Show simple item record

Audijencija kod/Saslušanje ... javnosti, predstavnika, suverena

dc.creatorMilanese, Niccolo
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-13T11:43:47Z
dc.date.available2018-02-13T11:43:47Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0353-5738
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1458
dc.description.abstractThe right of audience, in common law, is the right of a lawyer to represent a client in a court. Royalty, the Pope and some Presidents grant audi-ences. What does the power to grant an audience consist in? And what does it mean to demand an audience (with)? Through a reading of the way in which the vocabulary of theatre, acting and audience is involved in the generation of a theory of state by Hobbes and Rousseau, this paper looks to reopen these questions as a political resource for us to re-imagine and refigure our ways of being together. Through readings of Hobbes and Rousseau, it looks at the ways in which the performance of politics creates the public, the representative and the sovereign and the ways these figures interact. It proposes an alternative role for theatre as places of affective learning and a civic ethics of playfulness, in which the auto-institution of the state as an imagined collectivity is fully assumed.en
dc.description.abstractPravo na saslušanje (audijenciju), u običajnom pravu, jeste pravo advokata da zastupa klijenta na sudu. Kralj, Papa i neki predsednici primaju u audijenciju. U čemu se sastoji moć primanja u audijenciju (to grant an audience)? I šta znači zahtevati audijenciju? Čitanjem načina na koji je vokabular pozoriša, glume i audi­jencije (publike) uključen u proizvodnju teorije države kod Hobsa i Rusoa ovaj rad propituje pitanje političkih resursa koji nam pomažu da iznova promislimo načine bivanja zajedno. Preko Hobsa i Rusoa, ovaj tekst ispituje na koji način performiranje politike stvara javnost, predstavnika i suverena, te na koji način ove figure interaguju. Predlaže se alternativna uloga za pozorište kao mesto afek-tivnog učenja i građanske etike razigranosti u kojoj se autoinstitucija države kao zamišljenog zajedništva obuhvata u celosti.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teorijusr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.sourceFilozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Societysr
dc.subjectpublicsr
dc.subjectjavnostsr
dc.subjectsovereigntysr
dc.subjectperformancesr
dc.subjectaudiencesr
dc.subjectRousseausr
dc.subjectrhetoricsr
dc.subjectauthoritysr
dc.subjectrepresentationsr
dc.subjectHobbessr
dc.subjectsuverenostsr
dc.subjectizvedbasr
dc.subjectaudijencijasr
dc.subjectpublikasr
dc.subjectRusosr
dc.subjectretorikasr
dc.subjectautoritetsr
dc.subjectpredstavljanjesr
dc.subjectHobssr
dc.titleAn audience with ... the public, the representative, the sovereignen
dc.titleAudijencija kod/Saslušanje ... javnosti, predstavnika, suverenasr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-NDsr
dcterms.abstractМиланезе, Ниццоло; Aудијенција код/Саслушање ... јавности, представника, суверена; Aудијенција код/Саслушање ... јавности, представника, суверена;
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.volume28
dc.citation.spage5
dc.citation.epage21
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/FID1701005M
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2891/bitstream_2891.pdf
dc.identifier.wos000408375800001


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record