Sort By
Publication Year
Deposit Date
Title
Type
Access
Publication Year
2020 (1)
2019 (19)
2018 (41)
2017 (38)
2016 (35)
2015 (35)
2014 (20)
2013 (23)
2012 (46)
2011 (23)
2010 (1)
2009 (3)
2008 (1)
2005 (1)
2003 (2)
2000 (1)
1998 (1)
1996 (1)
1995 (1)

Studying climate change and its influence on environment: impacts, adaptation and mitigation

Link to this page

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/43007/RS//

Studying climate change and its influence on environment: impacts, adaptation and mitigation (en)
Истраживање климатских промена и њиховог утицаја на животну средину - праћење утицаја, адаптација и ублажавање (sr)
Istraživanje klimatskih promena i njihovog uticaja na životnu sredinu - praćenje uticaja, adaptacija i ublažavanje (sr_RS)
Authors

Publications

Deliberative Epistemic Instrumentalism, or Something Near Enough / Deliberativni epistemički instrumentalizam, ili nešto što je blizu tome

Mladenović, Ivan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mladenović, Ivan
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2001003M
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2061
AB  - In her book Democracy and Truth: The Conflict between Political and Epistemic Virtues, Snježana Prijić Samaržija advocates a stance that not only political, but also epistemic values are necessary for justification of democracy. Specifically, she mounts defense for one particular type of public deliberation on epistemic grounds. In this paper, I will discuss the following issue: What connects this type of public deliberation to the wider context of (epistemic) justification of democracy? I will attempt to explain why Prijić Samaržija’s stance can be understood as a version of deliberative epistemic instrumentalism and to discuss the role played by the public deliberation within this framework.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Deliberative Epistemic Instrumentalism, or Something Near Enough /
Deliberativni epistemički instrumentalizam, ili nešto što je blizu tome
IS  - 1
VL  - 31
SP  - 3
EP  - 11
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001003M
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mladenović, Ivan",
year = "2020",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2001003M, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2061",
abstract = "In her book Democracy and Truth: The Conflict between Political and Epistemic Virtues, Snježana Prijić Samaržija advocates a stance that not only political, but also epistemic values are necessary for justification of democracy. Specifically, she mounts defense for one particular type of public deliberation on epistemic grounds. In this paper, I will discuss the following issue: What connects this type of public deliberation to the wider context of (epistemic) justification of democracy? I will attempt to explain why Prijić Samaržija’s stance can be understood as a version of deliberative epistemic instrumentalism and to discuss the role played by the public deliberation within this framework.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Deliberative Epistemic Instrumentalism, or Something Near Enough /
Deliberativni epistemički instrumentalizam, ili nešto što je blizu tome",
number = "1",
volume = "31",
pages = "3-11",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001003M"
}
Mladenović, I. (2020). Deliberative Epistemic Instrumentalism, or Something Near Enough /
Deliberativni epistemički instrumentalizam, ili nešto što je blizu tome.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(1), 3-11.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001003M
Mladenović I. Deliberative Epistemic Instrumentalism, or Something Near Enough /
Deliberativni epistemički instrumentalizam, ili nešto što je blizu tome. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(1):3-11
Mladenović Ivan, "Deliberative Epistemic Instrumentalism, or Something Near Enough /
Deliberativni epistemički instrumentalizam, ili nešto što je blizu tome" 31, no. 1 (2020):3-11,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001003M .

The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative

Fiket, Irena; Ivković, Marjan; Pudar Draško, Gazela; Vasiljević, Jelena

(Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2044
AB  - The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socioeconomic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.
PB  - Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento
T2  - Partecipazione E Conflitto
T1  - The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative
IS  - 3
VL  - 12
SP  - 898
EP  - 918
DO  - DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Ivković, Marjan and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2044",
abstract = "The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socioeconomic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.",
publisher = "Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento",
journal = "Partecipazione E Conflitto",
title = "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative",
number = "3",
volume = "12",
pages = "898-918",
doi = "DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898"
}
Fiket, I., Ivković, M., Pudar Draško, G.,& Vasiljević, J. (2019). The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative.
Partecipazione E ConflittoCoordinamento SIBA - University of Salento., 12(3), 898-918.
https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898
Fiket I, Ivković M, Pudar Draško G, Vasiljević J. The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. Partecipazione E Conflitto. 2019;12(3):898-918
Fiket Irena, Ivković Marjan, Pudar Draško Gazela, Vasiljević Jelena, "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative" 12, no. 3 (2019):898-918,
https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 .

Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia

Pavlović, Aleksandar; Losoncz, Mark

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pavlović, Aleksandar
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID1901149P
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1957
AB  - Even though Belgrade student protests emerged and ended abruptly after only seven days in June of 1968, they came as a cumulative point of a decade-long accumulated social dissatisfaction and antagonisms, as well as of philosophical investigations of the unorthodox Marxists of the Praxis school (Praksisovci). It surprised the Yugoslav authorities as the first massive rebellion after WWII to explicitly criticize rising social inequality, bureaucratization and unemployment and demand free speech and abolishment of privileges. This article focuses on the intellectual destiny and legacy of the eight professors from the Faculty of Philosophy close to the Praxis school, who were identified as the protests’ instigators and subsequently expelled from the University of Belgrade due to their “ethico-political unsuitability”. Under both international and domestic pressure, they were later reemployed in a separate research unit named the Centre for Philosophy and Social Theory, where they kept their critical edge and argued for political pluralism. From the late 1980s onwards, they and their colleagues became politically active and at times occupied the highest positions in Serbia – Dragoljub Mićunović as one of the founders of the modern Democratic Party and the Speaker of the Parliament, former Serbian President and Prime Minister Vojislav Koštunica and former Prime Minister late Zoran Đinđić. Still, while some members became strong anti-nationalists and anti-war activists, other embraced Serbian nationalism, therefore pivoting the intellectual split into the so called First and Second Serbia that marked Serbian society during the 1990s and remained influential to this day.
AB  - Drugog svetskog rata koja je eksplicitno kritikovala rastuću društvenu nejednakost, birokratizaciju i nezaposlenost, i zahtevala slobodu govora i ukidanje privilegija. Ovaj članak fokusira se na sudbinu osmoro profesora sa Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu bliskih Praksis idejama, koje je režim identifikovao kao podstrekače protesta i kasnije ih proterao sa fakulteta zbog njihove „moralno-političke nepodobnosti“. Nakon međunarodnih i unutrašnjih pritisaka, oni su kasnije ponovo zaposleni u zasebnoj istraživačkoj jedinici nazvanoj Centar za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, gde su zadržali svoju kritičku oštricu i zagovarali politički pluralizam. Od kraja osamdesetih godina prošlog veka, oni i njihove kolege iz Centra postaju politički aktivni, nalaze se među osnivačima i kasnije liderima Demokratske Stranke i povremeno zauzimaju najviše položaje u Srbiji – Dragoljub Mićunović kao predsedavajući Narodne skupštine, bivši srpski predsednik i premijer Vojislav Koštunica i nekadašnji premijer Zoran Đinđić. Međutim, dok su neki članovi osmorke i Centra postali čvrsti anti-nacionalisti i antiratni aktivisti, drugi su prigrlili srpski nacionalizam, tako predvodeći intelektualni razdor na Prvu i Drugi Srbiju koji je obeležio srpsko društvo devedesetih godina prošlog veka, i ostao uticajan do danas.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia
IS  - 1
VL  - 30
SP  - 149
EP  - 164
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901149P
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Pavlović, Aleksandar and Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2019",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID1901149P, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1957",
abstract = "Even though Belgrade student protests emerged and ended abruptly after only seven days in June of 1968, they came as a cumulative point of a decade-long accumulated social dissatisfaction and antagonisms, as well as of philosophical investigations of the unorthodox Marxists of the Praxis school (Praksisovci). It surprised the Yugoslav authorities as the first massive rebellion after WWII to explicitly criticize rising social inequality, bureaucratization and unemployment and demand free speech and abolishment of privileges. This article focuses on the intellectual destiny and legacy of the eight professors from the Faculty of Philosophy close to the Praxis school, who were identified as the protests’ instigators and subsequently expelled from the University of Belgrade due to their “ethico-political unsuitability”. Under both international and domestic pressure, they were later reemployed in a separate research unit named the Centre for Philosophy and Social Theory, where they kept their critical edge and argued for political pluralism. From the late 1980s onwards, they and their colleagues became politically active and at times occupied the highest positions in Serbia – Dragoljub Mićunović as one of the founders of the modern Democratic Party and the Speaker of the Parliament, former Serbian President and Prime Minister Vojislav Koštunica and former Prime Minister late Zoran Đinđić. Still, while some members became strong anti-nationalists and anti-war activists, other embraced Serbian nationalism, therefore pivoting the intellectual split into the so called First and Second Serbia that marked Serbian society during the 1990s and remained influential to this day., Drugog svetskog rata koja je eksplicitno kritikovala rastuću društvenu nejednakost, birokratizaciju i nezaposlenost, i zahtevala slobodu govora i ukidanje privilegija. Ovaj članak fokusira se na sudbinu osmoro profesora sa Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu bliskih Praksis idejama, koje je režim identifikovao kao podstrekače protesta i kasnije ih proterao sa fakulteta zbog njihove „moralno-političke nepodobnosti“. Nakon međunarodnih i unutrašnjih pritisaka, oni su kasnije ponovo zaposleni u zasebnoj istraživačkoj jedinici nazvanoj Centar za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, gde su zadržali svoju kritičku oštricu i zagovarali politički pluralizam. Od kraja osamdesetih godina prošlog veka, oni i njihove kolege iz Centra postaju politički aktivni, nalaze se među osnivačima i kasnije liderima Demokratske Stranke i povremeno zauzimaju najviše položaje u Srbiji – Dragoljub Mićunović kao predsedavajući Narodne skupštine, bivši srpski predsednik i premijer Vojislav Koštunica i nekadašnji premijer Zoran Đinđić. Međutim, dok su neki članovi osmorke i Centra postali čvrsti anti-nacionalisti i antiratni aktivisti, drugi su prigrlili srpski nacionalizam, tako predvodeći intelektualni razdor na Prvu i Drugi Srbiju koji je obeležio srpsko društvo devedesetih godina prošlog veka, i ostao uticajan do danas.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia",
number = "1",
volume = "30",
pages = "149-164",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901149P"
}
Pavlović, A.,& Losoncz, M. (2019). Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 30(1), 149-164.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901149P
Pavlović A, Losoncz M. Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2019;30(1):149-164
Pavlović Aleksandar, Losoncz Mark, "Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia" 30, no. 1 (2019):149-164,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901149P .

Mevorah, Vera

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mevorah, Vera
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=754
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1989
AB  - 
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - 
T1  - Mark Lošonc i Predrag Krstić (ur.), Holokaust i filozofija, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd, 2018
IS  - 2
VL  - 30
SP  - 317
EP  - 319
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Mevorah, Vera",
year = "2019",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=754, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1989",
abstract = "",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = ", Mark Lošonc i Predrag Krstić (ur.), Holokaust i filozofija, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd, 2018",
number = "2",
volume = "30",
pages = "317-319"
}
Mevorah, V. (2019). Mark Lošonc i Predrag Krstić (ur.), Holokaust i filozofija, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd, 2018.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 30(2), 317-319.
Mevorah V. Mark Lošonc i Predrag Krstić (ur.), Holokaust i filozofija, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd, 2018. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2019;30(2):317-319
Mevorah Vera, "Mark Lošonc i Predrag Krstić (ur.), Holokaust i filozofija, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd, 2018" 30, no. 2 (2019):317-319

Social Engagement and Personal Activism: Some Research Reflection and Fieldnotes from Conversations with Activists in Two Belgrade Protest Initiatives

Vasiljević, Jelena

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2022
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Engaging (for) Social Change. Towards New Forms of Collective Action
T1  - Social Engagement and Personal Activism: Some Research Reflection and Fieldnotes from Conversations with Activists in Two Belgrade Protest Initiatives
SP  - 303
EP  - 313
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2022",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Engaging (for) Social Change. Towards New Forms of Collective Action",
title = "Social Engagement and Personal Activism: Some Research Reflection and Fieldnotes from Conversations with Activists in Two Belgrade Protest Initiatives",
pages = "303-313"
}
Vasiljević, J. (2019). Social Engagement and Personal Activism: Some Research Reflection and Fieldnotes from Conversations with Activists in Two Belgrade Protest Initiatives.
Engaging (for) Social Change. Towards New Forms of Collective ActionBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 303-313.
Vasiljević J. Social Engagement and Personal Activism: Some Research Reflection and Fieldnotes from Conversations with Activists in Two Belgrade Protest Initiatives. Engaging (for) Social Change. Towards New Forms of Collective Action. 2019;:303-313
Vasiljević Jelena, "Social Engagement and Personal Activism: Some Research Reflection and Fieldnotes from Conversations with Activists in Two Belgrade Protest Initiatives" (2019):303-313

Max Bergholz, Nasilje kao generativna sila: identitet, nacionalizam i sjećanje u jednoj balkanskoj zajednici, prev. Senada Kreso, Buybook, Sarajevo, 2018

Bešlin, Milivoj

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bešlin, Milivoj
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=768
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2034
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Max Bergholz, Nasilje kao generativna sila: identitet, nacionalizam i sjećanje u jednoj balkanskoj zajednici, prev. Senada Kreso, Buybook, Sarajevo, 2018
IS  - 3
VL  - 30
SP  - 453
EP  - 458
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bešlin, Milivoj",
year = "2019",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=768, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2034",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Max Bergholz, Nasilje kao generativna sila: identitet, nacionalizam i sjećanje u jednoj balkanskoj zajednici, prev. Senada Kreso, Buybook, Sarajevo, 2018",
number = "3",
volume = "30",
pages = "453-458"
}
Bešlin, M. (2019). Max Bergholz, Nasilje kao generativna sila: identitet, nacionalizam i sjećanje u jednoj balkanskoj zajednici, prev. Senada Kreso, Buybook, Sarajevo, 2018.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 30(3), 453-458.
Bešlin M. Max Bergholz, Nasilje kao generativna sila: identitet, nacionalizam i sjećanje u jednoj balkanskoj zajednici, prev. Senada Kreso, Buybook, Sarajevo, 2018. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2019;30(3):453-458
Bešlin Milivoj, "Max Bergholz, Nasilje kao generativna sila: identitet, nacionalizam i sjećanje u jednoj balkanskoj zajednici, prev. Senada Kreso, Buybook, Sarajevo, 2018" 30, no. 3 (2019):453-458

Todor Kuljić, Prognani pojmovi: neoliberalna pojmovna revizija misli o društvu, Clio, Beograd, 2018

Urošević, Milan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Urošević, Milan
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=769
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2035
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Todor Kuljić, Prognani pojmovi: neoliberalna pojmovna revizija misli o društvu, Clio, Beograd, 2018
IS  - 3
VL  - 30
SP  - 459
EP  - 461
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Urošević, Milan",
year = "2019",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=769, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2035",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Todor Kuljić, Prognani pojmovi: neoliberalna pojmovna revizija misli o društvu, Clio, Beograd, 2018",
number = "3",
volume = "30",
pages = "459-461"
}
Urošević, M. (2019). Todor Kuljić, Prognani pojmovi: neoliberalna pojmovna revizija misli o društvu, Clio, Beograd, 2018.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 30(3), 459-461.
Urošević M. Todor Kuljić, Prognani pojmovi: neoliberalna pojmovna revizija misli o društvu, Clio, Beograd, 2018. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2019;30(3):459-461
Urošević Milan, "Todor Kuljić, Prognani pojmovi: neoliberalna pojmovna revizija misli o društvu, Clio, Beograd, 2018" 30, no. 3 (2019):459-461

Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale

Bojanić, Petar; Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Milano : La Nuova Italia Editrice, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2037
PB  - Milano : La Nuova Italia Editrice
T2  - Aut Aut
T1  - Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale
IS  - 384
SP  - 94
EP  - 112
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2019",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2037",
publisher = "Milano : La Nuova Italia Editrice",
journal = "Aut Aut",
title = "Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale",
number = "384",
pages = "94-112"
}
Bojanić, P.,& Pudar Draško, G. (2019). Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale.
Aut AutMilano : La Nuova Italia Editrice.(384), 94-112.
Bojanić P, Pudar Draško G. Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale. Aut Aut. 2019;(384):94-112
Bojanić Petar, Pudar Draško Gazela, "Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale", no. 384 (2019):94-112

Arhitekta kao socijalni akt

Bojanić, Petar; Đokić, Vladan

(Univerzitet u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet, 2019)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Đokić, Vladan
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2039
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet
T2  - Živeti zajedno
T1  - Arhitekta kao socijalni akt
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Đokić, Vladan",
year = "2019",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2039",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet",
journal = "Živeti zajedno",
title = "Arhitekta kao socijalni akt"
}
Bojanić, P.,& Đokić, V. (2019). Arhitekta kao socijalni akt.
Živeti zajednoUniverzitet u Beogradu, Arhitektonski fakultet..
Bojanić P, Đokić V. Arhitekta kao socijalni akt. Živeti zajedno. 2019;
Bojanić Petar, Đokić Vladan, "Arhitekta kao socijalni akt" (2019)

Мои кровь и культура

Bojanić, Petar

(ГУАП Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет аэрокосмического приборостроения, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://einai.ru/ru/volume-8-2-2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2040
AB  - В этом кратком тексте, написанном в честь нового издания книги Ва-
лерия Савчука «Кровь и культура», я хотел бы раскрыть значимость этой книги
и, в частности, главы о жертве, сыгравшей для меня важную роль при написании
докторской диссертации. Связь между жертвоприношением, насилием и кровью
действительно является центральной темой книги Савчука. Моя позиция заключа-
ется в том, чтобы проблематизировать наше отношение к жертвоприношению и ста-
тус его эффективности — как одной из важнейших составляющих этой институции.
AB  - In this brief text, written in honor of the new edition of Valery Savchuk’s
book «Blood and Culture», I would like to present the significance this book, and specifically
the chapter on sacrifice, had when I was writing my doctoral thesis. The connection
between sacrifice, violence and blood is indeed the central theme of Savchuk’s book.
My contribution to this topic is to problematize our positions on sacrifice and the status
of efficiency of sacrifice, as one of the main components of this institute.
PB  - ГУАП Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет аэрокосмического приборостроения
T2  - EINAI: Философия. Религия. Культура
T1  - Мои кровь и культура
IS  - 2
VL  - 16
SP  - 50
EP  - 53
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2019",
url = "https://einai.ru/ru/volume-8-2-2019, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2040",
abstract = "В этом кратком тексте, написанном в честь нового издания книги Ва-
лерия Савчука «Кровь и культура», я хотел бы раскрыть значимость этой книги
и, в частности, главы о жертве, сыгравшей для меня важную роль при написании
докторской диссертации. Связь между жертвоприношением, насилием и кровью
действительно является центральной темой книги Савчука. Моя позиция заключа-
ется в том, чтобы проблематизировать наше отношение к жертвоприношению и ста-
тус его эффективности — как одной из важнейших составляющих этой институции., In this brief text, written in honor of the new edition of Valery Savchuk’s
book «Blood and Culture», I would like to present the significance this book, and specifically
the chapter on sacrifice, had when I was writing my doctoral thesis. The connection
between sacrifice, violence and blood is indeed the central theme of Savchuk’s book.
My contribution to this topic is to problematize our positions on sacrifice and the status
of efficiency of sacrifice, as one of the main components of this institute.",
publisher = "ГУАП Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет аэрокосмического приборостроения",
journal = "EINAI: Философия. Религия. Культура",
title = "Мои кровь и культура",
number = "2",
volume = "16",
pages = "50-53"
}
Bojanić, P. (2019). Мои кровь и культура.
EINAI: Философия. Религия. КультураГУАП Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет аэрокосмического приборостроения., 16(2), 50-53.
Bojanić P. Мои кровь и культура. EINAI: Философия. Религия. Культура. 2019;16(2):50-53
Bojanić Petar, "Мои кровь и культура" 16, no. 2 (2019):50-53

Что такое социальный или общественный акт? о природе ангажированных актов

Bojanić, Petar; Borisov, Sergej

(Белгород : Эпицентр, 2019)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Borisov, Sergej
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2041
PB  - Белгород : Эпицентр
T2  - Что такое сообщество?  социальная герменевтика, власть и медиа
T1  - Что такое социальный или общественный акт?  о природе ангажированных актов
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Borisov, Sergej",
year = "2019",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2041",
publisher = "Белгород : Эпицентр",
journal = "Что такое сообщество?  социальная герменевтика, власть и медиа",
title = "Что такое социальный или общественный акт?  о природе ангажированных актов"
}
Bojanić, P.,& Borisov, S. (2019). Что такое социальный или общественный акт?  о природе ангажированных актов.
Что такое сообщество?  социальная герменевтика, власть и медиаБелгород : Эпицентр..
Bojanić P, Borisov S. Что такое социальный или общественный акт?  о природе ангажированных актов. Что такое сообщество?  социальная герменевтика, власть и медиа. 2019;
Bojanić Petar, Borisov Sergej, "Что такое социальный или общественный акт?  о природе ангажированных актов" (2019)

La “disciplina” como categoría y la “disciplina institucional”

Bojanić, Petar

(Instituto de Filosofía, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2042
AB  - El propósito del presente trabajo
consiste en reflexionar sobre la disciplina como
categoría (por oposición a otras posibilidades,
tales como noción, estructura, norma, protocolo,
etc.) y explicar el uso de comillas en el título,
en la medida en que siempre pueden suponer
una ampliación y una corrección de la
palabra disciplina. Mi intención es reconstruir
la resistencia, que se ha extendido durante décadas,
a la disciplina (como castigo, control,
pedagogía violenta, militarismo, fanatismo,
masculinidad, falta de libertad), así como descubrir
el origen del elogio de la auto-disciplina,
de la falta de disciplina y de la interdisciplinariedad.
Asimismo, querría ofrecer
algunos argumentos en favor de la disciplina
como uno de los protocolos más importantes
de la ontología social y como la incondicionada
condición de la cooperación, la vida y el trabajo
en grupo. La disciplina es el aprendizaje
conjunto, así como la producción y el enriquecimiento
del conocimiento que constituye
y sostiene una institución. La cuestión es si, de
hecho, la disciplina de los individuos hace de
manera necesaria que una institución sea mejor
o más justa.
AB  - In this paper I would like to reflect
on discipline as a category (as opposed to other
possibilities, such as notion, structure, norm,
protocol, etc.), and explain the quotation marks
in the title, as they can always follow and amend
the word discipline. My intention is to reconstruct
a decades-long resistance to discipline (as
punishment, control, violent pedagogy, militarism,
fanaticism, masculinity, unfreedom), and
to uncover the origin of praise for self-discipline,
un-discipline or interdisciplinarity. Further, I would like to offer a few arguments in favor of
discipline as one of the most important protocols
of social ontology, and the unconditioned condition
of cooperation, life and group work. Discipline
is joint learning, as well as production
and a nurturing of knowledge that constitutes
and sustains an institution. The question is whether
individuals’ discipline indeed makes an institution
necessarily better or more just.
PB  - Instituto de Filosofía, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
T2  - Isegoria. Revista de Filosofia Moral y Politica
T1  - La “disciplina” como categoría y la “disciplina institucional”
T1  - “Discipline” as a Category and “Institutional Discipline”
IS  - 61
SP  - 543
EP  - 558
DO  - 10.3989/isegoria.2019.061.07
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2019",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2042",
abstract = "El propósito del presente trabajo
consiste en reflexionar sobre la disciplina como
categoría (por oposición a otras posibilidades,
tales como noción, estructura, norma, protocolo,
etc.) y explicar el uso de comillas en el título,
en la medida en que siempre pueden suponer
una ampliación y una corrección de la
palabra disciplina. Mi intención es reconstruir
la resistencia, que se ha extendido durante décadas,
a la disciplina (como castigo, control,
pedagogía violenta, militarismo, fanatismo,
masculinidad, falta de libertad), así como descubrir
el origen del elogio de la auto-disciplina,
de la falta de disciplina y de la interdisciplinariedad.
Asimismo, querría ofrecer
algunos argumentos en favor de la disciplina
como uno de los protocolos más importantes
de la ontología social y como la incondicionada
condición de la cooperación, la vida y el trabajo
en grupo. La disciplina es el aprendizaje
conjunto, así como la producción y el enriquecimiento
del conocimiento que constituye
y sostiene una institución. La cuestión es si, de
hecho, la disciplina de los individuos hace de
manera necesaria que una institución sea mejor
o más justa., In this paper I would like to reflect
on discipline as a category (as opposed to other
possibilities, such as notion, structure, norm,
protocol, etc.), and explain the quotation marks
in the title, as they can always follow and amend
the word discipline. My intention is to reconstruct
a decades-long resistance to discipline (as
punishment, control, violent pedagogy, militarism,
fanaticism, masculinity, unfreedom), and
to uncover the origin of praise for self-discipline,
un-discipline or interdisciplinarity. Further, I would like to offer a few arguments in favor of
discipline as one of the most important protocols
of social ontology, and the unconditioned condition
of cooperation, life and group work. Discipline
is joint learning, as well as production
and a nurturing of knowledge that constitutes
and sustains an institution. The question is whether
individuals’ discipline indeed makes an institution
necessarily better or more just.",
publisher = "Instituto de Filosofía, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas",
journal = "Isegoria. Revista de Filosofia Moral y Politica",
title = "La “disciplina” como categoría y la “disciplina institucional”, “Discipline” as a Category and “Institutional Discipline”",
number = "61",
pages = "543-558",
doi = "10.3989/isegoria.2019.061.07"
}
Bojanić, P. (2019). “Discipline” as a Category and “Institutional Discipline”.
Isegoria. Revista de Filosofia Moral y PoliticaInstituto de Filosofía, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.(61), 543-558.
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2019.061.07
Bojanić P. “Discipline” as a Category and “Institutional Discipline”. Isegoria. Revista de Filosofia Moral y Politica. 2019;(61):543-558
Bojanić Petar, "“Discipline” as a Category and “Institutional Discipline”", no. 61 (2019):543-558,
https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2019.061.07 .

“Leben und Gewalt” or “Gewalt und Leben” A Commentary on Paragraph 18 of Walter Benjamin’s “Toward the Critique of Violence”

Bojanić, Petar

(International Consortium of Critical Theory Programs : Duke University Press, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2043
AB  - In paragraph
18 of “Toward the Critique of Violence,” the terms life, living,
and violence,
and
the relations
among them, complicate
Walter Benjamin’s
justification
of divine
violence—
his text’s
main discovery.
This article
seeks to reconstruct
Benjamin’s
uses of life and living
in earlier
texts and to
consider
the potential
influence
of various
authors
he was reading
at the time (Heinrich Rickert, Erich
Unger, Kurt Hiller, Gershom Scholem). Benjamin’s
distinction
between
life and living
is crucial
for his critique
of pacifism
and for his shift in perspective:
he moves the focus
from the victim
to the one committing
murder,
but whose violent
act just might bring justice.
PB  - International Consortium of Critical Theory Programs : Duke University Press
T2  - Critical Times: Interventions in Global Critical Theory
T1  - “Leben und Gewalt” or “Gewalt und Leben” A Commentary on Paragraph 18 of Walter Benjamin’s “Toward the Critique of Violence”
IS  - 2
VL  - 2
SP  - 320
EP  - 329
DO  - 10.1215/26410478-7708379
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2019",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2043",
abstract = "In paragraph
18 of “Toward the Critique of Violence,” the terms life, living,
and violence,
and
the relations
among them, complicate
Walter Benjamin’s
justification
of divine
violence—
his text’s
main discovery.
This article
seeks to reconstruct
Benjamin’s
uses of life and living
in earlier
texts and to
consider
the potential
influence
of various
authors
he was reading
at the time (Heinrich Rickert, Erich
Unger, Kurt Hiller, Gershom Scholem). Benjamin’s
distinction
between
life and living
is crucial
for his critique
of pacifism
and for his shift in perspective:
he moves the focus
from the victim
to the one committing
murder,
but whose violent
act just might bring justice.",
publisher = "International Consortium of Critical Theory Programs : Duke University Press",
journal = "Critical Times: Interventions in Global Critical Theory",
title = "“Leben und Gewalt” or “Gewalt und Leben” A Commentary on Paragraph 18 of Walter Benjamin’s “Toward the Critique of Violence”",
number = "2",
volume = "2",
pages = "320-329",
doi = "10.1215/26410478-7708379"
}
Bojanić, P. (2019). “Leben und Gewalt” or “Gewalt und Leben” A Commentary on Paragraph 18 of Walter Benjamin’s “Toward the Critique of Violence”.
Critical Times: Interventions in Global Critical TheoryInternational Consortium of Critical Theory Programs : Duke University Press., 2(2), 320-329.
https://doi.org/10.1215/26410478-7708379
Bojanić P. “Leben und Gewalt” or “Gewalt und Leben” A Commentary on Paragraph 18 of Walter Benjamin’s “Toward the Critique of Violence”. Critical Times: Interventions in Global Critical Theory. 2019;2(2):320-329
Bojanić Petar, "“Leben und Gewalt” or “Gewalt und Leben” A Commentary on Paragraph 18 of Walter Benjamin’s “Toward the Critique of Violence”" 2, no. 2 (2019):320-329,
https://doi.org/10.1215/26410478-7708379 .

Institutional Change and the Paradox of (Restitution and) Restauration of the Institution

Bojanić, Petar

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID1904465B
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2045
AB  - My intention in this text is to present the most significant contribution of some French philosophers and anthropologists to the notion of reconstruction and advancement of institutions. The paradox of change, reform or transformation of the institution – is an entirely new institution possible? How do institutions die? – lies in the difficulty or even impossibility to change something that manifests what we are as a group. If institutions really present or represent the relations among all of us, how can they be changed in the first place? Whence the capacity for change? What allows for the idea of the “new”?
AB  - U ovom tekstu mi je namera da pokazem najvažniji prilog nekih francuskih filozofa i antro-pologa u vezi sa rekonstrukcijom i poboljšanjem institucija. Paradoks promene, reforme ili transformacije institucije (da li je moguća potpuno nova institucija i kako umiru institucije?) zasniva se na teškoći ili nemogućnosti da se promeni nesto što manifestuje ono sto mi kao grupa jesmo. Ako institucije predstavljaju ili pokazuju zapravo relacije koje postoje između svih nas, kako je moguće menjati ih? Odakle kapacitet za promenu i kako je uopšte moguća ideja „novog“?
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Institutional Change and the Paradox of (Restitution and) Restauration of the Institution
T1  - Institucionalna promena i paradoks (restitucije i) restauracije institucije
IS  - 4
VL  - 30
SP  - 465
EP  - 475
DO  - 10.2298//FID1904465B
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2019",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID1904465B, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2045",
abstract = "My intention in this text is to present the most significant contribution of some French philosophers and anthropologists to the notion of reconstruction and advancement of institutions. The paradox of change, reform or transformation of the institution – is an entirely new institution possible? How do institutions die? – lies in the difficulty or even impossibility to change something that manifests what we are as a group. If institutions really present or represent the relations among all of us, how can they be changed in the first place? Whence the capacity for change? What allows for the idea of the “new”?, U ovom tekstu mi je namera da pokazem najvažniji prilog nekih francuskih filozofa i antro-pologa u vezi sa rekonstrukcijom i poboljšanjem institucija. Paradoks promene, reforme ili transformacije institucije (da li je moguća potpuno nova institucija i kako umiru institucije?) zasniva se na teškoći ili nemogućnosti da se promeni nesto što manifestuje ono sto mi kao grupa jesmo. Ako institucije predstavljaju ili pokazuju zapravo relacije koje postoje između svih nas, kako je moguće menjati ih? Odakle kapacitet za promenu i kako je uopšte moguća ideja „novog“?",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Institutional Change and the Paradox of (Restitution and) Restauration of the Institution, Institucionalna promena i paradoks (restitucije i) restauracije institucije",
number = "4",
volume = "30",
pages = "465-475",
doi = "10.2298//FID1904465B"
}
Bojanić, P. (2019). Institucionalna promena i paradoks (restitucije i) restauracije institucije.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 30(4), 465-475.
https://doi.org/10.2298//FID1904465B
Bojanić P. Institucionalna promena i paradoks (restitucije i) restauracije institucije. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2019;30(4):465-475
Bojanić Petar, "Institucionalna promena i paradoks (restitucije i) restauracije institucije" 30, no. 4 (2019):465-475,
https://doi.org/10.2298//FID1904465B .

Connection

Losoncz, Mark

(Charlottesville, Virginia: Philosophy Documentation Center, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://www.pdcnet.org/philtoday/content/philtoday_2019_0063_0004_0903_0913
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2074
AB  - There are productive material connections beyond mere internal or external
relations. The concept of connection enables a creative reinterpretation of certain
historical questions and, accordingly, the essay stresses the importance of the concepts
of connection, nexus, and fusion in many philosophies, from Aristotle to Deleuze.
PB  - Charlottesville, Virginia: Philosophy Documentation Center
T2  - Philosophy Today
T1  - Connection
IS  - 4
VL  - 63
SP  - 903
EP  - 913
DO  - https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday202016300
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2019",
url = "https://www.pdcnet.org/philtoday/content/philtoday_2019_0063_0004_0903_0913, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2074",
abstract = "There are productive material connections beyond mere internal or external
relations. The concept of connection enables a creative reinterpretation of certain
historical questions and, accordingly, the essay stresses the importance of the concepts
of connection, nexus, and fusion in many philosophies, from Aristotle to Deleuze.",
publisher = "Charlottesville, Virginia: Philosophy Documentation Center",
journal = "Philosophy Today",
title = "Connection",
number = "4",
volume = "63",
pages = "903-913",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday202016300"
}
Losoncz, M. (2019). Connection.
Philosophy TodayCharlottesville, Virginia: Philosophy Documentation Center., 63(4), 903-913.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday202016300
Losoncz M. Connection. Philosophy Today. 2019;63(4):903-913
Losoncz Mark, "Connection" 63, no. 4 (2019):903-913,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday202016300 .

Dragan Bulatović, Umetnost i muzealnost: istorijsko-umetnički govor i njegovi muzeološki ishodi, Galerija Matice srpske, Novi Sad, 2016

Ćipranić, Miloš

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ćipranić, Miloš
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=753
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1988
AB  - Dragan Bulatović, Umetnost i muzealnost: istorijsko-umetnički govor i njegovi muzeološki ishodi, Galerija Matice srpske, Novi Sad, 2016
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Dragan Bulatović, Umetnost i muzealnost: istorijsko-umetnički govor i njegovi muzeološki ishodi, Galerija Matice srpske, Novi Sad, 2016
IS  - 2
VL  - 30
SP  - 314
EP  - 316
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ćipranić, Miloš",
year = "2019",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=753, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1988",
abstract = "Dragan Bulatović, Umetnost i muzealnost: istorijsko-umetnički govor i njegovi muzeološki ishodi, Galerija Matice srpske, Novi Sad, 2016",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Dragan Bulatović, Umetnost i muzealnost: istorijsko-umetnički govor i njegovi muzeološki ishodi, Galerija Matice srpske, Novi Sad, 2016",
number = "2",
volume = "30",
pages = "314-316"
}
Ćipranić, M. (2019). Dragan Bulatović, Umetnost i muzealnost: istorijsko-umetnički govor i njegovi muzeološki ishodi, Galerija Matice srpske, Novi Sad, 2016.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 30(2), 314-316.
Ćipranić M. Dragan Bulatović, Umetnost i muzealnost: istorijsko-umetnički govor i njegovi muzeološki ishodi, Galerija Matice srpske, Novi Sad, 2016. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2019;30(2):314-316
Ćipranić Miloš, "Dragan Bulatović, Umetnost i muzealnost: istorijsko-umetnički govor i njegovi muzeološki ishodi, Galerija Matice srpske, Novi Sad, 2016" 30, no. 2 (2019):314-316

O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici

Krstić, Predrag

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2005
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2019",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2005",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici"
}
Krstić, P. (2019). O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici.
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Krstić P. O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici. 2019;
Krstić Predrag, "O čemu govorimo kad govorimo o kritici" (2019)

(Nova) Razmišljanja o solidarnosti: od etike zajedništva do političkog principa zajednice

Vasiljević, Jelena

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Fakultet političkih nauka, 2019)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2000
AB  - Kakva je priroda odnosa između zajednice i solidarnosti; da li solidarnost konstituiše zajednicu ili, obrnuto, zajednica stvara solidarne veze; ima li solidarnost antagonizujućeg Drugog (solidarna borba protiv) i kako solidarnost konstituiše granice/zidove/mostove između nas i drugih/drugačijih; u čemu se sastoji politička priroda solidarnosti (za razliku od drugih društvenih odnosa pomoći, podrške, saradnje)? Inspirisana stalnom i gorljivom tematizacijom ovih pitanja unutar feminizma, u ovom tekstu ću se pak fokusirati na sam pojam-problem solidarnosti u društvenoj teoriji generalno, uverena da svaka teorijska refleksija o njemu, a naročito o njegovoj podrazumevanoj političkoj dimenziji, mora imati visoku relevantnost i za feministički teorijski i praktični angažman. U tekstu ću se prvo kratko osvrnuti na savremeni kontekst koji je reaktuelizovao interesovanje za solidarnost, te ukazati na pristupe ovoj temi koje lično smatram najproduktivnijim. Taj će me put neminovno dovesti i do problema adekvatne definicije, tj. do razloga zbog kojih je teško precizno definisati solidarnost. Potom ću se opet vratiti na savremenost i neke skorašnje pokušaje teoretisanja i problematizovanja solidarnosti – kao ideje, kao ponašanja, i kao stavova – te pokušati da uočim spone među njima, kao i da ukažem na neka otvorena pitanja i teme za čija dublja istraživanja snažno plediram
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Fakultet političkih nauka
T2  - Feministička teorija je za sve
T1  - (Nova) Razmišljanja o solidarnosti: od etike zajedništva do političkog principa zajednice
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2000",
abstract = "Kakva je priroda odnosa između zajednice i solidarnosti; da li solidarnost konstituiše zajednicu ili, obrnuto, zajednica stvara solidarne veze; ima li solidarnost antagonizujućeg Drugog (solidarna borba protiv) i kako solidarnost konstituiše granice/zidove/mostove između nas i drugih/drugačijih; u čemu se sastoji politička priroda solidarnosti (za razliku od drugih društvenih odnosa pomoći, podrške, saradnje)? Inspirisana stalnom i gorljivom tematizacijom ovih pitanja unutar feminizma, u ovom tekstu ću se pak fokusirati na sam pojam-problem solidarnosti u društvenoj teoriji generalno, uverena da svaka teorijska refleksija o njemu, a naročito o njegovoj podrazumevanoj političkoj dimenziji, mora imati visoku relevantnost i za feministički teorijski i praktični angažman. U tekstu ću se prvo kratko osvrnuti na savremeni kontekst koji je reaktuelizovao interesovanje za solidarnost, te ukazati na pristupe ovoj temi koje lično smatram najproduktivnijim. Taj će me put neminovno dovesti i do problema adekvatne definicije, tj. do razloga zbog kojih je teško precizno definisati solidarnost. Potom ću se opet vratiti na savremenost i neke skorašnje pokušaje teoretisanja i problematizovanja solidarnosti – kao ideje, kao ponašanja, i kao stavova – te pokušati da uočim spone među njima, kao i da ukažem na neka otvorena pitanja i teme za čija dublja istraživanja snažno plediram",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Fakultet političkih nauka",
journal = "Feministička teorija je za sve",
title = "(Nova) Razmišljanja o solidarnosti: od etike zajedništva do političkog principa zajednice"
}
Vasiljević, J. (2019). (Nova) Razmišljanja o solidarnosti: od etike zajedništva do političkog principa zajednice.
Feministička teorija je za sveBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Fakultet političkih nauka..
Vasiljević J. (Nova) Razmišljanja o solidarnosti: od etike zajedništva do političkog principa zajednice. Feministička teorija je za sve. 2019;
Vasiljević Jelena, "(Nova) Razmišljanja o solidarnosti: od etike zajedništva do političkog principa zajednice" (2019)

О естественных границах и культурных войнах: выживание группы мигрантов/беженцев, или Вдохновляет ли нас еще Фихте?

Bojanić, Petar

(Moskva : Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/neprikosnovennyy_zapas/123_nz_1_2019/article/20848/
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1963
PB  - Moskva : Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie
T2  - Новое литературное обозрение
T1  - О естественных границах и культурных войнах: выживание группы мигрантов/беженцев, или Вдохновляет ли нас еще Фихте?
VL  - 1
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2019",
url = "https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/neprikosnovennyy_zapas/123_nz_1_2019/article/20848/, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1963",
publisher = "Moskva : Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie",
journal = "Новое литературное обозрение",
title = "О естественных границах и культурных войнах: выживание группы мигрантов/беженцев, или Вдохновляет ли нас еще Фихте?",
volume = "1"
}
Bojanić, P. (2019). О естественных границах и культурных войнах: выживание группы мигрантов/беженцев, или Вдохновляет ли нас еще Фихте?.
Новое литературное обозрениеMoskva : Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie., 1.
Bojanić P. О естественных границах и культурных войнах: выживание группы мигрантов/беженцев, или Вдохновляет ли нас еще Фихте?. Новое литературное обозрение. 2019;1
Bojanić Petar, "О естественных границах и культурных войнах: выживание группы мигрантов/беженцев, или Вдохновляет ли нас еще Фихте?" 1 (2019)

Nasilna intencionalnost uzvišenoga

Cvejić, Igor

(Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Cvejić, Igor
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2003
AB  - Osnovno pitanje kojim se ovaj rad bavi je da li je i na koji način u Kantovoj teoriji uzvišenog objekat integrisan u osećajni doživljaj. Da bismo razumeli ovaj problem u radu se iznose Kantove ambivalentne tvrdnje, prvo o predmetu kao uzvišenom, te zatim o tome da uzvišeno u pravom smislu nije predmet koji se prosuđuje već stanje subjekta praćena još jačom tezom o besformnosti objekta, koja implicira da objekat ne može biti deo svesnog doživljaja. U nastavku rada razmatraćemo Kantovu tezu o subrepciji poštovanja prema vlastitoj odredbi sa onim prema objektu i njene različite interpretacije. Na kraju rada ponudiće se nešto drugačije moguće čitanje, koje bi mogli da pruži plauzibilniju sliku o intencionalnosti osećaja uzvišenog. Prema ovoj tezi Kant pokušava dostupnim jezikom da ukaže da u svesnom doživljaju nema objekta saznanja, međutim da se objekat konstituiše kao objekat nasilne emotivne intencionalnosti, podređivanja čulne prirode idejama uma.
AB  - The main question in this paper is if (and how) in Kant’s theory of sublime the
object could be integrated into an emotional experience. In order to understand this
problem, the ambivalent Kant’s claims will be addressed: (1) about the object as sublime and (2) that correctly understood it is not an object, but the state of the subject
which is sublime. The latter thesis could be even strengthened with accompanying
claim about formlessness of the object, which implies that this object can not be a part
of conscious experience. Further, I will discuss Kant’s thesis about a subreption of a
respect for the object instead of for the idea of humanity in our subject, as well as
various interpretations of it. In the final part of the paper, I will introduce alternative
interpretation which could give us a more plausible outline about the intentionality of
the feeling of sublime. My claim is that Kant uses language available to him in order
to state that in sublime there is no object of cognition in conscious experience. However, the object is constituted as an object of the violent emotional intentionality – sensibility brought under ideas of reason.
PB  - Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo
T2  - Theoria
T1  - Nasilna intencionalnost uzvišenoga
IS  - 2
VL  - 62
SP  - 53
EP  - 68
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1902053C
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Cvejić, Igor",
year = "2019",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2003",
abstract = "Osnovno pitanje kojim se ovaj rad bavi je da li je i na koji način u Kantovoj teoriji uzvišenog objekat integrisan u osećajni doživljaj. Da bismo razumeli ovaj problem u radu se iznose Kantove ambivalentne tvrdnje, prvo o predmetu kao uzvišenom, te zatim o tome da uzvišeno u pravom smislu nije predmet koji se prosuđuje već stanje subjekta praćena još jačom tezom o besformnosti objekta, koja implicira da objekat ne može biti deo svesnog doživljaja. U nastavku rada razmatraćemo Kantovu tezu o subrepciji poštovanja prema vlastitoj odredbi sa onim prema objektu i njene različite interpretacije. Na kraju rada ponudiće se nešto drugačije moguće čitanje, koje bi mogli da pruži plauzibilniju sliku o intencionalnosti osećaja uzvišenog. Prema ovoj tezi Kant pokušava dostupnim jezikom da ukaže da u svesnom doživljaju nema objekta saznanja, međutim da se objekat konstituiše kao objekat nasilne emotivne intencionalnosti, podređivanja čulne prirode idejama uma., The main question in this paper is if (and how) in Kant’s theory of sublime the
object could be integrated into an emotional experience. In order to understand this
problem, the ambivalent Kant’s claims will be addressed: (1) about the object as sublime and (2) that correctly understood it is not an object, but the state of the subject
which is sublime. The latter thesis could be even strengthened with accompanying
claim about formlessness of the object, which implies that this object can not be a part
of conscious experience. Further, I will discuss Kant’s thesis about a subreption of a
respect for the object instead of for the idea of humanity in our subject, as well as
various interpretations of it. In the final part of the paper, I will introduce alternative
interpretation which could give us a more plausible outline about the intentionality of
the feeling of sublime. My claim is that Kant uses language available to him in order
to state that in sublime there is no object of cognition in conscious experience. However, the object is constituted as an object of the violent emotional intentionality – sensibility brought under ideas of reason.",
publisher = "Beograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo",
journal = "Theoria",
title = "Nasilna intencionalnost uzvišenoga",
number = "2",
volume = "62",
pages = "53-68",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1902053C"
}
Cvejić, I. (2019). Nasilna intencionalnost uzvišenoga.
TheoriaBeograd : Srpsko filozofsko društvo., 62(2), 53-68.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1902053C
Cvejić I. Nasilna intencionalnost uzvišenoga. Theoria. 2019;62(2):53-68
Cvejić Igor, "Nasilna intencionalnost uzvišenoga" 62, no. 2 (2019):53-68,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1902053C .

Progutati M/mamac: čitanje Albaharijevog predstavljanja Holokausta u kontekstu postjugoslovenskih ratova

Pavlović, Aleksandar

(Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2018)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pavlović, Aleksandar
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1462
AB  - Ovo izlaganje ispituje povezanosti između holokausta i ratova iz 1990-ih godina u romanu Davida Albaharija Mamac (1996). Dosadašnja kritika već je ukazala na “kopernikanski obrt” koji postoji između Albaharijevih ranih, postmodernističkih, aistorijskih knjiga i erupcije istorije u njegove romane posle 1990. godine. U ovom radu iznosi se tvrdnja da ovo pomeranje težišta u Albaharijevom opusu ukazuje na to da za njega holokaust kao trauma može biti predstavljen kroz pisanje samo nakon savremene traume post-jugoslovenskih ratova i raspada zemlje. Ipak, prethodni tumači (Vervaet 2013) uglavnom su Albaharijevu naraciju o holokaustu čitali kao primera onoga što Merien Hirš (Marianne Hirsch) naziva post-sećanje (postmemory) i opisuje kao “veza koju ‘generacija posle’ oseća sa ličnom, kolektivnom i kulturnom traumom onih koji su došli pre – iskustva kojih se oni ‘sećaju’ samo putem priča, slika i ponašanja onih s kojima su rasli.” Nedavno, međutim, proučavaoci poput Ive Kosmos izneli su stav da se, preplićući priču o holokaustu sa novijim kontekstom balkanskih ratova, Albahari zapravo ograničio na “hegemonski narativ srpske žrtve, odnosno, priču o povijesnom stradanju srpskoga naroda koja je poslužila kao opravdanje za rat” (Kosmos 2016). U ovom članku ukršteni su Albaharijevo pisanje o holokaustu u sa njegovim referencama na post-jugoslovenske ratove u romanu Mamac, kako bi se utvdilo u kojoj meri oni poseduju kritički potencijal a u kojoj se uklapaju u dominantan srpski narativ o događajima iz novije istorije.
AB  - This paper explores the relations that David Albahari’s writings about the Holocaust in his novels Mamac (1996), Svetski putnik (Globetrotter, 2001) and Gec i Majer (Götz and Meyer, 2004) establish with the Yugoslav wars of the 1990s. Previous scholarship already pointed out the Copernican twists between Albahari’s early, postmodern, ahistorical writing and the eruption of history into his post-1990s novels. This thereby implies that for him the Holocaust as a trauma can be represented into writing only after the contemporary trauma of the Yugoslav wars and country’s dissolution. Yet, earlier scholarship (Vervaet 2013) mostly remained confined to the reading of his Holocaust narratives as instances of what Marianne Hirsch calls postmemory: “the relationship that the ‘generation after’ bears to the personal, collective, and cultural trauma of those who came before – experiences they ‘remember’ only by means of the stories, images, and behaviors among which they grew up.” Most recently, however, scholars such as Iva Kosmos argued that by framing the Holocaust narratives into the recent context of the Balkan wars, Albahari actually remains confined to the “hegemonic narrative of Serbian victimhood, story about historical suffering of the Serbian people that served as an excuse for the war” (Kosmos 2016). I therefore intend to relate Albahari’s Holocaust narratives against the backdrop of the 1990s post-Yugoslav wars in order to determine their critical potential for understanding the recent violent Balkan past.
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Holokaust i filozofija
T1  - Progutati M/mamac: čitanje Albaharijevog predstavljanja Holokausta u kontekstu postjugoslovenskih ratova
T1  - Swallowing the Bate: Reading David Albahari’s Representation of the Holocaust against the Background of the 1990s Yugoslav Wars
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Pavlović, Aleksandar",
year = "2018",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1462",
abstract = "Ovo izlaganje ispituje povezanosti između holokausta i ratova iz 1990-ih godina u romanu Davida Albaharija Mamac (1996). Dosadašnja kritika već je ukazala na “kopernikanski obrt” koji postoji između Albaharijevih ranih, postmodernističkih, aistorijskih knjiga i erupcije istorije u njegove romane posle 1990. godine. U ovom radu iznosi se tvrdnja da ovo pomeranje težišta u Albaharijevom opusu ukazuje na to da za njega holokaust kao trauma može biti predstavljen kroz pisanje samo nakon savremene traume post-jugoslovenskih ratova i raspada zemlje. Ipak, prethodni tumači (Vervaet 2013) uglavnom su Albaharijevu naraciju o holokaustu čitali kao primera onoga što Merien Hirš (Marianne Hirsch) naziva post-sećanje (postmemory) i opisuje kao “veza koju ‘generacija posle’ oseća sa ličnom, kolektivnom i kulturnom traumom onih koji su došli pre – iskustva kojih se oni ‘sećaju’ samo putem priča, slika i ponašanja onih s kojima su rasli.” Nedavno, međutim, proučavaoci poput Ive Kosmos izneli su stav da se, preplićući priču o holokaustu sa novijim kontekstom balkanskih ratova, Albahari zapravo ograničio na “hegemonski narativ srpske žrtve, odnosno, priču o povijesnom stradanju srpskoga naroda koja je poslužila kao opravdanje za rat” (Kosmos 2016). U ovom članku ukršteni su Albaharijevo pisanje o holokaustu u sa njegovim referencama na post-jugoslovenske ratove u romanu Mamac, kako bi se utvdilo u kojoj meri oni poseduju kritički potencijal a u kojoj se uklapaju u dominantan srpski narativ o događajima iz novije istorije., This paper explores the relations that David Albahari’s writings about the Holocaust in his novels Mamac (1996), Svetski putnik (Globetrotter, 2001) and Gec i Majer (Götz and Meyer, 2004) establish with the Yugoslav wars of the 1990s. Previous scholarship already pointed out the Copernican twists between Albahari’s early, postmodern, ahistorical writing and the eruption of history into his post-1990s novels. This thereby implies that for him the Holocaust as a trauma can be represented into writing only after the contemporary trauma of the Yugoslav wars and country’s dissolution. Yet, earlier scholarship (Vervaet 2013) mostly remained confined to the reading of his Holocaust narratives as instances of what Marianne Hirsch calls postmemory: “the relationship that the ‘generation after’ bears to the personal, collective, and cultural trauma of those who came before – experiences they ‘remember’ only by means of the stories, images, and behaviors among which they grew up.” Most recently, however, scholars such as Iva Kosmos argued that by framing the Holocaust narratives into the recent context of the Balkan wars, Albahari actually remains confined to the “hegemonic narrative of Serbian victimhood, story about historical suffering of the Serbian people that served as an excuse for the war” (Kosmos 2016). I therefore intend to relate Albahari’s Holocaust narratives against the backdrop of the 1990s post-Yugoslav wars in order to determine their critical potential for understanding the recent violent Balkan past.",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Holokaust i filozofija",
title = "Progutati M/mamac: čitanje Albaharijevog predstavljanja Holokausta u kontekstu postjugoslovenskih ratova, Swallowing the Bate: Reading David Albahari’s Representation of the Holocaust against the Background of the 1990s Yugoslav Wars"
}
Pavlović, A. (2018). Swallowing the Bate: Reading David Albahari’s Representation of the Holocaust against the Background of the 1990s Yugoslav Wars.
Holokaust i filozofijaBeograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Pavlović A. Swallowing the Bate: Reading David Albahari’s Representation of the Holocaust against the Background of the 1990s Yugoslav Wars. Holokaust i filozofija. 2018;
Pavlović Aleksandar, "Swallowing the Bate: Reading David Albahari’s Representation of the Holocaust against the Background of the 1990s Yugoslav Wars" (2018)

Predstave životinja u filozofiji

Krstić, Predrag

(Beograd : Radio Beograd 2, 2018)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2008
PB  - Beograd : Radio Beograd 2
T2  - O delu Filozofska životinja: zoografski nagovor na filozofiju Predraga Krstića
T1  - Predstave životinja u filozofiji
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2018",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2008",
publisher = "Beograd : Radio Beograd 2",
journal = "O delu Filozofska životinja: zoografski nagovor na filozofiju Predraga Krstića",
title = "Predstave životinja u filozofiji"
}
Krstić, P. (2018). Predstave životinja u filozofiji.
O delu Filozofska životinja: zoografski nagovor na filozofiju Predraga KrstićaBeograd : Radio Beograd 2..
Krstić P. Predstave životinja u filozofiji. O delu Filozofska životinja: zoografski nagovor na filozofiju Predraga Krstića. 2018;
Krstić Predrag, "Predstave životinja u filozofiji" (2018)

Filozófiai fantasztikum: Az utópikus terekről való gondolkodás és tér az utópikus gondolkodásra (tanulmány)

Krstić, Predrag; Zaharijević, Adriana

(2018)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://hidkor.com/publication/343-filozofiai-fantasztikum-az-utopikus-terekrol-valo-gondolkodas-es-ter-az-utopikus-gondolkodasra
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2010
T2  - Híd
T1  - Filozófiai fantasztikum: Az utópikus terekről való gondolkodás és tér az utópikus gondolkodásra (tanulmány)
T1  - Philosophical fantasy: Thinking about utopian spaces and space for utopian thinking (study)
IS  - 84
VL  - 10
SP  - 94
EP  - 125
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Krstić, Predrag and Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2018",
url = "https://hidkor.com/publication/343-filozofiai-fantasztikum-az-utopikus-terekrol-valo-gondolkodas-es-ter-az-utopikus-gondolkodasra, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2010",
journal = "Híd",
title = "Filozófiai fantasztikum: Az utópikus terekről való gondolkodás és tér az utópikus gondolkodásra (tanulmány), Philosophical fantasy: Thinking about utopian spaces and space for utopian thinking (study)",
number = "84",
volume = "10",
pages = "94-125"
}
Krstić, P.,& Zaharijević, A. (2018). Philosophical fantasy: Thinking about utopian spaces and space for utopian thinking (study).
Híd, 10(84), 94-125.
Krstić P, Zaharijević A. Philosophical fantasy: Thinking about utopian spaces and space for utopian thinking (study). Híd. 2018;10(84):94-125
Krstić Predrag, Zaharijević Adriana, "Philosophical fantasy: Thinking about utopian spaces and space for utopian thinking (study)" 10, no. 84 (2018):94-125

Protiv duha pobune: Tradicionalistička osuda filozofije reformacije i revolucije

Krstić, Predrag

(2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://hrcak.srce.hr/219475
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2011
AB  - U prvom dijelu članka izlaže se tradicionalistička kritika Francuske revolucije, prvenstveno
kroz autore Josepha de Maistrea i Edmunda Burkea. Drugi dio posvećen je recepciji protestantizma
katoličke reakcije, naročito s obzirom na detektiranje »duha pobune« u njemu,
kao jezgra onog držanja ili mentaliteta koji će obilježiti nastupajuće subverzivne političke i
društvene prevrate. Zaključni dio rada prikazuje utjecaje i obrade rane konzervativne misli
u suvremenosti, nalazeći da je ona, u istrajnom proturječju prema radikalnoj društvenoj
reformi, imala ulogu ponekad razložne opomene i, rjeđe, korektiva pretencioznim revolucionarnim
zahvatima.
AB  - In the first part of the paper, the traditionalistic critique of the French Revolution is presented, primarily through the characters of Joseph de Maistre and Edmund Burke. The second part is dedicated to the reception of the Protestantism of the Catholic reaction, especially in the view of detecting the ‘spirit of rebellion' in it, as the nucleus of the posture or mentality that will mark the emerging subversive political and social upheavals. The concluding part of the paper exposes the influence and treatment of early conservative thought in modernity, finding that, in a persistent struggle against radical social reform, it sometimes had the role of the reasonable warning and, more rarely, the corrective of pretentious revolutionary interventions.
T2  - Filozofska istraživanja
T1  - Protiv duha pobune: Tradicionalistička osuda filozofije reformacije i revolucije
T1  - Against the Spirit of Rebellion. A Traditionalists Condemnation of the Philosophy of Reformation and Revolution
IS  - 4
VL  - 38
SP  - 837
EP  - 851
DO  - 10.21464/fi38412
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2018",
url = "https://hrcak.srce.hr/219475, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2011",
abstract = "U prvom dijelu članka izlaže se tradicionalistička kritika Francuske revolucije, prvenstveno
kroz autore Josepha de Maistrea i Edmunda Burkea. Drugi dio posvećen je recepciji protestantizma
katoličke reakcije, naročito s obzirom na detektiranje »duha pobune« u njemu,
kao jezgra onog držanja ili mentaliteta koji će obilježiti nastupajuće subverzivne političke i
društvene prevrate. Zaključni dio rada prikazuje utjecaje i obrade rane konzervativne misli
u suvremenosti, nalazeći da je ona, u istrajnom proturječju prema radikalnoj društvenoj
reformi, imala ulogu ponekad razložne opomene i, rjeđe, korektiva pretencioznim revolucionarnim
zahvatima., In the first part of the paper, the traditionalistic critique of the French Revolution is presented, primarily through the characters of Joseph de Maistre and Edmund Burke. The second part is dedicated to the reception of the Protestantism of the Catholic reaction, especially in the view of detecting the ‘spirit of rebellion' in it, as the nucleus of the posture or mentality that will mark the emerging subversive political and social upheavals. The concluding part of the paper exposes the influence and treatment of early conservative thought in modernity, finding that, in a persistent struggle against radical social reform, it sometimes had the role of the reasonable warning and, more rarely, the corrective of pretentious revolutionary interventions.",
journal = "Filozofska istraživanja",
title = "Protiv duha pobune: Tradicionalistička osuda filozofije reformacije i revolucije, Against the Spirit of Rebellion. A Traditionalists Condemnation of the Philosophy of Reformation and Revolution",
number = "4",
volume = "38",
pages = "837-851",
doi = "10.21464/fi38412"
}
Krstić, P. (2018). Against the Spirit of Rebellion. A Traditionalists Condemnation of the Philosophy of Reformation and Revolution.
Filozofska istraživanja, 38(4), 837-851.
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi38412
Krstić P. Against the Spirit of Rebellion. A Traditionalists Condemnation of the Philosophy of Reformation and Revolution. Filozofska istraživanja. 2018;38(4):837-851
Krstić Predrag, "Against the Spirit of Rebellion. A Traditionalists Condemnation of the Philosophy of Reformation and Revolution" 38, no. 4 (2018):837-851,
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi38412 .

Neprijatni najbliži rođak: naučne i pokretne slike majmuna

Krstić, Predrag

(2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2012
AB  - Tema ovog rada su predstave majmuna na filmu i, šire, u zapadnoj kulturnoj tradiciji. Detektuje se obrazac ambivalentne recepcije te vrste života: prepoznavanje najbližeg srodnika neprijatno podseća na zajedničko poreklo. Film je, načelno, umeo da čovekolikog majmuna i augmentizuje, učini neodoljivo pretećom (King Kong), i da ga personalizuje i paternalističkim sentimentalizmom posliči čoveku (Cheeta), i da izokrene čitav odnos čoveka i majmuna i signalizira političke konsekvence vrsne dominacije (Planeta majmuna), i, najzad, da razreši neprijatnu blizinu – sasvim približavajući čoveka i majmuna u zajedničkom katastrofičkom udesu (12 majmuna, Congo, Gorile u magli). U svakoj varijanti, pokazuje se da je znamenitu
Marxovu formulaciju – „anatomija čoveka je ključ za razumevanje anatomije majmuna“ – zanimljivije sada obrnuti i misliti možda ne više samo metodološki.
AB  - This paper outlines the performance of monkeys in the film and, more broadly, in
western cultural tradition. The pattern of ambivalent reception of that liveform is
detected: recognizing the closest relatives uncomfortable resemblance to a common
origin. In principle, movie used to augment ape and make him irresistibly threatening
(King Kong); to personalize and with paternalistic sentimentalism assimilate him to
human (Tarzan’s Cheeta), to distort the whole relation of humans and apes and signalize political consequences of species domination (Planet of the Apes), and finally, to
resolve an uncomfortable closeness – with complete approximation of humans and
monkeys in common catastrophic accidents (12 Monkeys, Congo, Gorillas in the
Mist). It is demonstrated that, in whatever version, it is more interesting now to reverse
the famous Marx’s formulation –„the anatomy of man is the key to the anatomy of the
ape“– and think it not only methodologically any more.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Neprijatni najbliži rođak: naučne i pokretne slike majmuna
T1  - Unpleasent Closest Cousin: Scientific and Mosion Pictures of Apes
IS  - 1
VL  - 62
SP  - 133
EP  - 152
DO  - 10.2298/THEO1901133K
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2018",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2012",
abstract = "Tema ovog rada su predstave majmuna na filmu i, šire, u zapadnoj kulturnoj tradiciji. Detektuje se obrazac ambivalentne recepcije te vrste života: prepoznavanje najbližeg srodnika neprijatno podseća na zajedničko poreklo. Film je, načelno, umeo da čovekolikog majmuna i augmentizuje, učini neodoljivo pretećom (King Kong), i da ga personalizuje i paternalističkim sentimentalizmom posliči čoveku (Cheeta), i da izokrene čitav odnos čoveka i majmuna i signalizira političke konsekvence vrsne dominacije (Planeta majmuna), i, najzad, da razreši neprijatnu blizinu – sasvim približavajući čoveka i majmuna u zajedničkom katastrofičkom udesu (12 majmuna, Congo, Gorile u magli). U svakoj varijanti, pokazuje se da je znamenitu
Marxovu formulaciju – „anatomija čoveka je ključ za razumevanje anatomije majmuna“ – zanimljivije sada obrnuti i misliti možda ne više samo metodološki., This paper outlines the performance of monkeys in the film and, more broadly, in
western cultural tradition. The pattern of ambivalent reception of that liveform is
detected: recognizing the closest relatives uncomfortable resemblance to a common
origin. In principle, movie used to augment ape and make him irresistibly threatening
(King Kong); to personalize and with paternalistic sentimentalism assimilate him to
human (Tarzan’s Cheeta), to distort the whole relation of humans and apes and signalize political consequences of species domination (Planet of the Apes), and finally, to
resolve an uncomfortable closeness – with complete approximation of humans and
monkeys in common catastrophic accidents (12 Monkeys, Congo, Gorillas in the
Mist). It is demonstrated that, in whatever version, it is more interesting now to reverse
the famous Marx’s formulation –„the anatomy of man is the key to the anatomy of the
ape“– and think it not only methodologically any more.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Neprijatni najbliži rođak: naučne i pokretne slike majmuna, Unpleasent Closest Cousin: Scientific and Mosion Pictures of Apes",
number = "1",
volume = "62",
pages = "133-152",
doi = "10.2298/THEO1901133K"
}
Krstić, P. (2018). Unpleasent Closest Cousin: Scientific and Mosion Pictures of Apes.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 62(1), 133-152.
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1901133K
Krstić P. Unpleasent Closest Cousin: Scientific and Mosion Pictures of Apes. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2018;62(1):133-152
Krstić Predrag, "Unpleasent Closest Cousin: Scientific and Mosion Pictures of Apes" 62, no. 1 (2018):133-152,
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO1901133K .