Sort By
Publication Year
Deposit Date
Title
Type
Access
Publication Year
2020 (1)
2017 (1)
2014 (1)
2013 (2)
2012 (3)
2011 (2)
Version
Access

Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
a3652aa6-9bdb-47b5-90bb-96095b240389
  • Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana (9)
  • Prijić Samaržija, Snježana (1)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

The Epistemology of Democracy: the Epistemic Virtues of Democracy Snježana Prijić Samaržija

Prijić Samaržija, Snježana

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Prijić Samaržija, Snježana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2001056P
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2067
AB  - The new and vibrant field of the epistemology of democracy, or the inquiry about the epistemic justification of democracy as a social system of procedures, institutions, and practices, as a cross-disciplinary endeavour, necessarily encounters both epistemologists and political philosophers. Despite possible complaints that this kind of discussion is either insufficiently epistemological or insufficiently political, my approach explicitly aims to harmonize the political and epistemic justification of democracy. In this article, I tackle some fundamental issues concerning the nature of the epistemic justification of democracy and the best theoretical framework for harmonizing political and epistemic values. I also inquire whether the proposed division of epistemic labour and the inclusion of experts can indeed improve the epistemic quality of decision-making without jeopardizing political justification. More specifically, I argue in favour of three theses. First, not only democratic procedures but also the outcomes of democracy, as a social system, need to be epistemically virtuous. Second, democracy’s epistemic virtues are more than just a tool for achieving political goals. Third, an appropriate division of epistemic labour has to overcome the limitations of both individual and collective intelligence.
AB  - Novo i vibrantno područje epistemologije demokratije ili istraživanje epistemičkog opravdanja demokratije kao društvenog sistema procedura, institucija i praksi nužno, kao interdisciplinarni poduhvat, povezuje epistemologe i filozofe politike. Uprkos mogućim prigovorima da ovakva vrsta diskusije ili nije dovoljno epistemološka ili da nije dovoljno filozofsko-politička, ovaj pristup upravo obeležava nakana usklađivanja političkog i epistemičkog opravdanja demokratije. U ovom se članku bavim nekim temeljnim izazovima vezanim uz prirodu epistemičkog opravdanja demokratije kao i pitanjem koji je najbolji teorijski okvir za usklađivanje političkih i epistemičkih vrednosti. Takođe, posebno važnim smatram pitanje može li predložena podela epistemičkog posla i uključivanje stručnjaka doista poboljšati epistemički kvalitet odlučivanja bez pretnje za političko opravdanje. U članku argumentujem u prilog tri teze; (i) ne samo procedura, već i ishodi demokratije, kao društvenog sistema, treba da budu epistemički vredni, (ii) epistemička vrlina demokratije više je od prikladnog sredstva za političke ciljeve, (iii) podela epistemičkog posla u demokratiji treba da nadiđe kako ograničenja individualne i kolektivne inteligencije.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - The Epistemology of Democracy: the Epistemic Virtues of Democracy Snježana Prijić Samaržija
T1  - Epistemologija demokratije: epistemičke vrline demokratije
IS  - 1
VL  - 31
SP  - 56
EP  - 70
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001056P
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Prijić Samaržija, Snježana",
year = "2020",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2001056P, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2067",
abstract = "The new and vibrant field of the epistemology of democracy, or the inquiry about the epistemic justification of democracy as a social system of procedures, institutions, and practices, as a cross-disciplinary endeavour, necessarily encounters both epistemologists and political philosophers. Despite possible complaints that this kind of discussion is either insufficiently epistemological or insufficiently political, my approach explicitly aims to harmonize the political and epistemic justification of democracy. In this article, I tackle some fundamental issues concerning the nature of the epistemic justification of democracy and the best theoretical framework for harmonizing political and epistemic values. I also inquire whether the proposed division of epistemic labour and the inclusion of experts can indeed improve the epistemic quality of decision-making without jeopardizing political justification. More specifically, I argue in favour of three theses. First, not only democratic procedures but also the outcomes of democracy, as a social system, need to be epistemically virtuous. Second, democracy’s epistemic virtues are more than just a tool for achieving political goals. Third, an appropriate division of epistemic labour has to overcome the limitations of both individual and collective intelligence., Novo i vibrantno područje epistemologije demokratije ili istraživanje epistemičkog opravdanja demokratije kao društvenog sistema procedura, institucija i praksi nužno, kao interdisciplinarni poduhvat, povezuje epistemologe i filozofe politike. Uprkos mogućim prigovorima da ovakva vrsta diskusije ili nije dovoljno epistemološka ili da nije dovoljno filozofsko-politička, ovaj pristup upravo obeležava nakana usklađivanja političkog i epistemičkog opravdanja demokratije. U ovom se članku bavim nekim temeljnim izazovima vezanim uz prirodu epistemičkog opravdanja demokratije kao i pitanjem koji je najbolji teorijski okvir za usklađivanje političkih i epistemičkih vrednosti. Takođe, posebno važnim smatram pitanje može li predložena podela epistemičkog posla i uključivanje stručnjaka doista poboljšati epistemički kvalitet odlučivanja bez pretnje za političko opravdanje. U članku argumentujem u prilog tri teze; (i) ne samo procedura, već i ishodi demokratije, kao društvenog sistema, treba da budu epistemički vredni, (ii) epistemička vrlina demokratije više je od prikladnog sredstva za političke ciljeve, (iii) podela epistemičkog posla u demokratiji treba da nadiđe kako ograničenja individualne i kolektivne inteligencije.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "The Epistemology of Democracy: the Epistemic Virtues of Democracy Snježana Prijić Samaržija, Epistemologija demokratije: epistemičke vrline demokratije",
number = "1",
volume = "31",
pages = "56-70",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001056P"
}
Prijić Samaržija, S. (2020). Epistemologija demokratije: epistemičke vrline demokratije.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(1), 56-70.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001056P
Prijić Samaržija S. Epistemologija demokratije: epistemičke vrline demokratije. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(1):56-70
Prijić Samaržija Snježana, "Epistemologija demokratije: epistemičke vrline demokratije" 31, no. 1 (2020):56-70,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001056P .

Epistemic Justice as a Virtue in Hermeneutic Psychotherapy

Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana; Miškulin, Inka

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana
AU  - Miškulin, Inka
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1392
AB  - The value turn in epistemology generated a particularly influential 
new position – virtue epistemology. It is an increasingly influential epistemological normative approach that opts for the intellectual virtues of the epistemic agent, rather than the truth-value of the proposition, as the central epistemic value. In the first part of this article we will attempt to briefly explain the value turn and outline the basic aspects of virtue epistemology, underlining the diversity of epistemic attitudes associated with this approach and their positive impact on expanding epistemological horizons. The second part will be focused on the virtues of epistemic responsibility and epistemic justice as particularly appropriate for evaluating social processes such as, for example, testimony and conversational practices in general. In the third section we will show how the psychiatric and psychotherapeutic 
communicational act can be more efficiently analyzed and evaluated from the perspective of the virtue of epistemic justice, than from the traditional epistemic approach based on a monist concept of truth. The fourth 
and fifth section synthesize the discussion by introducing the concept of 
hermeneutic psychotherapy as a therapeutically and epistemically favorable 
framework for evaluating communicational acts in psychotherapy.
AB  - Vrednosni obrt u epistemologiji generisao je jednu posebno uticajnu poziciju – epistemologiju vrline. Radi se o narastajuće uticajnom epistemološkom normativnom pristupu koji se odlučuje za intelektualne vrline epistemičkog agenta, pre nego za vrednost istinitosti propozicije, kao centralne epistemičke vrednosti. U 
prvom delu ovog članka pokušaćemo da kratko objasnimo taj vrednosni obrt i da ocrtamo osnovne aspekte epistemologije vrline, ističući raznovrsnost epistemičkih stavova povezanih sa ovim pristupom i njihov pozitivni uticaj na proširenje epistemoloških horizonata. Drugi deo će biti usredsređen na vrline epistemičke odgovornosti i epistemičke pravde kao posebno podesnih za procenjivanje društvenih procesa kao što su, na primer, svedočenje i konverzacione prakse uopšte. U trećoj sekciji pokazaćemo kako psihijatrijski i psihoterapeutski komunikativni akt može biti učinkovitije analiziran i procenjen iz prespektive vrline 
epistemičke pravde, nego kroz tradicionalni epistemički pristup zasnovan na monističkom pojmu istine. Četvrti i peti odeljak sintetišu diskusiju uvođenjem koncepta hermeneutičke psihoterapije kao jednog terapeutski i epistemički pogodnog okvira za procenjivanje komunikativnih akata u psihoterapiji.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Epistemic Justice as a Virtue in Hermeneutic Psychotherapy
T1  - Epistemička pravda kao vrlina u hermeneutičkoj psihoterapiji
IS  - 4
VL  - 28
SP  - 1063
EP  - 1086
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana and Miškulin, Inka",
year = "2017",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1392",
abstract = "The value turn in epistemology generated a particularly influential 
new position – virtue epistemology. It is an increasingly influential epistemological normative approach that opts for the intellectual virtues of the epistemic agent, rather than the truth-value of the proposition, as the central epistemic value. In the first part of this article we will attempt to briefly explain the value turn and outline the basic aspects of virtue epistemology, underlining the diversity of epistemic attitudes associated with this approach and their positive impact on expanding epistemological horizons. The second part will be focused on the virtues of epistemic responsibility and epistemic justice as particularly appropriate for evaluating social processes such as, for example, testimony and conversational practices in general. In the third section we will show how the psychiatric and psychotherapeutic 
communicational act can be more efficiently analyzed and evaluated from the perspective of the virtue of epistemic justice, than from the traditional epistemic approach based on a monist concept of truth. The fourth 
and fifth section synthesize the discussion by introducing the concept of 
hermeneutic psychotherapy as a therapeutically and epistemically favorable 
framework for evaluating communicational acts in psychotherapy., Vrednosni obrt u epistemologiji generisao je jednu posebno uticajnu poziciju – epistemologiju vrline. Radi se o narastajuće uticajnom epistemološkom normativnom pristupu koji se odlučuje za intelektualne vrline epistemičkog agenta, pre nego za vrednost istinitosti propozicije, kao centralne epistemičke vrednosti. U 
prvom delu ovog članka pokušaćemo da kratko objasnimo taj vrednosni obrt i da ocrtamo osnovne aspekte epistemologije vrline, ističući raznovrsnost epistemičkih stavova povezanih sa ovim pristupom i njihov pozitivni uticaj na proširenje epistemoloških horizonata. Drugi deo će biti usredsređen na vrline epistemičke odgovornosti i epistemičke pravde kao posebno podesnih za procenjivanje društvenih procesa kao što su, na primer, svedočenje i konverzacione prakse uopšte. U trećoj sekciji pokazaćemo kako psihijatrijski i psihoterapeutski komunikativni akt može biti učinkovitije analiziran i procenjen iz prespektive vrline 
epistemičke pravde, nego kroz tradicionalni epistemički pristup zasnovan na monističkom pojmu istine. Četvrti i peti odeljak sintetišu diskusiju uvođenjem koncepta hermeneutičke psihoterapije kao jednog terapeutski i epistemički pogodnog okvira za procenjivanje komunikativnih akata u psihoterapiji.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Epistemic Justice as a Virtue in Hermeneutic Psychotherapy, Epistemička pravda kao vrlina u hermeneutičkoj psihoterapiji",
number = "4",
volume = "28",
pages = "1063-1086"
}
Prijić-Samaržija, S.,& Miškulin, I. (2017). Epistemička pravda kao vrlina u hermeneutičkoj psihoterapiji.
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 28(4), 1063-1086.
Prijić-Samaržija S, Miškulin I. Epistemička pravda kao vrlina u hermeneutičkoj psihoterapiji. 2017;28(4):1063-1086
Prijić-Samaržija Snježana, Miškulin Inka, "Epistemička pravda kao vrlina u hermeneutičkoj psihoterapiji" 28, no. 4 (2017):1063-1086

Center for advanced studies - South East Europe

Bojanić, Petar D.; Džihić, Vedran; Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana

(Rijeka : Center for advanced studies - South East Europe, 2014)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Bojanić, Petar D.
AU  - Džihić, Vedran
AU  - Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/127
PB  - Rijeka : Center for advanced studies - South East Europe
T1  - Center for advanced studies - South East Europe
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Bojanić, Petar D. and Džihić, Vedran and Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana",
year = "2014",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/127",
publisher = "Rijeka : Center for advanced studies - South East Europe",
title = "Center for advanced studies - South East Europe"
}
Bojanić, P. D., Džihić, V.,& Prijić-Samaržija, S. (2014). Center for advanced studies - South East Europe.
Rijeka : Center for advanced studies - South East Europe..
Bojanić PD, Džihić V, Prijić-Samaržija S. Center for advanced studies - South East Europe. 2014;
Bojanić Petar D., Džihić Vedran, Prijić-Samaržija Snježana, "Center for advanced studies - South East Europe" (2014)

Center for Advanced Studies - South East Europe / Booklet

Bojanić, Petar D.; Djihic, Vedran; Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana

(Rijeka : Center for Advanced Studies-South East Europe, University of Rijeka, 2013)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Bojanić, Petar D.
AU  - Djihic, Vedran
AU  - Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/150
PB  - Rijeka : Center for Advanced Studies-South East Europe, University of Rijeka
T1  - Center for Advanced Studies - South East Europe / Booklet
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Bojanić, Petar D. and Djihic, Vedran and Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana",
year = "2013",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/150",
publisher = "Rijeka : Center for Advanced Studies-South East Europe, University of Rijeka",
title = "Center for Advanced Studies - South East Europe / Booklet"
}
Bojanić, P. D., Djihic, V.,& Prijić-Samaržija, S. (2013). Center for Advanced Studies - South East Europe / Booklet.
Rijeka : Center for Advanced Studies-South East Europe, University of Rijeka..
Bojanić PD, Djihic V, Prijić-Samaržija S. Center for Advanced Studies - South East Europe / Booklet. 2013;
Bojanić Petar D., Djihic Vedran, Prijić-Samaržija Snježana, "Center for Advanced Studies - South East Europe / Booklet" (2013)

New Challenges for Democracy – Exploring the Crisis of Trust and Democratic Legitimacy in Europe

Bojanić, Petar D.; Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana

(2013)

TY  - CONF
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1068
AB  - In the last few years we have been increasingly confronted with crisis symptoms of 
democracy. The trust in political representatives and institutions is decreasing, while 
populism and nationalism are on rise. The economic crisis and hardships with which the 
world is confronted have challenged the notion of deregulated market economies and social 
welfare. Neoliberal economic policies go hand in hand with enormous power of multinational 
corporations and financial markets. At the same time, socioeconomic inequalities in the West 
seem to endanger the stability and legitimacy of the democratic order. The time of euphoria 
after the fall of the Berlin Wall and demise of communism is over; we have entered a time of 
fear, distrust and crisis. The end of history has not arrived. Rather, we face a new stage of 
global history with no guarantees regarding the outcome. As we live in fluid times, 
democracy has also become a fluid concept. Democracy has been challenged; the crisis of 
trust evident, and democratic legitimacy is contested. Deprived populations occupy the 
streets, new social movements demand more transparency in politics and the economy, and 
requests for a more direct form of participation are formulated.
T1  - New Challenges for Democracy – Exploring the Crisis of Trust and Democratic Legitimacy  in Europe
ER  - 
@conference{
editor = "Bojanić, Petar D., Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana",
year = "2013",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1068",
abstract = "In the last few years we have been increasingly confronted with crisis symptoms of 
democracy. The trust in political representatives and institutions is decreasing, while 
populism and nationalism are on rise. The economic crisis and hardships with which the 
world is confronted have challenged the notion of deregulated market economies and social 
welfare. Neoliberal economic policies go hand in hand with enormous power of multinational 
corporations and financial markets. At the same time, socioeconomic inequalities in the West 
seem to endanger the stability and legitimacy of the democratic order. The time of euphoria 
after the fall of the Berlin Wall and demise of communism is over; we have entered a time of 
fear, distrust and crisis. The end of history has not arrived. Rather, we face a new stage of 
global history with no guarantees regarding the outcome. As we live in fluid times, 
democracy has also become a fluid concept. Democracy has been challenged; the crisis of 
trust evident, and democratic legitimacy is contested. Deprived populations occupy the 
streets, new social movements demand more transparency in politics and the economy, and 
requests for a more direct form of participation are formulated.",
title = "New Challenges for Democracy – Exploring the Crisis of Trust and Democratic Legitimacy  in Europe"
}
Bojanić, P. D.,& Prijić-Samaržija, S. (2013). New Challenges for Democracy – Exploring the Crisis of Trust and Democratic Legitimacy  in Europe.
.
Bojanić PD, Prijić-Samaržija S. New Challenges for Democracy – Exploring the Crisis of Trust and Democratic Legitimacy  in Europe. 2013;
Bojanić Petar D., Prijić-Samaržija Snježana, "New Challenges for Democracy – Exploring the Crisis of Trust and Democratic Legitimacy  in Europe" (2013)

The Moral Status of Contraception and Openness to Procreation

Milidrag, Predrag; Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana

(2012)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/528
AB  - Permissibility of contraception as a method of birth control is closely connected with issues of moral justification of reproductive autonomy, namely the question whether or not individuals should be allowed to autonomously and freely decide if they are going to have children, when and how many. The development of medical and scientific technologies led to the usage of artificial methods of contraception that can prevent conception with the goal of postponing and planning the birth of a child. In the first part I analyse the bioethical arguments that appear in debates about reproductive autonomy and which can be mobilized against the permissibility of contraception. In the second part I have compared the bioethical arguments to those used against the artificial contraception in the literature about the philosophy of sexuality. In the third and final part, I have argued against the stance of G.E.M. Anscombe and J. Finnis that there is morally relevant distinction between artificial and natural methods of birth control.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - The Moral Status of Contraception and Openness to Procreation
T1  - Moralnost uporabe kontracepcije i otvorenost prokreaciji
SP  - 4
EP  - 18
DO  - 10.2298/FID1204004P
ER  - 
@article{
editor = "Milidrag, Predrag",
author = "Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana",
year = "2012",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/528",
abstract = "Permissibility of contraception as a method of birth control is closely connected with issues of moral justification of reproductive autonomy, namely the question whether or not individuals should be allowed to autonomously and freely decide if they are going to have children, when and how many. The development of medical and scientific technologies led to the usage of artificial methods of contraception that can prevent conception with the goal of postponing and planning the birth of a child. In the first part I analyse the bioethical arguments that appear in debates about reproductive autonomy and which can be mobilized against the permissibility of contraception. In the second part I have compared the bioethical arguments to those used against the artificial contraception in the literature about the philosophy of sexuality. In the third and final part, I have argued against the stance of G.E.M. Anscombe and J. Finnis that there is morally relevant distinction between artificial and natural methods of birth control.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "The Moral Status of Contraception and Openness to Procreation, Moralnost uporabe kontracepcije i otvorenost prokreaciji",
pages = "4-18",
doi = "10.2298/FID1204004P"
}
Milidrag, P.,& Prijić-Samaržija, S. (2012). Moralnost uporabe kontracepcije i otvorenost prokreaciji.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 4-18.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1204004P
Milidrag P, Prijić-Samaržija S. Moralnost uporabe kontracepcije i otvorenost prokreaciji. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2012;:4-18
Milidrag Predrag, Prijić-Samaržija Snježana, "Moralnost uporabe kontracepcije i otvorenost prokreaciji" (2012):4-18,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1204004P .

Nenad Miščević - sva lica filozofije

Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana; Bojanić, Petar D.

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2012)

TY  - BOOK
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/856
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Nenad Miščević - sva lica filozofije
ER  - 
@book{
editor = "Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana, Bojanić, Petar D.",
year = "2012",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/856",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Nenad Miščević - sva lica filozofije"
}
Prijić-Samaržija, S.,& Bojanić, P. D. (2012). Nenad Miščević - sva lica filozofije.
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Prijić-Samaržija S, Bojanić PD. Nenad Miščević - sva lica filozofije. 2012;
Prijić-Samaržija Snježana, Bojanić Petar D., "Nenad Miščević - sva lica filozofije" (2012)

Socijalna epistemologija između revizionizma i ekspanzionizma

Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana; Bojanić, Petar D.

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2012)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana
AU  - Bojanić, Petar D.
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/939
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Nenad Miščević - Sva lica filozofije
T1  - Socijalna epistemologija između revizionizma i ekspanzionizma
SP  - 93
EP  - 107
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana and Bojanić, Petar D.",
year = "2012",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/939",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Nenad Miščević - Sva lica filozofije",
title = "Socijalna epistemologija između revizionizma i ekspanzionizma",
pages = "93-107"
}
Prijić-Samaržija, S.,& Bojanić, P. D. (2012). Socijalna epistemologija između revizionizma i ekspanzionizma.
Nenad Miščević - Sva lica filozofijeBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 93-107.
Prijić-Samaržija S, Bojanić PD. Socijalna epistemologija između revizionizma i ekspanzionizma. Nenad Miščević - Sva lica filozofije. 2012;:93-107
Prijić-Samaržija Snježana, Bojanić Petar D., "Socijalna epistemologija između revizionizma i ekspanzionizma" (2012):93-107

Pre neposlušnosti: naivnost i stid

Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana; Bojanić, Petar D.; Krstić, Predrag

(Beograd : Narodna biblioteka Srbije, 2011)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2011
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/767
PB  - Beograd : Narodna biblioteka Srbije
T2  - Neposlušnost
T1  - Pre neposlušnosti: naivnost i stid
SP  - 171
EP  - 208
EP  - 
ER  - 
@article{
editor = "Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana, Bojanić, Petar D.",
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2011",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/767",
publisher = "Beograd : Narodna biblioteka Srbije",
journal = "Neposlušnost",
title = "Pre neposlušnosti: naivnost i stid",
pages = "171-208-"
}
Prijić-Samaržija, S., Bojanić, P. D.,& Krstić, P. (2011). Pre neposlušnosti: naivnost i stid.
NeposlušnostBeograd : Narodna biblioteka Srbije., 171-.
Prijić-Samaržija S, Bojanić PD, Krstić P. Pre neposlušnosti: naivnost i stid. Neposlušnost. 2011;:171-
Prijić-Samaržija Snježana, Bojanić Petar D., Krstić Predrag, "Pre neposlušnosti: naivnost i stid" (2011):171-

Nenad Miščević : filozofski razgovori

Bojanić, Petar D.; Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana; Univerzitet u Beogradu, IFDT, CELAP

(2011)

TY  - CONF
PY  - 2011
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1126
T1  - Nenad Miščević : filozofski razgovori
ER  - 
@conference{
editor = "Bojanić, Petar D., Prijić-Samaržija, Snježana, Univerzitet u Beogradu, IFDT, CELAP",
year = "2011",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1126",
title = "Nenad Miščević : filozofski razgovori"
}
Bojanić, P. D., Prijić-Samaržija, S.,& Univerzitet u Beogradu, I. C. (2011). Nenad Miščević : filozofski razgovori.
.
Bojanić PD, Prijić-Samaržija S, Univerzitet u Beogradu IC. Nenad Miščević : filozofski razgovori. 2011;
Bojanić Petar D., Prijić-Samaržija Snježana, Univerzitet u Beogradu IFDT CELAP, "Nenad Miščević : filozofski razgovori" (2011)