Show simple item record

Slabost stimulusa: Kvajn i Vvitgenštajn

dc.creatorO'Sullivan, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-01T10:17:49Z
dc.date.available2017-11-01T10:17:49Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier0353-5738
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1323
dc.description.abstractQuine and Wittgenstein were dominant figures in philosophy in the middle of the twentieth century. Many readers, like Quine himself, have felt that there are deep similarities between the two thinkers, though those similarities are difficult to articulate. I argue that they share the project of understanding the meaning of utterances by reference to the environment of the speaker, though they understand that environment in radically different ways. In particular, Quine has a much thinner conception of the environment than does Wittgenstein. For Quine, the stimulus is impoverished in a way that it is not for Wittgenstein. I also argue that they share a certain deflationary approach to ontology.eng
dc.format25 1 (2014) 164-179
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen
dc.publisherBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceFilozofija i društvomul
dc.subjectontologija
dc.subjectlanguage games
dc.subjectempiricism
dc.subjectWittgenstein, Ludwig
dc.subjectmeaning
dc.titleThe Poverty of the Stimulus: Quine and Wittgensteineng
dc.titleSlabost stimulusa: Kvajn i Vvitgenštajnsrp
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dcterms.abstractО'Сулливан, Мицхаел; Слабост стимулуса: Квајн и Ввитгенштајн;
dc.citation.spage164
dc.citation.epage179
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/FID1401164O
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs//bitstream/id/4773/1321.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record