su priroda i kultura konceptualizovane unutar ovog teorijskog okvira. Drugo, bavim se separacionizmom koji zastupa Kronfeldner i Ingoldovom holističkom perspektivom kada je u pitanju konceptualni odnosa prirode
i kulture. Treće, raspravljam o implikacijama njihovih teorija na izbor istraživačke heuristike
u naukama koje proučavaju ljudsku prirodu i ljudske kulture. Dok tumačim Ingoldovu poziciju kao metodološki integracionizam, Kronfelder se zalaže za verziju integrativn...og pluralizma. Na kraju, postavljam okvire za dalja istraživanja konceptualne integracije i integrativnog
pluralizma.
Кључне речи:
human nature / culture / integrative pluralism / conceptual integration / evolutionary psychologyИзвор:
Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 2024, 35, 1, 103-123Издавач:
- Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
Финансирање / пројекти:
- Министарство науке, технолошког развоја и иновација Републике Србије, институционално финансирање - 200025 (Универзитет у Београду, Институт за филозофију и друштвену теорију) (RS-MESTD-inst-2020-200025)
Колекције
Институција/група
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Knežević, Aleksandra PY - 2024 UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3698 AB - In this paper, I analyze and compare Maria Kronfeldner’s and Tim Ingold’s views on the conceptual relationship between nature and culture. I show that despite the differences, their views remain close particularly in terms of their integrative potential. The ultimate purpose of this examination is to lay the groundwork for further research on the problem of conceptual integration between sociocultural anthropology and evolutionary psychology. The paper comprises four main sections. First, I briefly explore the history of Darwinism to show how nature and culture were conceptualized within this framework. Second, I deal with Kronfeldner’s separationist stance and Ingold’s holistic perspective on the nature/culture conceptual relationship. Third, I discuss the implications of their views on the choice of research heuristics in the sciences that study human nature and cultures. While I interpret Ingold as supporting methodological integration, Kronfelder argues for a version of integrative pluralism. Lastly, I provide an outlook for further discussions on conceptual integration and integrative pluralism. AB - U ovom radu analiziram i upoređujem tvrdnje Marie Kronfeldner i Tima Ingolda o konceptualnom odnosu prirode i kulture. Pokazujem da uprkos razlikama, njihovi stavovi ostaju bliski, posebno u pogledu njihovog integrativnog potencijala. Krajnji cilj ovog istraživanja je postavljanje osnova za dalje ispitivanje problema konceptualne integracije između sociokulturne antropologije i evolucione psihologije. Rad se sastoji od četiri glavna dela. Prvo, ukratko istražujem istoriju darvinizma kako bih pokazala na koji način su priroda i kultura konceptualizovane unutar ovog teorijskog okvira. Drugo, bavim se separacionizmom koji zastupa Kronfeldner i Ingoldovom holističkom perspektivom kada je u pitanju konceptualni odnosa prirode i kulture. Treće, raspravljam o implikacijama njihovih teorija na izbor istraživačke heuristike u naukama koje proučavaju ljudsku prirodu i ljudske kulture. Dok tumačim Ingoldovu poziciju kao metodološki integracionizam, Kronfelder se zalaže za verziju integrativnog pluralizma. Na kraju, postavljam okvire za dalja istraživanja konceptualne integracije i integrativnog pluralizma. PB - Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory T2 - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society T1 - The Integrative Potential of Contemporary Perspectives on the Nature/Culture Conceptual Relationship T1 - Integrativni potencijal savremenih perspektiva na konceptualni odnos prirode i kulture IS - 1 VL - 35 SP - 103 EP - 123 DO - 10.2298/FID2401103K UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3698 ER -
@article{ author = "Knežević, Aleksandra", year = "2024", abstract = "In this paper, I analyze and compare Maria Kronfeldner’s and Tim Ingold’s views on the conceptual relationship between nature and culture. I show that despite the differences, their views remain close particularly in terms of their integrative potential. The ultimate purpose of this examination is to lay the groundwork for further research on the problem of conceptual integration between sociocultural anthropology and evolutionary psychology. The paper comprises four main sections. First, I briefly explore the history of Darwinism to show how nature and culture were conceptualized within this framework. Second, I deal with Kronfeldner’s separationist stance and Ingold’s holistic perspective on the nature/culture conceptual relationship. Third, I discuss the implications of their views on the choice of research heuristics in the sciences that study human nature and cultures. While I interpret Ingold as supporting methodological integration, Kronfelder argues for a version of integrative pluralism. Lastly, I provide an outlook for further discussions on conceptual integration and integrative pluralism., U ovom radu analiziram i upoređujem tvrdnje Marie Kronfeldner i Tima Ingolda o konceptualnom odnosu prirode i kulture. Pokazujem da uprkos razlikama, njihovi stavovi ostaju bliski, posebno u pogledu njihovog integrativnog potencijala. Krajnji cilj ovog istraživanja je postavljanje osnova za dalje ispitivanje problema konceptualne integracije između sociokulturne antropologije i evolucione psihologije. Rad se sastoji od četiri glavna dela. Prvo, ukratko istražujem istoriju darvinizma kako bih pokazala na koji način su priroda i kultura konceptualizovane unutar ovog teorijskog okvira. Drugo, bavim se separacionizmom koji zastupa Kronfeldner i Ingoldovom holističkom perspektivom kada je u pitanju konceptualni odnosa prirode i kulture. Treće, raspravljam o implikacijama njihovih teorija na izbor istraživačke heuristike u naukama koje proučavaju ljudsku prirodu i ljudske kulture. Dok tumačim Ingoldovu poziciju kao metodološki integracionizam, Kronfelder se zalaže za verziju integrativnog pluralizma. Na kraju, postavljam okvire za dalja istraživanja konceptualne integracije i integrativnog pluralizma.", publisher = "Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory", journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society", title = "The Integrative Potential of Contemporary Perspectives on the Nature/Culture Conceptual Relationship, Integrativni potencijal savremenih perspektiva na konceptualni odnos prirode i kulture", number = "1", volume = "35", pages = "103-123", doi = "10.2298/FID2401103K", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3698" }
Knežević, A.. (2024). The Integrative Potential of Contemporary Perspectives on the Nature/Culture Conceptual Relationship. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory., 35(1), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2401103K https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3698
Knežević A. The Integrative Potential of Contemporary Perspectives on the Nature/Culture Conceptual Relationship. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2024;35(1):103-123. doi:10.2298/FID2401103K https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3698 .
Knežević, Aleksandra, "The Integrative Potential of Contemporary Perspectives on the Nature/Culture Conceptual Relationship" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 35, no. 1 (2024):103-123, https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2401103K ., https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3698 .