Show simple item record

dc.creatorBabić, Jovan
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-01T10:15:10Z
dc.date.available2017-11-01T10:15:10Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier0353-5738
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/123
dc.description.abstractThe so called “non-culpable ignorance” is an instrument to justify participating in a war on a defeated side, on condition that fighters sincerely believe that they are defending a just cause and had some valid reasons to believe in having a chance to win. Within the just war theory this instrument is needed to make both sides prima facie right, otherwise the theory would imply that those who lose are guilty in advance, especially if they are the weaker side. However, in contemporary context of criminalizing war the very concept of war is changing and becoming extremely vague. As wars are more and more “asymmetric”, just war theory might face serious challenges regarding incorporation of “non-culpable ignorance” within its scope, as well as difficulties in showing that justice goes with the victory, opening thus the issues of articulation of a just peace.eng
dc.format18 3 (2007) 59-68
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen
dc.publisherBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.sourceFilozofija i društvomul
dc.subjectjust war theory
dc.subjectnon-culpable ignorance
dc.subjectvictory
dc.titleNon-culpable ignorance and just war theoryeng
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dcterms.abstractБабић, Јован;
dc.citation.spage59
dc.citation.epage68
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/FID0703059B
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs//bitstream/id/4751/121.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record