This paper focuses on the following question: how is philosophy of anything possible? Where lies the boundary of specialisation area beyond which the term “philosophy” loses not only its strength, but also its meaning? When we talk about specific genre, for example, graphic art or sculpture we use the term “philosophy” in a broader, metaphorical sense. Why then should philosophy of photography be any different? All of the above mentioned questions are discussed in the present article. Philosophy of photography is, indeed, a legitimate discipline, just as philosophy of language, philosophy of science and technology and philosophy of politics are.
Keywords:
photography / visual image / iconic turn / language of media
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2015, 893-901
Publisher:
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
TY - JOUR
AU - Savchuk, Valéry
PY - 2015
UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/338
AB - This paper focuses on the following question: how is philosophy of anything possible? Where lies the boundary of specialisation area beyond which the term “philosophy” loses not only its strength, but also its meaning? When we talk about specific genre, for example, graphic art or sculpture we use the term “philosophy” in a broader, metaphorical sense. Why then should philosophy of photography be any different? All of the above mentioned questions are discussed in the present article. Philosophy of photography is, indeed, a legitimate discipline, just as philosophy of language, philosophy of science and technology and philosophy of politics are.
PB - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1 - How is a Philosophy of Photography Possible?
SP - 893
EP - 901
DO - 10.2298/FID1504893S
ER -
@article{
editor = "Jovanov, Rastko",
author = "Savchuk, Valéry",
year = "2015",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/338",
abstract = "This paper focuses on the following question: how is philosophy of anything possible? Where lies the boundary of specialisation area beyond which the term “philosophy” loses not only its strength, but also its meaning? When we talk about specific genre, for example, graphic art or sculpture we use the term “philosophy” in a broader, metaphorical sense. Why then should philosophy of photography be any different? All of the above mentioned questions are discussed in the present article. Philosophy of photography is, indeed, a legitimate discipline, just as philosophy of language, philosophy of science and technology and philosophy of politics are.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "How is a Philosophy of Photography Possible?",
pages = "893-901",
doi = "10.2298/FID1504893S"
}
Jovanov, R.,& Savchuk, V. (2015). How is a Philosophy of Photography Possible?.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 893-901.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1504893S
Jovanov R, Savchuk V. How is a Philosophy of Photography Possible?. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2015;:893-901
Jovanov Rastko, Savchuk Valéry, "How is a Philosophy of Photography Possible?" Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2015):893-901,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1504893S .
