Zaharijević, Adriana

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
orcid::0000-0003-4884-7158
  • Zaharijević, Adriana (80)

Author's Bibliography

On Butler’s Theory of Agency

Zaharijević, Adriana

(University of Amsterdam Press, 2021)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2172
AB  - This essay addresses the notion of agency in Judith Butler’s work. Its central claim is that her political philosophy revolves around a specific understanding of agency, even a theory of agency, which has not as yet received due attention. The first part of the essay examines two main thought traditions in which agency became an operational notion, through the lenses of intentionality and constraints, voluntarism and determinism. The second part elaborates on the centrality of the body, the social, and the power in Butler’s understanding of agency, conjoining agency with performativity. The essay argues that agency in Butler exceeds freedom, autonomy, and liberation, and has a potent political meaning of its own.
PB  - University of Amsterdam Press
T2  - Bodies That Still Matter: Resonances of the Work of Judith Butler
T1  - On Butler’s Theory of Agency
VL  - 21-30
DO  - 10.5117/9789463722940
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2021",
abstract = "This essay addresses the notion of agency in Judith Butler’s work. Its central claim is that her political philosophy revolves around a specific understanding of agency, even a theory of agency, which has not as yet received due attention. The first part of the essay examines two main thought traditions in which agency became an operational notion, through the lenses of intentionality and constraints, voluntarism and determinism. The second part elaborates on the centrality of the body, the social, and the power in Butler’s understanding of agency, conjoining agency with performativity. The essay argues that agency in Butler exceeds freedom, autonomy, and liberation, and has a potent political meaning of its own.",
publisher = "University of Amsterdam Press",
journal = "Bodies That Still Matter: Resonances of the Work of Judith Butler",
booktitle = "On Butler’s Theory of Agency",
volume = "21-30",
doi = "10.5117/9789463722940"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2021). On Butler’s Theory of Agency. in Bodies That Still Matter: Resonances of the Work of Judith Butler
University of Amsterdam Press., 21-30.
https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463722940
Zaharijević A. On Butler’s Theory of Agency. in Bodies That Still Matter: Resonances of the Work of Judith Butler. 2021;21-30.
doi:10.5117/9789463722940 .
Zaharijević, Adriana, "On Butler’s Theory of Agency" in Bodies That Still Matter: Resonances of the Work of Judith Butler, 21-30 (2021),
https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463722940 . .

Rod i ideologija. O pobuni protiv jednakosti

Zaharijević, Adriana; Lončarević, Katarina

(Beograd : Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti, 2020)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
AU  - Lončarević, Katarina
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2174
AB  - Последњих година род и питања родне равноправности се у различитим геополитичким контекстима, па и у Србији, користе као политичко оруђе у борби против демократије, постигнуте једнакости и освојених слобода. Род функционише као „симболички лепак“ који у себи спаја различита друштвена незадовољства, те се родна равноправност у конзервативним и, све чешће, популистичким круговима одређујe као оно што води уништењу породице, нације и државе. Циљ излагања је да покаже како се јавни наратив против такозване родне идеологије лако може претворити у позив на укидање стечених слобода, постигнуте једнакости и равноправности, и одвећ крхке демократије. Настојаћемо да укажемо на сличности у национално различитим приступима овом питању, и да покажемо да тренд који се издаје као битно национални има суштински транснационални карактер. У
тексту ћемо мапирати кључна места за разумевање борбе против такозване родне идеологије.
AB  - During the last decade the notion of gender (in gender equality, gender
mainstreaming, theory & studies) increasingly began to figure as a threat to the
‘common man’, family, nation and the state – despite the fact that gender equality
has not been fully reached anywhere in the world. Gender functions as a ‘symbolic
glue’ or an obscure source for divergent, and at times contradictory grievances.
Although anti-gender discourses tend to present them as particular to a given nation, the trend is pointedly international. The paper demonstrates that anti-gender
discourses belong to an arsenal of right-wing populist political tools aimed at
dismantling democracy, equality and attained liberties. We focus on various cases,
Serbian among them. Our aim is to discern the discursive patterns that frame antigender attitudes, and to show that the context in which they appear replicates itself
in different national settings.
PB  - Beograd : Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti
T2  - Rodna ravnopravnost, od jednakih prava do jednakih mogućnosti
T1  - Rod i ideologija. O pobuni protiv jednakosti
T1  - Gender And Ideology: On An Inssurection Against Equality
SP  - 29
EP  - 44
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana and Lončarević, Katarina",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Последњих година род и питања родне равноправности се у различитим геополитичким контекстима, па и у Србији, користе као политичко оруђе у борби против демократије, постигнуте једнакости и освојених слобода. Род функционише као „симболички лепак“ који у себи спаја различита друштвена незадовољства, те се родна равноправност у конзервативним и, све чешће, популистичким круговима одређујe као оно што води уништењу породице, нације и државе. Циљ излагања је да покаже како се јавни наратив против такозване родне идеологије лако може претворити у позив на укидање стечених слобода, постигнуте једнакости и равноправности, и одвећ крхке демократије. Настојаћемо да укажемо на сличности у национално различитим приступима овом питању, и да покажемо да тренд који се издаје као битно национални има суштински транснационални карактер. У
тексту ћемо мапирати кључна места за разумевање борбе против такозване родне идеологије., During the last decade the notion of gender (in gender equality, gender
mainstreaming, theory & studies) increasingly began to figure as a threat to the
‘common man’, family, nation and the state – despite the fact that gender equality
has not been fully reached anywhere in the world. Gender functions as a ‘symbolic
glue’ or an obscure source for divergent, and at times contradictory grievances.
Although anti-gender discourses tend to present them as particular to a given nation, the trend is pointedly international. The paper demonstrates that anti-gender
discourses belong to an arsenal of right-wing populist political tools aimed at
dismantling democracy, equality and attained liberties. We focus on various cases,
Serbian among them. Our aim is to discern the discursive patterns that frame antigender attitudes, and to show that the context in which they appear replicates itself
in different national settings.",
publisher = "Beograd : Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti",
journal = "Rodna ravnopravnost, od jednakih prava do jednakih mogućnosti",
booktitle = "Rod i ideologija. O pobuni protiv jednakosti, Gender And Ideology: On An Inssurection Against Equality",
pages = "29-44"
}
Zaharijević, A.,& Lončarević, K.. (2020). Rod i ideologija. O pobuni protiv jednakosti. in Rodna ravnopravnost, od jednakih prava do jednakih mogućnosti
Beograd : Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti., 29-44.
Zaharijević A, Lončarević K. Rod i ideologija. O pobuni protiv jednakosti. in Rodna ravnopravnost, od jednakih prava do jednakih mogućnosti. 2020;:29-44..
Zaharijević, Adriana, Lončarević, Katarina, "Rod i ideologija. O pobuni protiv jednakosti" in Rodna ravnopravnost, od jednakih prava do jednakih mogućnosti (2020):29-44.

Independent and Invulnerable: Politics of an Individual

Zaharijević, Adriana

(London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2020)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2173
AB  - When from the early 1980s onwards a reconfiguration of the politics of dependence began to take place, followed by a thorough dismantling of welfarism and real-socialism, individuals were called upon to use their freedom to self-actualize –to depend only on their own wits and capacities to deal with globalized insecurities. Government could no longer be interested in taking care of the governed. The governed needed to become more dependent on themselves, and less dependent on the state in particular. The governed, in other words, needed to be less vulnerable. It was repeated time and again that the welfare of individuals is best secured and promoted when they are prompted to be independent, to use all their might and imagination to be the only carers for themselves. To not be cared for by others implies a certain level of imagined invulnerability. Each and every one of us –simply by being individuals– has the capacity to demonstrate one’s sovereignty over oneself through one’s independence.   
	Such reprogrammed neo-Victorian language urges us to meticulously revisit its source. The link between early liberalism and neoliberalism, at least in their shared tendency to produce strong aversion to dependence and vulnerability, to correlate it with utter abjection, is by no means accidental. I will claim that the notion of independence is inextricable from an incessant circuit of exclusions, systemic blockades, restrictions or obstructions of opportunities, rights and resources. It is, however also closely related to a specific epistemic and normative configuration of the creature who is the bearer of independence, i.e. a sovereign individual who governs himself.
PB  - London : Palgrave Macmillan
T2  - Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays
T1  - Independent and Invulnerable: Politics of an Individual
SP  - 83
EP  - 100
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60519-3_5
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2020",
abstract = "When from the early 1980s onwards a reconfiguration of the politics of dependence began to take place, followed by a thorough dismantling of welfarism and real-socialism, individuals were called upon to use their freedom to self-actualize –to depend only on their own wits and capacities to deal with globalized insecurities. Government could no longer be interested in taking care of the governed. The governed needed to become more dependent on themselves, and less dependent on the state in particular. The governed, in other words, needed to be less vulnerable. It was repeated time and again that the welfare of individuals is best secured and promoted when they are prompted to be independent, to use all their might and imagination to be the only carers for themselves. To not be cared for by others implies a certain level of imagined invulnerability. Each and every one of us –simply by being individuals– has the capacity to demonstrate one’s sovereignty over oneself through one’s independence.   
	Such reprogrammed neo-Victorian language urges us to meticulously revisit its source. The link between early liberalism and neoliberalism, at least in their shared tendency to produce strong aversion to dependence and vulnerability, to correlate it with utter abjection, is by no means accidental. I will claim that the notion of independence is inextricable from an incessant circuit of exclusions, systemic blockades, restrictions or obstructions of opportunities, rights and resources. It is, however also closely related to a specific epistemic and normative configuration of the creature who is the bearer of independence, i.e. a sovereign individual who governs himself.",
publisher = "London : Palgrave Macmillan",
journal = "Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays",
booktitle = "Independent and Invulnerable: Politics of an Individual",
pages = "83-100",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60519-3_5"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2020). Independent and Invulnerable: Politics of an Individual. in Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays
London : Palgrave Macmillan., 83-100.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60519-3_5
Zaharijević A. Independent and Invulnerable: Politics of an Individual. in Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays. 2020;:83-100.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60519-3_5 .
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Independent and Invulnerable: Politics of an Individual" in Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays (2020):83-100,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60519-3_5 . .

Foucault’s Concept of Clinical Gaze Today

Zaharijević, Adriana; Ristić, Aleksandar; Milčić, Nenad

(Basingstoke : Springer Nature, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
AU  - Ristić, Aleksandar
AU  - Milčić, Nenad
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2166
AB  - The article examines the patient-doctor relationship, relying on Michel Foucault’s concept of the clinical gaze. We argue that during the last decades, a profound transformation
of the social nature of medicine took place, one that Foucault’s understanding of the clinical gaze cannot adequately account for. First, the article offers an elaboration of the three-node network of clinical gaze, the clinic, and nosology to explain the positioning of the doctor and the patient within the specific social ontology generated by the rise of medicine. We then discuss intensive but irresolute developments brought by technological advancements, especially the X-ray tube. Finally, we argue that in the contemporary clinic, equipped with a plethora of
sophisticated devices, the position of the doctor endured the most radical transformation in comparison with Foucault’s proponent of the clinical gaze at the dawn of modern medicine.
PB  - Basingstoke : Springer Nature
T2  - Health Care Analysis An International Journal of Health, Philosophy and Policy
T1  - Foucault’s Concept of Clinical Gaze Today
VL  - online
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00402-0
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana and Ristić, Aleksandar and Milčić, Nenad",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The article examines the patient-doctor relationship, relying on Michel Foucault’s concept of the clinical gaze. We argue that during the last decades, a profound transformation
of the social nature of medicine took place, one that Foucault’s understanding of the clinical gaze cannot adequately account for. First, the article offers an elaboration of the three-node network of clinical gaze, the clinic, and nosology to explain the positioning of the doctor and the patient within the specific social ontology generated by the rise of medicine. We then discuss intensive but irresolute developments brought by technological advancements, especially the X-ray tube. Finally, we argue that in the contemporary clinic, equipped with a plethora of
sophisticated devices, the position of the doctor endured the most radical transformation in comparison with Foucault’s proponent of the clinical gaze at the dawn of modern medicine.",
publisher = "Basingstoke : Springer Nature",
journal = "Health Care Analysis An International Journal of Health, Philosophy and Policy",
title = "Foucault’s Concept of Clinical Gaze Today",
volume = "online",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00402-0"
}
Zaharijević, A., Ristić, A.,& Milčić, N.. (2020). Foucault’s Concept of Clinical Gaze Today. in Health Care Analysis An International Journal of Health, Philosophy and Policy
Basingstoke : Springer Nature., online.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00402-0
Zaharijević A, Ristić A, Milčić N. Foucault’s Concept of Clinical Gaze Today. in Health Care Analysis An International Journal of Health, Philosophy and Policy. 2020;online.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00402-0 .
Zaharijević, Adriana, Ristić, Aleksandar, Milčić, Nenad, "Foucault’s Concept of Clinical Gaze Today" in Health Care Analysis An International Journal of Health, Philosophy and Policy, online (2020),
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00402-0 . .

Becoming a Master of an Island Again: On the Desire to be Bodiless

Zaharijević, Adriana

(Helsinki University Press, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2165
AB  - Reading Robinson Crusoe 300 years after its first publication can help us understand two major fantasies of our current moment: the desire to be in complete possession of oneself and thus invulnerable to the endless reconfigurations of the world one merely happens to be part of; and the desire to return to the times when society was ordained as an aggregate of self-contained, self-actualizing individuals. Both fantasies have been invested in the creation of the two paradigmatic figures of our time – the neoliberal homo economicus and the white masculine master of his property and affairs. Both desires have, additionally, rested upon numerous erasures not only of vulnerability and inter/dependence in general, but also and significantly of the body. I argue, however, that the desire to be bodiless goes hand in hand with the desire to place and possess bodies, as material or symbolic property, which are for various reasons denied the capacity to be self-actualizing, indivisible, and independent. Robinson Crusoe works as a fictional figure with which a self-possessed master identifies with and desires to return to.
PB  - Helsinki University Press
T2  - Redescriptions. Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory
T1  - Becoming a Master of an Island Again: On the Desire to be Bodiless
IS  - 2
VL  - 23
SP  - 107
EP  - 119
DO  - https://doi.org/10.33134/rds.322
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Reading Robinson Crusoe 300 years after its first publication can help us understand two major fantasies of our current moment: the desire to be in complete possession of oneself and thus invulnerable to the endless reconfigurations of the world one merely happens to be part of; and the desire to return to the times when society was ordained as an aggregate of self-contained, self-actualizing individuals. Both fantasies have been invested in the creation of the two paradigmatic figures of our time – the neoliberal homo economicus and the white masculine master of his property and affairs. Both desires have, additionally, rested upon numerous erasures not only of vulnerability and inter/dependence in general, but also and significantly of the body. I argue, however, that the desire to be bodiless goes hand in hand with the desire to place and possess bodies, as material or symbolic property, which are for various reasons denied the capacity to be self-actualizing, indivisible, and independent. Robinson Crusoe works as a fictional figure with which a self-possessed master identifies with and desires to return to.",
publisher = "Helsinki University Press",
journal = "Redescriptions. Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory",
title = "Becoming a Master of an Island Again: On the Desire to be Bodiless",
number = "2",
volume = "23",
pages = "107-119",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.33134/rds.322"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2020). Becoming a Master of an Island Again: On the Desire to be Bodiless. in Redescriptions. Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory
Helsinki University Press., 23(2), 107-119.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33134/rds.322
Zaharijević A. Becoming a Master of an Island Again: On the Desire to be Bodiless. in Redescriptions. Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory. 2020;23(2):107-119.
doi:https://doi.org/10.33134/rds.322 .
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Becoming a Master of an Island Again: On the Desire to be Bodiless" in Redescriptions. Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 23, no. 2 (2020):107-119,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33134/rds.322 . .

Elkoteleződes es kritika, Tanulmanyok az angazsaltsagrol

Zaharijević, Adriana; Losoncz, Márk; Vasiljević, Jelena

(Novi Sad: Forum, 2020)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
AU  - Losoncz, Márk
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2164
AB  - A tanulmánykötet a Belgrádi Egyetem Filozófiai és Társadalomelméleti
Intézetében évek óta zajló munkának és együttműködésnek az eredménye.
Ezt illetően érdemes kiemelni, hogy – bizonyos korábbi kezdeményezések
nyomán – 2014-ben alakult meg az intézetnek az elköteleződéssel
foglalkozó kutatócsoportja, Grupa za studije angažovanosti,
avagy Group for Social Engagement Studies néven. A csoport mindenekelőtt
olyan elméleti, illetve empirikus kutatások folytatását tűzte ki
céljául, melyek az angazsáltságot sokrétűségében ragadják meg, figyelembe
véve, ahogyan a fennálló normák és szabályok kritikai reflexióját
végzi, s ahogyan ezzel a társadalmi változások motorjává válik. Az
intézet nyitottsága és több szakterületre való figyelme nagyban segítette
az elköteleződésre vonatkozó vizsgálódások elmélyítését. Filozófusok,
szociológusok, irodalomtudósok, történészek, antropológusok, politikatudománnyal
foglalkozók, szlavisták és mások vállalták, hogy feltárják
e problémakör különböző vetületeit, a fogalomtörténeti mozzanatait,
a társadalomtudományi kutatásokban való alkalmazhatóságát vagy
a rokon jelenségekkel (aktivizmus, ellenállás stb.) való összefüggéseit.
Egyebek mellett abból a belátásból indultak ki, hogy az elköteleződés sui
generis, más cselekvési formákban nem feloldható tevékenység, és számos,
a társadalomelemzésben nem kellőképpen kiaknázott lehetőséget
rejt magában. Talán mondanunk sem kell, e megközelítés révén egyúttal
az a kérdés is felmerült, hogy vajon a tudományos tevékenység, és ezen
belül magának az elköteleződésnek a kutatása mennyiben lehet maga is
elkötelezetté. Jelentős részben az intézeti hagyományokból következett
az az attitűd, amely a nyilvános szerepvállalást, a kulcsfontosságú közvitákban
való részvételt és állásfoglalást az elköteleződéstanulmányok
elengedhetetlen folyományának tekintette.
PB  - Novi Sad: Forum
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Elkoteleződes es kritika, Tanulmanyok az angazsaltsagrol
EP  - 456
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana and Losoncz, Márk and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2020",
abstract = "A tanulmánykötet a Belgrádi Egyetem Filozófiai és Társadalomelméleti
Intézetében évek óta zajló munkának és együttműködésnek az eredménye.
Ezt illetően érdemes kiemelni, hogy – bizonyos korábbi kezdeményezések
nyomán – 2014-ben alakult meg az intézetnek az elköteleződéssel
foglalkozó kutatócsoportja, Grupa za studije angažovanosti,
avagy Group for Social Engagement Studies néven. A csoport mindenekelőtt
olyan elméleti, illetve empirikus kutatások folytatását tűzte ki
céljául, melyek az angazsáltságot sokrétűségében ragadják meg, figyelembe
véve, ahogyan a fennálló normák és szabályok kritikai reflexióját
végzi, s ahogyan ezzel a társadalmi változások motorjává válik. Az
intézet nyitottsága és több szakterületre való figyelme nagyban segítette
az elköteleződésre vonatkozó vizsgálódások elmélyítését. Filozófusok,
szociológusok, irodalomtudósok, történészek, antropológusok, politikatudománnyal
foglalkozók, szlavisták és mások vállalták, hogy feltárják
e problémakör különböző vetületeit, a fogalomtörténeti mozzanatait,
a társadalomtudományi kutatásokban való alkalmazhatóságát vagy
a rokon jelenségekkel (aktivizmus, ellenállás stb.) való összefüggéseit.
Egyebek mellett abból a belátásból indultak ki, hogy az elköteleződés sui
generis, más cselekvési formákban nem feloldható tevékenység, és számos,
a társadalomelemzésben nem kellőképpen kiaknázott lehetőséget
rejt magában. Talán mondanunk sem kell, e megközelítés révén egyúttal
az a kérdés is felmerült, hogy vajon a tudományos tevékenység, és ezen
belül magának az elköteleződésnek a kutatása mennyiben lehet maga is
elkötelezetté. Jelentős részben az intézeti hagyományokból következett
az az attitűd, amely a nyilvános szerepvállalást, a kulcsfontosságú közvitákban
való részvételt és állásfoglalást az elköteleződéstanulmányok
elengedhetetlen folyományának tekintette.",
publisher = "Novi Sad: Forum, Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Elkoteleződes es kritika, Tanulmanyok az angazsaltsagrol",
pages = "456"
}
Zaharijević, A., Losoncz, M.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2020). Elkoteleződes es kritika, Tanulmanyok az angazsaltsagrol. 
Novi Sad: Forum..
Zaharijević A, Losoncz M, Vasiljević J. Elkoteleződes es kritika, Tanulmanyok az angazsaltsagrol. 2020;:null-456..
Zaharijević, Adriana, Losoncz, Márk, Vasiljević, Jelena, "Elkoteleződes es kritika, Tanulmanyok az angazsaltsagrol" (2020).

Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays

Zaharijević, Adriana

(London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2020)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2162
AB  - This volume presents an attempt to conjoin two related, but in essence deeply problematic notions: vulnerability and exclusion. Their relationship today seems unambiguous: if one is excluded, one is, in all probability, vulnerable and vice versa. We take this as a given. However, we also wish to see what lies behind that givenness, and in a certain sense produces it. Like many of the notions that have taken shape in philosophy and social theory, once they become part of the policy language of righting wrongs, they tend to become hollow and stripped of their multiple layers of meaning. Often, they portray a phenomenon as something that can be singled out and cast outside a larger and inevitably more complex frame. Both exclusion and vulnerability are cases in point: certain groups/populations/identities are vulnerable, thus actions need to be taken to alleviate their vulnerability; certain groups/populations/identities are excluded, and so ways to include them need to be found. 
	Without questioning the fact that there are indeed such groups, assembled and categorized as vulnerable and/or excluded, we wanted to understand why this is the case; more specifically, in what ways these groups are related to others (those deemed ‘invulnerable’ or those excluded on some different basis); how, and from where, the boundary between the excluded and the included arises; what the stakes of ‘invulnerability’ (to which the alleviation of vulnerability supposedly leads) might be; in what ways such categorizations preclude or forestall the agency of the excluded/the vulnerable. What might be the conclusive frame to which actions of inclusion and alleviation of vulnerability lead – one in which all are recognized as vulnerable and where the notion of exclusion has ultimately lost its meaning, or one in which the desired invulnerable individuals monitor the boundaries of their communities or nation-states, caring for the included and warding off those who do not belong? The questions themselves are certainly not new, although the answers to them have assumed a specific form and content in the 21st century. With this volume we want to emphasize both their novelty and their deep-seatedness. Following a variety of critical approaches, all of the contributions here attempt to shed light on the dense theoretical content and complex conceptual history of such notions.
PB  - London : Palgrave Macmillan
T2  - Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays
T1  - Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays
EP  - 232
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2020",
abstract = "This volume presents an attempt to conjoin two related, but in essence deeply problematic notions: vulnerability and exclusion. Their relationship today seems unambiguous: if one is excluded, one is, in all probability, vulnerable and vice versa. We take this as a given. However, we also wish to see what lies behind that givenness, and in a certain sense produces it. Like many of the notions that have taken shape in philosophy and social theory, once they become part of the policy language of righting wrongs, they tend to become hollow and stripped of their multiple layers of meaning. Often, they portray a phenomenon as something that can be singled out and cast outside a larger and inevitably more complex frame. Both exclusion and vulnerability are cases in point: certain groups/populations/identities are vulnerable, thus actions need to be taken to alleviate their vulnerability; certain groups/populations/identities are excluded, and so ways to include them need to be found. 
	Without questioning the fact that there are indeed such groups, assembled and categorized as vulnerable and/or excluded, we wanted to understand why this is the case; more specifically, in what ways these groups are related to others (those deemed ‘invulnerable’ or those excluded on some different basis); how, and from where, the boundary between the excluded and the included arises; what the stakes of ‘invulnerability’ (to which the alleviation of vulnerability supposedly leads) might be; in what ways such categorizations preclude or forestall the agency of the excluded/the vulnerable. What might be the conclusive frame to which actions of inclusion and alleviation of vulnerability lead – one in which all are recognized as vulnerable and where the notion of exclusion has ultimately lost its meaning, or one in which the desired invulnerable individuals monitor the boundaries of their communities or nation-states, caring for the included and warding off those who do not belong? The questions themselves are certainly not new, although the answers to them have assumed a specific form and content in the 21st century. With this volume we want to emphasize both their novelty and their deep-seatedness. Following a variety of critical approaches, all of the contributions here attempt to shed light on the dense theoretical content and complex conceptual history of such notions.",
publisher = "London : Palgrave Macmillan",
journal = "Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays",
title = "Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays",
pages = "232"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2020). Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays. in Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays
London : Palgrave Macmillan..
Zaharijević A. Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays. in Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays. 2020;:null-232..
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays" in Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays (2020).

Život tela. Politička filozofija Džudit Batler

Zaharijević, Adriana

(Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga, 2020)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2161
AB  - Ono što politička filozofija Džudit Batler radi na najtemeljniji je način povezano s performativnošću. Jasno je, performativnost je ključan pojam njenog teorijskog poduhvata, reč koja prva dolazi na um kad se na njega pomisli. Međutim, ovde je reč o jednom vrlo specifičnom aspektu performativnosti, o izvođačkoj dimenziji samog teksta. Tekst izvodi: svaki njen tekst je svojevrstan performans u jeziku (i moglo bi se tvrditi da je upravo to ono što njene tekstove čini tako zavodljivim i rasplesanim, ili frustrirajućim i parališućim).  Moja osnovna teza – i to je ono što ovu knjigu izdvaja u odnosu na nebrojena tumačenja raznih aspekata njenog dela – jeste da politička filozofija Džudit Batler izvodi pobunu u ravni ontologije (PL, 33), izvodeći to kao zahtev koji nam se upućuje, koji nas izaziva. Tekst je taj koji nas nagoni da se zapitamo šta je stvarno, da li je to sve što jeste i da li se stvarno može misliti nekako drugačije – štaviše, može li se nešto učiniti da stvarno postane drugačije. Zapitanost o kojoj je ovde reč nije, međutim, svodiva na intelektualnu radoznalnost. Nešto se u tekstu, i u nama zajedno s njim, buni, a svaka pobuna uvek ima političku narav. Političko, dakle, iskrsava iz samog teksta, pojavljuje se i angažuje in medias res. Sam tekst ne nudi objašnjenja pobune, on nije njen opis, niti se ona ikada njime na neki izričiti način propisuje. Pa ipak, zahvaćeni tom tekstualnom pobunom u ravni stvarnog, postajemo zatečeni u činu koji nas otvara, koji nas inicira u promenu koja nam se zbiva sada i ovde. Knjiga nosi naslov Život telā zbog toga što se na nekom neizrecivom nivou pobuna doživljava kao neizbežna, kao nešto čemu se ne možemo odupreti jer je ulog previsok: ulog je sâm život. 
Oni koji bar donekle poznaju delo Džudit Batler jamačno će zastati kod reči „telo“. Nije li se zamašan deo kritike njenog dela organizovao oko pretpostavke da se telu nikada nije poklanjalo dovoljno pažnje? Nije li takoreći opšteprihvaćena teza da teorija performativnosti i njeno specifično uobličenje roda i pola staju na put onom što se uobičajeno određuje kao stvar tela? Zar se subjekt performativnosti ne javlja kao neumoljivo zapreten u diskurse, i nije li upravo on simbol gotovo potpunog odsustva materijalnosti, takav da postoji jedino kao lingvistička stvar, u govornom činu? Premda bi se moglo reći da uvođenjem prekarnosti Batler stavlja značajniji naglasak na tela čime kao da unekoliko koriguje svoje početke, moja će tvrdnja biti da je telo nesvodivi subjekt njene političke filozofije, te da je telo ono što u bitnom smislu spaja performativnost i prekarnost, odnosno ranu i kasnu fazu njenog rada. Život tela je ono što nas čini društvenim bićima, ono što uslovljava da jedina ljudska stvarnost bude društvena stvarnost. Kako „izmeniti“ stvarno tako da ne postoje životi koji će biti manje življivi i, samim tim, manje ljudski, pitanje je koje će, prvi put jasno formulisano u Okvirima rata (Frames of War [2009]), postati na specifičan način vezano za polje socijalne ontologije.
PB  - Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga
T1  - Život tela. Politička filozofija Džudit Batler
EP  - 461
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Ono što politička filozofija Džudit Batler radi na najtemeljniji je način povezano s performativnošću. Jasno je, performativnost je ključan pojam njenog teorijskog poduhvata, reč koja prva dolazi na um kad se na njega pomisli. Međutim, ovde je reč o jednom vrlo specifičnom aspektu performativnosti, o izvođačkoj dimenziji samog teksta. Tekst izvodi: svaki njen tekst je svojevrstan performans u jeziku (i moglo bi se tvrditi da je upravo to ono što njene tekstove čini tako zavodljivim i rasplesanim, ili frustrirajućim i parališućim).  Moja osnovna teza – i to je ono što ovu knjigu izdvaja u odnosu na nebrojena tumačenja raznih aspekata njenog dela – jeste da politička filozofija Džudit Batler izvodi pobunu u ravni ontologije (PL, 33), izvodeći to kao zahtev koji nam se upućuje, koji nas izaziva. Tekst je taj koji nas nagoni da se zapitamo šta je stvarno, da li je to sve što jeste i da li se stvarno može misliti nekako drugačije – štaviše, može li se nešto učiniti da stvarno postane drugačije. Zapitanost o kojoj je ovde reč nije, međutim, svodiva na intelektualnu radoznalnost. Nešto se u tekstu, i u nama zajedno s njim, buni, a svaka pobuna uvek ima političku narav. Političko, dakle, iskrsava iz samog teksta, pojavljuje se i angažuje in medias res. Sam tekst ne nudi objašnjenja pobune, on nije njen opis, niti se ona ikada njime na neki izričiti način propisuje. Pa ipak, zahvaćeni tom tekstualnom pobunom u ravni stvarnog, postajemo zatečeni u činu koji nas otvara, koji nas inicira u promenu koja nam se zbiva sada i ovde. Knjiga nosi naslov Život telā zbog toga što se na nekom neizrecivom nivou pobuna doživljava kao neizbežna, kao nešto čemu se ne možemo odupreti jer je ulog previsok: ulog je sâm život. 
Oni koji bar donekle poznaju delo Džudit Batler jamačno će zastati kod reči „telo“. Nije li se zamašan deo kritike njenog dela organizovao oko pretpostavke da se telu nikada nije poklanjalo dovoljno pažnje? Nije li takoreći opšteprihvaćena teza da teorija performativnosti i njeno specifično uobličenje roda i pola staju na put onom što se uobičajeno određuje kao stvar tela? Zar se subjekt performativnosti ne javlja kao neumoljivo zapreten u diskurse, i nije li upravo on simbol gotovo potpunog odsustva materijalnosti, takav da postoji jedino kao lingvistička stvar, u govornom činu? Premda bi se moglo reći da uvođenjem prekarnosti Batler stavlja značajniji naglasak na tela čime kao da unekoliko koriguje svoje početke, moja će tvrdnja biti da je telo nesvodivi subjekt njene političke filozofije, te da je telo ono što u bitnom smislu spaja performativnost i prekarnost, odnosno ranu i kasnu fazu njenog rada. Život tela je ono što nas čini društvenim bićima, ono što uslovljava da jedina ljudska stvarnost bude društvena stvarnost. Kako „izmeniti“ stvarno tako da ne postoje životi koji će biti manje življivi i, samim tim, manje ljudski, pitanje je koje će, prvi put jasno formulisano u Okvirima rata (Frames of War [2009]), postati na specifičan način vezano za polje socijalne ontologije.",
publisher = "Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga",
title = "Život tela. Politička filozofija Džudit Batler",
pages = "461"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2020). Život tela. Politička filozofija Džudit Batler. 
Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga..
Zaharijević A. Život tela. Politička filozofija Džudit Batler. 2020;:null-461..
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Život tela. Politička filozofija Džudit Batler" (2020).

Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése

Losoncz, Mark; Vasiljević, Jelena; Zaharijević, Adriana

(Novi Sad : Forum; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2020)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2205
PB  - Novi Sad : Forum; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról
T1  - Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése
SP  - 5
EP  - 10
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Losoncz, Mark and Vasiljević, Jelena and Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2020",
publisher = "Novi Sad : Forum; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról",
booktitle = "Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése",
pages = "5-10"
}
Losoncz, M., Vasiljević, J.,& Zaharijević, A.. (2020). Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése. in Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról
Novi Sad : Forum; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 5-10.
Losoncz M, Vasiljević J, Zaharijević A. Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése. in Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról. 2020;:5-10..
Losoncz, Mark, Vasiljević, Jelena, Zaharijević, Adriana, "Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése" in Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról (2020):5-10.

Social Ontology: Butler via Arendt via Loidolt

Zaharijević, Adriana

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2002146Z
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2078
AB  - This short contribution is written on the occasion of the book discussion of Sophie Loidolt’s Phenomenology of Plurality: Hannah Arendt on Political Intersubjectivity (2018) at the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory. It presents an attempt to read the two key notions Loidolt elaborates in her book – spaces of meaning and spaces of the public and private – from a critical perspective offered by Judith Butler’s taking up of Arendt’s work. Offering Butler’s conception of social ontology through several major points of contestation with Arendt, I argue against an all too simple reduction of her understanding of the political and normativity to poststructuralist ones.
AB  - Ovaj kratak doprinos napisan je povodom diskusije o knjizi Phenomenology of Plurality: Hannah Arendt on Political Intersubjectivity Sofi Lojdolt na Institutu za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju. On predstavlja pokušaj čitanja dva ključna pojma koja Lojdolt izlaže u svojoj knjizi – prostori značenja i prostori javnog i privatnog – iz kritičke perspektive koju Džudit Batler nudi baveći se radom Arentove. Razmatrajući koncepciju socijalne ontologije Batler kroz nekoliko značajnih tačaka njene rasprave sa Arent zalagaću se protiv olake redukcije njenih shvatanja političkog i normativnog na poststrukturalistička shvatanja.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Social Ontology: Butler via Arendt via Loidolt
T1  - Socijalna ontologija: Batler preko Arent preko Lojdolt
IS  - 2
VL  - 31
SP  - 146
EP  - 154
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002146Z
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2020",
abstract = "This short contribution is written on the occasion of the book discussion of Sophie Loidolt’s Phenomenology of Plurality: Hannah Arendt on Political Intersubjectivity (2018) at the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory. It presents an attempt to read the two key notions Loidolt elaborates in her book – spaces of meaning and spaces of the public and private – from a critical perspective offered by Judith Butler’s taking up of Arendt’s work. Offering Butler’s conception of social ontology through several major points of contestation with Arendt, I argue against an all too simple reduction of her understanding of the political and normativity to poststructuralist ones., Ovaj kratak doprinos napisan je povodom diskusije o knjizi Phenomenology of Plurality: Hannah Arendt on Political Intersubjectivity Sofi Lojdolt na Institutu za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju. On predstavlja pokušaj čitanja dva ključna pojma koja Lojdolt izlaže u svojoj knjizi – prostori značenja i prostori javnog i privatnog – iz kritičke perspektive koju Džudit Batler nudi baveći se radom Arentove. Razmatrajući koncepciju socijalne ontologije Batler kroz nekoliko značajnih tačaka njene rasprave sa Arent zalagaću se protiv olake redukcije njenih shvatanja političkog i normativnog na poststrukturalistička shvatanja.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Social Ontology: Butler via Arendt via Loidolt, Socijalna ontologija: Batler preko Arent preko Lojdolt",
number = "2",
volume = "31",
pages = "146-154",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002146Z"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2020). Social Ontology: Butler via Arendt via Loidolt. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(2), 146-154.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002146Z
Zaharijević A. Social Ontology: Butler via Arendt via Loidolt. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(2):146-154.
doi:https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002146Z .
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Social Ontology: Butler via Arendt via Loidolt" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 31, no. 2 (2020):146-154,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002146Z . .

The Community of the Dispossessed: Women's Peace Coalition

Zaharijević, Adriana

(Routledge, London; Southeast European Studies Series, 2019)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2176
AB  - The text considers the possibility of establishing and maintaining alternative communities, taking as an example the Women's Peace Coalition between Kosovo Women Network and the Serbian Women in Black network. The principal question put forward is whether communities that surpass identitarian belonging are possible, and how these communities relate to “communities” determined territorially, nationally (by a nation state), as well as how they relate to artificial and symbolic supranational bodies. The main aim is the examination of the political potential of a community that wishes to be grounded on the logic of peace and the rejection of the logic of possession (following the slogan “people, not territories”). A community of women activists in the shape of the Women's Peace Coalition is defined as a community of the dispossessed, a term developed following the work of Judith Butler and Athena Athanasiou. This pregnant philosophical concept is introduced in order to offer a new approach to the context of an ambivalent, divided, inoperative state, with long-festering wounds of war.
PB  - Routledge, London; Southeast European Studies Series
T2  - Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy
T1  - The Community of the Dispossessed: Women's Peace Coalition
SP  - 215
EP  - 225
DO  - https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351273169
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The text considers the possibility of establishing and maintaining alternative communities, taking as an example the Women's Peace Coalition between Kosovo Women Network and the Serbian Women in Black network. The principal question put forward is whether communities that surpass identitarian belonging are possible, and how these communities relate to “communities” determined territorially, nationally (by a nation state), as well as how they relate to artificial and symbolic supranational bodies. The main aim is the examination of the political potential of a community that wishes to be grounded on the logic of peace and the rejection of the logic of possession (following the slogan “people, not territories”). A community of women activists in the shape of the Women's Peace Coalition is defined as a community of the dispossessed, a term developed following the work of Judith Butler and Athena Athanasiou. This pregnant philosophical concept is introduced in order to offer a new approach to the context of an ambivalent, divided, inoperative state, with long-festering wounds of war.",
publisher = "Routledge, London; Southeast European Studies Series",
journal = "Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy",
booktitle = "The Community of the Dispossessed: Women's Peace Coalition",
pages = "215-225",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351273169"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2019). The Community of the Dispossessed: Women's Peace Coalition. in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy
Routledge, London; Southeast European Studies Series., 215-225.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351273169
Zaharijević A. The Community of the Dispossessed: Women's Peace Coalition. in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy. 2019;:215-225.
doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351273169 .
Zaharijević, Adriana, "The Community of the Dispossessed: Women's Peace Coalition" in Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy (2019):215-225,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351273169 . .

Seeing Violence: Images and Critique

Zaharijević, Adriana

(Universidade de Coimbra, IEF Instituto de Estudos Filosóficos, 2019)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2175
AB  - Thus, my main interest here is in what images of horror produce. What happens to reason when confronted with an image of something that surpasses the powers of explanation or rational reconciliation with the seen? Surmising that the frames of horror – which re-present violence in different ways – equally exercise a certain form of violence over us, I wonder in which part of us this violence takes place. But what if we want, as indeed many have, to use precisely these images as the means for a critique or, further, for the development of a strong ethico-political stance? Is it possible to be both numb and critical? What is critique, and what are our critical capacities, when sifted through violent images – images of violence and images exercising violence? What role do affects play in our being ‘seized’ and what – if anything – propels us to act against violence by being exposed to it?
PB  - Universidade de Coimbra, IEF Instituto de Estudos Filosóficos
T2  - Politics and Image
T1  - Seeing Violence: Images and Critique
SP  - 87
EP  - 100
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Thus, my main interest here is in what images of horror produce. What happens to reason when confronted with an image of something that surpasses the powers of explanation or rational reconciliation with the seen? Surmising that the frames of horror – which re-present violence in different ways – equally exercise a certain form of violence over us, I wonder in which part of us this violence takes place. But what if we want, as indeed many have, to use precisely these images as the means for a critique or, further, for the development of a strong ethico-political stance? Is it possible to be both numb and critical? What is critique, and what are our critical capacities, when sifted through violent images – images of violence and images exercising violence? What role do affects play in our being ‘seized’ and what – if anything – propels us to act against violence by being exposed to it?",
publisher = "Universidade de Coimbra, IEF Instituto de Estudos Filosóficos",
journal = "Politics and Image",
booktitle = "Seeing Violence: Images and Critique",
pages = "87-100"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2019). Seeing Violence: Images and Critique. in Politics and Image
Universidade de Coimbra, IEF Instituto de Estudos Filosóficos., 87-100.
Zaharijević A. Seeing Violence: Images and Critique. in Politics and Image. 2019;:87-100..
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Seeing Violence: Images and Critique" in Politics and Image (2019):87-100.

Vedere la violenza: immagini e critica

Zaharijević, Adriana

(La Nuova Italia Editrice, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2168
AB  - Questo mio testo deve molto alla lettura di Davanti al dolore degli altri di Susan Sontag. Il trafiletto che si trova nel frontespizio dell’edizione inglese del libro – “un’analisi acuta della nostra
insensibilità di fronte alle immagini dell’orrore” – e ha quasi la funzione di un sottotitolo mi ha spinto a iniziare a pensare a che cosa significhi diventare insensibili di fronte a un’immagine, essere
criticamente inebetiti e inebetite, perderne il senso o farsi paralizzare da essa. Naturalmente, il piccolo libro di Sontag non rappresenta l’unica possibilità di accesso al mondo delle immagini. L’ambito della fotografia è stato ampiamente discusso fin dalla prima introduzione dei fotogrammi nella nostra realtà ottica e discorsiva. La prima domanda è: a partire da quali posizioni reagiamo alle immagini della violenza? La seconda, articolata in maniera leggermente manichea, è: che cosa fanno le immagini? Ci perseguitano o hanno la capacità di farci comprendere qualcosa e forse di produrre una risposta critica? Lo stesso vale per l’altra dimensione cui il testo fa riferimento,
la violenza, altro tema infinitamente dibattuto. Tuttavia, Davanti al
dolore degli altri pone due domande significative per una riflessione
che unisca le immagini con la critica e fornisce risposte precise,
per quanto discutibili.
PB  - La Nuova Italia Editrice
T2  - Aut Aut
T1  - Vedere la violenza: immagini e critica
VL  - 384
SP  - 58
EP  - 76
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Questo mio testo deve molto alla lettura di Davanti al dolore degli altri di Susan Sontag. Il trafiletto che si trova nel frontespizio dell’edizione inglese del libro – “un’analisi acuta della nostra
insensibilità di fronte alle immagini dell’orrore” – e ha quasi la funzione di un sottotitolo mi ha spinto a iniziare a pensare a che cosa significhi diventare insensibili di fronte a un’immagine, essere
criticamente inebetiti e inebetite, perderne il senso o farsi paralizzare da essa. Naturalmente, il piccolo libro di Sontag non rappresenta l’unica possibilità di accesso al mondo delle immagini. L’ambito della fotografia è stato ampiamente discusso fin dalla prima introduzione dei fotogrammi nella nostra realtà ottica e discorsiva. La prima domanda è: a partire da quali posizioni reagiamo alle immagini della violenza? La seconda, articolata in maniera leggermente manichea, è: che cosa fanno le immagini? Ci perseguitano o hanno la capacità di farci comprendere qualcosa e forse di produrre una risposta critica? Lo stesso vale per l’altra dimensione cui il testo fa riferimento,
la violenza, altro tema infinitamente dibattuto. Tuttavia, Davanti al
dolore degli altri pone due domande significative per una riflessione
che unisca le immagini con la critica e fornisce risposte precise,
per quanto discutibili.",
publisher = "La Nuova Italia Editrice",
journal = "Aut Aut",
title = "Vedere la violenza: immagini e critica",
volume = "384",
pages = "58-76"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2019). Vedere la violenza: immagini e critica. in Aut Aut
La Nuova Italia Editrice., 384, 58-76.
Zaharijević A. Vedere la violenza: immagini e critica. in Aut Aut. 2019;384:58-76..
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Vedere la violenza: immagini e critica" in Aut Aut, 384 (2019):58-76.

Spaljivanje u 21. veku: šta stoji iza ’rodne ideologije’?

Zaharijević, Adriana

(Beograd : Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2167
AB  - У тексту се разматра такозвана антиродна идеологија. Реч је о глобалном феномену који почива на снажном отпору променама у сфери рода, сексуалности и породице. Стратегије којима се служи редефинишу појам субверзије, приказујући субверзију као нешто конзервативно. Иако се јавља као културни отпор који се често позива на религију, теза је текста да је „родна идеологија“ испред свега политичко средство, секуларни колико и религијски инструмент за дефинисање пожељног друштва 21. века.  У првом делу текста се указује на парадоксалне, често и противречне облике испољавања захтева поборника антиродне идеологије, уз нагласак на тезама о ненаучности, злоупотреби језика, идеолошком мотиву који се издаје као научно и политички неутралан. У другом делу текста се кратко разматра улога религије, и то римокатоличке и православне верзије хришћанства, у градњи овог феномена. У трећем и завршном делу показује како је род постао тачка укрштања противљења реартикулацијама значења прва, људског, слободе и једнакости
AB  - The text delves into the so called anti-gender ideology. Anti-gender
ideology is a global phenomenon established on a strong resistance to
changes in the domain of gender, sexuality and family. Its strategies
re-define the notion of subversion, demonstrating that subversion
nowadays can also be very conservative.Although anti-gender ideology
appears as a cultural form of resistance which regularly evokes religion,
the text claims that it works primarily as a political tool, a secular as
much as a religious instrument for defining the desirable society of the
21st century. The first part of the text demonstrates the paradoxical,
even contradictory articulations of the claims in support of anti-gender
ideology. A special emphasis is put on what becomes defined as the
non-scientific character of gender, the misuse and abuse of language
of gender, and its covert political aspirations which supposedly hide
themselves behind the neutrality ofscience.In the second part ofthe text,
the role of religion, Roman Catholic and Serbian Orthodox religions in
particular, is briefly examined. In the last section, I try to demonstrate
how gender allowed for an intersection of various oppositions to the
rearticulations of the meanings of the right, the human, freedom and
equality.
PB  - Beograd : Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka
T2  - Kultura
T1  - Spaljivanje u 21. veku: šta stoji iza ’rodne ideologije’?
T1  - Burning In The 21st Century What Lies Behind “Gender Ideology”
VL  - 163
SP  - 28
EP  - 45
DO  - 10.5937/kultura1963028Z
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2019",
abstract = "У тексту се разматра такозвана антиродна идеологија. Реч је о глобалном феномену који почива на снажном отпору променама у сфери рода, сексуалности и породице. Стратегије којима се служи редефинишу појам субверзије, приказујући субверзију као нешто конзервативно. Иако се јавља као културни отпор који се често позива на религију, теза је текста да је „родна идеологија“ испред свега политичко средство, секуларни колико и религијски инструмент за дефинисање пожељног друштва 21. века.  У првом делу текста се указује на парадоксалне, често и противречне облике испољавања захтева поборника антиродне идеологије, уз нагласак на тезама о ненаучности, злоупотреби језика, идеолошком мотиву који се издаје као научно и политички неутралан. У другом делу текста се кратко разматра улога религије, и то римокатоличке и православне верзије хришћанства, у градњи овог феномена. У трећем и завршном делу показује како је род постао тачка укрштања противљења реартикулацијама значења прва, људског, слободе и једнакости, The text delves into the so called anti-gender ideology. Anti-gender
ideology is a global phenomenon established on a strong resistance to
changes in the domain of gender, sexuality and family. Its strategies
re-define the notion of subversion, demonstrating that subversion
nowadays can also be very conservative.Although anti-gender ideology
appears as a cultural form of resistance which regularly evokes religion,
the text claims that it works primarily as a political tool, a secular as
much as a religious instrument for defining the desirable society of the
21st century. The first part of the text demonstrates the paradoxical,
even contradictory articulations of the claims in support of anti-gender
ideology. A special emphasis is put on what becomes defined as the
non-scientific character of gender, the misuse and abuse of language
of gender, and its covert political aspirations which supposedly hide
themselves behind the neutrality ofscience.In the second part ofthe text,
the role of religion, Roman Catholic and Serbian Orthodox religions in
particular, is briefly examined. In the last section, I try to demonstrate
how gender allowed for an intersection of various oppositions to the
rearticulations of the meanings of the right, the human, freedom and
equality.",
publisher = "Beograd : Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka",
journal = "Kultura",
title = "Spaljivanje u 21. veku: šta stoji iza ’rodne ideologije’?, Burning In The 21st Century What Lies Behind “Gender Ideology”",
volume = "163",
pages = "28-45",
doi = "10.5937/kultura1963028Z"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2019). Spaljivanje u 21. veku: šta stoji iza ’rodne ideologije’?. in Kultura
Beograd : Zavod za proučavanje kulturnog razvitka., 163, 28-45.
https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura1963028Z
Zaharijević A. Spaljivanje u 21. veku: šta stoji iza ’rodne ideologije’?. in Kultura. 2019;163:28-45.
doi:10.5937/kultura1963028Z .
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Spaljivanje u 21. veku: šta stoji iza ’rodne ideologije’?" in Kultura, 163 (2019):28-45,
https://doi.org/10.5937/kultura1963028Z . .

Filozófiai fantasztikum: Az utópikus terekről való gondolkodás és tér az utópikus gondolkodásra (tanulmány)

Krstić, Predrag; Zaharijević, Adriana

(2018)

TY  - GEN
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://hidkor.com/publication/343-filozofiai-fantasztikum-az-utopikus-terekrol-valo-gondolkodas-es-ter-az-utopikus-gondolkodasra
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2010
T2  - Híd
T1  - Filozófiai fantasztikum: Az utópikus terekről való gondolkodás és tér az utópikus gondolkodásra (tanulmány)
T1  - Philosophical fantasy: Thinking about utopian spaces and space for utopian thinking (study)
IS  - 84
VL  - 10
SP  - 94
EP  - 125
ER  - 
@misc{
author = "Krstić, Predrag and Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2018",
journal = "Híd",
title = "Filozófiai fantasztikum: Az utópikus terekről való gondolkodás és tér az utópikus gondolkodásra (tanulmány), Philosophical fantasy: Thinking about utopian spaces and space for utopian thinking (study)",
number = "84",
volume = "10",
pages = "94-125"
}
Krstić, P.,& Zaharijević, A.. (2018). Filozófiai fantasztikum: Az utópikus terekről való gondolkodás és tér az utópikus gondolkodásra (tanulmány). in Híd, 10(84), 94-125.
Krstić P, Zaharijević A. Filozófiai fantasztikum: Az utópikus terekről való gondolkodás és tér az utópikus gondolkodásra (tanulmány). in Híd. 2018;10(84):94-125..
Krstić, Predrag, Zaharijević, Adriana, "Filozófiai fantasztikum: Az utópikus terekről való gondolkodás és tér az utópikus gondolkodásra (tanulmány)" in Híd, 10, no. 84 (2018):94-125.

La traduzione politicamente impegnata della filosofia: il caso del termine agency

Zaharijević, Adriana

(Milano: Mimesis Edizioni, 2018)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2178
AB  - In questo testo mi concentrerò sulla traduzione di un termine il cui utilizzo in campo teorico è piuttosto recente. Va detto che ciò si riferisce in modo particolare al contesto postjugoslavo. Si tratta del concetto di agency, concetto la cui traduzione in serbo – e nelle altre lingue presenti
nella regione – è tutt’ora controverso. In tal senso, questo testo preso nella sua interezza si può intendere come una sorta di argomentazione filosofica per una determinata proposta di standardizzazione del termine filosofico. Tuttavia, questa è anche più di un’incitazione alla traduzione (quella non letterale, “ultraderivata e ultraconcettuale”). Poiché si tratta di un termine filosofico che ha potenziale di impegno politico, il che in questo testo emerge particolarmente dalla filosofia di Judith Butler, sosterrò che anche una traduzione “sbagliata” può essere giustificata qualora comporti un’occasione di mettere in atto dei cambiamenti immediati nel mondo fuori dal testo.
PB  - Milano: Mimesis Edizioni
T2  - Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa
T1  - La traduzione politicamente impegnata della filosofia: il caso del termine agency
SP  - 113
EP  - 127
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2018",
abstract = "In questo testo mi concentrerò sulla traduzione di un termine il cui utilizzo in campo teorico è piuttosto recente. Va detto che ciò si riferisce in modo particolare al contesto postjugoslavo. Si tratta del concetto di agency, concetto la cui traduzione in serbo – e nelle altre lingue presenti
nella regione – è tutt’ora controverso. In tal senso, questo testo preso nella sua interezza si può intendere come una sorta di argomentazione filosofica per una determinata proposta di standardizzazione del termine filosofico. Tuttavia, questa è anche più di un’incitazione alla traduzione (quella non letterale, “ultraderivata e ultraconcettuale”). Poiché si tratta di un termine filosofico che ha potenziale di impegno politico, il che in questo testo emerge particolarmente dalla filosofia di Judith Butler, sosterrò che anche una traduzione “sbagliata” può essere giustificata qualora comporti un’occasione di mettere in atto dei cambiamenti immediati nel mondo fuori dal testo.",
publisher = "Milano: Mimesis Edizioni",
journal = "Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa",
booktitle = "La traduzione politicamente impegnata della filosofia: il caso del termine agency",
pages = "113-127"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2018). La traduzione politicamente impegnata della filosofia: il caso del termine agency. in Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa
Milano: Mimesis Edizioni., 113-127.
Zaharijević A. La traduzione politicamente impegnata della filosofia: il caso del termine agency. in Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa. 2018;:113-127..
Zaharijević, Adriana, "La traduzione politicamente impegnata della filosofia: il caso del termine agency" in Culture in traduzione: un paradigma per l’Europa (2018):113-127.

Čemu služi teorija? Misliti sa Džudit Batler

Zaharijević, Adriana

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2018)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2177
AB  - U tekstu se na iscrpan način preispituje korist od (feminističke) teorije, njena služba, namena ili upotrebna vrednost. U tom poduhvatu se oslanjam na Džudit Batler, teoretičarku koja je bez sumnje najčešće kritikovana i kod nas i drugde zbog svog složenog i hermetičnog jezika. Propituju se tri teze: teza o tome da je za radikalnu misao potreban radikalni jezik, teza o tome da žene ne razumeju teoriju i teza da teorija poseduje kapacitet za angažman koji se ne izvodi iz nečega izvan same teorije. Najzad, tekst se zaključuje problematizovanjem statusa feminističke teorije u Srbiji.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd : Fakultet političkih nauka
T2  - Feministička teorija je za sve
T1  - Čemu služi teorija? Misliti sa Džudit Batler
SP  - 117
EP  - 132
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2018",
abstract = "U tekstu se na iscrpan način preispituje korist od (feminističke) teorije, njena služba, namena ili upotrebna vrednost. U tom poduhvatu se oslanjam na Džudit Batler, teoretičarku koja je bez sumnje najčešće kritikovana i kod nas i drugde zbog svog složenog i hermetičnog jezika. Propituju se tri teze: teza o tome da je za radikalnu misao potreban radikalni jezik, teza o tome da žene ne razumeju teoriju i teza da teorija poseduje kapacitet za angažman koji se ne izvodi iz nečega izvan same teorije. Najzad, tekst se zaključuje problematizovanjem statusa feminističke teorije u Srbiji.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd : Fakultet političkih nauka",
journal = "Feministička teorija je za sve",
booktitle = "Čemu služi teorija? Misliti sa Džudit Batler",
pages = "117-132"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2018). Čemu služi teorija? Misliti sa Džudit Batler. in Feministička teorija je za sve
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 117-132.
Zaharijević A. Čemu služi teorija? Misliti sa Džudit Batler. in Feministička teorija je za sve. 2018;:117-132..
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Čemu služi teorija? Misliti sa Džudit Batler" in Feministička teorija je za sve (2018):117-132.

Habemus gender. The Serbian case

Zaharijević, Adriana

(2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2171
AB  - The article discusses the emergence of 'gender ideology' in Serbia, focusing on the recent public outcry against the introduction of education packages on gendered violence in schools. The case demonstrates that this concerted action has been undertaken not by the 'common people' it purportedly represents, but by conservative academics. The struggle against 'gender ideology' divides 'the people' into two camps, upholding the values of the 'normal' (Serbian) family: that is, a middle-class, well-to-do family that wants to be left alone, unaffected and undisturbed by intrusions of the state. The article demonstrates the validity of the claim that gender acts as 'symbolic glue' in contemporary conservative struggles across Europe.
T2  - Feministiqa
T1  - Habemus gender. The Serbian case
VL  - 1
SP  - 93
EP  - 97
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The article discusses the emergence of 'gender ideology' in Serbia, focusing on the recent public outcry against the introduction of education packages on gendered violence in schools. The case demonstrates that this concerted action has been undertaken not by the 'common people' it purportedly represents, but by conservative academics. The struggle against 'gender ideology' divides 'the people' into two camps, upholding the values of the 'normal' (Serbian) family: that is, a middle-class, well-to-do family that wants to be left alone, unaffected and undisturbed by intrusions of the state. The article demonstrates the validity of the claim that gender acts as 'symbolic glue' in contemporary conservative struggles across Europe.",
journal = "Feministiqa",
title = "Habemus gender. The Serbian case",
volume = "1",
pages = "93-97"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2018). Habemus gender. The Serbian case. in Feministiqa, 1, 93-97.
Zaharijević A. Habemus gender. The Serbian case. in Feministiqa. 2018;1:93-97..
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Habemus gender. The Serbian case" in Feministiqa, 1 (2018):93-97.

Angažovano prevođenje filozofije: Slučaj pojma agency

Zaharijević, Adriana

(Udruženje književnih prevodilaca Srbije, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2170
AB  - U ovom tekstu ću se posvetiti prevodu jedne reči čija je teorijska upotreba uopšte uzev novijeg datuma. To se posebno odnosi na postjugoslovenski kontekst. Reč je o pojmu agency, pojmu čiji je prevod na srpski – i druge jezike zastupljene u regionu – i dalje sporan. U tom smislu, ovaj se tekst u celini uzev može razumeti kao jedna vrsta filozofskog obrazloženja za određeni predlog standardizacije filozofskog termina. No, ovo je i više od nagovora na (nedoslovan, „preizveden i preidejan“) prevod. Budući da se radi o filozofskoj reči koja ima potencijal za angažman, što se u ovom tekstu posebno iščitava iz filozofije Džudit Batler, zalagaću se za to da je i „pogrešan“ prevod opravdan ukoliko dobija priliku da izvodi neposredne promene u svetu izvan teksta.
PB  - Udruženje književnih prevodilaca Srbije
T2  - Mostovi. Časopis za prevodnu književnost
T1  - Angažovano prevođenje filozofije: Slučaj pojma agency
IS  - 175-176
VL  - 45
SP  - 179
EP  - 191
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2018",
abstract = "U ovom tekstu ću se posvetiti prevodu jedne reči čija je teorijska upotreba uopšte uzev novijeg datuma. To se posebno odnosi na postjugoslovenski kontekst. Reč je o pojmu agency, pojmu čiji je prevod na srpski – i druge jezike zastupljene u regionu – i dalje sporan. U tom smislu, ovaj se tekst u celini uzev može razumeti kao jedna vrsta filozofskog obrazloženja za određeni predlog standardizacije filozofskog termina. No, ovo je i više od nagovora na (nedoslovan, „preizveden i preidejan“) prevod. Budući da se radi o filozofskoj reči koja ima potencijal za angažman, što se u ovom tekstu posebno iščitava iz filozofije Džudit Batler, zalagaću se za to da je i „pogrešan“ prevod opravdan ukoliko dobija priliku da izvodi neposredne promene u svetu izvan teksta.",
publisher = "Udruženje književnih prevodilaca Srbije",
journal = "Mostovi. Časopis za prevodnu književnost",
title = "Angažovano prevođenje filozofije: Slučaj pojma agency",
number = "175-176",
volume = "45",
pages = "179-191"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2018). Angažovano prevođenje filozofije: Slučaj pojma agency. in Mostovi. Časopis za prevodnu književnost
Udruženje književnih prevodilaca Srbije., 45(175-176), 179-191.
Zaharijević A. Angažovano prevođenje filozofije: Slučaj pojma agency. in Mostovi. Časopis za prevodnu književnost. 2018;45(175-176):179-191..
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Angažovano prevođenje filozofije: Slučaj pojma agency" in Mostovi. Časopis za prevodnu književnost, 45, no. 175-176 (2018):179-191.

Protiv individue. Deindividualizirani politički subject

Zaharijević, Adriana

(Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2169
AB  - Autorica u tekstu polazi od premise da je politički subjekt neoliberalizma, vladajuće političke
racionalnosti, individua koja se može okarakterizirati kao isključivi i nepodijeljeni posjednik samog sebe. Preispitivanjem tropa ne/ovisnosti razlažu se pretpostavke koje su uključene u pojam individue, a potom se, analizom konteksta njegove upotrebe u 19. stoljeću, pokazuje da je on bremenit genealogijama koje ograničavaju njegovu političku upotrebljivost u 21. stoljeću. Misliti protiv neoliberalizma zahtijeva napuštanje ideje individue kao suverenog vlasnika koji vlada sobom. Promišljanje alternativnog političkog horizonta, traganje za homo politicus-om koji se uistinu razlikuje od homo oeconomicus-a, iziskuje napuštanje političkog mišljenja koje polazi od pojedinca.
AB  - The text is based on two premises. The first is that we live in the times of neoliberalism, and
the second is that the political subject of neoliberalism is the individual, the “one” qualified as
indivisible, independent, sole owner of one’s self. To define what an individual is, I will revisit
several 19th-century claims which at the same time posit individual as an empty universal – anyone qualifies for entitlement of an individual – and reveal it as profoundly exclusionary – as
the holder of entitlements. I will claim that the indivisibility of an individual is also the basis for
its understanding as sovereign and self-actualized. Liberal politicization of a sovereign possessor of interests introduces not only homo oeconomicus, but it also integrates economic mode of
governmentality into the sphere of the political, it becoming a space of incessant play of exclusions and inclusions. If another kind of political imaginary is to be developed, I argue we need
to distance ourselves from the figure of the individual, bearing in mind that homo oeconomicus
triumphs today as the exhaustive figure of the human, amidst the patently unequal distribution
not only of precarity but also of vulnerability. Critical engagement with neoliberalism assumes
engaging with the political centrality of a figure of an agentic individual
PB  - Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
T2  - Filozofska istraživanja
T1  - Protiv individue. Deindividualizirani politički subject
T1  - Against the Individual. Deindividualized Political Subject
IS  - 3
VL  - 151
SP  - 651
EP  - 666
DO  - 10.21464/fi38314
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Autorica u tekstu polazi od premise da je politički subjekt neoliberalizma, vladajuće političke
racionalnosti, individua koja se može okarakterizirati kao isključivi i nepodijeljeni posjednik samog sebe. Preispitivanjem tropa ne/ovisnosti razlažu se pretpostavke koje su uključene u pojam individue, a potom se, analizom konteksta njegove upotrebe u 19. stoljeću, pokazuje da je on bremenit genealogijama koje ograničavaju njegovu političku upotrebljivost u 21. stoljeću. Misliti protiv neoliberalizma zahtijeva napuštanje ideje individue kao suverenog vlasnika koji vlada sobom. Promišljanje alternativnog političkog horizonta, traganje za homo politicus-om koji se uistinu razlikuje od homo oeconomicus-a, iziskuje napuštanje političkog mišljenja koje polazi od pojedinca., The text is based on two premises. The first is that we live in the times of neoliberalism, and
the second is that the political subject of neoliberalism is the individual, the “one” qualified as
indivisible, independent, sole owner of one’s self. To define what an individual is, I will revisit
several 19th-century claims which at the same time posit individual as an empty universal – anyone qualifies for entitlement of an individual – and reveal it as profoundly exclusionary – as
the holder of entitlements. I will claim that the indivisibility of an individual is also the basis for
its understanding as sovereign and self-actualized. Liberal politicization of a sovereign possessor of interests introduces not only homo oeconomicus, but it also integrates economic mode of
governmentality into the sphere of the political, it becoming a space of incessant play of exclusions and inclusions. If another kind of political imaginary is to be developed, I argue we need
to distance ourselves from the figure of the individual, bearing in mind that homo oeconomicus
triumphs today as the exhaustive figure of the human, amidst the patently unequal distribution
not only of precarity but also of vulnerability. Critical engagement with neoliberalism assumes
engaging with the political centrality of a figure of an agentic individual",
publisher = "Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo",
journal = "Filozofska istraživanja",
title = "Protiv individue. Deindividualizirani politički subject, Against the Individual. Deindividualized Political Subject",
number = "3",
volume = "151",
pages = "651-666",
doi = "10.21464/fi38314"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2018). Protiv individue. Deindividualizirani politički subject. in Filozofska istraživanja
Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo., 151(3), 651-666.
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi38314
Zaharijević A. Protiv individue. Deindividualizirani politički subject. in Filozofska istraživanja. 2018;151(3):651-666.
doi:10.21464/fi38314 .
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Protiv individue. Deindividualizirani politički subject" in Filozofska istraživanja, 151, no. 3 (2018):651-666,
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi38314 . .

Feministička teorija je za sve

Zaharijević, Adriana

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2018)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2163
AB  - Ova knjiga je proizvod promišljanja i udruženog rada osoba koje su se okupile na konferenciji
održanoj u februaru 2018. godine u organizaciji Instituta za filozofiju i društvenu
teoriju i Fakulteta političkih nauka. Kao knjiga, ona je nužno samo sažetak,
poprečni presek onoga što je tokom četiri dana izgovarano, onoga o čemu se tokom četiri
dana razgovaralo za stolom ili u foajeima. No, upravo kao knjiga, ona je i neizbrisiv
trag tih razgovora, nešto što ih trajno zbira i okuplja na mestu koje istrajava i nadrasta
određeni trenutak. 
Knjiga je podeljena na osam tematskih celina koje nisu u potpunosti odvojene, pa se
lako može uspostaviti komunikacija ne samo između različitih delova knjige već i između
pojedinačnih tekstova u različitim celinama.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd : Fakultet političkih nauka
T1  - Feministička teorija je za sve
EP  - 513
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Ova knjiga je proizvod promišljanja i udruženog rada osoba koje su se okupile na konferenciji
održanoj u februaru 2018. godine u organizaciji Instituta za filozofiju i društvenu
teoriju i Fakulteta političkih nauka. Kao knjiga, ona je nužno samo sažetak,
poprečni presek onoga što je tokom četiri dana izgovarano, onoga o čemu se tokom četiri
dana razgovaralo za stolom ili u foajeima. No, upravo kao knjiga, ona je i neizbrisiv
trag tih razgovora, nešto što ih trajno zbira i okuplja na mestu koje istrajava i nadrasta
određeni trenutak. 
Knjiga je podeljena na osam tematskih celina koje nisu u potpunosti odvojene, pa se
lako može uspostaviti komunikacija ne samo između različitih delova knjige već i između
pojedinačnih tekstova u različitim celinama.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd : Fakultet političkih nauka",
title = "Feministička teorija je za sve",
pages = "513"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2018). Feministička teorija je za sve. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Zaharijević A. Feministička teorija je za sve. 2018;:null-513..
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Feministička teorija je za sve" (2018).

U čemu je vrlina kritike?

Krstić, Predrag; Zaharijević, Adriana

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2018)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1500
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga
T2  - Mišel Fuko, Džudit Batler "Šta je kritika?"
T1  - U čemu je vrlina kritike?
SP  - 7
EP  - 34
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Krstić, Predrag and Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2018",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga",
journal = "Mišel Fuko, Džudit Batler "Šta je kritika?"",
booktitle = "U čemu je vrlina kritike?",
pages = "7-34"
}
Krstić, P.,& Zaharijević, A.. (2018). U čemu je vrlina kritike?. in Mišel Fuko, Džudit Batler "Šta je kritika?"
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 7-34.
Krstić P, Zaharijević A. U čemu je vrlina kritike?. in Mišel Fuko, Džudit Batler "Šta je kritika?". 2018;:7-34..
Krstić, Predrag, Zaharijević, Adriana, "U čemu je vrlina kritike?" in Mišel Fuko, Džudit Batler "Šta je kritika?" (2018):7-34.

Athena Athanasiou, Agonistic Mourning. Political Dissidence and the Women in Black, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2017.

Zaharijević, Adriana

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1550
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Athena Athanasiou, Agonistic Mourning. Political Dissidence and the Women in Black, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2017.
IS  - 1
VL  - 29
SP  - 133
EP  - 135
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2018",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Athena Athanasiou, Agonistic Mourning. Political Dissidence and the Women in Black, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2017.",
number = "1",
volume = "29",
pages = "133-135"
}
Zaharijević, A.. (2018). Athena Athanasiou, Agonistic Mourning. Political Dissidence and the Women in Black, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2017.. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 29(1), 133-135.
Zaharijević A. Athena Athanasiou, Agonistic Mourning. Political Dissidence and the Women in Black, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2017.. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2018;29(1):133-135..
Zaharijević, Adriana, "Athena Athanasiou, Agonistic Mourning. Political Dissidence and the Women in Black, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2017." in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 29, no. 1 (2018):133-135.

Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti

Vasiljević, Jelena; Zaharijević, Adriana

(Novi Sad; Beograd : Akademska knjiga; Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2017)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1606
PB  - Novi Sad; Beograd : Akademska knjiga; Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Vasiljević, Jelena and Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2017",
publisher = "Novi Sad; Beograd : Akademska knjiga; Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti"
}
Vasiljević, J.,& Zaharijević, A.. (2017). Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti. 
Novi Sad; Beograd : Akademska knjiga; Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Vasiljević J, Zaharijević A. Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti. 2017;..
Vasiljević, Jelena, Zaharijević, Adriana, "Angažman. Uvod u studije angažovanosti" (2017).

Filozofska fantastika: mišljenje utopijskih prostora i prostor za utopijsko mišljenje

Zaharijević, Adriana; Krstić, Predrag

(Beograd : Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1503
AB  - U tekstu se polazi od pitanja zbog čega se zamišljaju drugi svetovi. Pored motiva za zamišljanje, pažnja se posvećuje samom procesu zamišljanja, resursima i asocijativnim sklopovima koji su dostupni zamišljanju u izgradnji svetova koji se od našeg razlikuju. „Druge svetove“ određujemo i kao utopiju i kao prostor fantazije, rukovodeći se hipotezom da taj prostor nikada nije u potpunosti slobodan. Poseban naglasak stavljamo na prostor i vreme utopije, kao i na dimenziju novog. Tekst je podeljen u četiri celine, od kojih se prva bavi motivom za fantaziju; druga razmatra moć mašte i ograničenja
zamišljanja; treća u svom središtu ima „cenu“ fantazije, potiranje složenosti postojećeg sveta. U četvrtom se delu razmatra značaj utopijskog mišljenja za društvenu teoriju.
AB  - The main question of this article is why imagine other worlds. In addition to shedding light on the motivation, we also examine the imaginative processes, their resources and the associative arrangements available to imagination in the construction of new worlds. We see ‘other worlds’ as both utopian and as fantastic spaces, following the hypothesis that the space of fantasy is never entirely free. We place particular emphasis on the space and time of utopia, and on the aspect of the novelty. The paper is divided into four parts. The first takes into account the path to the other world, or the methodical problem of imagination.  The second wants to portray the other world, or the limitations to imagining something entirely different and new. The third part inquires about the cost of utopian thinking: what is lost in the process, what is sacrificed to its flattening gestures? Finally, despite all these limitations, in the fourth part we consider the significance of utopian thought for social theory.
AB  - Le point de départ de ce texte sont les raisons qui incitent l’homme à imaginer
d’autres mondes. En plus de ces raisons, l’attention est portée au processus
même de l’imagination, aux ressources et aux réseaux des associations d’idées
accessibles à l’imagination dans la construction des mondes qui diffèrent du
notre. Nous définissons les „autres mondes“ à la fois comme une utopie et
comme un espace de fantaisie, partant de l’hypothèse que cet espace n’est jamais
complètement libre. Un accent particulier est mis sur l’espace et le temps
de l’utopie, ainsi que sur la dimension du nouveau. Le texte est divisé en quatre
parties, dont la première traite les raisons d’imaginer; la deuxième analyse le
pouvoir de l’imagination et les limites de cette dernière; la troisième est consacrée
au „prix“ de l’imagination, à savoir l’annulation de la complexité du monde
existant. Dans la quatrième est examinée l’importance de la pensée utopique
pour la théorie sociale.
PB  - Beograd : Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju
T2  - Етноантрополошки проблеми
T1  - Filozofska fantastika: mišljenje utopijskih prostora i prostor za utopijsko mišljenje
T1  - Philosophical fantasy: thinking utopian spaces and the space for utopian thought
T1  - Philosophical fantasy: thinking utopian spaces and the space for utopian thought
VL  - 12
SP  - 641
EP  - 663
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Zaharijević, Adriana and Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2017",
abstract = "U tekstu se polazi od pitanja zbog čega se zamišljaju drugi svetovi. Pored motiva za zamišljanje, pažnja se posvećuje samom procesu zamišljanja, resursima i asocijativnim sklopovima koji su dostupni zamišljanju u izgradnji svetova koji se od našeg razlikuju. „Druge svetove“ određujemo i kao utopiju i kao prostor fantazije, rukovodeći se hipotezom da taj prostor nikada nije u potpunosti slobodan. Poseban naglasak stavljamo na prostor i vreme utopije, kao i na dimenziju novog. Tekst je podeljen u četiri celine, od kojih se prva bavi motivom za fantaziju; druga razmatra moć mašte i ograničenja
zamišljanja; treća u svom središtu ima „cenu“ fantazije, potiranje složenosti postojećeg sveta. U četvrtom se delu razmatra značaj utopijskog mišljenja za društvenu teoriju., The main question of this article is why imagine other worlds. In addition to shedding light on the motivation, we also examine the imaginative processes, their resources and the associative arrangements available to imagination in the construction of new worlds. We see ‘other worlds’ as both utopian and as fantastic spaces, following the hypothesis that the space of fantasy is never entirely free. We place particular emphasis on the space and time of utopia, and on the aspect of the novelty. The paper is divided into four parts. The first takes into account the path to the other world, or the methodical problem of imagination.  The second wants to portray the other world, or the limitations to imagining something entirely different and new. The third part inquires about the cost of utopian thinking: what is lost in the process, what is sacrificed to its flattening gestures? Finally, despite all these limitations, in the fourth part we consider the significance of utopian thought for social theory., Le point de départ de ce texte sont les raisons qui incitent l’homme à imaginer
d’autres mondes. En plus de ces raisons, l’attention est portée au processus
même de l’imagination, aux ressources et aux réseaux des associations d’idées
accessibles à l’imagination dans la construction des mondes qui diffèrent du
notre. Nous définissons les „autres mondes“ à la fois comme une utopie et
comme un espace de fantaisie, partant de l’hypothèse que cet espace n’est jamais
complètement libre. Un accent particulier est mis sur l’espace et le temps
de l’utopie, ainsi que sur la dimension du nouveau. Le texte est divisé en quatre
parties, dont la première traite les raisons d’imaginer; la deuxième analyse le
pouvoir de l’imagination et les limites de cette dernière; la troisième est consacrée
au „prix“ de l’imagination, à savoir l’annulation de la complexité du monde
existant. Dans la quatrième est examinée l’importance de la pensée utopique
pour la théorie sociale.",
publisher = "Beograd : Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju",
journal = "Етноантрополошки проблеми",
title = "Filozofska fantastika: mišljenje utopijskih prostora i prostor za utopijsko mišljenje, Philosophical fantasy: thinking utopian spaces and the space for utopian thought, Philosophical fantasy: thinking utopian spaces and the space for utopian thought",
volume = "12",
pages = "641-663"
}
Zaharijević, A.,& Krstić, P.. (2017). Filozofska fantastika: mišljenje utopijskih prostora i prostor za utopijsko mišljenje. in Етноантрополошки проблеми
Beograd : Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju., 12, 641-663.
Zaharijević A, Krstić P. Filozofska fantastika: mišljenje utopijskih prostora i prostor za utopijsko mišljenje. in Етноантрополошки проблеми. 2017;12:641-663..
Zaharijević, Adriana, Krstić, Predrag, "Filozofska fantastika: mišljenje utopijskih prostora i prostor za utopijsko mišljenje" in Етноантрополошки проблеми, 12 (2017):641-663.