Real Institution. Document and Realism
Stvarna institucija. Dokument i realizam
Apstrakt
Regardless of the fact that I am using certain texts by Searle, Fer- raris, Smith and De Soto, my intention is not at all to reiterate someone else’s position in my own words, nor is it to question or modify some such position. My intention for now is to, using Ferraris’ theory of the document, affirm the existence of a paradox - one rejected by Searle, but unconvincingly so, I think - regarding the institution (or the institutionalization of the institution). In order to do that, it seems to me that I am forced to slightly disturb both Searle’s and Ferraris’ conception, in attempting to offer my own contribution to a new future theory of the institution.
Ključne reči:
institution / document / realism / dokumentologijaIzvor:
Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society, 2014, 19-30Izdavač:
- Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
Finansiranje / projekti:
- Istraživanje klimatskih promena i njihovog uticaja na životnu sredinu - praćenje uticaja, adaptacija i ublažavanje (RS-MESTD-Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)-43007)
Institucija/grupa
IFDTTY - JOUR AU - Bojanić, Petar D. PY - 2014 UR - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/197 AB - Regardless of the fact that I am using certain texts by Searle, Fer- raris, Smith and De Soto, my intention is not at all to reiterate someone else’s position in my own words, nor is it to question or modify some such position. My intention for now is to, using Ferraris’ theory of the document, affirm the existence of a paradox - one rejected by Searle, but unconvincingly so, I think - regarding the institution (or the institutionalization of the institution). In order to do that, it seems to me that I am forced to slightly disturb both Searle’s and Ferraris’ conception, in attempting to offer my own contribution to a new future theory of the institution. PB - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju T2 - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society T1 - Real Institution. Document and Realism T1 - Stvarna institucija. Dokument i realizam SP - 19 EP - 30 DO - 10.2298/FID1402019B ER -
@article{ author = "Bojanić, Petar D.", year = "2014", abstract = "Regardless of the fact that I am using certain texts by Searle, Fer- raris, Smith and De Soto, my intention is not at all to reiterate someone else’s position in my own words, nor is it to question or modify some such position. My intention for now is to, using Ferraris’ theory of the document, affirm the existence of a paradox - one rejected by Searle, but unconvincingly so, I think - regarding the institution (or the institutionalization of the institution). In order to do that, it seems to me that I am forced to slightly disturb both Searle’s and Ferraris’ conception, in attempting to offer my own contribution to a new future theory of the institution.", publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju", journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society", title = "Real Institution. Document and Realism, Stvarna institucija. Dokument i realizam", pages = "19-30", doi = "10.2298/FID1402019B" }
Bojanić, P. D.. (2014). Real Institution. Document and Realism. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 19-30. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1402019B
Bojanić PD. Real Institution. Document and Realism. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2014;:19-30. doi:10.2298/FID1402019B .
Bojanić, Petar D., "Real Institution. Document and Realism" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society (2014):19-30, https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1402019B . .