Show simple item record

Šta znači biti stranac? Bernhard Valdenfels i politika responzivnog interkulturalizma

dc.creatorPaić, Žarko
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-09T09:30:30Z
dc.date.available2018-10-09T09:30:30Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0353-5738
dc.identifier.urihttp://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=678
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1818
dc.description.abstractThe author analyzes the politics of responsive interculturalism in Bernhard Waldenfels’ thought, starting from the assumption that after Husserl’s phenomenology only two fundamental concepts – body and the Other – should be considered. In contemporary German “post-phenomenology” the first concept was systematically articulated by Hermann Schmitz, while the latter theme has been advanced in Waldenfels’ works as the phenomenology of the alien, up until the end of Western metaphysics. In the two parts of the discussion, the author draws on his fundamental hypothesis about aporias and paradoxes of interculturalism, since responsiveness and xenology cannot reach the positive definition of the concept of culture in the era of global entropy. The analysis, therefore, deals with the questions: (1) what is the responsiveness of man in relation to the Other, including the different ways of his presence in the world; and (2) whether the Other as alien and uncanny (Unheimlich) calls into question the basic assumption of phenomenology as such – the intentionality of consciousness?sr
dc.description.abstractAutor analizira politiku responzivnog interkulturalizma u mišljenju Bernharda Valdenfelsa, počevši od teze da nakon Huserlove fenomenologije valja razmatrati samo dva fundamentalna pojma: telo i Drugog. U savremenoj nemačkoj „post-fenomenologiji“, prvi pojam je sistematski artikulisao Herman Šmic, dok je potonja tema napredovala u Valdenfelsovom delu, i to kao fenomenologija stranog do kraja metafizike Zapada. U dva dela diskusije, autor naznačuje svoju fundamentalnu hipotezu o aporijama i paradoksima interkulturalizma, budući da responzivnost i ksenologija ne mogu da pruže pozitivnu definiciju pojma kulture u eri globalne entropije. Analiza otuda tematizuje dva pitanja: (1) šta je responzivnost čoveka u odnosu na Drugog, uključujući i različite puteve njegovog prisustva u svetu, i (2) zbog čega Drugi kao stranac i neodomaćen (Unheimlich) dovodi u pitanje osnovni stav fenomenologije kao takve – intencionalnost svesti?sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teorijusr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.sourceFilozofija i društvosr
dc.subjectstranacsr
dc.subjectaliensr
dc.subjectphenomenologysr
dc.subjectresponsivenesssr
dc.subjectirreducible asymmetrysr
dc.subjectinterculturalismsr
dc.subjectbodysr
dc.subjectfenomenologijasr
dc.subjectresponzivnostsr
dc.subjectnesvodiva asimetrijasr
dc.subjectintekulturalizamsr
dc.subjecttelosr
dc.titleWhat does it mean to be an alien? Bernhard Waldenfels and politics of responsive interculturalismsr
dc.titleŠta znači biti stranac? Bernhard Valdenfels i politika responzivnog interkulturalizmasr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-NDsr
dcterms.abstractПаић, Жарко; Шта значи бити странац? Бернхард Валденфелс и политика респонзивног интеркултурализма; Шта значи бити странац? Бернхард Валденфелс и политика респонзивног интеркултурализма;
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.volume29
dc.citation.spage355
dc.citation.epage376
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs//bitstream/id/4026/full text.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record