In her book Democracy and Truth: The Conflict between Political and Epistemic Virtues, Snježana Prijić Samaržija advocates a stance that not only political, but also epistemic values are necessary for justification of democracy. Specifically, she mounts defense for one particular type of public deliberation on epistemic grounds. In this paper, I will discuss the following issue: What connects this type of public deliberation to the wider context of (epistemic) justification of democracy? I will attempt to explain why Prijić Samaržija’s stance can be understood as a version of deliberative epistemic instrumentalism and to discuss the role played by the public deliberation within this framework.
Keywords:
democracy / procedure / epistemic values / public deliberation / democratic system
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2020, 31, 1, 3-11
Publisher:
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
TY - JOUR
AU - Mladenović, Ivan
PY - 2020
UR - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2001003M
UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2061
AB - In her book Democracy and Truth: The Conflict between Political and Epistemic Virtues, Snježana Prijić Samaržija advocates a stance that not only political, but also epistemic values are necessary for justification of democracy. Specifically, she mounts defense for one particular type of public deliberation on epistemic grounds. In this paper, I will discuss the following issue: What connects this type of public deliberation to the wider context of (epistemic) justification of democracy? I will attempt to explain why Prijić Samaržija’s stance can be understood as a version of deliberative epistemic instrumentalism and to discuss the role played by the public deliberation within this framework.
PB - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2 - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1 - Deliberative Epistemic Instrumentalism, or Something Near Enough /
Deliberativni epistemički instrumentalizam, ili nešto što je blizu tome
IS - 1
VL - 31
SP - 3
EP - 11
DO - 10.2298/FID2001003M
ER -
@article{
author = "Mladenović, Ivan",
year = "2020",
abstract = "In her book Democracy and Truth: The Conflict between Political and Epistemic Virtues, Snježana Prijić Samaržija advocates a stance that not only political, but also epistemic values are necessary for justification of democracy. Specifically, she mounts defense for one particular type of public deliberation on epistemic grounds. In this paper, I will discuss the following issue: What connects this type of public deliberation to the wider context of (epistemic) justification of democracy? I will attempt to explain why Prijić Samaržija’s stance can be understood as a version of deliberative epistemic instrumentalism and to discuss the role played by the public deliberation within this framework.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Deliberative Epistemic Instrumentalism, or Something Near Enough /
Deliberativni epistemički instrumentalizam, ili nešto što je blizu tome",
number = "1",
volume = "31",
pages = "3-11",
doi = "10.2298/FID2001003M"
}
Mladenović, I.. (2020). Deliberative Epistemic Instrumentalism, or Something Near Enough /
Deliberativni epistemički instrumentalizam, ili nešto što je blizu tome. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(1), 3-11.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001003M
Mladenović I. Deliberative Epistemic Instrumentalism, or Something Near Enough /
Deliberativni epistemički instrumentalizam, ili nešto što je blizu tome. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(1):3-11.
doi:10.2298/FID2001003M .
Mladenović, Ivan, "Deliberative Epistemic Instrumentalism, or Something Near Enough /
Deliberativni epistemički instrumentalizam, ili nešto što je blizu tome" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 31, no. 1 (2020):3-11,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001003M . .
