Show simple item record

Koliko je „politički“ Kvongov politički liberalizam?

dc.creatorZoffoli, Enrico
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-01T10:17:47Z
dc.date.available2017-11-01T10:17:47Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier0353-5738
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1308
dc.description.abstractIn this short paper I ask to what extent the sharp contrast between the political and the comprehensive, on which political liberals such as Rawls and Quong place primary emphasis, caters to a truly “political” conception of liberalism. I argue that Quong’s own take on this point is more distinctively “political” than Rawls’s, in that it assigns far less weight to citizens’ comprehensive doctrines. Indeed, I suggest that Quong’s exclusion of comprehensive doctrines (exemplified by his worries about an “overlapping consensus”) has more radical implications than Quong himself seems to think. In doing so, I offer a streamlined version of Quong’s critique, which encompasses two more or less direct criticisms of Rawls’s doctrine of the overlapping consensus. I will call them the “sincerity objection” and the “liberal objection”.eng
dc.format25 1 (2014) 47-56
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen
dc.publisherBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceFilozofija i društvoeng
dc.subjectcomprehensive doctrines
dc.subjectpolitical liberalism
dc.subjectRawls
dc.subjectpreklapajući konsenzus
dc.subjectjavni um
dc.titleHow “Political” is Quong’s Political Liberalism?eng
dc.titleKoliko je „politički“ Kvongov politički liberalizam?srp
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dcterms.abstractЗоффоли, Енрицо; Колико је „политички“ Квонгов политички либерализам?;
dc.citation.spage47
dc.citation.epage56
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/FID1401047Z
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs//bitstream/id/4764/1306.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record