Vold, Karina

Link to this page

http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/APP/faces/author.xhtml?author_id=2b9061c0-fdf4-4e32-a943-197808fa6a68&item_offset=0&project_offset=0&sort_by=dc.date.issued
Authority KeyName Variants
2b9061c0-fdf4-4e32-a943-197808fa6a68
  • Vold, Karina (1)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

Overcoming Deadlock: Scientific and Ethical Reasons to Embrace the Extended Mind Thesis

Vold, Karina

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2018) 

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vold, Karina
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=700
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1966
AB  - The extended mind thesis maintains that while minds may be centrally
located in one’s brain-and-body, they are sometimes partly constituted
by tools in our environment. Critics argue that we have no reason to
move from the claim that cognition is embedded in the environment to
the stronger claim that cognition can be constituted by the environment.
I will argue that there are normative reasons, both scientific and ethical,
for preferring the extended account of the mind to the rival embedded
account.
AB  - Prema tezi o proširenom duhu iako se naši umovi prevashodno nalaze u našem mozgu i telu, njih ponekad delimično ustanovljuju delovi naše sredine. Kritičari tvrde da nemamo razloga da od teze da je naša kognicija uronjena u našu sredinu napravimo korak ka prihvatanju jače teze prema kojoj je naša kognicija konstituisana našom sredinom. U ovom radu, pokazujem da postoje normativni razlozi, naučni i etički, da prihvatimo tezu o proširenom duhu umesto suparničke, uronjene, teze.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Overcoming Deadlock: Scientific and Ethical Reasons to Embrace the Extended Mind Thesis
IS  - 4
VL  - 29
SP  - 489
EP  - 504
DO  - 10.2298/FID1804489V
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Vold, Karina",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The extended mind thesis maintains that while minds may be centrally
located in one’s brain-and-body, they are sometimes partly constituted
by tools in our environment. Critics argue that we have no reason to
move from the claim that cognition is embedded in the environment to
the stronger claim that cognition can be constituted by the environment.
I will argue that there are normative reasons, both scientific and ethical,
for preferring the extended account of the mind to the rival embedded
account., Prema tezi o proširenom duhu iako se naši umovi prevashodno nalaze u našem mozgu i telu, njih ponekad delimično ustanovljuju delovi naše sredine. Kritičari tvrde da nemamo razloga da od teze da je naša kognicija uronjena u našu sredinu napravimo korak ka prihvatanju jače teze prema kojoj je naša kognicija konstituisana našom sredinom. U ovom radu, pokazujem da postoje normativni razlozi, naučni i etički, da prihvatimo tezu o proširenom duhu umesto suparničke, uronjene, teze.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Overcoming Deadlock: Scientific and Ethical Reasons to Embrace the Extended Mind Thesis",
number = "4",
volume = "29",
pages = "489-504",
doi = "10.2298/FID1804489V"
}
Vold, K.. (2018). Overcoming Deadlock: Scientific and Ethical Reasons to Embrace the Extended Mind Thesis. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 29(4), 489-504.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1804489V
Vold K. Overcoming Deadlock: Scientific and Ethical Reasons to Embrace the Extended Mind Thesis. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2018;29(4):489-504.
doi:10.2298/FID1804489V .
Vold, Karina, "Overcoming Deadlock: Scientific and Ethical Reasons to Embrace the Extended Mind Thesis" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 29, no. 4 (2018):489-504,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1804489V . .
6