TY  - JOUR
AU  - Novaković, Marko
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1549
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Marc Nicolas Sommer, Das Konzept einer negativen Dialektik, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2016.
IS  - 1
VL  - 29
SP  - 129
EP  - 132
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1549
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Novaković, Marko",
year = "2018",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Marc Nicolas Sommer, Das Konzept einer negativen Dialektik, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2016.",
number = "1",
volume = "29",
pages = "129-132",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1549"
}

Novaković, M.. (2018). Marc Nicolas Sommer, Das Konzept einer negativen Dialektik, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2016.. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 29(1), 129-132.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1549

Novaković M. Marc Nicolas Sommer, Das Konzept einer negativen Dialektik, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2016.. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2018;29(1):129-132.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1549 .

Novaković, Marko, "Marc Nicolas Sommer, Das Konzept einer negativen Dialektik, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2016." in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 29, no. 1 (2018):129-132,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1549 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Novaković, Marko
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/921
AB  - The main purpose of this paper is to clarify the category of the aesthetic in context of Adorno’s critique of the philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard. Adorno’s principal thesis is that Kierkegaard’s famous doctrine of existence and his individualism contain an implicit ontology, despite the fact that he intends to overcome objective ontology of absolute idealism. However, this reversal is hidden from Kierkegaard, and can only be deciphered in the posthumous history of his work. Adorno’s method is critique of ideology synthetised with Benjamin’s rather esoteric theory of allegory. His intent is twofold: not only to expose the abstract character of Kierkegaard’s doctrine of “objectless” inwardness, but to decipher an implicit historical truth of his philosophy, the social relations of bourgeois society. In the course of his argument, Adorno shows that Kierkegaard’s philosophy comes closest to its truth not in the realm of religious experience and faith, as Kierkegaard himself believed, but in the sphere of melancholy and aesthetic semblance. The category of the aesthetic plays an important role in Adorno’s later philosophy of art, as well as his critique of knowledge in general.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Dijalektika estetskog u Adornovoj kritici Kjerkegora
T1  - Dialectic of the Aesthetic in Adorno’s Critique of Kierkegaard
SP  - 57
EP  - 80
DO  - 10.2298/FID1303057N
ER  - 

@article{
editor = "Jovanov, Rastko",
author = "Novaković, Marko",
year = "2013",
abstract = "The main purpose of this paper is to clarify the category of the aesthetic in context of Adorno’s critique of the philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard. Adorno’s principal thesis is that Kierkegaard’s famous doctrine of existence and his individualism contain an implicit ontology, despite the fact that he intends to overcome objective ontology of absolute idealism. However, this reversal is hidden from Kierkegaard, and can only be deciphered in the posthumous history of his work. Adorno’s method is critique of ideology synthetised with Benjamin’s rather esoteric theory of allegory. His intent is twofold: not only to expose the abstract character of Kierkegaard’s doctrine of “objectless” inwardness, but to decipher an implicit historical truth of his philosophy, the social relations of bourgeois society. In the course of his argument, Adorno shows that Kierkegaard’s philosophy comes closest to its truth not in the realm of religious experience and faith, as Kierkegaard himself believed, but in the sphere of melancholy and aesthetic semblance. The category of the aesthetic plays an important role in Adorno’s later philosophy of art, as well as his critique of knowledge in general.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Dijalektika estetskog u Adornovoj kritici Kjerkegora, Dialectic of the Aesthetic in Adorno’s Critique of Kierkegaard",
pages = "57-80",
doi = "10.2298/FID1303057N"
}

Jovanov, R.,& Novaković, M.. (2013). Dijalektika estetskog u Adornovoj kritici Kjerkegora. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 57-80.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1303057N

Jovanov R, Novaković M. Dijalektika estetskog u Adornovoj kritici Kjerkegora. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2013;:57-80.
doi:10.2298/FID1303057N .

Jovanov, Rastko, Novaković, Marko, "Dijalektika estetskog u Adornovoj kritici Kjerkegora" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2013):57-80,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1303057N . .