Takács, Ádám

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
72885405-7a27-4a11-8b62-5366ca0e04f3
  • Takács, Ádám (2)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

Biopolitics

Takács, Ádám; Losoncz, Márk

(Dordrecht : Springer International Publishing, 2015)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Takács, Ádám
AU  - Losoncz, Márk
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1420
AB  - The notion of biopolitics is being harnessed by many pioneering empirical and theoretical research today. Apart from describing its basic characters and its relation to bioethics, this entry reviews the canonical contexts and uses of this term which are rooted in the field of contemporary moral, political, and social
philosophy and theory.
PB  - Dordrecht : Springer International Publishing
T2  - Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
T1  - Biopolitics
SP  - 372
EP  - 380
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_58-1
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Takács, Ádám and Losoncz, Márk",
year = "2015",
abstract = "The notion of biopolitics is being harnessed by many pioneering empirical and theoretical research today. Apart from describing its basic characters and its relation to bioethics, this entry reviews the canonical contexts and uses of this term which are rooted in the field of contemporary moral, political, and social
philosophy and theory.",
publisher = "Dordrecht : Springer International Publishing",
journal = "Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics",
booktitle = "Biopolitics",
pages = "372-380",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_58-1"
}
Takács, Á.,& Losoncz, M.. (2015). Biopolitics. in Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
Dordrecht : Springer International Publishing., 372-380.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_58-1
Takács Á, Losoncz M. Biopolitics. in Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. 2015;:372-380.
doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_58-1 .
Takács, Ádám, Losoncz, Márk, "Biopolitics" in Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics (2015):372-380,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_58-1 . .

Intentionality and Objectification - Husserl and Simmel on the Cognitive and Social Conditions of Experience

Takács, Ádám

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2014)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Takács, Ádám
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/200
AB  - Husserl’s transcendental turn can be best regarded as a turn in his phenomenological models of intentionality. While in the Logical Investiga¬tions, he maintains a conception according to which intentionality is a struc¬ture of cognitive directedness in which objectification plays a formative role, in his later works the intentional relation is considered as a structure of con-sciousness founded on a sphere of purely subjective interiority. This paper argues that if Husserl had extended the scope of his early phenomenological research to the problems of object formation in the domain of historical and cultural sciences (Geisteswissenschaften), the radical subjectively oriented transformation of his theory of intentionality would have been much more difficult, if not impossible. We also argue that in Simmel’s theory of historical cognition and culture one can detect the elements of a theory of intentionality that can account for what is missing in Husserl, namely the attention devoted to the specific constitution of social and cultural objects. It is precisely the objective mediation through exteriorization and symbolization deployed in social and cultural values, and in historical time that constitutes the specifi¬city of these objects which also conditions subjective experiencing, rather than remains dependent on it.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - Intentionality and Objectification - Husserl and Simmel on the Cognitive and Social Conditions of Experience
SP  - 42
EP  - 55
DO  - 10.2298/FID1402042T
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Takács, Ádám",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Husserl’s transcendental turn can be best regarded as a turn in his phenomenological models of intentionality. While in the Logical Investiga¬tions, he maintains a conception according to which intentionality is a struc¬ture of cognitive directedness in which objectification plays a formative role, in his later works the intentional relation is considered as a structure of con-sciousness founded on a sphere of purely subjective interiority. This paper argues that if Husserl had extended the scope of his early phenomenological research to the problems of object formation in the domain of historical and cultural sciences (Geisteswissenschaften), the radical subjectively oriented transformation of his theory of intentionality would have been much more difficult, if not impossible. We also argue that in Simmel’s theory of historical cognition and culture one can detect the elements of a theory of intentionality that can account for what is missing in Husserl, namely the attention devoted to the specific constitution of social and cultural objects. It is precisely the objective mediation through exteriorization and symbolization deployed in social and cultural values, and in historical time that constitutes the specifi¬city of these objects which also conditions subjective experiencing, rather than remains dependent on it.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "Intentionality and Objectification - Husserl and Simmel on the Cognitive and Social Conditions of Experience",
pages = "42-55",
doi = "10.2298/FID1402042T"
}
Takács, Á.. (2014). Intentionality and Objectification - Husserl and Simmel on the Cognitive and Social Conditions of Experience. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 42-55.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1402042T
Takács Á. Intentionality and Objectification - Husserl and Simmel on the Cognitive and Social Conditions of Experience. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2014;:42-55.
doi:10.2298/FID1402042T .
Takács, Ádám, "Intentionality and Objectification - Husserl and Simmel on the Cognitive and Social Conditions of Experience" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society (2014):42-55,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1402042T . .
1