TY  - JOUR
AU  - Zoffoli, Enrico
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1308
AB  - In this short paper I ask to what extent the sharp contrast between the political and the comprehensive, on which political liberals such as Rawls and Quong place primary emphasis, caters to a truly “political” conception of liberalism. I argue that Quong’s own take on this point is more distinctively “political” than Rawls’s, in that it assigns far less weight to citizens’ comprehensive doctrines. Indeed, I suggest that Quong’s exclusion of comprehensive doctrines (exemplified by his worries about an “overlapping consensus”) has more radical implications than Quong himself seems to think. In doing so, I offer a streamlined version of Quong’s critique, which encompasses two more or less direct criticisms of Rawls’s doctrine of the overlapping consensus. I will call them the “sincerity objection” and the “liberal objection”.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - How “Political” is Quong’s Political Liberalism?
T1  - Koliko je „politički“ Kvongov politički liberalizam?
SP  - 47
EP  - 56
DO  - 10.2298/FID1401047Z
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Zoffoli, Enrico",
year = "2014",
abstract = "In this short paper I ask to what extent the sharp contrast between the political and the comprehensive, on which political liberals such as Rawls and Quong place primary emphasis, caters to a truly “political” conception of liberalism. I argue that Quong’s own take on this point is more distinctively “political” than Rawls’s, in that it assigns far less weight to citizens’ comprehensive doctrines. Indeed, I suggest that Quong’s exclusion of comprehensive doctrines (exemplified by his worries about an “overlapping consensus”) has more radical implications than Quong himself seems to think. In doing so, I offer a streamlined version of Quong’s critique, which encompasses two more or less direct criticisms of Rawls’s doctrine of the overlapping consensus. I will call them the “sincerity objection” and the “liberal objection”.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "How “Political” is Quong’s Political Liberalism?, Koliko je „politički“ Kvongov politički liberalizam?",
pages = "47-56",
doi = "10.2298/FID1401047Z"
}

Zoffoli, E.. (2014). How “Political” is Quong’s Political Liberalism?. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 47-56.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1401047Z

Zoffoli E. How “Political” is Quong’s Political Liberalism?. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2014;:47-56.
doi:10.2298/FID1401047Z .

Zoffoli, Enrico, "How “Political” is Quong’s Political Liberalism?" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2014):47-56,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1401047Z . .