Sort By
Publication Year
Deposit Date
Title
Type
Access
Publication Year
2019 (1)
2018 (3)
2017 (6)
2016 (4)
2015 (3)
2014 (2)
2010 (2)
2006 (1)
Type
Version

Ivković, Marjan

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
c8aeac75-6fd3-4d74-b9f1-5f2a34b75c27
  • Ivković, Marjan (22)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative

Fiket, Irena; Ivković, Marjan; Pudar Draško, Gazela; Vasiljević, Jelena

(Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2044
AB  - The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socioeconomic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.
PB  - Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento
T2  - Partecipazione E Conflitto
T1  - The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative
IS  - 3
VL  - 12
SP  - 898
EP  - 918
DO  - DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Ivković, Marjan and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2044",
abstract = "The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socioeconomic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.",
publisher = "Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento",
journal = "Partecipazione E Conflitto",
title = "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative",
number = "3",
volume = "12",
pages = "898-918",
doi = "DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898"
}

Alessandro Ferrara, Rousseau and Critical Theory, Leiden, Brill, 2017

Ivković, Marjan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2018)

@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2018",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=710, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1977",
abstract = "Alessandro Ferrara, Rousseau and Critical Theory, Leiden, Brill, 2017",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Alessandro Ferrara, Rousseau and Critical Theory, Leiden, Brill, 2017",
number = "4",
volume = "29",
pages = "634-635"
}

Reception without Receptivity: Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities in the Region of Former Yugoslavia

Ivković, Marjan; Trajković, Đurđa

(Argument Verlag, 2018)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Trajković, Đurđa
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1680
PB  - Argument Verlag
T2  - Contexts of Reception of Race, Nation, 	Class: Ambiguous Identities
T1  - Reception without Receptivity: Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous  	Identities in the Region of Former Yugoslavia
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Trajković, Đurđa",
year = "2018",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1680",
publisher = "Argument Verlag",
journal = "Contexts of Reception of Race, Nation, 	Class: Ambiguous Identities",
title = "Reception without Receptivity: Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous  	Identities in the Region of Former Yugoslavia"
}

Neoliberal Instrumentalism and the Fight Against it: the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own Movement

Ivković, Marjan; Matković, Aleksandar

(Milton Park : Taylor and Francis, 2018)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Matković, Aleksandar
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1681
AB  - The article focuses on the new anti-neoliberal social movements in post-Socialist Serbia, most notably the Belgrade movement “ We Won’ t Let Belgrade D(r)own” . It does this by proposing an
analytical framework for analysing the way they deploy their critique of what the authors term “ neoliberal instrumentalism”, a discourse of justification that legitimises the curtailing of
democracy in the name of economic efficiency. The article also addresses Igor  Štiks’ s “ disaggregation thesis” and suggests that, rather than being a “ failure” , the disaggregation of the
movements such as “ We Won’ t Let Belgrade D(r)own” at the initial stage of their development can be an advantage for mobilising specific segments of the population.
PB  - Milton Park : Taylor and Francis
T2  - Journal of East European Politics
T1  - Neoliberal Instrumentalism and the Fight Against it: the We 	Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own Movement
IS  - 1
VL  - 34
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Matković, Aleksandar",
year = "2018",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1681",
abstract = "The article focuses on the new anti-neoliberal social movements in post-Socialist Serbia, most notably the Belgrade movement “ We Won’ t Let Belgrade D(r)own” . It does this by proposing an
analytical framework for analysing the way they deploy their critique of what the authors term “ neoliberal instrumentalism”, a discourse of justification that legitimises the curtailing of
democracy in the name of economic efficiency. The article also addresses Igor  Štiks’ s “ disaggregation thesis” and suggests that, rather than being a “ failure” , the disaggregation of the
movements such as “ We Won’ t Let Belgrade D(r)own” at the initial stage of their development can be an advantage for mobilising specific segments of the population.",
publisher = "Milton Park : Taylor and Francis",
journal = "Journal of East European Politics",
title = "Neoliberal Instrumentalism and the Fight Against it: the We 	Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own Movement",
number = "1",
volume = "34"
}

The intersubjectivist conception of autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of liberalism

Ivković, Marjan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1364
AB  - The paper reconstructs Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of the classical-liberal conception of autonomy and his articulation of an alternative view of personal autonomy as the property of certain types of intersubjective relations of recognition in modernity, developed most systematically in Honneth’s
recent work Freedom’s Right (Das Recht der Freiheit). The analysis of Freedom’s Right focuses on reconstructing Honneth’s critique of the ‘negative’ and ‘reflexive’ types of freedom (autonomy) articulated within the liberal tradition, and contrasting the former two with the conception of ‘social freedom’ (the intersubjectivist conception of autonomy) that Honneth formulates through a detailed ‘normative reconstruction of modernity’. Finally, the paper considers the proximity of Honneth’s ‘Hegelian liberalism’ to communitarianism.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - The intersubjectivist conception of autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of liberalism
IS  - 1
VL  - 28
SP  - 74
EP  - 89
EP  - 
DO  - 10.2298/FID1701074I
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2017",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1364",
abstract = "The paper reconstructs Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of the classical-liberal conception of autonomy and his articulation of an alternative view of personal autonomy as the property of certain types of intersubjective relations of recognition in modernity, developed most systematically in Honneth’s
recent work Freedom’s Right (Das Recht der Freiheit). The analysis of Freedom’s Right focuses on reconstructing Honneth’s critique of the ‘negative’ and ‘reflexive’ types of freedom (autonomy) articulated within the liberal tradition, and contrasting the former two with the conception of ‘social freedom’ (the intersubjectivist conception of autonomy) that Honneth formulates through a detailed ‘normative reconstruction of modernity’. Finally, the paper considers the proximity of Honneth’s ‘Hegelian liberalism’ to communitarianism.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "The intersubjectivist conception of autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of liberalism",
number = "1",
volume = "28",
pages = "74-89-",
doi = "10.2298/FID1701074I"
}

Kritička teorija Aksela Honeta: ka prevazilaženju metafizike

Ivković, Marjan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2017)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1678
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Kritička teorija Aksela Honeta: ka prevazilaženju metafizike
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2017",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1678",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Kritička teorija Aksela Honeta: ka prevazilaženju metafizike"
}

Five Years of Being at Home in the Academic World

Ivković, Marjan

(London : SAGE Publications LTD., 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1465
PB  - London : SAGE Publications LTD.
T2  - Philosophy and Social Criticism
T1  - Five Years of Being at Home in the Academic World
IS  - 3
VL  - 43
SP  - 349
EP  - 350
DO  - 10.1177/0191453716687635
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2017",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1465",
publisher = "London : SAGE Publications LTD.",
journal = "Philosophy and Social Criticism",
title = "Five Years of Being at Home in the Academic World",
number = "3",
volume = "43",
pages = "349-350",
doi = "10.1177/0191453716687635"
}

Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism

Ferrara, Alessandro; Ivković, Marjan; Lončar, Jelena; Prodanović, Srđan; Simeunović, Bojana

(London: SAGE Publications LTD., 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ferrara, Alessandro
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Lončar, Jelena
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Simeunović, Bojana
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1428
AB  - In this symposium, Alessandro Ferrara’s recent book The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism – an attempt to expand the framework of Rawls’ political liberalism in order to enable it to meet the challenge of today’s hyperpluralism – is discussed from a variety of angles by four contributors. Among the themes addressed are the potential of political liberalism for grounding a critical attitude; the different potential for accommodation offered by political liberalism for religious and moral, as opposed to economic, pluralism; Rawls’ implicit understanding of truth; the prospects of true democracy in ethnically divided societies that embrace consociationalist and particularly consensualist forms of governance; and the proper role of human rights in paths from decency to democracy from the perspective of an expanded political liberalism. In the final section, Alessandro Ferrara replies to his critics and accepts some of their suggestions.
PB  - London: SAGE Publications LTD.
PB  - London : Political Studies Association
T2  - Political Studies Review
T1  - Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism
IS  - 3
VL  - 15
SP  - 368
EP  - 390
DO  - 10.1177/1478929916645359
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ferrara, Alessandro and Ivković, Marjan and Lončar, Jelena and Prodanović, Srđan and Simeunović, Bojana",
year = "2017",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1428",
abstract = "In this symposium, Alessandro Ferrara’s recent book The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism – an attempt to expand the framework of Rawls’ political liberalism in order to enable it to meet the challenge of today’s hyperpluralism – is discussed from a variety of angles by four contributors. Among the themes addressed are the potential of political liberalism for grounding a critical attitude; the different potential for accommodation offered by political liberalism for religious and moral, as opposed to economic, pluralism; Rawls’ implicit understanding of truth; the prospects of true democracy in ethnically divided societies that embrace consociationalist and particularly consensualist forms of governance; and the proper role of human rights in paths from decency to democracy from the perspective of an expanded political liberalism. In the final section, Alessandro Ferrara replies to his critics and accepts some of their suggestions.",
publisher = "London: SAGE Publications LTD., London : Political Studies Association",
journal = "Political Studies Review",
title = "Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism",
number = "3",
volume = "15",
pages = "368-390",
doi = "10.1177/1478929916645359"
}

The Intersubjectivist Conception of Autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian Critique of Liberalism

Ivković, Marjan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1682
AB  - The paper reconstructs Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of the classical-liberal conception of autonomy and his articulation of an alternative view of personal autonomy as the property of certain types of intersubjective relations of recognition in modernity, developed most systematically in Honneth’s recent work Freedom’s Right (Das Recht der Freiheit). The analysis of Freedom’s
Right focuses on reconstructing Honneth’s critique of the ‘negative’ and ‘reflexive’ types of freedom (autonomy) articulated within the liberal tradition, and contrasting the former two with the conception of ‘social freedom’ (the intersubjectivist conception of autonomy) that Honneth formulates through a detailed ‘normative reconstruction of modernity’. Finally, the paper considers the proximity of Honneth’s ‘Hegelian liberalism’ to communitarianism.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - The Intersubjectivist Conception of Autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian Critique of Liberalism
IS  - 1
VL  - 28
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2017",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1682",
abstract = "The paper reconstructs Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian critique of the classical-liberal conception of autonomy and his articulation of an alternative view of personal autonomy as the property of certain types of intersubjective relations of recognition in modernity, developed most systematically in Honneth’s recent work Freedom’s Right (Das Recht der Freiheit). The analysis of Freedom’s
Right focuses on reconstructing Honneth’s critique of the ‘negative’ and ‘reflexive’ types of freedom (autonomy) articulated within the liberal tradition, and contrasting the former two with the conception of ‘social freedom’ (the intersubjectivist conception of autonomy) that Honneth formulates through a detailed ‘normative reconstruction of modernity’. Finally, the paper considers the proximity of Honneth’s ‘Hegelian liberalism’ to communitarianism.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "The Intersubjectivist Conception of Autonomy: Axel Honneth’s Neo-Hegelian Critique of Liberalism",
number = "1",
volume = "28"
}

Praxis Philosophy's Older Sister: The Reception of Critical Theory in the Former Yugoslavia

Ivković, Marjan

( Leverkusen : Verlag Barbara Budrich, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1679
PB  -  Leverkusen : Verlag Barbara Budrich
T2  - Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie
T1  - Praxis Philosophy's Older Sister: The Reception of Critical Theory in the Former Yugoslavia
IS  - 2
VL  - 8
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2017",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1679",
publisher = " Leverkusen : Verlag Barbara Budrich",
journal = "Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie",
title = "Praxis Philosophy's Older Sister: The Reception of Critical Theory in the Former Yugoslavia",
number = "2",
volume = "8"
}

Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije

Ivković, Marjan; Prodanović, Srđan; Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Beton, 2016)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1686
AB  - U ovom radu ćemo nastojati da ispitamo u kojoj meri je egalitaristički rečnik jugoslovenskog
socijalizma bio u stanju da ponudi alternativni okvir za interpretaciju savremenih
srpsko-albanskih odnosa. Inicijalna hipoteza polazi od toga da je jugoslovenska
elita – usled eksperimentalnog karaktera samoupravnog socijalizma koji je podrazumevao
određene kompromise sa liberalnim kapitalizmom – bila strukturalno prinuđena
da sistematično negira socijalni aspekt demonstracija koje su na Kosovu odvijale
tokom 1968, 1981. i 1988 godine. Primenom kritičke analize diskursa na štampane
medije (Politika, Večernje novosti i Borba), pokušaćemo da pokažemo kako je vladajuća
nomenklatura složene političko-ekonomske aspekte bunta isključivo tretirala kao izraz
nacionalizma. Ova diskurzivna strategija je samim akterima sugerisala da je nacionalizam
zajednički imenitelj za ekonomsku, političku i etničku jednakost. Krajnje posledice
ovakvih diskurzivnih redukcija će biti prikazane kroz analizu medijskog
izveštavanja sa demonstracija na Kosovu i mitinga „Bratstva i jedinstva“ u Beogradu
1988. godine, gde je primetno zatvaranje prostora za ne-nacionalističko tumačenje
bilo koje vrste socijalnog bunta, ali i postepeno odustajanje aktera od artikulisanja
sopstvenog iskustva nepravde u socijalnom ključu.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Beton
T2  - Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa
T1  - Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Prodanović, Srđan and Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara",
year = "2016",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1686",
abstract = "U ovom radu ćemo nastojati da ispitamo u kojoj meri je egalitaristički rečnik jugoslovenskog
socijalizma bio u stanju da ponudi alternativni okvir za interpretaciju savremenih
srpsko-albanskih odnosa. Inicijalna hipoteza polazi od toga da je jugoslovenska
elita – usled eksperimentalnog karaktera samoupravnog socijalizma koji je podrazumevao
određene kompromise sa liberalnim kapitalizmom – bila strukturalno prinuđena
da sistematično negira socijalni aspekt demonstracija koje su na Kosovu odvijale
tokom 1968, 1981. i 1988 godine. Primenom kritičke analize diskursa na štampane
medije (Politika, Večernje novosti i Borba), pokušaćemo da pokažemo kako je vladajuća
nomenklatura složene političko-ekonomske aspekte bunta isključivo tretirala kao izraz
nacionalizma. Ova diskurzivna strategija je samim akterima sugerisala da je nacionalizam
zajednički imenitelj za ekonomsku, političku i etničku jednakost. Krajnje posledice
ovakvih diskurzivnih redukcija će biti prikazane kroz analizu medijskog
izveštavanja sa demonstracija na Kosovu i mitinga „Bratstva i jedinstva“ u Beogradu
1988. godine, gde je primetno zatvaranje prostora za ne-nacionalističko tumačenje
bilo koje vrste socijalnog bunta, ali i postepeno odustajanje aktera od artikulisanja
sopstvenog iskustva nepravde u socijalnom ključu.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Beton",
journal = "Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa",
title = "Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije"
}

The Habermasian Foundations and Aims of Axel Honneth’s Theory of Recognition

Ivković, Marjan

(São Paulo : Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1685
AB  - The paper reconstructs Axel Honneth’s theoretical evolution as a complex interrogation of Habermasian critical theory, arguing against a misconception that Honneth tries to ‘supersede’ Habermas’ perspective through an essentialist and reductionist social philosophy, and pointing out that Honneth’s theory retains a ‘Habermasian’ tension between two imperatives: attaining post-metaphysical normative foundations and articulating a ‘diagnostic’ social critique. The paper concludes that Honneth’s recent works exhibit a systems-theoretic sensitivity, which suggests that Honneth’s ‘dialogue’ with Habermas  continues.
PB  - São Paulo : Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas
T2  - Revista Ideias
T1  - The Habermasian Foundations and Aims of Axel Honneth’s Theory of Recognition
IS  - 2
VL  - 7
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2016",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1685",
abstract = "The paper reconstructs Axel Honneth’s theoretical evolution as a complex interrogation of Habermasian critical theory, arguing against a misconception that Honneth tries to ‘supersede’ Habermas’ perspective through an essentialist and reductionist social philosophy, and pointing out that Honneth’s theory retains a ‘Habermasian’ tension between two imperatives: attaining post-metaphysical normative foundations and articulating a ‘diagnostic’ social critique. The paper concludes that Honneth’s recent works exhibit a systems-theoretic sensitivity, which suggests that Honneth’s ‘dialogue’ with Habermas  continues.",
publisher = "São Paulo : Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas",
journal = "Revista Ideias",
title = "The Habermasian Foundations and Aims of Axel Honneth’s Theory of Recognition",
number = "2",
volume = "7"
}

Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism

Ferrara, Alessandro; Ivković, Marjan; Prodanović, Srđan; Lončar, Jelena; Simeunović, Bojana

(Thousand Oaks, California : SAGE Publications, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ferrara, Alessandro
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Lončar, Jelena
AU  - Simeunović, Bojana
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1683
AB  - n this symposium, Alessandro Ferrara’s recent book The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism – an attempt to expand the framework of Rawls’ political liberalism in order to enable it to meet the challenge of today’s hyperpluralism – is discussed from a variety of angles by four contributors. Among the themes addressed are the potential of political liberalism for grounding a critical attitude; the different potential for accommodation offered by political liberalism for religious and moral, as opposed to economic, pluralism; Rawls’ implicit understanding of truth; the prospects of true democracy in ethnically divided societies that embrace consociationalist and particularly consensualist forms of governance; and the proper role of human rights in paths from decency to democracy from the perspective of an expanded political liberalism. In the final section, Alessandro Ferrara replies to his critics and accepts some of their suggestions.
PB  - Thousand Oaks, California : SAGE Publications
T2  - Political Studies Review
T1  - Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism
IS  - 1
VL  - 23
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ferrara, Alessandro and Ivković, Marjan and Prodanović, Srđan and Lončar, Jelena and Simeunović, Bojana",
year = "2016",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1683",
abstract = "n this symposium, Alessandro Ferrara’s recent book The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism – an attempt to expand the framework of Rawls’ political liberalism in order to enable it to meet the challenge of today’s hyperpluralism – is discussed from a variety of angles by four contributors. Among the themes addressed are the potential of political liberalism for grounding a critical attitude; the different potential for accommodation offered by political liberalism for religious and moral, as opposed to economic, pluralism; Rawls’ implicit understanding of truth; the prospects of true democracy in ethnically divided societies that embrace consociationalist and particularly consensualist forms of governance; and the proper role of human rights in paths from decency to democracy from the perspective of an expanded political liberalism. In the final section, Alessandro Ferrara replies to his critics and accepts some of their suggestions.",
publisher = "Thousand Oaks, California : SAGE Publications",
journal = "Political Studies Review",
title = "Liberalism between Politics and Epistemology: A Discussion of Alessandro Ferrara’s The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism",
number = "1",
volume = "23"
}

Social Critique and Engagement between Universalism, Anti-Authoritarianism and Diagnosis of Domination

Ivković, Marjan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1684
AB  - The paper discusses a particular ‘isomorphy’ between two forms of social criticism: the ‘holistic’ theoretical social critique represented by such authors as Jürgen Habermas and Axel Honneth and ‘collective social engagement’ represented by such civic movements as the ‘We Won’t Let Belgrade D(r)own’ initiative in contemporary Serbia, which the paper tries to distinguish from more conventional forms of popular protest. This ‘isomorphy’, the paper argues, consists in a tension between three distinct imperatives of the justification of critique – those of normative universalism, epistemological anti-authoritarianism, and diagnosis of social domination – produced by the attempts of both the ‘holistic’ social critics and the collectively engaged actors to simultaneously respond to all threeimperatives. After presenting the three types of theoretical critique that crystallize around each imperative, the paper discusses the internal tension that arises in the
works of ‘holistic’ theoretical critics and then identifies the same kind of tension in the ‘We Won’t Let Belgrade D(r)own’ initiative. The tension in the movement’s critique is outlined through a brief analysis of the activists’ discourse as articulated in the bulletin We Won’t Let Belgrade D(r)own issued in March 2015. Since the examples also suggest that collective engagement is better than theoretical critique at keeping this tension ‘productive’, the paper finally offers some tentative
thoughts on the possible reasons for this difference.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - Social Critique and Engagement between Universalism, Anti-Authoritarianism and Diagnosis of Domination
IS  - 2
VL  - 27
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2016",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1684",
abstract = "The paper discusses a particular ‘isomorphy’ between two forms of social criticism: the ‘holistic’ theoretical social critique represented by such authors as Jürgen Habermas and Axel Honneth and ‘collective social engagement’ represented by such civic movements as the ‘We Won’t Let Belgrade D(r)own’ initiative in contemporary Serbia, which the paper tries to distinguish from more conventional forms of popular protest. This ‘isomorphy’, the paper argues, consists in a tension between three distinct imperatives of the justification of critique – those of normative universalism, epistemological anti-authoritarianism, and diagnosis of social domination – produced by the attempts of both the ‘holistic’ social critics and the collectively engaged actors to simultaneously respond to all threeimperatives. After presenting the three types of theoretical critique that crystallize around each imperative, the paper discusses the internal tension that arises in the
works of ‘holistic’ theoretical critics and then identifies the same kind of tension in the ‘We Won’t Let Belgrade D(r)own’ initiative. The tension in the movement’s critique is outlined through a brief analysis of the activists’ discourse as articulated in the bulletin We Won’t Let Belgrade D(r)own issued in March 2015. Since the examples also suggest that collective engagement is better than theoretical critique at keeping this tension ‘productive’, the paper finally offers some tentative
thoughts on the possible reasons for this difference.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Social Critique and Engagement between Universalism, Anti-Authoritarianism and Diagnosis of Domination",
number = "2",
volume = "27"
}

Philosophical Practice Through the Lens of Post-Metaphysical Thought

Ivković, Marjan

(Cambridge : Cambridge Scholars Press, 2015)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1688
PB  - Cambridge : Cambridge Scholars Press
T2  - Practicing Philosophy
T1  - Philosophical Practice Through the Lens of Post-Metaphysical Thought
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2015",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1688",
publisher = "Cambridge : Cambridge Scholars Press",
journal = "Practicing Philosophy",
title = "Philosophical Practice Through the Lens of Post-Metaphysical Thought"
}

The Concept of Social Domination in Axel Honneth's Critical Theory

Ivković, Marjan

(Beograd : Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu, 2015)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1687
AB  - This paper attempts to reconstruct the concept of social domination articulated in the early works of Axel Honneth, a key figure of the ’third generation’ of critical theory. The author argues that one of the key ambitions of the early Honneth, expressed trhough his critique of Jürgen Habermas, was to theorize the process of societal reproduction in contemporary capitalism in ’action-theoretic’ terms, i.e. as determined by the inter-group dynamics of social conflict and domination, as opposed to Habermas’ systems-theoretic approach. The author analyzes Honneth’s criticism of Habermas developed in ’The Critique of Power’, and focuses more narrowly on Honneth’s conceptualization of social domination outlined in the early article ’Moral Conscioussness and Class Domination’. The analysis grounds the author’s subsequent reconstruction of the early Honneth’s conception of social domination as a two-dimensional phenomenon that encompasses an ’intentional’ and a ’structural’ dimension. Turning towards Honneth’s mature perspective, the author argues that a critique of social domination no longer occupies a central place in Honneth’s influential theory of recognition. Finally, the author considers Honneth’s only recent attempt at theorizing domination presented in the article ’Recognition as Ideology’, and argues that Honneth has so far missed the opportunity to integrate the early social-theoretical perspective on domination into his mature theoretical system.
PB  - Beograd : Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu
T2  - Sociologija
T1  - The Concept of Social Domination in Axel Honneth's Critical Theory
IS  - 1
VL  - 57
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2015",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1687",
abstract = "This paper attempts to reconstruct the concept of social domination articulated in the early works of Axel Honneth, a key figure of the ’third generation’ of critical theory. The author argues that one of the key ambitions of the early Honneth, expressed trhough his critique of Jürgen Habermas, was to theorize the process of societal reproduction in contemporary capitalism in ’action-theoretic’ terms, i.e. as determined by the inter-group dynamics of social conflict and domination, as opposed to Habermas’ systems-theoretic approach. The author analyzes Honneth’s criticism of Habermas developed in ’The Critique of Power’, and focuses more narrowly on Honneth’s conceptualization of social domination outlined in the early article ’Moral Conscioussness and Class Domination’. The analysis grounds the author’s subsequent reconstruction of the early Honneth’s conception of social domination as a two-dimensional phenomenon that encompasses an ’intentional’ and a ’structural’ dimension. Turning towards Honneth’s mature perspective, the author argues that a critique of social domination no longer occupies a central place in Honneth’s influential theory of recognition. Finally, the author considers Honneth’s only recent attempt at theorizing domination presented in the article ’Recognition as Ideology’, and argues that Honneth has so far missed the opportunity to integrate the early social-theoretical perspective on domination into his mature theoretical system.",
publisher = "Beograd : Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu",
journal = "Sociologija",
title = "The Concept of Social Domination in Axel Honneth's Critical Theory",
number = "1",
volume = "57"
}

Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije

Ivković, Marjan; Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara; Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd : KPZ Beton, 2015)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1614
AB  - U ovom radu ćemo nastojati da ispitamo u kojoj meri je egalitaristički rečnik jugoslovenskog
socijalizma bio u stanju da ponudi alternativni okvir za interpretaciju savremenih
srpsko-albanskih odnosa. Inicijalna hipoteza polazi od toga da je jugoslovenska
elita – usled eksperimentalnog karaktera samoupravnog socijalizma koji je podrazumevao
određene kompromise sa liberalnim kapitalizmom – bila strukturalno prinuđena
da sistematično negira socijalni aspekt demonstracija koje su na Kosovu odvijale
tokom 1968, 1981. i 1988 godine. Primenom kritičke analize diskursa na štampane
medije (Politika, Večernje novosti i Borba), pokušaćemo da pokažemo kako je vladajuća
nomenklatura složene političko-ekonomske aspekte bunta isključivo tretirala kao izraz
nacionalizma. Ova diskurzivna strategija je samim akterima sugerisala da je nacionalizam
zajednički imenitelj za ekonomsku, političku i etničku jednakost. Krajnje posledice
ovakvih diskurzivnih redukcija će biti prikazane kroz analizu medijskog
izveštavanja sa demonstracija na Kosovu i mitinga „Bratstva i jedinstva“ u Beogradu
1988. godine, gde je primetno zatvaranje prostora za ne-nacionalističko tumačenje
bilo koje vrste socijalnog bunta, ali i postepeno odustajanje aktera od artikulisanja
sopstvenog iskustva nepravde u socijalnom ključu.
AB  - In this paper we examine to which extent was egalitarian vocabulary of Yugoslav socialism
able to provide an alternative framework for interpretation of Serbian-Albanian
relations. Our initial hypothesis is that – due to the experimental nature of Yugoslav
self-management socialism, which implied certain compromises with liberal
capitalism – the Yugoslav elite was structurally bound to systematically negate the
social aspect of protests that took place in Kosovo in 1968, 1981 and 1988. Using critical
discourse analysis on daily newspapers (Politika, Večernje novosti and Borba), we
show how the nomenclature treated the complex social-political aspects of the social
uprisings exclusively as a manifestation of nationalism. To the actors involved, this
discursive strategy suggested that nationalism is a common denominator for economic,
political and ethnic equality. Final consequences of these discursive strategies will
be shown through analysis of media coverage of protests in Kosovo and the “Brotherhood
and Unity” meeting that took place Belgrade in 1988, wherein we can see that
there is little space left for non-nationalistic interpretation of any kind of social uprising,
both in media and actors’ perspective.
PB  - Beograd : KPZ Beton
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa
T1  - Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije
T1  - Serbian-Albanian Relations in Socialist Yugoslavia: Protests in Kosovo and the Burden of Systemic Legitimization
SP  - 153
EP  - 173
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan and Petrović-Trifunović, Tamara and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2015",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1614",
abstract = "U ovom radu ćemo nastojati da ispitamo u kojoj meri je egalitaristički rečnik jugoslovenskog
socijalizma bio u stanju da ponudi alternativni okvir za interpretaciju savremenih
srpsko-albanskih odnosa. Inicijalna hipoteza polazi od toga da je jugoslovenska
elita – usled eksperimentalnog karaktera samoupravnog socijalizma koji je podrazumevao
određene kompromise sa liberalnim kapitalizmom – bila strukturalno prinuđena
da sistematično negira socijalni aspekt demonstracija koje su na Kosovu odvijale
tokom 1968, 1981. i 1988 godine. Primenom kritičke analize diskursa na štampane
medije (Politika, Večernje novosti i Borba), pokušaćemo da pokažemo kako je vladajuća
nomenklatura složene političko-ekonomske aspekte bunta isključivo tretirala kao izraz
nacionalizma. Ova diskurzivna strategija je samim akterima sugerisala da je nacionalizam
zajednički imenitelj za ekonomsku, političku i etničku jednakost. Krajnje posledice
ovakvih diskurzivnih redukcija će biti prikazane kroz analizu medijskog
izveštavanja sa demonstracija na Kosovu i mitinga „Bratstva i jedinstva“ u Beogradu
1988. godine, gde je primetno zatvaranje prostora za ne-nacionalističko tumačenje
bilo koje vrste socijalnog bunta, ali i postepeno odustajanje aktera od artikulisanja
sopstvenog iskustva nepravde u socijalnom ključu., In this paper we examine to which extent was egalitarian vocabulary of Yugoslav socialism
able to provide an alternative framework for interpretation of Serbian-Albanian
relations. Our initial hypothesis is that – due to the experimental nature of Yugoslav
self-management socialism, which implied certain compromises with liberal
capitalism – the Yugoslav elite was structurally bound to systematically negate the
social aspect of protests that took place in Kosovo in 1968, 1981 and 1988. Using critical
discourse analysis on daily newspapers (Politika, Večernje novosti and Borba), we
show how the nomenclature treated the complex social-political aspects of the social
uprisings exclusively as a manifestation of nationalism. To the actors involved, this
discursive strategy suggested that nationalism is a common denominator for economic,
political and ethnic equality. Final consequences of these discursive strategies will
be shown through analysis of media coverage of protests in Kosovo and the “Brotherhood
and Unity” meeting that took place Belgrade in 1988, wherein we can see that
there is little space left for non-nationalistic interpretation of any kind of social uprising,
both in media and actors’ perspective.",
publisher = "Beograd : KPZ Beton, Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Figura neprijatelja: preosmišljavanje srpsko-albanskih odnosa",
title = "Srpsko-albanski odnosi u socijalističkoj Jugoslaviji: protesti na Kosovu i teret sistemske legitimizacije, Serbian-Albanian Relations in Socialist Yugoslavia: Protests in Kosovo and the Burden of Systemic Legitimization",
pages = "153-173"
}

Two Attempts at Grounding Social Critique in„Ordinary“ Actors’ Perspectives: The Critical Theories of Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth

Ivković, Marjan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2014)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/251
AB  - This paper analyzes two contemporary, „third-generation“ perspectives within critical theory – Nancy Fraser’s and Axel Honneth’s – with the aim of examining the degree to which the two authors succeed in grounding the normative criteria of social critique in the perspectives of ’ordinary’ social actors, as opposed to speculative social theory. To that end, the author focuses on the influential debate between Fraser and Honneth Redistribution or Re- cognition? which concerns the appropriate normative foundations of a „post-
metaphysical“ critical theory, and attempts to reconstruct the fundamental	29
disagreements between Fraser and Honneth over the meaning and tasks of critical theory. The author concludes that both critical theorists ultimately secure the normative foundations of critique through substantive theorizations of the social, which frame the two authors’ „reconstructions“ of the normativity of everyday social action, but argues that post-metaphysical critical theory does not have to abandon comprehensive social theory in order to be epistmo- logically „non-authoritarian“.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - Two Attempts at Grounding Social Critique in„Ordinary“ Actors’ Perspectives: The Critical Theories of Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth
SP  - 29
EP  - 50
DO  - 10.2298/FID1403029I
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2014",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/251",
abstract = "This paper analyzes two contemporary, „third-generation“ perspectives within critical theory – Nancy Fraser’s and Axel Honneth’s – with the aim of examining the degree to which the two authors succeed in grounding the normative criteria of social critique in the perspectives of ’ordinary’ social actors, as opposed to speculative social theory. To that end, the author focuses on the influential debate between Fraser and Honneth Redistribution or Re- cognition? which concerns the appropriate normative foundations of a „post-
metaphysical“ critical theory, and attempts to reconstruct the fundamental	29
disagreements between Fraser and Honneth over the meaning and tasks of critical theory. The author concludes that both critical theorists ultimately secure the normative foundations of critique through substantive theorizations of the social, which frame the two authors’ „reconstructions“ of the normativity of everyday social action, but argues that post-metaphysical critical theory does not have to abandon comprehensive social theory in order to be epistmo- logically „non-authoritarian“.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Two Attempts at Grounding Social Critique in„Ordinary“ Actors’ Perspectives: The Critical Theories of Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth",
pages = "29-50",
doi = "10.2298/FID1403029I"
}

The Two Dimensions of Foucauldian Critique and Engagement

Cvejić, Igor; Losoncz, Márk; Matković, Aleksandar; Ivković, Marjan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2014)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/376
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Knjiga apstrakata sa konferencije Engaging Foucault – International Conference, Beograd, 5-7. Decembar
T1  - The Two Dimensions of Foucauldian Critique and Engagement
SP  - 128
ER  - 
@article{
editor = "Cvejić, Igor, Losoncz, Márk, Matković, Aleksandar",
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2014",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/376",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Knjiga apstrakata sa konferencije Engaging Foucault – International Conference, Beograd, 5-7. Decembar",
title = "The Two Dimensions of Foucauldian Critique and Engagement",
pages = "128"
}

Negativna dijalektika i jezički zaokret: aktuelnost Adornovog shvatanja konfliktne prirode modernih društava

Ivković, Marjan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2010)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1689
AB  - Autor nastoji da preispita Habermasovu i Honetovu tvrdnju da jezièki zaokret u kritièkoj teoriji predstavlja izlaz iz „æorsokaka“ u kome prva generacija Frankfurtske škole zavšršava, ne uspevši da koncipira delatno-teorijsko shvatanje društvene dinamike i konfliktnosti. Iznoseæi stanovište da Adorno u Negativnojdijalektici razvija uvid u temeljnu karakteristiku konfliktnosti modernih društava,koja izmièe jezièko-pragmatièkoj kritièkoj teoriji, autor pokušava da odbrani i reaktualizuje Adornovu perspektivu. U radu se analiziraju, u glavnim crtama, izvorna zamisao kritièke teorije i „negativistièki zaokret“ koji Adorno i Horkhajmer poduzimaju u Dijalektici prosvetiteljstva. Razmatrajuæi zatim kljuène premise Negativnedijalektike, autor izla e svoje shvatanje Adornove koncepcije konfliktnosti, koja se,kroz osvrt na osnovne postulate teorije komunikativnog delanja, kontrastira sa Habermasovom formulacijom konfliktnosti kao sistemske kolonizacije sveta života.
Razmatrajuæi ogranièenja Habermasovog koncepta, autor nastoji da izoštri slikukonfliktnosti koju Adorno skicira, pokazujuæi da njegova perspektiva problematizujesam koncept intersubjektivnosti koji Habermas i Honet tretiraju kao aprioran
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - Negativna dijalektika i jezički zaokret: aktuelnost Adornovog shvatanja konfliktne prirode modernih društava
IS  - 2
VL  - 21
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2010",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1689",
abstract = "Autor nastoji da preispita Habermasovu i Honetovu tvrdnju da jezièki zaokret u kritièkoj teoriji predstavlja izlaz iz „æorsokaka“ u kome prva generacija Frankfurtske škole zavšršava, ne uspevši da koncipira delatno-teorijsko shvatanje društvene dinamike i konfliktnosti. Iznoseæi stanovište da Adorno u Negativnojdijalektici razvija uvid u temeljnu karakteristiku konfliktnosti modernih društava,koja izmièe jezièko-pragmatièkoj kritièkoj teoriji, autor pokušava da odbrani i reaktualizuje Adornovu perspektivu. U radu se analiziraju, u glavnim crtama, izvorna zamisao kritièke teorije i „negativistièki zaokret“ koji Adorno i Horkhajmer poduzimaju u Dijalektici prosvetiteljstva. Razmatrajuæi zatim kljuène premise Negativnedijalektike, autor izla e svoje shvatanje Adornove koncepcije konfliktnosti, koja se,kroz osvrt na osnovne postulate teorije komunikativnog delanja, kontrastira sa Habermasovom formulacijom konfliktnosti kao sistemske kolonizacije sveta života.
Razmatrajuæi ogranièenja Habermasovog koncepta, autor nastoji da izoštri slikukonfliktnosti koju Adorno skicira, pokazujuæi da njegova perspektiva problematizujesam koncept intersubjektivnosti koji Habermas i Honet tretiraju kao aprioran",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Negativna dijalektika i jezički zaokret: aktuelnost Adornovog shvatanja konfliktne prirode modernih društava",
number = "2",
volume = "21"
}

Habermasova koncepcija sistemske kolonizacije sveta života

Ivković, Marjan

(Beograd : Sociological Association of Serbia and Montenegro, 2010)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/636
PB  - Beograd : Sociological Association of Serbia and Montenegro
T2  - Sociologija
T1  - Habermasova koncepcija sistemske kolonizacije sveta života
SP  - 1
EP  - 22
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2010",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/636",
publisher = "Beograd : Sociological Association of Serbia and Montenegro",
journal = "Sociologija",
title = "Habermasova koncepcija sistemske kolonizacije sveta života",
pages = "1-22"
}

Fuko versus Habermas: moderna kao nedovršeni projekat naspram teorije moći – neizbežna suprotstavljenost ili mogućnost komunikacije

Ivković, Marjan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2006)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
PY  - 2006
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/980
AB  - The paper considers the possibility of detecting points of contact between Michel Foucault’s theory of power and the theory of communicative agency formed by Jurgen Habermas. In the beginning, the development of the philosophical discourse of modernity, which Habermas analyzes in his work bearing the same title, is laid out, with the aim to gain insight into the nature of Habermas’s critique of Foucault.
After having reviewed some of the basis of Foucault’s theory, the author points out Habermas’s depiction of the theory of power as the pinnacle of Nietzschean, anti –
modernist stream of the philosophical discourse. The critique is based on Habermas’s assumption that Foucault’s analyses of power fails to comprehend the complexity of
modernity. Foucault, according to Habermas, over – emphasizes one dimension of the process of modernization – gradual strengthening of the disciplinatory power based on the “control of the spirit”.The author, however, wishes to point out the importance the theory of power ascribes to the preservation of insight into the complexity of history. Through the insight into multiple and divergent nature of historical processes that are responsible for the formation of modern society, the individual becomes historically self – conscious and able to step out of the paradigm of self – relating subject. As the theory of communicative agency also tends to transcend the “limits of the subject – philosophy”, the author concludes that Foucault’s work is, to the same extent as Habermas’s, imbued with the idea of “modernity as an unrealized undertaking”. Towards the end of the paper the author analyzes Foucault’s relation to
Enlightenment, in order to show the essentially modern nature of his thought.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - Fuko versus Habermas: moderna kao nedovršeni projekat naspram teorije moći – neizbežna suprotstavljenost ili mogućnost komunikacije
T1  - Foucault versus Habermas: Modernity as an Unfinished Endeavor vs. the Theory of Power – An Inevitable Conflict or Possibility of Communication
SP  - 59
EP  - 76
DO  - 10.2298/FID0630059I
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ivković, Marjan",
year = "2006",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/980",
abstract = "The paper considers the possibility of detecting points of contact between Michel Foucault’s theory of power and the theory of communicative agency formed by Jurgen Habermas. In the beginning, the development of the philosophical discourse of modernity, which Habermas analyzes in his work bearing the same title, is laid out, with the aim to gain insight into the nature of Habermas’s critique of Foucault.
After having reviewed some of the basis of Foucault’s theory, the author points out Habermas’s depiction of the theory of power as the pinnacle of Nietzschean, anti –
modernist stream of the philosophical discourse. The critique is based on Habermas’s assumption that Foucault’s analyses of power fails to comprehend the complexity of
modernity. Foucault, according to Habermas, over – emphasizes one dimension of the process of modernization – gradual strengthening of the disciplinatory power based on the “control of the spirit”.The author, however, wishes to point out the importance the theory of power ascribes to the preservation of insight into the complexity of history. Through the insight into multiple and divergent nature of historical processes that are responsible for the formation of modern society, the individual becomes historically self – conscious and able to step out of the paradigm of self – relating subject. As the theory of communicative agency also tends to transcend the “limits of the subject – philosophy”, the author concludes that Foucault’s work is, to the same extent as Habermas’s, imbued with the idea of “modernity as an unrealized undertaking”. Towards the end of the paper the author analyzes Foucault’s relation to
Enlightenment, in order to show the essentially modern nature of his thought.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Fuko versus Habermas: moderna kao nedovršeni projekat naspram teorije moći – neizbežna suprotstavljenost ili mogućnost komunikacije, Foucault versus Habermas: Modernity as an Unfinished Endeavor vs. the Theory of Power – An Inevitable Conflict or Possibility of Communication",
pages = "59-76",
doi = "10.2298/FID0630059I"
}