Претраживање
Приказ резултата 1-5 од 5
Evropsko-prosvetiteljski i nacional - romantičarski izvori kulturnog pamćenja : refleksije u savremenim društvenim raspravama / European-Enlightenment and National-Romanticist Sources of Cultural Memory: Reflections in Contemporary Debates
(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2006)
Each society is marked by a selective cultural memory which, beside events and traditions whose importance is emphasized, is also constituted by its parts and contents whose influence is either diminished or forgotten. Our ...
Prosvetiteljstvo: kriza i preobražaj pojma / Enlightenment: The Crisis and Transformation of the Concept
(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2006)
The subject of the paper is the crisis of the concept of enlightenment, examined at three levels: polemic-rhetorical, historical-descriptive, and philosophical-normative. The author argues that the inconsistency of substantive ...
Odiseja prosvetiteljstva i Edip: Subjekt, um i emancipacija u Dijalektici prosvetiteljstva Horkhajmera i Adorna / The Enlightenment Odyssey and Oedipus: Subject, Reason and the Emancipation in Horkheimer’s and Adorno’s Dialectic of the Enlightenment
(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2006)
Led by Adorno and Horkheimer’s understanding of the three conceptual orienteers – subject, reason and emancipation – this work attempts to sketch a status that they have attributed to the Enlightenment. Ulysses and Oedipus ...
Rađanje ruske inteligencije iz duha prosvetiteljstva: Aleksandar Radiščev (II) / The Birth of Russian Intelligentsia from the Spirit of the Enlightement : Alexander Radishchev (II)
(Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2009)
This text is the second part of a study about Alexander Radishchev, one of the leading representatives of Enlightenment in Russia’s XVIII Century. Starting
with explanation of the ‘enlightened absolutism’ of Catherine the ...
Why still philosophy? – Once again
(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2007)
The intention of this paper is to revisit, once again the question asked
by Adorno and Habermas and other contemporary thinkers under different headings, a few decades ago. The author is suggesting that nowadays philosophy ...