Sort By
Publication Year
Deposit Date
Title
Type
Access
Publication Year
2020 (1)
2019 (2)
Type
Version

Losoncz, Mark

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
cf398279-3d58-4da1-9f27-1fcc97641ae0
  • Losoncz, Mark (3)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

The Aristotelian Arche-Decisions and the Challenge of Perishing

Losoncz, Mark

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2002194L
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2082
AB  - The paper deals with Aristotle’s concept of corruption. First, it reconstructs Aristotle’s debate with the pre-Socratics and then it focuses on the candidates for entity that can perish: form, matter, and substance. The text argues against the widely accepted thesis according to which substance is a corruptio simpliciter without further ado. The paper intensely relies upon ancient and medieval commentators of Aristotle. Finally, special attention is devoted to the dimension of time and the problem of actuality.
AB  - Ovaj rad tematizuje Aristotelov pojam nestajanja. Prvo, rekonstruiše Aristotelovu raspravu da predsokratcima, zatim se fokusira na pojedine kandidate za entitete koji mogu da nestanu: formu, materiju i supstanciju. Tekst pruža argumente protiv široko prihaćene teze da je supstancija corruptio simpliciter bez ikakvih rezervi. Rad se o velikoj meri oslanja i na antičke i srednjovekovne komentatore Aristotela. Na kraju, uzima se u obzir i dimenzija vremena, odnosno aktualnosti.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - The Aristotelian Arche-Decisions and the Challenge of Perishing
T1  - Aristotelove praodluke i izazov nestajanja
IS  - 2
VL  - 31
SP  - 194
EP  - 219
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002194L
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2020",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2002194L, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2082",
abstract = "The paper deals with Aristotle’s concept of corruption. First, it reconstructs Aristotle’s debate with the pre-Socratics and then it focuses on the candidates for entity that can perish: form, matter, and substance. The text argues against the widely accepted thesis according to which substance is a corruptio simpliciter without further ado. The paper intensely relies upon ancient and medieval commentators of Aristotle. Finally, special attention is devoted to the dimension of time and the problem of actuality., Ovaj rad tematizuje Aristotelov pojam nestajanja. Prvo, rekonstruiše Aristotelovu raspravu da predsokratcima, zatim se fokusira na pojedine kandidate za entitete koji mogu da nestanu: formu, materiju i supstanciju. Tekst pruža argumente protiv široko prihaćene teze da je supstancija corruptio simpliciter bez ikakvih rezervi. Rad se o velikoj meri oslanja i na antičke i srednjovekovne komentatore Aristotela. Na kraju, uzima se u obzir i dimenzija vremena, odnosno aktualnosti.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "The Aristotelian Arche-Decisions and the Challenge of Perishing, Aristotelove praodluke i izazov nestajanja",
number = "2",
volume = "31",
pages = "194-219",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002194L"
}
Losoncz, M. (2020). Aristotelove praodluke i izazov nestajanja.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(2), 194-219.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002194L
Losoncz M. Aristotelove praodluke i izazov nestajanja. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(2):194-219
Losoncz Mark, "Aristotelove praodluke i izazov nestajanja" 31, no. 2 (2020):194-219,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002194L .

Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia

Pavlović, Aleksandar; Losoncz, Mark

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pavlović, Aleksandar
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID1901149P
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1957
AB  - Even though Belgrade student protests emerged and ended abruptly after only seven days in June of 1968, they came as a cumulative point of a decade-long accumulated social dissatisfaction and antagonisms, as well as of philosophical investigations of the unorthodox Marxists of the Praxis school (Praksisovci). It surprised the Yugoslav authorities as the first massive rebellion after WWII to explicitly criticize rising social inequality, bureaucratization and unemployment and demand free speech and abolishment of privileges. This article focuses on the intellectual destiny and legacy of the eight professors from the Faculty of Philosophy close to the Praxis school, who were identified as the protests’ instigators and subsequently expelled from the University of Belgrade due to their “ethico-political unsuitability”. Under both international and domestic pressure, they were later reemployed in a separate research unit named the Centre for Philosophy and Social Theory, where they kept their critical edge and argued for political pluralism. From the late 1980s onwards, they and their colleagues became politically active and at times occupied the highest positions in Serbia – Dragoljub Mićunović as one of the founders of the modern Democratic Party and the Speaker of the Parliament, former Serbian President and Prime Minister Vojislav Koštunica and former Prime Minister late Zoran Đinđić. Still, while some members became strong anti-nationalists and anti-war activists, other embraced Serbian nationalism, therefore pivoting the intellectual split into the so called First and Second Serbia that marked Serbian society during the 1990s and remained influential to this day.
AB  - Drugog svetskog rata koja je eksplicitno kritikovala rastuću društvenu nejednakost, birokratizaciju i nezaposlenost, i zahtevala slobodu govora i ukidanje privilegija. Ovaj članak fokusira se na sudbinu osmoro profesora sa Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu bliskih Praksis idejama, koje je režim identifikovao kao podstrekače protesta i kasnije ih proterao sa fakulteta zbog njihove „moralno-političke nepodobnosti“. Nakon međunarodnih i unutrašnjih pritisaka, oni su kasnije ponovo zaposleni u zasebnoj istraživačkoj jedinici nazvanoj Centar za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, gde su zadržali svoju kritičku oštricu i zagovarali politički pluralizam. Od kraja osamdesetih godina prošlog veka, oni i njihove kolege iz Centra postaju politički aktivni, nalaze se među osnivačima i kasnije liderima Demokratske Stranke i povremeno zauzimaju najviše položaje u Srbiji – Dragoljub Mićunović kao predsedavajući Narodne skupštine, bivši srpski predsednik i premijer Vojislav Koštunica i nekadašnji premijer Zoran Đinđić. Međutim, dok su neki članovi osmorke i Centra postali čvrsti anti-nacionalisti i antiratni aktivisti, drugi su prigrlili srpski nacionalizam, tako predvodeći intelektualni razdor na Prvu i Drugi Srbiju koji je obeležio srpsko društvo devedesetih godina prošlog veka, i ostao uticajan do danas.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia
IS  - 1
VL  - 30
SP  - 149
EP  - 164
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901149P
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Pavlović, Aleksandar and Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2019",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID1901149P, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1957",
abstract = "Even though Belgrade student protests emerged and ended abruptly after only seven days in June of 1968, they came as a cumulative point of a decade-long accumulated social dissatisfaction and antagonisms, as well as of philosophical investigations of the unorthodox Marxists of the Praxis school (Praksisovci). It surprised the Yugoslav authorities as the first massive rebellion after WWII to explicitly criticize rising social inequality, bureaucratization and unemployment and demand free speech and abolishment of privileges. This article focuses on the intellectual destiny and legacy of the eight professors from the Faculty of Philosophy close to the Praxis school, who were identified as the protests’ instigators and subsequently expelled from the University of Belgrade due to their “ethico-political unsuitability”. Under both international and domestic pressure, they were later reemployed in a separate research unit named the Centre for Philosophy and Social Theory, where they kept their critical edge and argued for political pluralism. From the late 1980s onwards, they and their colleagues became politically active and at times occupied the highest positions in Serbia – Dragoljub Mićunović as one of the founders of the modern Democratic Party and the Speaker of the Parliament, former Serbian President and Prime Minister Vojislav Koštunica and former Prime Minister late Zoran Đinđić. Still, while some members became strong anti-nationalists and anti-war activists, other embraced Serbian nationalism, therefore pivoting the intellectual split into the so called First and Second Serbia that marked Serbian society during the 1990s and remained influential to this day., Drugog svetskog rata koja je eksplicitno kritikovala rastuću društvenu nejednakost, birokratizaciju i nezaposlenost, i zahtevala slobodu govora i ukidanje privilegija. Ovaj članak fokusira se na sudbinu osmoro profesora sa Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu bliskih Praksis idejama, koje je režim identifikovao kao podstrekače protesta i kasnije ih proterao sa fakulteta zbog njihove „moralno-političke nepodobnosti“. Nakon međunarodnih i unutrašnjih pritisaka, oni su kasnije ponovo zaposleni u zasebnoj istraživačkoj jedinici nazvanoj Centar za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, gde su zadržali svoju kritičku oštricu i zagovarali politički pluralizam. Od kraja osamdesetih godina prošlog veka, oni i njihove kolege iz Centra postaju politički aktivni, nalaze se među osnivačima i kasnije liderima Demokratske Stranke i povremeno zauzimaju najviše položaje u Srbiji – Dragoljub Mićunović kao predsedavajući Narodne skupštine, bivši srpski predsednik i premijer Vojislav Koštunica i nekadašnji premijer Zoran Đinđić. Međutim, dok su neki članovi osmorke i Centra postali čvrsti anti-nacionalisti i antiratni aktivisti, drugi su prigrlili srpski nacionalizam, tako predvodeći intelektualni razdor na Prvu i Drugi Srbiju koji je obeležio srpsko društvo devedesetih godina prošlog veka, i ostao uticajan do danas.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia",
number = "1",
volume = "30",
pages = "149-164",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901149P"
}
Pavlović, A.,& Losoncz, M. (2019). Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 30(1), 149-164.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901149P
Pavlović A, Losoncz M. Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2019;30(1):149-164
Pavlović Aleksandar, Losoncz Mark, "Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia" 30, no. 1 (2019):149-164,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901149P .

Connection

Losoncz, Mark

(Charlottesville, Virginia: Philosophy Documentation Center, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://www.pdcnet.org/philtoday/content/philtoday_2019_0063_0004_0903_0913
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2074
AB  - There are productive material connections beyond mere internal or external
relations. The concept of connection enables a creative reinterpretation of certain
historical questions and, accordingly, the essay stresses the importance of the concepts
of connection, nexus, and fusion in many philosophies, from Aristotle to Deleuze.
PB  - Charlottesville, Virginia: Philosophy Documentation Center
T2  - Philosophy Today
T1  - Connection
IS  - 4
VL  - 63
SP  - 903
EP  - 913
DO  - https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday202016300
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2019",
url = "https://www.pdcnet.org/philtoday/content/philtoday_2019_0063_0004_0903_0913, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2074",
abstract = "There are productive material connections beyond mere internal or external
relations. The concept of connection enables a creative reinterpretation of certain
historical questions and, accordingly, the essay stresses the importance of the concepts
of connection, nexus, and fusion in many philosophies, from Aristotle to Deleuze.",
publisher = "Charlottesville, Virginia: Philosophy Documentation Center",
journal = "Philosophy Today",
title = "Connection",
number = "4",
volume = "63",
pages = "903-913",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday202016300"
}
Losoncz, M. (2019). Connection.
Philosophy TodayCharlottesville, Virginia: Philosophy Documentation Center., 63(4), 903-913.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday202016300
Losoncz M. Connection. Philosophy Today. 2019;63(4):903-913
Losoncz Mark, "Connection" 63, no. 4 (2019):903-913,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday202016300 .