Show simple item record

dc.creatorBojanić, Petar
dc.creatorCvejić, Igor
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-22T09:09:00Z
dc.date.available2019-02-22T09:09:00Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1926
dc.description.abstractThe place of evidence regarding joint commitment and plural action is mostly reserved for documents and explicit linguistic expressions. This paper considers the problem of evidence in cases of engaged (jointly committed) social acts where there is no explicit expression or binding document, yet can still be ascribed to a plural subject. The argument rests on the double meaning of the term factum as fact (factum brutum) and deed (factum practica), as well as contemporary debates about the topic of fact of reason in Kant. The text seeks to show that in certain cases, the execution of an act or the obligation produced by it can be considered evidence of a plural subject. Thus, these facts deserve a special position in relation to scientific evidence.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherTorino : Labontsr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/43007/RS//sr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.sourceRivista di Esteticasr
dc.subjectsocial factssr
dc.subjectfact of reasonsr
dc.subjectevidencesr
dc.titleFact of Reason, Social Facts and Evidencesr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-NDsr
dcterms.abstractБојанић, Петар; Цвејић, Игор; Фацт оф Реасон, Социал Фацтс анд Евиденце; Фацт оф Реасон, Социал Фацтс анд Евиденце;
dc.citation.volume69
dc.type.versionacceptedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs//bitstream/id/4391/Fact of Reason, Social Facts and Evidence.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record