Sort By
Publication Year
Deposit Date
Title
Type
Access
Publication Year
2020 (1)
2019 (1)
2018 (1)
2017 (3)
2016 (2)
Type
Version

Ćipranić, Miloš

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
5cce7d85-344c-456c-9b29-8cc654121491
  • Ćipranić, Miloš (8)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

The Work of Art as fictio personae

Ćipranić, Miloš

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ćipranić, Miloš
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2002242C
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2084
AB  - The article investigates how and why we treat works of art as persons. From rhetoric to jurisprudence, various disciplines have dealt with the practice of attributing human features and abilities to insensate objects. The agency of works of art acting as fictitious persons is not only rec­ognized at the level of aesthetic experience, but also outside it, because there have been cases in which they were subject to legal liability. Per­sonhood is not reducible to individual human beings. However, since works of art lack senses and consciousness, there is ultimately a limit to the personifying metaphor.
AB  - Članak istražuje kako i zašto tretiramo umetnička dela kao osobe. Od retorike do filozofije prava, različite discipline bavile su se praksom kojom se neživim objektima pridavaju ljudske osobine i sposobnosti. Moć delovanja umetničkih dela kao fiktivnih osoba nije prepoznata samo na nivou estetskog doživljaja, već i izvan njega, jer su zabeleženi slučajevi u kojima su bila podvrgnuta krivičnoj odgovornosti. Ličnost nije svodiva na pojedinačna ljudska bića. Međutim, pošto umetničkim delima nedostaju čula i svest, na kraju krajeva personifikujuća metafora ima granicu.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - The Work of Art as fictio personae
T1  - Umetničko delo kao fictio personae
IS  - 2
VL  - 31
SP  - 242
EP  - 259
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ćipranić, Miloš",
year = "2020",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2002242C, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2084",
abstract = "The article investigates how and why we treat works of art as persons. From rhetoric to jurisprudence, various disciplines have dealt with the practice of attributing human features and abilities to insensate objects. The agency of works of art acting as fictitious persons is not only rec­ognized at the level of aesthetic experience, but also outside it, because there have been cases in which they were subject to legal liability. Per­sonhood is not reducible to individual human beings. However, since works of art lack senses and consciousness, there is ultimately a limit to the personifying metaphor., Članak istražuje kako i zašto tretiramo umetnička dela kao osobe. Od retorike do filozofije prava, različite discipline bavile su se praksom kojom se neživim objektima pridavaju ljudske osobine i sposobnosti. Moć delovanja umetničkih dela kao fiktivnih osoba nije prepoznata samo na nivou estetskog doživljaja, već i izvan njega, jer su zabeleženi slučajevi u kojima su bila podvrgnuta krivičnoj odgovornosti. Ličnost nije svodiva na pojedinačna ljudska bića. Međutim, pošto umetničkim delima nedostaju čula i svest, na kraju krajeva personifikujuća metafora ima granicu.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "The Work of Art as fictio personae, Umetničko delo kao fictio personae",
number = "2",
volume = "31",
pages = "242-259"
}

Ksenija Šulović, Hose Ortega i Gaset – život i delo sa bibliografijom, Filozofski fakultet, Novi Sad, 2019

Ćipranić, Miloš

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

@article{
author = "Ćipranić, Miloš",
year = "2019",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=795, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2058",
abstract = "Miloš Ćipranić
(Ksenija Šulović, Hose Ortega i Gaset – život i delo sa bibliografijom, Filozofski fakultet, Novi Sad, 2019)",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Ksenija Šulović, Hose Ortega i Gaset – život i delo sa bibliografijom, Filozofski fakultet, Novi Sad, 2019",
number = "4",
volume = "30",
pages = "643-644"
}

Roberto Navarrete Alonso, Los tiempos del poder: Franz Rosenzweig y Carl Schmitt, Escolar y Mayo editores, Madrid, 2017.

Bojanić, Petar D.; Ćipranić, Miloš

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2018)

@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar D. and Ćipranić, Miloš",
year = "2018",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1545",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Roberto Navarrete Alonso, Los tiempos del poder: Franz Rosenzweig y Carl Schmitt, Escolar y Mayo editores, Madrid, 2017.",
number = "1",
volume = "29",
pages = "125-128"
}

Nikola Samardžić, Identitet Španije, Admiral Books, Beograd, 2014.

Ćipranić, Miloš

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2017)

@article{
author = "Ćipranić, Miloš",
year = "2017",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1403",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Nikola Samardžić, Identitet Španije, Admiral Books, Beograd, 2014.",
number = "4",
volume = "28",
pages = "1209-1211"
}

Avenues of Approach – Petar Bojanić and the Institution of Architecture

Ćipranić, Miloš

(Belgrade : Singidunum University, Faculty of Media and Communications, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ćipranić, Miloš
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1910
AB  - The philosopher Petar Bojanić advocates resistance of the architectural discipline to the philosophy of architecture. Using the technique of mise-en-scène, in “Thinking Architecture/Disciplining Architecture” (2015) Bojanić reaffirms that after architecture’s theoretical turn in the second half of the 20th century the architect is undoubtedly capable of theoretically thematizing his/her own work. I argue strongly that this implies, among other things, building a disciplinary language, which must reconcile, or at least balance between, the verbal and non-verbal form of expression. Also, I try to show that it is precisely theory that the architect has needed through history to establish the architectural discipline as liberal and autonomous.
In “The Real and the Theoretical” (2013) the philosopher from Belgrade stresses the tensions between reality and theory present in the work of the architect. Theorizing in the field of architecture carries a danger of severe detachment from currently important and pressing social problems. Since there is no discipline without a group and since architecture is defined as the art of community, architectural practice can be understood, as it is in “The Architectural Philosophy” (2013), as a spatial way of transforming society.
PB  - Belgrade : Singidunum University, Faculty of Media and Communications
T2  - AM Journal
T1  - Avenues of Approach – Petar Bojanić and the Institution of Architecture
IS  - 12
DO  - 10.25038/am.v0i12.171
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ćipranić, Miloš",
year = "2017",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1910",
abstract = "The philosopher Petar Bojanić advocates resistance of the architectural discipline to the philosophy of architecture. Using the technique of mise-en-scène, in “Thinking Architecture/Disciplining Architecture” (2015) Bojanić reaffirms that after architecture’s theoretical turn in the second half of the 20th century the architect is undoubtedly capable of theoretically thematizing his/her own work. I argue strongly that this implies, among other things, building a disciplinary language, which must reconcile, or at least balance between, the verbal and non-verbal form of expression. Also, I try to show that it is precisely theory that the architect has needed through history to establish the architectural discipline as liberal and autonomous.
In “The Real and the Theoretical” (2013) the philosopher from Belgrade stresses the tensions between reality and theory present in the work of the architect. Theorizing in the field of architecture carries a danger of severe detachment from currently important and pressing social problems. Since there is no discipline without a group and since architecture is defined as the art of community, architectural practice can be understood, as it is in “The Architectural Philosophy” (2013), as a spatial way of transforming society.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Singidunum University, Faculty of Media and Communications",
journal = "AM Journal",
title = "Avenues of Approach – Petar Bojanić and the Institution of Architecture",
number = "12",
doi = "10.25038/am.v0i12.171"
}

Ana María Leyra, La mirada creadora – de la experiencia artística a la filosofía

Ćipranić, Miloš

(2017)

@article{
author = "Ćipranić, Miloš",
year = "2017",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1433",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Ana María Leyra, La mirada creadora – de la experiencia artística a la filosofía",
number = "2",
volume = "28",
pages = "397-398"
}

Antonio Campillo, Tierra de nadie – cómo pensar (en) la sociedad global, Herder editorial, Barcelona, 2015

Ćipranić, Miloš

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2016)

@article{
author = "Ćipranić, Miloš",
year = "2016",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=473, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1894",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Antonio Campillo, Tierra de nadie – cómo pensar (en) la sociedad global, Herder editorial, Barcelona, 2015",
number = "4",
volume = "27",
pages = "977-978"
}

Inđić i Velaskez

Ćipranić, Miloš

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ćipranić, Miloš
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=392
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1871
AB  - The aim of this paper is to call into question the logic of interpretation of the texts of Ortega y Gasset about Velázquez made by Trivo Inđić. The sociologist from Belgrade in his text „Ortega i Velaskes“ [„Ortega and Velázquez“] overlooked an important question which the philosopher from Madrid proposed with regard to his interpretation of Velázquez - what is actually the condition of possibility to comprehend the work of (this) painter? Painting is a mute form of expression. Ortega y Gasset asks - how to speak about the persons who do not speak? Because Trivo Inđić did not stress the importance of this question and did not discover this transcendental motif, his text will be problematized in that direction.
AB  - Svr ha ra da je do vo đe nje u pi ta nje lo gi ke či ta nja tek sto va Or te ge i
Ga se ta o Ve la ske zu ko je je spro veo Tri vo In đić. Be o grad ski so ci o log je u tek stu
„Or te ga i Ve la skes“ pre vi deo bit no pi ta nje ko je po sta vlja ma drid ski fi lo zof u okviru
nje go ve in ter pre ta ci je Ve la ske za, a to je – ko ji je za pra vo uslov mo guć no sti
po i ma nja de la (ovog) sli ka ra? Sli kar stvo je ne ma for ma iz ra za. Or te ga i Ga set se
pi ta – ka ko go vo ri ti o lju di ma ko ji ne go vo re? Po što Tri vo In đić ni je is ta kao bit nost
ovog pi ta nja i ot krio taj tran scen den tal ni mo tiv, sam nje gov nje gov tekst o Vela
ske zu bi će pro ble ma ti zo van u tom prav cu.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - Inđić i Velaskez
T1  - Inđić and Velázquez
IS  - 3
VL  - 27
SP  - 664
EP  - 678
DO  - 10.2298/FID1603670C
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ćipranić, Miloš",
year = "2016",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=392, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1871",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to call into question the logic of interpretation of the texts of Ortega y Gasset about Velázquez made by Trivo Inđić. The sociologist from Belgrade in his text „Ortega i Velaskes“ [„Ortega and Velázquez“] overlooked an important question which the philosopher from Madrid proposed with regard to his interpretation of Velázquez - what is actually the condition of possibility to comprehend the work of (this) painter? Painting is a mute form of expression. Ortega y Gasset asks - how to speak about the persons who do not speak? Because Trivo Inđić did not stress the importance of this question and did not discover this transcendental motif, his text will be problematized in that direction., Svr ha ra da je do vo đe nje u pi ta nje lo gi ke či ta nja tek sto va Or te ge i
Ga se ta o Ve la ske zu ko je je spro veo Tri vo In đić. Be o grad ski so ci o log je u tek stu
„Or te ga i Ve la skes“ pre vi deo bit no pi ta nje ko je po sta vlja ma drid ski fi lo zof u okviru
nje go ve in ter pre ta ci je Ve la ske za, a to je – ko ji je za pra vo uslov mo guć no sti
po i ma nja de la (ovog) sli ka ra? Sli kar stvo je ne ma for ma iz ra za. Or te ga i Ga set se
pi ta – ka ko go vo ri ti o lju di ma ko ji ne go vo re? Po što Tri vo In đić ni je is ta kao bit nost
ovog pi ta nja i ot krio taj tran scen den tal ni mo tiv, sam nje gov nje gov tekst o Vela
ske zu bi će pro ble ma ti zo van u tom prav cu.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Inđić i Velaskez, Inđić and Velázquez",
number = "3",
volume = "27",
pages = "664-678",
doi = "10.2298/FID1603670C"
}