Pudar Draško, G., Meka, E.,& Pavlović, A.. (2018). Politics of Enmity. 
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1611

Pudar Draško G, Meka E, Pavlović A. Politics of Enmity. 2018;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1611 .

Pudar Draško, Gazela, Meka, Eltion, Pavlović, Aleksandar, "Politics of Enmity" (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_1611 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Pavlović, Aleksandar
AU  - Meka, Eltion
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3598
AB  - This volume attempts to contribute to the discussion about the nation, nationalism and its inevitable attendant, enmity. In what sense have friendship and hostility (Schmitt 1996, Derrida 1994, Bojanić 1995; 2015) gained new meanings, and what would those meanings be? Does nation-building always involve a common enemy one has to fight? Or does it meet its limits with being a mere remedy for contemporary forms of inequality, or a tranquilizer for those unsettled by the complexity and insecurity brought up by globalized capitalism? These questions become increasingly important as we witness the crisis of the collectivity-building process of the European Union. Do the contemporary politics of difference contest the notion of enmity or, quite to the contrary, reaffirm it?
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Politics of Enmity
T1  - Enmity and Politics: Reaffirming or Rejecting the Concepts
SP  - 5
EP  - 12
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3598
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Pavlović, Aleksandar and Meka, Eltion",
year = "2018",
abstract = "This volume attempts to contribute to the discussion about the nation, nationalism and its inevitable attendant, enmity. In what sense have friendship and hostility (Schmitt 1996, Derrida 1994, Bojanić 1995; 2015) gained new meanings, and what would those meanings be? Does nation-building always involve a common enemy one has to fight? Or does it meet its limits with being a mere remedy for contemporary forms of inequality, or a tranquilizer for those unsettled by the complexity and insecurity brought up by globalized capitalism? These questions become increasingly important as we witness the crisis of the collectivity-building process of the European Union. Do the contemporary politics of difference contest the notion of enmity or, quite to the contrary, reaffirm it?",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Politics of Enmity",
booktitle = "Enmity and Politics: Reaffirming or Rejecting the Concepts",
pages = "5-12",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3598"
}

Pudar Draško, G., Pavlović, A.,& Meka, E.. (2018). Enmity and Politics: Reaffirming or Rejecting the Concepts. in Politics of Enmity
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 5-12.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3598

Pudar Draško G, Pavlović A, Meka E. Enmity and Politics: Reaffirming or Rejecting the Concepts. in Politics of Enmity. 2018;:5-12.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3598 .

Pudar Draško, Gazela, Pavlović, Aleksandar, Meka, Eltion, "Enmity and Politics: Reaffirming or Rejecting the Concepts" in Politics of Enmity (2018):5-12,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rifdt_3598 .