Sort By
Publication Year
Deposit Date
Title
Type
Access
Publication Year
2016 (1)
2015 (1)
2013 (2)
2012 (3)
2009 (2)
2007 (2)
2006 (2)
2005 (1)
Version
Access

Dobrijević, Aleksandar

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
8815de3d-15d3-4762-b81b-d5775079e238
  • Dobrijević, Aleksandar (14)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

The Dualism of practical reason and the autonomy Sidgwick’s pessimism and Kant’s pptimism

Dobrijević, Aleksandar

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Dobrijević, Aleksandar
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=460
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1890
AB  - The question this paper is concerned with is: what if Immanuel Kant found a solution to the problem of the dualism of practical reason before Henry Sidgwick even came to formulate it? A comparison of Sidgwick’s and Kant’s approach to the problem of the dualism of practical reason is presented only in general terms, but the author concludes that this is sufficient for grasping the advantage of Kant’s solution to the problem.
AB  - U ovom tekstu postavlja se pitanje šta ako je Imanuel Kant rešio problem dualizma praktičkog uma pre nego što je Henri Sidžvik uopšte stigao da ga formuliše? Komparacija između sidžvikovskog i kantovskog pristupa problemu dualizma praktičkog uma ovde se pruža tek u opštim crtama, ali autor zaključuje da je i to dovoljno kako bi se uvidela prednost Kantovog rešenja tog problema.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - The Dualism of practical reason and the autonomy Sidgwick’s pessimism and Kant’s pptimism
T1  - Dualizam praktičkog uma i autonomija: Sidžvikov pesimizam i Kantov optimizam
IS  - 4
VL  - 27
SP  - 749
EP  - 756
DO  - 10.2298/FID1604749D
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Dobrijević, Aleksandar",
year = "2016",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=460, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1890",
abstract = "The question this paper is concerned with is: what if Immanuel Kant found a solution to the problem of the dualism of practical reason before Henry Sidgwick even came to formulate it? A comparison of Sidgwick’s and Kant’s approach to the problem of the dualism of practical reason is presented only in general terms, but the author concludes that this is sufficient for grasping the advantage of Kant’s solution to the problem., U ovom tekstu postavlja se pitanje šta ako je Imanuel Kant rešio problem dualizma praktičkog uma pre nego što je Henri Sidžvik uopšte stigao da ga formuliše? Komparacija između sidžvikovskog i kantovskog pristupa problemu dualizma praktičkog uma ovde se pruža tek u opštim crtama, ali autor zaključuje da je i to dovoljno kako bi se uvidela prednost Kantovog rešenja tog problema.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "The Dualism of practical reason and the autonomy Sidgwick’s pessimism and Kant’s pptimism, Dualizam praktičkog uma i autonomija: Sidžvikov pesimizam i Kantov optimizam",
number = "4",
volume = "27",
pages = "749-756",
doi = "10.2298/FID1604749D"
}
Dobrijević, A. (2016). Dualizam praktičkog uma i autonomija: Sidžvikov pesimizam i Kantov optimizam.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 27(4), 749-756.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1604749D
Dobrijević A. Dualizam praktičkog uma i autonomija: Sidžvikov pesimizam i Kantov optimizam. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2016;27(4):749-756
Dobrijević Aleksandar, "Dualizam praktičkog uma i autonomija: Sidžvikov pesimizam i Kantov optimizam" 27, no. 4 (2016):749-756,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1604749D .
1

Osvrt na inostranu recepciju radova Jovana Babića

Jovanov, Rastko; Dobrijević, Aleksandar

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2015)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Dobrijević, Aleksandar
PY  - 2015
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/348
AB  - U ovom radu se razmatra inostrana recepcija radova Jovana Babića, za koju se ispostavlja daje u velikoj meri živa i raznolika. To razmatranje je ograničeno na kratak i sasvim parcijalan prikaz recepcije samo dva Babićeva teksta koji su zasad privukli najviše pažnje.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Osvrt na inostranu recepciju radova Jovana Babića
SP  - 753
EP  - 761
DO  - 10.2298/FID1503753D
ER  - 
@article{
editor = "Jovanov, Rastko",
author = "Dobrijević, Aleksandar",
year = "2015",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/348",
abstract = "U ovom radu se razmatra inostrana recepcija radova Jovana Babića, za koju se ispostavlja daje u velikoj meri živa i raznolika. To razmatranje je ograničeno na kratak i sasvim parcijalan prikaz recepcije samo dva Babićeva teksta koji su zasad privukli najviše pažnje.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Osvrt na inostranu recepciju radova Jovana Babića",
pages = "753-761",
doi = "10.2298/FID1503753D"
}
Jovanov, R.,& Dobrijević, A. (2015). Osvrt na inostranu recepciju radova Jovana Babića.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 753-761.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1503753D
Jovanov R, Dobrijević A. Osvrt na inostranu recepciju radova Jovana Babića. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2015;:753-761
Jovanov Rastko, Dobrijević Aleksandar, "Osvrt na inostranu recepciju radova Jovana Babića" (2015):753-761,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1503753D .

Self–Education and University

Dobrijević, Aleksandar; Krstić, Predrag

(2013)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Dobrijević, Aleksandar
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/785
UR  - https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=176969
AB  - In an attempt to articulate the link between the “ideas” of university and self­education, the authors of this paper firstly set forth the classical understanding of education that precedes the conception of self­education. The second part deals with Nietzsche’s rigorous under­ standing of self­education as the most consequent and most far­reaching intervention in the concept of education so far. The third part is exploring the example of Derrida’s wavering in regard to university activity and efficacity and signals the modern “antinomies” of legiti­mising its status. It is concluded that not only exterior challenges, but also the paradoxical tasks a university sets for itself, appertain to the very constitution of the university model which readily relied on the tradition of self­education, and that the relation between the vi­sions of university and self­education, is not devoid of intrinsic tensions, though it is often thought of these as mutually underpinning.
T2  - Synthesis philosophica
T1  - Self–Education and University
T1  - Samoobrazovanje i univerzitet
IS  - 55-56 (1-2)
VL  - 28
SP  - 83
EP  - 96
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Dobrijević, Aleksandar and Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2013",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/785, https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=176969",
abstract = "In an attempt to articulate the link between the “ideas” of university and self­education, the authors of this paper firstly set forth the classical understanding of education that precedes the conception of self­education. The second part deals with Nietzsche’s rigorous under­ standing of self­education as the most consequent and most far­reaching intervention in the concept of education so far. The third part is exploring the example of Derrida’s wavering in regard to university activity and efficacity and signals the modern “antinomies” of legiti­mising its status. It is concluded that not only exterior challenges, but also the paradoxical tasks a university sets for itself, appertain to the very constitution of the university model which readily relied on the tradition of self­education, and that the relation between the vi­sions of university and self­education, is not devoid of intrinsic tensions, though it is often thought of these as mutually underpinning.",
journal = "Synthesis philosophica",
title = "Self–Education and University, Samoobrazovanje i univerzitet",
number = "55-56 (1-2)",
volume = "28",
pages = "83-96"
}
Dobrijević, A.,& Krstić, P. (2013). Samoobrazovanje i univerzitet.
Synthesis philosophica, 28(55-56 (1-2)), 83-96.
Dobrijević A, Krstić P. Samoobrazovanje i univerzitet. Synthesis philosophica. 2013;28(55-56 (1-2)):83-96
Dobrijević Aleksandar, Krstić Predrag, "Samoobrazovanje i univerzitet" 28, no. 55-56 (1-2) (2013):83-96

Razlozi i normativnost

Dobrijević, Aleksandar; Mladenović, Ivan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2013)

TY  - BOOK
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1096
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Razlozi i normativnost
ER  - 
@book{
editor = "Dobrijević, Aleksandar, Mladenović, Ivan",
year = "2013",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1096",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Razlozi i normativnost"
}
Dobrijević, A.,& Mladenović, I. (2013). Razlozi i normativnost.
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Dobrijević A, Mladenović I. Razlozi i normativnost. 2013;
Dobrijević Aleksandar, Mladenović Ivan, "Razlozi i normativnost" (2013)

Opasnosti od moralnog poboljšanja ljudi

Milidrag, Predrag; Dobrijević, Aleksandar

(2012)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Dobrijević, Aleksandar
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/412
AB  - The idea of biotechnological enhancement of people for non-medical purposes is not unambiguous. A gap that may arise between the “cognitive” and so-called “moral” enhancement points precisely to this fact. This article shows that, contrary to the intentions of its supporters, the idea according to which moral enhancement has precedence over cognitive enhancement is essentially just a new form of undermining human freedom.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Opasnosti od moralnog poboljšanja ljudi
T1  - The Perils of Moral Enhancement
SP  - 104
EP  - 110
DO  - 10.2298/FID1202104D
ER  - 
@article{
editor = "Milidrag, Predrag",
author = "Dobrijević, Aleksandar",
year = "2012",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/412",
abstract = "The idea of biotechnological enhancement of people for non-medical purposes is not unambiguous. A gap that may arise between the “cognitive” and so-called “moral” enhancement points precisely to this fact. This article shows that, contrary to the intentions of its supporters, the idea according to which moral enhancement has precedence over cognitive enhancement is essentially just a new form of undermining human freedom.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Opasnosti od moralnog poboljšanja ljudi, The Perils of Moral Enhancement",
pages = "104-110",
doi = "10.2298/FID1202104D"
}
Milidrag, P.,& Dobrijević, A. (2012). The Perils of Moral Enhancement.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 104-110.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1202104D
Milidrag P, Dobrijević A. The Perils of Moral Enhancement. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2012;:104-110
Milidrag Predrag, Dobrijević Aleksandar, "The Perils of Moral Enhancement" (2012):104-110,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1202104D .

„Samoobrazovanje i univerzitet“, Simpozij „Ideja sveučilišta“, 21. dani Frane Petrića, Cres: 23-26. septembar 2012.

Krstić, Predrag; Dobrijević, Aleksandar

(2012)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
AU  - Dobrijević, Aleksandar
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1150
T1  - „Samoobrazovanje i univerzitet“, Simpozij „Ideja sveučilišta“, 21. dani Frane Petrića, Cres: 23-26. septembar 2012.
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Krstić, Predrag and Dobrijević, Aleksandar",
year = "2012",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1150",
title = "„Samoobrazovanje i univerzitet“, Simpozij „Ideja sveučilišta“, 21. dani Frane Petrića, Cres: 23-26. septembar 2012."
}
Krstić, P.,& Dobrijević, A. (2012). „Samoobrazovanje i univerzitet“, Simpozij „Ideja sveučilišta“, 21. dani Frane Petrića, Cres: 23-26. septembar 2012..
.
Krstić P, Dobrijević A. „Samoobrazovanje i univerzitet“, Simpozij „Ideja sveučilišta“, 21. dani Frane Petrića, Cres: 23-26. septembar 2012.. 2012;
Krstić Predrag, Dobrijević Aleksandar, "„Samoobrazovanje i univerzitet“, Simpozij „Ideja sveučilišta“, 21. dani Frane Petrića, Cres: 23-26. septembar 2012." (2012)

Istorija i pravda kod Hobza

Dobrijević, Aleksandar; Milisavljević, Vladimir

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Albatros plus, 2012)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Dobrijević, Aleksandar
AU  - Milisavljević, Vladimir
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/881
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Albatros plus
T2  - Tomas Hobs : Utemeljenje moderne filozofije politike
T1  - Istorija i pravda kod Hobza
SP  - 75
EP  - 94
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Dobrijević, Aleksandar and Milisavljević, Vladimir",
year = "2012",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/881",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Albatros plus",
journal = "Tomas Hobs : Utemeljenje moderne filozofije politike",
title = "Istorija i pravda kod Hobza",
pages = "75-94"
}
Dobrijević, A.,& Milisavljević, V. (2012). Istorija i pravda kod Hobza.
Tomas Hobs : Utemeljenje moderne filozofije politikeBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; Albatros plus., 75-94.
Dobrijević A, Milisavljević V. Istorija i pravda kod Hobza. Tomas Hobs : Utemeljenje moderne filozofije politike. 2012;:75-94
Dobrijević Aleksandar, Milisavljević Vladimir, "Istorija i pravda kod Hobza" (2012):75-94

Šta je antroponomija?

Dobrijević, Aleksandar

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2009)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Dobrijević, Aleksandar
PY  - 2009
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1349
AB  - Although the "anthroponomical question“ (as Kant has named it) is one of the oldest philosophical questions, the concept of „anthroponomy“ was never treated in philosophy as it deserves. However, anthroponomy, as a theory about what a man should or could be, was never neglected. In this article the author confines himself to analysis of Kant’s, Nietzsche’s and Sloterdijk’s anthroponomical sketches.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Šta je antroponomija?
T1  - What is Anthroponomy?
IS  - 20
VL  - 2
SP  - 31
EP  - 40
DO  - 10.2298/FID0902031D
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Dobrijević, Aleksandar",
year = "2009",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1349",
abstract = "Although the "anthroponomical question“ (as Kant has named it) is one of the oldest philosophical questions, the concept of „anthroponomy“ was never treated in philosophy as it deserves. However, anthroponomy, as a theory about what a man should or could be, was never neglected. In this article the author confines himself to analysis of Kant’s, Nietzsche’s and Sloterdijk’s anthroponomical sketches.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Šta je antroponomija?, What is Anthroponomy?",
number = "20",
volume = "2",
pages = "31-40",
doi = "10.2298/FID0902031D"
}
Dobrijević, A. (2009). What is Anthroponomy?.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 2(20), 31-40.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0902031D
Dobrijević A. What is Anthroponomy?. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2009;2(20):31-40
Dobrijević Aleksandar, "What is Anthroponomy?" 2, no. 20 (2009):31-40,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0902031D .

Potrepštine po Martinu : roman

Dobrijević, Aleksandar

(Beograd : Medijska knjižara Krug, 2009)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Dobrijević, Aleksandar
PY  - 2009
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/128
PB  - Beograd : Medijska knjižara Krug
T1  - Potrepštine po Martinu : roman
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Dobrijević, Aleksandar",
year = "2009",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/128",
publisher = "Beograd : Medijska knjižara Krug",
title = "Potrepštine po Martinu : roman"
}
Dobrijević, A. (2009). Potrepštine po Martinu : roman.
Beograd : Medijska knjižara Krug..
Dobrijević A. Potrepštine po Martinu : roman. 2009;
Dobrijević Aleksandar, "Potrepštine po Martinu : roman" (2009)

Bildung – pojam, koncepcija, ideal

Dobrijević, Aleksandar

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2007)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Dobrijević, Aleksandar
PY  - 2007
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1343
AB  - The author claims that we should differentiate the concept,the conception
and the ideal of
Bildung. Based on these differences,Bildung could be considered as
a kind of attitude, project, or as specific – normative and optative – practice.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Bildung – pojam, koncepcija, ideal
SP  - 101
EP  - 119
DO  - 10.2298/FID0702101D
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Dobrijević, Aleksandar",
year = "2007",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1343",
abstract = "The author claims that we should differentiate the concept,the conception
and the ideal of
Bildung. Based on these differences,Bildung could be considered as
a kind of attitude, project, or as specific – normative and optative – practice.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Bildung – pojam, koncepcija, ideal",
pages = "101-119",
doi = "10.2298/FID0702101D"
}
Dobrijević, A. (2007). Bildung – pojam, koncepcija, ideal.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 101-119.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0702101D
Dobrijević A. Bildung – pojam, koncepcija, ideal. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2007;:101-119
Dobrijević Aleksandar, "Bildung – pojam, koncepcija, ideal" (2007):101-119,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0702101D .

Histoire et justice dans la perspective Hobbesienne

Milisavljević, Vladimir; Dobrijević, Aleksandar

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2007)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Milisavljević, Vladimir
AU  - Dobrijević, Aleksandar
PY  - 2007
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/142
AB  - Ce texte se propose de nuancer la dichotomie stricte entre les concepts
d’histoire et de justice, qui est courante dans l’interprétation de la pensée hobbesienne.
L’attitude critique de Hobbes envers l’histoire s’explique par sa polémique
contre l’héritage de l’antiquité classique, qui découle de son projet d’une science rigoureuse
de la morale et de la politique. Cependant, la conception hobbesienne de la justice ne se laisse pas développer sans faire appel à certains éléments factuels et empiriques;
elle ne se réduit donc pas à une construction purement rationnelle. Ces éléments
ouvrent la pensée hobbesienne à la problématique de l’histoire réelle; pour
Hobbes, le représentant le plus important de ce genre d’histoire est Thucydide. Enfin,
la dimension historique de la pensée de Hobbes nous permet d’entrevoir chez lui un
concept de justice plus large, qui franchit les limites de la justice contractuelle
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Histoire et justice dans la perspective Hobbesienne
SP  - 69
EP  - 86
DO  - 10.2298/FID0703069M
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Milisavljević, Vladimir and Dobrijević, Aleksandar",
year = "2007",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/142",
abstract = "Ce texte se propose de nuancer la dichotomie stricte entre les concepts
d’histoire et de justice, qui est courante dans l’interprétation de la pensée hobbesienne.
L’attitude critique de Hobbes envers l’histoire s’explique par sa polémique
contre l’héritage de l’antiquité classique, qui découle de son projet d’une science rigoureuse
de la morale et de la politique. Cependant, la conception hobbesienne de la justice ne se laisse pas développer sans faire appel à certains éléments factuels et empiriques;
elle ne se réduit donc pas à une construction purement rationnelle. Ces éléments
ouvrent la pensée hobbesienne à la problématique de l’histoire réelle; pour
Hobbes, le représentant le plus important de ce genre d’histoire est Thucydide. Enfin,
la dimension historique de la pensée de Hobbes nous permet d’entrevoir chez lui un
concept de justice plus large, qui franchit les limites de la justice contractuelle",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Histoire et justice dans la perspective Hobbesienne",
pages = "69-86",
doi = "10.2298/FID0703069M"
}
Milisavljević, V.,& Dobrijević, A. (2007). Histoire et justice dans la perspective Hobbesienne.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 69-86.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703069M
Milisavljević V, Dobrijević A. Histoire et justice dans la perspective Hobbesienne. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2007;:69-86
Milisavljević Vladimir, Dobrijević Aleksandar, "Histoire et justice dans la perspective Hobbesienne" (2007):69-86,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703069M .

Izmeđ obrazovanja i samoobrazovanja : od Bildunga do etike vrline

Dobrijević, Aleksandar

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2006)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Dobrijević, Aleksandar
PY  - 2006
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/727
AB  - The article contains an explanation of the topic to be dealt with by the author within the work on the project “Regional and European Aspects of Integration Processes in Serbia: Civilization Preconditions, Reality and Prospects for the Future” of the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory. A concern for the problem of Bildung reoccurs in social sciences. The author claims that we should elicit a dominated normative meaning from many senses of the concept of Bildung, in order to explain his vitality and the possibility of his interdisciplinary application in more appropriate way.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Izmeđ obrazovanja i samoobrazovanja : od Bildunga do etike vrline
T1  - Between Education and Self-Education : From Bildung to Virtue Ethics
SP  - 119
EP  - 128
DO  - 10.2298/FID0629119D
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Dobrijević, Aleksandar",
year = "2006",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/727",
abstract = "The article contains an explanation of the topic to be dealt with by the author within the work on the project “Regional and European Aspects of Integration Processes in Serbia: Civilization Preconditions, Reality and Prospects for the Future” of the Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory. A concern for the problem of Bildung reoccurs in social sciences. The author claims that we should elicit a dominated normative meaning from many senses of the concept of Bildung, in order to explain his vitality and the possibility of his interdisciplinary application in more appropriate way.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Izmeđ obrazovanja i samoobrazovanja : od Bildunga do etike vrline, Between Education and Self-Education : From Bildung to Virtue Ethics",
pages = "119-128",
doi = "10.2298/FID0629119D"
}
Dobrijević, A. (2006). Between Education and Self-Education : From Bildung to Virtue Ethics.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 119-128.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0629119D
Dobrijević A. Between Education and Self-Education : From Bildung to Virtue Ethics. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2006;:119-128
Dobrijević Aleksandar, "Between Education and Self-Education : From Bildung to Virtue Ethics" (2006):119-128,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0629119D .

Ka adekvatnoj moralnoj teoriji : Normativna etika Ričarda M. Hera

Dobrijević, Aleksandar

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; "Filip Višnjić", 2006)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Dobrijević, Aleksandar
PY  - 2006
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/802
AB  - Towards an adequate moral theory: Hare’s Normative Ethics

According to Hare’s device, an adequate association of two mutually akin but independent theoretical disciplines – metaethics (universal prescriptivism) and normative ethics (utilitarianism) – enables the formation of the complete and coherent moral system. The main subject of this book is reception and critical analysis of Hare’s constructivism; but much more attention is dedicated to the substantive aspect of his doctrine, where idea of all-encompassing ethical theory is fully developed and crystallized. In Hare’s opinion, the fact that something like this is possible is approved by detailed inquiry of the structure of so-called “moral thinking”, which, although in theory divided into three plateaus or levels, in practice can operate as unique faculty. The first part of the book considers Hare’s metaethical doctrine, i.e. metaethical level of moral thinking. This part especially analyzes semantic and logical properties of the moral words and judgments, which Hare grasps and marks off as elements that constitute specific ethical theory in narrow sense under the name of “universal prescriptivism”. Thence, it contrasts the theory with the most prominent types of rival metaethical conceptions; this is a way of showing its supremacy over them. The second part analyzes Hare’s multiple ways of connecting his metaethical with his normative doctrine, which is in formal sense 197 determined as “Kantian utilitarianism”, and in substantive sense as “preference-utilitarianism”. Critical references to both dimensions of utilitarian doctrine aim at indication on scopes and limits of Hare’s ambitious redefinition of the doctrine. In addition, this part accessorily affirms a proposal about certain more rigorous terminological delimitation of different kinds of normativity. Further on it discusses about so-called “necessary ingredients” of moral reasoning, where special attention is being paid on element of “sympathetic imagination”, which Hare grasps in his developed theory not only as a normative demand but also as a logical thesis. Finally, it considers kinds of preferences that can or cannot be recognized (with help of established set of criteria) as morally relevant. The third (the last) part displays so-called “two-level theory” of normative moral thinking (“intuitive” level and “critical” level), including goals that are intended by its establishing. Given Hare’s holism, the metaethical level, considered as fundamental or the “third” level, has notable effect on process of normative reasoning, especially if it is taken as one of the determinant of the critical moral thinking. Upon examining the (utilitarian) character of the theory, its plausibility is verified in the light of its application to one specific theoretical realm – the realm of philosophy of moral upbringing and education.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; "Filip Višnjić"
T1  - Ka adekvatnoj moralnoj teoriji : Normativna etika Ričarda M. Hera
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Dobrijević, Aleksandar",
year = "2006",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/802",
abstract = "Towards an adequate moral theory: Hare’s Normative Ethics

According to Hare’s device, an adequate association of two mutually akin but independent theoretical disciplines – metaethics (universal prescriptivism) and normative ethics (utilitarianism) – enables the formation of the complete and coherent moral system. The main subject of this book is reception and critical analysis of Hare’s constructivism; but much more attention is dedicated to the substantive aspect of his doctrine, where idea of all-encompassing ethical theory is fully developed and crystallized. In Hare’s opinion, the fact that something like this is possible is approved by detailed inquiry of the structure of so-called “moral thinking”, which, although in theory divided into three plateaus or levels, in practice can operate as unique faculty. The first part of the book considers Hare’s metaethical doctrine, i.e. metaethical level of moral thinking. This part especially analyzes semantic and logical properties of the moral words and judgments, which Hare grasps and marks off as elements that constitute specific ethical theory in narrow sense under the name of “universal prescriptivism”. Thence, it contrasts the theory with the most prominent types of rival metaethical conceptions; this is a way of showing its supremacy over them. The second part analyzes Hare’s multiple ways of connecting his metaethical with his normative doctrine, which is in formal sense 197 determined as “Kantian utilitarianism”, and in substantive sense as “preference-utilitarianism”. Critical references to both dimensions of utilitarian doctrine aim at indication on scopes and limits of Hare’s ambitious redefinition of the doctrine. In addition, this part accessorily affirms a proposal about certain more rigorous terminological delimitation of different kinds of normativity. Further on it discusses about so-called “necessary ingredients” of moral reasoning, where special attention is being paid on element of “sympathetic imagination”, which Hare grasps in his developed theory not only as a normative demand but also as a logical thesis. Finally, it considers kinds of preferences that can or cannot be recognized (with help of established set of criteria) as morally relevant. The third (the last) part displays so-called “two-level theory” of normative moral thinking (“intuitive” level and “critical” level), including goals that are intended by its establishing. Given Hare’s holism, the metaethical level, considered as fundamental or the “third” level, has notable effect on process of normative reasoning, especially if it is taken as one of the determinant of the critical moral thinking. Upon examining the (utilitarian) character of the theory, its plausibility is verified in the light of its application to one specific theoretical realm – the realm of philosophy of moral upbringing and education.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; "Filip Višnjić"",
title = "Ka adekvatnoj moralnoj teoriji : Normativna etika Ričarda M. Hera"
}
Dobrijević, A. (2006). Ka adekvatnoj moralnoj teoriji : Normativna etika Ričarda M. Hera.
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju; "Filip Višnjić"..
Dobrijević A. Ka adekvatnoj moralnoj teoriji : Normativna etika Ričarda M. Hera. 2006;
Dobrijević Aleksandar, "Ka adekvatnoj moralnoj teoriji : Normativna etika Ričarda M. Hera" (2006)

Kritika intuitivnog uma

Dobrijević, Aleksandar

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2005)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Dobrijević, Aleksandar
PY  - 2005
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/151
AB  - Autor izlaže i preispituje Herovu teoriju o dva nivoa normativnog
moralnog mišljenja – „intuitivnog“ i „kritičkog“, kao i ciljeve koji se žele postići
njenim ustanovljenjem. Gledano iz perspektive Herovog holizma, metaetički nivo,
shvaćen kao fundamentalni ili „treći“ nivo, u znatnoj meri utiče na proces normativnog rasuđivanja, pogotovo ukoliko se uzima kao jedna od determinanti kritičkog moralnog mišljenja. Centralni deo analize predstavlja ispitivanje utilitarističkog karaktera ove teorije.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Kritika intuitivnog uma
SP  - 179
EP  - 226
DO  - 10.2298/FID0526179D
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Dobrijević, Aleksandar",
year = "2005",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/151",
abstract = "Autor izlaže i preispituje Herovu teoriju o dva nivoa normativnog
moralnog mišljenja – „intuitivnog“ i „kritičkog“, kao i ciljeve koji se žele postići
njenim ustanovljenjem. Gledano iz perspektive Herovog holizma, metaetički nivo,
shvaćen kao fundamentalni ili „treći“ nivo, u znatnoj meri utiče na proces normativnog rasuđivanja, pogotovo ukoliko se uzima kao jedna od determinanti kritičkog moralnog mišljenja. Centralni deo analize predstavlja ispitivanje utilitarističkog karaktera ove teorije.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Kritika intuitivnog uma",
pages = "179-226",
doi = "10.2298/FID0526179D"
}
Dobrijević, A. (2005). Kritika intuitivnog uma.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 179-226.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0526179D
Dobrijević A. Kritika intuitivnog uma. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2005;:179-226
Dobrijević Aleksandar, "Kritika intuitivnog uma" (2005):179-226,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0526179D .