Show simple item record

dc.creatorCvejić, Igor
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-12T09:48:19Z
dc.date.available2018-01-12T09:48:19Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn2334-8577
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1424
dc.description.abstractMy aim is to draw attention to the different forms of social engagement regarding the subject of import. The concept of import was introduced in the theory of action by Bennet Helm. It denotes an intentional characteristic of an object, to be viewed as worthy of pursuit or avoidance. However, according to Helm, the subject of import could be: either an individual person, the other or plural agent. Using this division in the context of social engagement, I propose to distinguish three forms of social engagement: (1) personal social engagement, (2) social engagement for the sake of others and (3) social engagement as togetherness. Social engagement as togetherness (plural agent) should not be confused with plural action with the same goal-directedness (which is part of personal social engagement). This argumentative step was enabled by Helm’s complex theory about “us” as a subject of import, contrary to some contemporary theorists who dispute the possibility of plural agents.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teorijusr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.sourceFilozofija i društvosr
dc.subjectengagementsr
dc.subjectimportsr
dc.subjectactionsr
dc.subjectplural agentssr
dc.subjectwe-intentionssr
dc.titleThe Forms of Social Engagement Regarding the Subject of Importsr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-NDsr
dcterms.abstractЦвејић, Игор;
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.volume27
dc.citation.spage332
dc.citation.epage342
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/FID1602332C
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2732/03-Igor-Cvejic.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record