Show simple item record

dc.creatorMilidrag, Predrag
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-04T12:40:44Z
dc.date.available2018-06-04T12:40:44Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=295187
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1559
dc.description.abstractU prvom delu rada izlaže se Suárezovo razumevanje večnih istina. Tri su momenta relevantna za tumačenje Descartesa: hipotetička nužnost večnih istina, uloga delotvornog uzrokovanja i večne istine o bićima razuma. U drugom delu teksta brani se teza da 16. pasus Treće meditacije (AT VII 42) sadrži dve suarezijanske večne istine i da obe tvrde da Bog postoji. Između ostalog, to vodi zaključku da ovaj pasus Treće meditacije zapravo sadrži Dekartovu nestvorenu večnu istinu o egzistenciji Boga (AT I 150).sr
dc.description.abstractThe article analyzes Suárez’s understanding of the eternal truths in his 31st Disputation, in regard to the status of creatures in the divine mind and the role of efficient causality. Three points are relevant for an interpretation of Descartes: for Suárez, the eternal truths regarding the essences of creatures express a hypothetical necessity concerning real existence; it is impossible to adequately understand these essences apart from their actual or possible efficient cause; there are eternal truths about entia rationis that express nothing concerning real existence. Part two of the article defends the thesis that Paragraph 16 of the Third Meditation (AT VII 42) contains two Suarezian eternal truths and that from both of these it follows that God exists: from “it could be demonstrated that there exists in the world something apart from myself,” it follows that God exists, and from “it cannot be demonstrated that there exists in the world something apart from myself” it also follows that God exists, i.e. myself. Hence, paragraphs 17–22 of the Meditation do not contribute to the proof of God’s existence, but they do prove that the subject itself of the Meditations is not God. All of the above leads to the conclusion that paragraph 16 of the Third Meditation in fact contains Descartes’ uncreated eternal truth about the existence of God (AT I 150).sr
dc.language.isohrsr
dc.publisherZagreb : Filozofsko teološki institut Družbe Isusovesr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/179049/RS//sr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.sourceObnovljeni životsr
dc.subjectvečne istinesr
dc.subjecteternal truthssr
dc.subjectnestvorene večne istinesr
dc.subjectmeditacijesr
dc.subjectSuarezsr
dc.subjectDekartsr
dc.subjectDescartessr
dc.subjectpotentia objectivasr
dc.subjectegzistencija Bogasr
dc.subjectuncreated eternal truthssr
dc.subjectmeditationssr
dc.subjectSuárezsr
dc.subjectDescartessr
dc.subjectpotentia objectivasr
dc.subjectexistence of Godsr
dc.titleSuárezove večne istine i Descartesova Treća meditacijasr
dc.typeconferenceObjectsr
dc.rights.licenseBYsr
dcterms.abstractМилидраг, Предраг; Суáрезове вечне истине и Десцартесова Трећа медитација; Суáрезове вечне истине и Десцартесова Трећа медитација;
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.volume73
dc.citation.spage11
dc.citation.epage23
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs//bitstream/id/3173/Suarezove vecne istine i Dekartova Treca med.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record