Sort By
Publication Year
Deposit Date
Title
Type
Access
Publication Year
2013 (1)
2012 (1)
2011 (1)
2009 (1)
2007 (1)
1993 (1)
Version
Access

Lolić, Marinko

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
3d9d4524-2370-4396-aabd-351fdd914ac4
  • Lolić, Marinko (6)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Osnovna obeležja razvoja srpske filozofske periodike

Jovanov, Rastko; Lolić, Marinko

(2013)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lolić, Marinko
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/665
AB  - This work discusses the creation, development, and key characteristics of philosophical periodicals in Serbia, as one of the most important institutional pillars for the development of a philosophical culture. The author shows that Serbian philosophical periodicals played a significant role in the development and dissemination, not only of its primary goal, philosophical culture, but also in building general standards of criticism, necessary for critical thinking in science and our society. At the end of the account, the author emphasizes that Serbian philosophical periodicals, in over a century of development, have managed to establish a broad philosophical communication with various traditions, directions and streams of philosophical thought. However, due to strong ideological breaks in history, it was not able of maintaining the continuity necessary for establishing clear and strong scientific criteria in assessing philosophical output and other philosophical activity in our milieu.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Osnovna obeležja razvoja srpske filozofske periodike
T1  - Basic Characteristics of the Development
of Serbian Philosophical Periodicals
SP  - 5
EP  - 15
DO  - 10.2298/FID1302005L
ER  - 
@article{
editor = "Jovanov, Rastko",
author = "Lolić, Marinko",
year = "2013",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/665",
abstract = "This work discusses the creation, development, and key characteristics of philosophical periodicals in Serbia, as one of the most important institutional pillars for the development of a philosophical culture. The author shows that Serbian philosophical periodicals played a significant role in the development and dissemination, not only of its primary goal, philosophical culture, but also in building general standards of criticism, necessary for critical thinking in science and our society. At the end of the account, the author emphasizes that Serbian philosophical periodicals, in over a century of development, have managed to establish a broad philosophical communication with various traditions, directions and streams of philosophical thought. However, due to strong ideological breaks in history, it was not able of maintaining the continuity necessary for establishing clear and strong scientific criteria in assessing philosophical output and other philosophical activity in our milieu.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Osnovna obeležja razvoja srpske filozofske periodike, Basic Characteristics of the Development
of Serbian Philosophical Periodicals",
pages = "5-15",
doi = "10.2298/FID1302005L"
}
Jovanov, R.,& Lolić, M. (2013). Basic Characteristics of the Development
of Serbian Philosophical Periodicals.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 5-15.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1302005L
Jovanov R, Lolić M. Basic Characteristics of the Development
of Serbian Philosophical Periodicals. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2013;:5-15
Jovanov Rastko, Lolić Marinko, "Basic Characteristics of the Development
of Serbian Philosophical Periodicals" (2013):5-15,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1302005L .

Kantova kritika mehanicističkog objašnjenja pojma organizma

Lolić, Marinko

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2012)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Lolić, Marinko
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/920
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Priroda, etika, politika : Ekološke (pre)okupacije i (pre)orijentacije
T1  - Kantova kritika mehanicističkog objašnjenja pojma organizma
SP  - 25
EP  - 38
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Lolić, Marinko",
year = "2012",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/920",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Priroda, etika, politika : Ekološke (pre)okupacije i (pre)orijentacije",
title = "Kantova kritika mehanicističkog objašnjenja pojma organizma",
pages = "25-38"
}
Lolić, M. (2012). Kantova kritika mehanicističkog objašnjenja pojma organizma.
Priroda, etika, politika : Ekološke (pre)okupacije i (pre)orijentacijeBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 25-38.
Lolić M. Kantova kritika mehanicističkog objašnjenja pojma organizma. Priroda, etika, politika : Ekološke (pre)okupacije i (pre)orijentacije. 2012;:25-38
Lolić Marinko, "Kantova kritika mehanicističkog objašnjenja pojma organizma" (2012):25-38

Da li je Kantovo shvatanje radikalnog zla dovoljno radikalno

Milidrag, Predrag; Lolić, Marinko

(2011)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lolić, Marinko
PY  - 2011
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/542
AB  - Svojim kritičkim filozofskim stavovima i idejama Kant je često izazivao burne reakcije ne samo filozofske već i najšire kulturne javnosti svoga vremena. Među njegovim idejama koje su pokrenule oštre filozofske sporove i kontroverze, najpoznatije su: što ne vredi u teoriji, to ne vredi ni u praksi; o tobožnjem pravu da se laže iz čovekoljublja; protiv prava građana na pobunu i dr. Ipak, najviše pažnje u evropskoj kulturnoj javnosti izazvala je Kantova ideja o radikalnom zlu, koja se u svom konačnom obliku pojavila u njegovim poznim spisima o filozofiji religije. Negativne reakcije i osude Kantovih savremenika zamenili su, u XX veku, ništa manje zbunjujući prigovori savremenih Kantovih tumača koji tvrde da Kantovo shvatanje radikalnog zla nije dovoljno radikalno. Pokušaćemo da u ovom kratkom razmatranju ukažemo na glavne tačke tog filozofskog spora i Kantov pojam radikalnog zla učinimo jasnijim.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Da li je Kantovo shvatanje radikalnog zla dovoljno radikalno
T1  - Is Kant’s conception of radical evil radical enough
SP  - 23
EP  - 36
DO  - 10.2298/FID1104023L
ER  - 
@article{
editor = "Milidrag, Predrag",
author = "Lolić, Marinko",
year = "2011",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/542",
abstract = "Svojim kritičkim filozofskim stavovima i idejama Kant je često izazivao burne reakcije ne samo filozofske već i najšire kulturne javnosti svoga vremena. Među njegovim idejama koje su pokrenule oštre filozofske sporove i kontroverze, najpoznatije su: što ne vredi u teoriji, to ne vredi ni u praksi; o tobožnjem pravu da se laže iz čovekoljublja; protiv prava građana na pobunu i dr. Ipak, najviše pažnje u evropskoj kulturnoj javnosti izazvala je Kantova ideja o radikalnom zlu, koja se u svom konačnom obliku pojavila u njegovim poznim spisima o filozofiji religije. Negativne reakcije i osude Kantovih savremenika zamenili su, u XX veku, ništa manje zbunjujući prigovori savremenih Kantovih tumača koji tvrde da Kantovo shvatanje radikalnog zla nije dovoljno radikalno. Pokušaćemo da u ovom kratkom razmatranju ukažemo na glavne tačke tog filozofskog spora i Kantov pojam radikalnog zla učinimo jasnijim.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Da li je Kantovo shvatanje radikalnog zla dovoljno radikalno, Is Kant’s conception of radical evil radical enough",
pages = "23-36",
doi = "10.2298/FID1104023L"
}
Milidrag, P.,& Lolić, M. (2011). Is Kant’s conception of radical evil radical enough.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 23-36.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1104023L
Milidrag P, Lolić M. Is Kant’s conception of radical evil radical enough. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2011;:23-36
Milidrag Predrag, Lolić Marinko, "Is Kant’s conception of radical evil radical enough" (2011):23-36,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1104023L .

Jaspersov pokušaj rehabilitacije ideje univerziteta

Lolić, Marinko

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2009)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lolić, Marinko
PY  - 2009
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1020
AB  - Author is into discussion of Jaspers’ perception of the crisis idea of university and his try to mane a rehabilitation of his idea in his texts from 1923 and 1945.
Autor shwos that Jaspers in his discussing idea of university count on whicle derive from implicit sociology german idealisam. For Jaspers the institutions are forms of
objective spirit which can function only in live form of the achivment of idea which is interesting.
As soon as spirit disapear, institution starts to fossilize in something which is soul, which deca in deod sbstance.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Jaspersov pokušaj rehabilitacije ideje univerziteta
T1  - Jaspers’ try of the Rehabilitation of the Idea of University
SP  - 41
EP  - 59
DO  - 10.2298/FID0903041L
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Lolić, Marinko",
year = "2009",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1020",
abstract = "Author is into discussion of Jaspers’ perception of the crisis idea of university and his try to mane a rehabilitation of his idea in his texts from 1923 and 1945.
Autor shwos that Jaspers in his discussing idea of university count on whicle derive from implicit sociology german idealisam. For Jaspers the institutions are forms of
objective spirit which can function only in live form of the achivment of idea which is interesting.
As soon as spirit disapear, institution starts to fossilize in something which is soul, which deca in deod sbstance.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Jaspersov pokušaj rehabilitacije ideje univerziteta, Jaspers’ try of the Rehabilitation of the Idea of University",
pages = "41-59",
doi = "10.2298/FID0903041L"
}
Lolić, M. (2009). Jaspers’ try of the Rehabilitation of the Idea of University.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 41-59.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0903041L
Lolić M. Jaspers’ try of the Rehabilitation of the Idea of University. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2009;:41-59
Lolić Marinko, "Jaspers’ try of the Rehabilitation of the Idea of University" (2009):41-59,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0903041L .

Stvaranje beogradskog univerziteta i sporovi oko teološkog fakulteta 1905–1920

Lolić, Marinko

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2007)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lolić, Marinko
PY  - 2007
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1347
AB  - The paper presents and sheds light on a 1919 controversy unfolding in the
periodical Demokratija. Its main protagonists were the notable Serbian philosopher
Branislav Petronijević, theologist Radovan Kazimirović and physiologist Ivan
Ðaja, and it concerned the proposal to establish a Faculty of Theology in Belgrade.
The debate reflects in fact the conflict among Serbian intellectuals over fundamental
principles of the university. We believe this is a most important intellectual dispute
taking place in our academic public in the early 20thcentury.
Although historical records indicate that the position of the Faculty of Theol-ogy within the future University was discussed as early as the 19th century, when the
first ideas of founding a University in Serbia had been put forward, with discussions
culminating on the occasion of the establishment of the first Serbian University in
1905, the questions raised then remained mainly unsolved and marked the one-cen-
tury of the Belgrade University, the most prestigious Serbian institution of higher learning.
Turbulent changes in our society in the 1990s announced new searches and
radical reevaluation of the condition of our higher education. The problem of the Fac-
ulty of Theology thus resurfaced within not just academic but also broader political
and cultural public. Unfortunately, some participants in this debate, disregarding the
complexity of the issue, have focused their attention on the communist period alone,
when the Faculty of Theology was separated from the University. In this way they
avoid facing the crucial problem of the contemporary Serbian society – the problem
of building modern secular educational and political institutions.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Stvaranje beogradskog univerziteta i sporovi oko teološkog fakulteta 1905–1920
SP  - 121
EP  - 149
DO  - 10.2298/FID0702121L
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Lolić, Marinko",
year = "2007",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1347",
abstract = "The paper presents and sheds light on a 1919 controversy unfolding in the
periodical Demokratija. Its main protagonists were the notable Serbian philosopher
Branislav Petronijević, theologist Radovan Kazimirović and physiologist Ivan
Ðaja, and it concerned the proposal to establish a Faculty of Theology in Belgrade.
The debate reflects in fact the conflict among Serbian intellectuals over fundamental
principles of the university. We believe this is a most important intellectual dispute
taking place in our academic public in the early 20thcentury.
Although historical records indicate that the position of the Faculty of Theol-ogy within the future University was discussed as early as the 19th century, when the
first ideas of founding a University in Serbia had been put forward, with discussions
culminating on the occasion of the establishment of the first Serbian University in
1905, the questions raised then remained mainly unsolved and marked the one-cen-
tury of the Belgrade University, the most prestigious Serbian institution of higher learning.
Turbulent changes in our society in the 1990s announced new searches and
radical reevaluation of the condition of our higher education. The problem of the Fac-
ulty of Theology thus resurfaced within not just academic but also broader political
and cultural public. Unfortunately, some participants in this debate, disregarding the
complexity of the issue, have focused their attention on the communist period alone,
when the Faculty of Theology was separated from the University. In this way they
avoid facing the crucial problem of the contemporary Serbian society – the problem
of building modern secular educational and political institutions.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Stvaranje beogradskog univerziteta i sporovi oko teološkog fakulteta 1905–1920",
pages = "121-149",
doi = "10.2298/FID0702121L"
}
Lolić, M. (2007). Stvaranje beogradskog univerziteta i sporovi oko teološkog fakulteta 1905–1920.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 121-149.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0702121L
Lolić M. Stvaranje beogradskog univerziteta i sporovi oko teološkog fakulteta 1905–1920. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2007;:121-149
Lolić Marinko, "Stvaranje beogradskog univerziteta i sporovi oko teološkog fakulteta 1905–1920" (2007):121-149,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0702121L .

Filozofske osnove Kantovog projekta svetskog građanskog poretka i njegova savremena recepcija : magistarska teza

Tartalja, Smilja; Lolić, Marinko

(Beograd : Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet političkih nauka, 1993)

@mastersthesis{
editor = "Tartalja, Smilja",
author = "Lolić, Marinko",
year = "1993",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/171",
publisher = "Beograd : Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet političkih nauka",
title = "Filozofske osnove Kantovog projekta svetskog građanskog poretka i njegova savremena recepcija : magistarska teza"
}
Tartalja, S.,& Lolić, M. (1993). Filozofske osnove Kantovog projekta svetskog građanskog poretka i njegova savremena recepcija : magistarska teza.
Beograd : Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet političkih nauka..
Tartalja S, Lolić M. Filozofske osnove Kantovog projekta svetskog građanskog poretka i njegova savremena recepcija : magistarska teza. 1993;
Tartalja Smilja, Lolić Marinko, "Filozofske osnove Kantovog projekta svetskog građanskog poretka i njegova savremena recepcija : magistarska teza" (1993)