Приказ основних података о документу

The Distinction of Civil and Political Society in The Work of Gramsci

dc.creatorKorolija, Aleksandar
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-15T14:13:31Z
dc.date.available2021-12-15T14:13:31Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2683-5959
dc.identifier.urihttps://kritika.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/kc/article/view/67
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2471
dc.description.abstractU radu se razmatra Gramšijevo shvatanje političkog i građanskog društva pozivajući se na kritiku Perija Andersona koji ovaj problem označava kao antinomiju u Gramšijevom radu. Osnovni problem je razlikovanje hegemonije i dominacije, prilikom kojeg se hegemonija svrstava unutar građanskog, a dominacija unutar političkog društva. U takvom razdvajanju nivoa dolazi do problema države i njene pripadnosti jednom od ova dva nivoa. Kroz ponovno čitanje Gramšija se pokušava doći do odgovora na problem koji Anderson primećuje i pridaje mu status antinomije. Kako bi se odgovor našao daje se celovit uvid Gramšija u predmete poput odnosa baze i nadgradnje, građanskog i političkog društva, kao i odnosa snaga i države.sr
dc.description.abstractThis work considers Gramsci’s understanding of civil and political society. Following Perry Anderson’s critique, an attempt was made to find a distinction between civil and political society which wouldn’t have a form of antinomy that Anderson attributes to it. In this representation, the reader can find arguments for and against Anderson’s claims. This is not the last word on this subject, we rather hope it is a further illumina tion of the problem and its reactualisation. The concept of hegemony that Gramsci built at the level of civil society and that implies consent also has a place within this consideration, while political society provides domination. In that division of levels, a specific problem is the place of the state which fluctuates between civil and political society. With the concept of ethical state, Gramsci signifies the transition of state from political society and domination to civil society and consent. This problematic is engaged in a totalized manner with the presentation of Gramsci’s insights into the relation of base and superstructure, hegemony, political and civil society, relations of force and state. These concepts can offer a closer insight into Gramsci’s understanding of ideological hegemony only when they are considered in their unity.sr
dc.language.isosrsr
dc.publisherBeograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teorijusr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceKritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društvasr
dc.subjecthegemonijasr
dc.subjectgrađansko i političko društvosr
dc.subjectetična državasr
dc.subjectbaza i nadgradnjasr
dc.subjectodnosi snagasr
dc.titleDistinkcija građanskog i političkog društva u delu Gramšijasr
dc.titleThe Distinction of Civil and Political Society in The Work of Gramscisr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-NDsr
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.volume2
dc.citation.spage273
dc.citation.epage298
dc.identifier.doi10.5281/zenodo.5732520
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/8733/bitstream_8733.pdf


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу