TY  - JOUR
AU  - Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=379&path%5B%5D=379
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1856
AB  - am referring to social engagement as a value-based choice to actively
intervene in social reality in order to modify existing collective identities
and social practices with the goal of realizing the public good. The very term
‘engagement’, necessarily involves the starting awareness of a social deficit or
flaw and presupposes a critical attitude towards social reality. In this article, I will
attempt to provide arguments in favour of the thesis about the possibility (and,
later, necessity) of institutional engagement, critical action and even institutional
protest, basing this view on the thesis that institutions are fundamentally collective
or social agents whose actions must be guided by ethical and epistemic virtues.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Institutional social engagement
T1  - Institucionalna društvena angažovanost
IS  - 2
VL  - 27
SP  - 429
EP  - 435
DO  - 10.2298/FID1602429P
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana",
year = "2016",
abstract = "am referring to social engagement as a value-based choice to actively
intervene in social reality in order to modify existing collective identities
and social practices with the goal of realizing the public good. The very term
‘engagement’, necessarily involves the starting awareness of a social deficit or
flaw and presupposes a critical attitude towards social reality. In this article, I will
attempt to provide arguments in favour of the thesis about the possibility (and,
later, necessity) of institutional engagement, critical action and even institutional
protest, basing this view on the thesis that institutions are fundamentally collective
or social agents whose actions must be guided by ethical and epistemic virtues.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Institutional social engagement, Institucionalna društvena angažovanost",
number = "2",
volume = "27",
pages = "429-435",
doi = "10.2298/FID1602429P"
}

Prijić-Samaržija, S.. (2016). Institutional social engagement. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 27(2), 429-435.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1602429P

Prijić-Samaržija S. Institutional social engagement. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2016;27(2):429-435.
doi:10.2298/FID1602429P .

Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana, "Institutional social engagement" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 27, no. 2 (2016):429-435,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1602429P . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana
PY  - 2014
UR  - https://www.ffri.hr/phil/casopis/content.html
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1924
AB  - The main aim of this article is to analyze a recent text by Nenad
Miščević dealing with social epistemology in the context of
Foucault's theory of knowledge. In the first part, we briefly note
Miščević's thoughts on the difference between analytic and
continental philosophy and his thoughts on the latter. In the second
part, we analyze both Miščević’s thesis about Foucault's dual
understanding of knowledge and his placement of social
epistemology as a proper framework for Foucault’s concept of
“new” knowledge. In opposition to Miščević's dualistic view, we
are more inclined to accept Goldman’s characterization of
Foucault’s position as a revisionist project in the context of
standard analytical epistemology that legitimately embraces even
very serious expansions of epistemological themes. Finally, we
propose that Miščević’s dualistic interpretation reflects his general
dualistic position concerning the previously described distinction
between “continental” and “analytic” philosophy.
PB  - Rijeka : University of Rijeka, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Philosophy
T2  - European Journal of Analiytic Philosophy
T1  - Social Epistemology between Revisionism and Expansionism
IS  - 2
VL  - 10
SP  - 31
EP  - 48
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1924
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana",
year = "2014",
abstract = "The main aim of this article is to analyze a recent text by Nenad
Miščević dealing with social epistemology in the context of
Foucault's theory of knowledge. In the first part, we briefly note
Miščević's thoughts on the difference between analytic and
continental philosophy and his thoughts on the latter. In the second
part, we analyze both Miščević’s thesis about Foucault's dual
understanding of knowledge and his placement of social
epistemology as a proper framework for Foucault’s concept of
“new” knowledge. In opposition to Miščević's dualistic view, we
are more inclined to accept Goldman’s characterization of
Foucault’s position as a revisionist project in the context of
standard analytical epistemology that legitimately embraces even
very serious expansions of epistemological themes. Finally, we
propose that Miščević’s dualistic interpretation reflects his general
dualistic position concerning the previously described distinction
between “continental” and “analytic” philosophy.",
publisher = "Rijeka : University of Rijeka, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Philosophy",
journal = "European Journal of Analiytic Philosophy",
title = "Social Epistemology between Revisionism and Expansionism",
number = "2",
volume = "10",
pages = "31-48",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1924"
}

Bojanić, P.,& Prijić-Samaržija, S.. (2014). Social Epistemology between Revisionism and Expansionism. in European Journal of Analiytic Philosophy
Rijeka : University of Rijeka, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Philosophy., 10(2), 31-48.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1924

Bojanić P, Prijić-Samaržija S. Social Epistemology between Revisionism and Expansionism. in European Journal of Analiytic Philosophy. 2014;10(2):31-48.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1924 .

Bojanić, Petar, Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana, "Social Epistemology between Revisionism and Expansionism" in European Journal of Analiytic Philosophy, 10, no. 2 (2014):31-48,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1924 .