Repository of The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrilic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • View Item
  •   RIFDT
  • IFDT
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

An audience with ... the public, the representative, the sovereign

Audijencija kod/Saslušanje ... javnosti, predstavnika, suverena

Thumbnail
2017
bitstream_2891.pdf (235.3Kb)
Authors
Milanese, Niccolo
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The right of audience, in common law, is the right of a lawyer to represent a client in a court. Royalty, the Pope and some Presidents grant audi-ences. What does the power to grant an audience consist in? And what does it mean to demand an audience (with)? Through a reading of the way in which the vocabulary of theatre, acting and audience is involved in the generation of a theory of state by Hobbes and Rousseau, this paper looks to reopen these questions as a political resource for us to re-imagine and refigure our ways of being together. Through readings of Hobbes and Rousseau, it looks at the ways in which the performance of politics creates the public, the representative and the sovereign and the ways these figures interact. It proposes an alternative role for theatre as places of affective learning and a civic ethics of playfulness, in which the auto-institution of the state as an imagined collectivity is fully assumed.
Pravo na saslušanje (audijenciju), u običajnom pravu, jeste pravo advokata da zastupa klijenta na sudu. Kralj, Papa i neki predsednici primaju u audijenciju. U čemu se sastoji moć primanja u audijenciju (to grant an audience)? I šta znači zahtevati audijenciju? Čitanjem načina na koji je vokabular pozoriša, glume i audi­jencije (publike) uključen u proizvodnju teorije države kod Hobsa i Rusoa ovaj rad propituje pitanje političkih resursa koji nam pomažu da iznova promislimo načine bivanja zajedno. Preko Hobsa i Rusoa, ovaj tekst ispituje na koji način performiranje politike stvara javnost, predstavnika i suverena, te na koji način ove figure interaguju. Predlaže se alternativna uloga za pozorište kao mesto afek-tivnog učenja i građanske etike razigranosti u kojoj se autoinstitucija države kao zamišljenog zajedništva obuhvata u celosti.
Keywords:
public / javnost / sovereignty / performance / audience / Rousseau / rhetoric / authority / representation / Hobbes / suverenost / izvedba / audijencija / publika / Ruso / retorika / autoritet / predstavljanje / Hobs
Source:
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 2017, 28, 1, 5-21
Publisher:
  • Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju

DOI: 10.2298/FID1701005M

ISSN: 0353-5738

WoS: 000408375800001

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1458
Collections
  • Filozofija i društvo [Philosophy and Society]
Institution
IFDT
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Milanese, Niccolo
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1458
AB  - The right of audience, in common law, is the right of a lawyer to represent a client in a court. Royalty, the Pope and some Presidents grant audi-ences. What does the power to grant an audience consist in? And what does it mean to demand an audience (with)? Through a reading of the way in which the vocabulary of theatre, acting and audience is involved in the generation of a theory of state by Hobbes and Rousseau, this paper looks to reopen these questions as a political resource for us to re-imagine and refigure our ways of being together. Through readings of Hobbes and Rousseau, it looks at the ways in which the performance of politics creates the public, the representative and the sovereign and the ways these figures interact. It proposes an alternative role for theatre as places of affective learning and a civic ethics of playfulness, in which the auto-institution of the state as an imagined collectivity is fully assumed.
AB  - Pravo na saslušanje (audijenciju), u običajnom pravu, jeste pravo advokata da zastupa klijenta na sudu. Kralj, Papa i neki predsednici primaju u audijenciju. U čemu se sastoji moć primanja u audijenciju (to grant an audience)? I šta znači zahtevati audijenciju? Čitanjem načina na koji je vokabular pozoriša, glume i audi­jencije (publike) uključen u proizvodnju teorije države kod Hobsa i Rusoa ovaj rad propituje pitanje političkih resursa koji nam pomažu da iznova promislimo načine bivanja zajedno. Preko Hobsa i Rusoa, ovaj tekst ispituje na koji način performiranje politike stvara javnost, predstavnika i suverena, te na koji način ove figure interaguju. Predlaže se alternativna uloga za pozorište kao mesto afek-tivnog učenja i građanske etike razigranosti u kojoj se autoinstitucija države kao zamišljenog zajedništva obuhvata u celosti.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - An audience with ... the public, the representative, the sovereign
T1  - Audijencija kod/Saslušanje ... javnosti, predstavnika, suverena
IS  - 1
VL  - 28
SP  - 5
EP  - 21
DO  - 10.2298/FID1701005M
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Milanese, Niccolo",
year = "2017",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1458",
abstract = "The right of audience, in common law, is the right of a lawyer to represent a client in a court. Royalty, the Pope and some Presidents grant audi-ences. What does the power to grant an audience consist in? And what does it mean to demand an audience (with)? Through a reading of the way in which the vocabulary of theatre, acting and audience is involved in the generation of a theory of state by Hobbes and Rousseau, this paper looks to reopen these questions as a political resource for us to re-imagine and refigure our ways of being together. Through readings of Hobbes and Rousseau, it looks at the ways in which the performance of politics creates the public, the representative and the sovereign and the ways these figures interact. It proposes an alternative role for theatre as places of affective learning and a civic ethics of playfulness, in which the auto-institution of the state as an imagined collectivity is fully assumed., Pravo na saslušanje (audijenciju), u običajnom pravu, jeste pravo advokata da zastupa klijenta na sudu. Kralj, Papa i neki predsednici primaju u audijenciju. U čemu se sastoji moć primanja u audijenciju (to grant an audience)? I šta znači zahtevati audijenciju? Čitanjem načina na koji je vokabular pozoriša, glume i audi­jencije (publike) uključen u proizvodnju teorije države kod Hobsa i Rusoa ovaj rad propituje pitanje političkih resursa koji nam pomažu da iznova promislimo načine bivanja zajedno. Preko Hobsa i Rusoa, ovaj tekst ispituje na koji način performiranje politike stvara javnost, predstavnika i suverena, te na koji način ove figure interaguju. Predlaže se alternativna uloga za pozorište kao mesto afek-tivnog učenja i građanske etike razigranosti u kojoj se autoinstitucija države kao zamišljenog zajedništva obuhvata u celosti.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "An audience with ... the public, the representative, the sovereign, Audijencija kod/Saslušanje ... javnosti, predstavnika, suverena",
number = "1",
volume = "28",
pages = "5-21",
doi = "10.2298/FID1701005M"
}
Milanese N. Audijencija kod/Saslušanje ... javnosti, predstavnika, suverena. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2017;28(1):5-21
Milanese, N. (2017). Audijencija kod/Saslušanje ... javnosti, predstavnika, suverena.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 28(1), 5-21.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1701005M
Milanese Niccolo, "Audijencija kod/Saslušanje ... javnosti, predstavnika, suverena" 28, no. 1 (2017):5-21,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1701005M .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT - Repository of Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutionsAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RIFDT - Repository of Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB