Industrijalizacija Holokausta? (Američka) debata o instrumentalizaciji Šoe na prelomu veka
Holocaust Industry? The (American) Debate on the Instrumentalization of the Shoah at the Turn of the Century
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
Тема рада је историјска дебата око феномена тзв. индустрије Холокауста. У основи ове дебате налазе се питања „централности", јединствености, универзализације, американизације и инструментализације Шое. Након горуће јавне контроверзе, последично уништених каријера и политичког збијања редова, та питања остала су да лебде као претећи означитељи Zeitgeista савремене културе сећања, као отворена прича о етичности репрезентације Холокауста.
In three books published at the turn of the millennium, the authors talk about the phenomenon of the pronounced presence and significance of the Holocaust in American society: Hilene Flanzbaum’s Americanization of the Holocaust (1999), Peter Novick’s Holocaust in American Life (1999) and Norman Finkelstein’s The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering (2000). These works describe (and criticize) the post-Holocaust memorial world which is characterized by the commodification, commercialization and instrumentalization of the culture of remembrance. Even though each of these authors invoked/understood the term differently, the effect of their works was the introduction of the term „Holocaust industry“ into the public discourse. Today, it has has become an umbrella metaphor for a whole range of practices that represent the instrumentalization, commercialization and commodification of Holocaust remembrance. The paper deals with the process of (politicaleconom...ic) instrumentalization of the Holocaust, its normalization, naturalization, normativization and mechanization – in Western societies – and criticism of that process. The aim of the paper is to shed light on what is meant by the Holocaust industry and to open space for further reflection and problematization of the Holocaust discourse in the light of the warning that its current commodification and industrialization sends us.
Кључне речи:
Holocaust / politics of remembrance / commodification / Holocaust industry / popular cultureИзвор:
Sociologija, 2023, 65, 2, 279-294Издавач:
- Beograd : Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije
Финансирање / пројекти:
- "info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200025/RS//" (RS-MESTD-inst-2020-200025)
Колекције
Институција/група
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Mevorah, Vera AU - Krstić, Predrag AU - Velinov, Marija PY - 2023 UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3022 AB - Тема рада је историјска дебата око феномена тзв. индустрије Холокауста. У основи ове дебате налазе се питања „централности", јединствености, универзализације, американизације и инструментализације Шое. Након горуће јавне контроверзе, последично уништених каријера и политичког збијања редова, та питања остала су да лебде као претећи означитељи Zeitgeista савремене културе сећања, као отворена прича о етичности репрезентације Холокауста. AB - In three books published at the turn of the millennium, the authors talk about the phenomenon of the pronounced presence and significance of the Holocaust in American society: Hilene Flanzbaum’s Americanization of the Holocaust (1999), Peter Novick’s Holocaust in American Life (1999) and Norman Finkelstein’s The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering (2000). These works describe (and criticize) the post-Holocaust memorial world which is characterized by the commodification, commercialization and instrumentalization of the culture of remembrance. Even though each of these authors invoked/understood the term differently, the effect of their works was the introduction of the term „Holocaust industry“ into the public discourse. Today, it has has become an umbrella metaphor for a whole range of practices that represent the instrumentalization, commercialization and commodification of Holocaust remembrance. The paper deals with the process of (politicaleconomic) instrumentalization of the Holocaust, its normalization, naturalization, normativization and mechanization – in Western societies – and criticism of that process. The aim of the paper is to shed light on what is meant by the Holocaust industry and to open space for further reflection and problematization of the Holocaust discourse in the light of the warning that its current commodification and industrialization sends us. PB - Beograd : Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije T2 - Sociologija T1 - Industrijalizacija Holokausta? (Američka) debata o instrumentalizaciji Šoe na prelomu veka T1 - Holocaust Industry? The (American) Debate on the Instrumentalization of the Shoah at the Turn of the Century IS - 2 VL - 65 SP - 279 EP - 294 DO - 10.2298/SOC220622009M ER -
@article{ author = "Mevorah, Vera and Krstić, Predrag and Velinov, Marija", year = "2023", abstract = "Тема рада је историјска дебата око феномена тзв. индустрије Холокауста. У основи ове дебате налазе се питања „централности", јединствености, универзализације, американизације и инструментализације Шое. Након горуће јавне контроверзе, последично уништених каријера и политичког збијања редова, та питања остала су да лебде као претећи означитељи Zeitgeista савремене културе сећања, као отворена прича о етичности репрезентације Холокауста., In three books published at the turn of the millennium, the authors talk about the phenomenon of the pronounced presence and significance of the Holocaust in American society: Hilene Flanzbaum’s Americanization of the Holocaust (1999), Peter Novick’s Holocaust in American Life (1999) and Norman Finkelstein’s The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering (2000). These works describe (and criticize) the post-Holocaust memorial world which is characterized by the commodification, commercialization and instrumentalization of the culture of remembrance. Even though each of these authors invoked/understood the term differently, the effect of their works was the introduction of the term „Holocaust industry“ into the public discourse. Today, it has has become an umbrella metaphor for a whole range of practices that represent the instrumentalization, commercialization and commodification of Holocaust remembrance. The paper deals with the process of (politicaleconomic) instrumentalization of the Holocaust, its normalization, naturalization, normativization and mechanization – in Western societies – and criticism of that process. The aim of the paper is to shed light on what is meant by the Holocaust industry and to open space for further reflection and problematization of the Holocaust discourse in the light of the warning that its current commodification and industrialization sends us.", publisher = "Beograd : Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije", journal = "Sociologija", title = "Industrijalizacija Holokausta? (Američka) debata o instrumentalizaciji Šoe na prelomu veka, Holocaust Industry? The (American) Debate on the Instrumentalization of the Shoah at the Turn of the Century", number = "2", volume = "65", pages = "279-294", doi = "10.2298/SOC220622009M" }
Mevorah, V., Krstić, P.,& Velinov, M.. (2023). Industrijalizacija Holokausta? (Američka) debata o instrumentalizaciji Šoe na prelomu veka. in Sociologija Beograd : Sociološko naučno društvo Srbije., 65(2), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC220622009M
Mevorah V, Krstić P, Velinov M. Industrijalizacija Holokausta? (Američka) debata o instrumentalizaciji Šoe na prelomu veka. in Sociologija. 2023;65(2):279-294. doi:10.2298/SOC220622009M .
Mevorah, Vera, Krstić, Predrag, Velinov, Marija, "Industrijalizacija Holokausta? (Američka) debata o instrumentalizaciji Šoe na prelomu veka" in Sociologija, 65, no. 2 (2023):279-294, https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC220622009M . .