Show simple item record

An Answer to the Question: How Enlightenment is Possible?

dc.creatorKrstić, Predrag
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-22T20:47:53Z
dc.date.available2018-06-22T20:47:53Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn2406-081X (e-ISSN)
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0351-2274/2014/0351-22741404105K.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1586
dc.description.abstractAutor članka analizira ključne termine Kantove definicije prosvećenosti: nezrelost, vođstvo drugoga, krivicu, čovečnost, lenjost, kukavičluk, hrabrost i druge. U prvom delu rada se izlažu kritike koje osporavaju svaki razložan karakter Kantove koncepcije prosvećenosti. Njima se potom suprotstavljaju odbrane Kantovog određenja prosvećenosti koje ukazuju, s jedne strane, na njegovu autorefleksivnost i, s druge, na njegovu neprolaznu aktuelnost. Posebna pažnja posvećuje se istorijskoj i tekstualnoj rekonstrukciji razumevanja javnosti kao uslova mogućnosti delotvornog angažovanja uma i racionalne organizacije društva. Zaključuje se da pitanje o prosvećenosti ostaje otvoreno, u meri da samom pojmu preti opasnost proizvoljne upotrebe pod potpuno nejasnim semantičkim pravilima, ali i da neprekidne reinterpretacije Kantovog pokušaja njegovog definisanja svedoče o nezaobilaznosti te instance, s obzirom na koju su se – priznanjem njene merodavnosti, preadaptacijom ili odbacivanjem – iskušavala, artikulisala i profilisala i od nje drugačija shvatanja prosvećenosti i njenih orijentira.sr
dc.description.abstractThe author analyzes the key terms of Kant's definition of enlightenment: immaturity, guilt, humanity, laziness, cowardice, bravery, and others. The first part of the paper presents the criticisms that challenge every reasonable character of Kant's conception of enlightenment. After that, these critiques are confronted with the defenses of Kant's definition of enlightenment that points out, on the one hand, its self-reflectivity and, on the other, its everlasting actuality. Special attention is paid to the historical and textual reconstruction of the understanding of public as a condition of the possibilities for the effective engagement of the mind and the rational organization of society. It is concluded that the question of enlightenment remains open, to the extent that the danger of arbitrary use under a completely vague semantic rules threatening the very notion of enlightenment. Continuous reinterpretations of Kant's attempt to define it, however, are also testimonies of an unavoidable instance, with respect to which – by recognition of its relevance, its rearranging or rejection – different conceptions of enlightenment and its landmarks were tempted, articulated and established.sr
dc.language.isosrsr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/43007/RS//sr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.sourceTheoriasr
dc.subjectprosvećenostsr
dc.subjectenlightenmentsr
dc.subjectKant, Imanuelsr
dc.subjectpublicsr
dc.subjectKant, Imanuelsr
dc.subjectjavnostsr
dc.subjectslobodasr
dc.subjectsamostalno mišljenjesr
dc.subjectfreedomsr
dc.subjectindependent thinkingsr
dc.titleOdgovor na pitanje: kako je moguća prosvećenost?sr
dc.titleAn Answer to the Question: How Enlightenment is Possible?sr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBYsr
dcterms.abstractКрстић, Предраг; Одговор на питање: како је могућа просвећеност?; Одговор на питање: како је могућа просвећеност?;
dc.citation.issue4
dc.citation.volume57
dc.citation.spage105
dc.citation.epage124
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/THEO1404105K
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/3270/0351-22741404105K.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record